29 April 2008 18:46 [Source: ICIS news]
Senator Barbara Boxer (Democrat-California), chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said at a committee hearing on federal control of toxic substances that “it is clear that improvement is necessary if we are to ensure that dangerous chemicals are properly regulated”.
She said the existing and longstanding
Referring to the new EU programme for the registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH), Boxer said: “REACH puts the burden on the chemical industry - where it should be - to show that their chemicals are safe” before they enter commercial use.
“We must strengthen our toxics laws to ensure that chemical companies are responsible for proving that their products are safe,” she said.
Chemical industry officials testifying at the hearing warned Congress against enacting a “US REACH” statute, saying such an approach would stifle
Speaking for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association (SOCMA), Jim DeLisi said that “an American REACH would not only hamper innovation but would reverse progress made over many years by federal regulators and the chemical industry to appropriately manage risk”.
DeLisi, president of Fanwood Chemical, argued that the environmental and human health benefits of REACH “will not be known for years, if ever, but its ability to tie up regulators and commerce is already clear”.
Jim Cooper, vice president for petrochemicals at the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA), told the committee that, contrary to popular perception, REACH will not shift the burden of proof to the European chemicals industry because the EU still requires that testing data provided by producers be evaluated by an EU government agency on scientific and political grounds.
He also challenged EU government claims that REACH will spur development of safer chemicals, saying that a ten-year-old EU requirement for pre-market testing by industry of new substances has stifled chemicals innovation in
He noted that in the last decade the European industry has introduced some 2,000 new chemical patents while during the same period US producers have generated nearly 14,000 new “and usually safer” substances.
Senator James Inhofe (Republican-Oklahoma), ranking member of the committee, cautioned that “we have to be mindful of what we put at risk if we over-regulate this industry and stifle its 30-year history of innovation”.
“I do not believe that American chemicals innovation should be stifled by government regulation without the clear identification of risk,” Inhofe said. “We need to ensure that we regulate chemicals based on demonstrated risk, not just the perception or assumption of it.”
“That ‘precautionary’ concept is one that I cannot support,” Inhofe added.
The committee may soon take up legislation to revise the 32-year-old Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the principal
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|
Asian Chemical Connections