04 January 2008 19:57 [Source: ICIS news]
WASHINGTON (
Since the middle of last year, the agency and Dow have been in discussions on what Dow must do to clean up the
Dow’s Midland facilities began operations in 1897, and EPA says that years of waste disposal practices, emissions and incineration at the site have caused on-site and off-site contamination, including a 50-mile stretch of the
EPA contends that contamination from the Dow Midland plant complex extends downstream in the Tittabawassee where it joins the
“I am extremely disappointed with this outcome,” said Mary Gade, administrator of EPA’s regional office in
“EPA is now reviewing its options for ensuring that dioxin contamination in the river system and the
EPA spokeswoman Anne Rowan said the agency “has a wide range of options open to it under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Superfund law”.
Mick Hans, another EPA spokesperson, said that “litigation is not always the most efficient approach, but we wouldn’t rule it out”.
Rowan said the agency also has administrative order authority and “wide latitude under the law to ensure that these cleanups are done”. She said both statutes give the agency corrective action authority and that the State of
Rowan said that because the negotiations with Dow were under a confidentiality agreement, she could not specify what elements of the talks caused the breakdown.
A spokesman for Dow was not immediately available to comment.
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|
|
ICIS Chemicals Confidential