16 September 2009 19:31 [Source: ICIS news]
The House Committee on Natural Resources has begun consideration of HR-3534, the
Among other steps, the wide-ranging bill would raise leasing fees for development of oil and gas reserves in federally owned onshore and offshore areas, assess production incentive fees on leases that are not generating oil or gas, repeal certain royalty relief provisions, end the royalty-in-kind lease payment system and allow federal officials to revise royalty agreements later found to be unfair to the federal government.
It also would consolidate operations of the Minerals Management Service (MMS), which currently manages federal offshore resources, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the onshore resources manager, into a single office within the Interior Department.
The bill sets up four regional planning councils that would give state and local governments and private sector organisations - including the oil and gas industry but also tourism groups, fisheries, alternative energy advocates and environmentalists - a say in development of oil and gas resources in US outer continental shelf (OCS) regions.
But US energy producers and chemical sector officials were sharply critical of the bill, charging that rather than promoting and advancing domestic energy production, the measure will retard development.
“While Congressman Rahall continues to pitch his bill, HR-3534, as a solution to promote domestic energy production, it will in fact result in the exact opposite,” said Barry Russell, president of the oil and gas producers' group, Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA).
Russell said that by eliminating the royalty-in-kind system - in which energy developers give the federal government a percentage of oil and gas recovered instead of cash royalties - and raising lease rates and other fees, the bill “will result in job losses, decrease royalties and revenues to the
He said the regional planning councils will create yet another layer of bureaucracy and permitting obstacles to offshore development.
Cal Dooley, president of the American Chemistry Council (ACC), said the Rahall bill fails to advance domestic energy production.
“By neglecting domestic energy supply, the committee is missing a significant opportunity to enhance the nation’s energy security, energy diversity and economic outlook,” Dooley said.
“Imposing tax and procedural provisions that raise the cost of fuel and energy feedstock borne by American manufacturers will threaten
Dooley noted that the
The Institute for Energy Research (IER), an energy industry think tank, charged that the CLEAR Act “is a direct attempt to ensure that a de facto ban on much of
The institute was referring to action taken late last year by Congress to end its 27-year moratorium on offshore energy development on the
Hearings on the CLEAR Act are set to resume on Thursday this week.
To discuss issues facing the chemical industry go to ICIS connect
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|
Asian Chemical Connections