12 January 2007 16:37 [Source: ICIS news]
By Nigel Davis
LONDON (ICIS news)--?xml:namespace>
Some European nations may seek quick wins to meet national targets but the pressure will be on firms that process materials to make further cuts.
The European Commission (EC) this week unveiled proposals to cut EU greenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2020 if there is no international agreement and by 30% in the case of a climate change agreement among developed countries.
Its energy policy package encompasses energy efficiency, security of supply, energy technologies and key competitive aspects of
Raising energy efficiency has been on the chemical industry agenda for years. Remember energy accounts for more than 50% of the variable costs of production of most materials.
But as the EU policies develop, chemical companies are more than likely to have to pay more for primary energy. They will also be pressed hard to become more energy efficient and to reduce their carbon footprint.
Some companies will gain – the likes of Rhodia and Ineos Fluor certainly as they obtain carbon emission reduction credits for newly applied carbon abatement technology – but most will not.
The knee jerk reaction from the sector on release of the new energy plans could have been expected. But was it necessary?
The sector is worried about its international competitiveness. In an ideal world the playing field would be level but in reality it is not.
European civil servants and politicians have come to better understand the role of chemicals in modern life as they have put together the Reach legislative package. But the message has to be hammered home that energy and industrial competitiveness run hand in hand.
That does not have to mean that countries or industrial sectors can continue to be profligate with energy. Increased energy efficiency can put them in good stead.
The argument is not so well made for the reduction of carbon emissions. But if a proper cost is put on carbon and trading mechanisms made to work effectively, then great strides are possible.
The true challenge is not technical or indeed related to energy markets but political.
“I believe we can be more creative in finding effective and workable policies well beyond the EU borders while avoiding the cumbersome UN process,” said director general of the European chemicals trade group Cefic, Alain Perroy, this week.He is right.
But the chemicals sector can also be more creative in its approach to global warming.
The clever companies embrace the concept and seek out opportunities to be more forward looking.
In the UK this week companies in the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) created a Climate Change Task Force which included companies as diverse as supermarket chain Tesco, British Airways, BP, BT and steel producer Corus. It met for the first time on Friday (12 January).
“Climate change poses a challenge to business, as a major source of emissions, but it also presents significant opportunities,” CBI director general Richard Lambert said.
“Business needs to be at the heart of the debate to ensure it can play its role effectively alongside other key players," he added.
The climate change group looks as much towards the opportunities presented by the EU’s more proactive climate change policy as towards the threats.
The chemical industry would do well to show that it is willing to think along similar lines.
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|