14 October 2009 20:28 [Source: ICIS news]
WASHINGTON (ICIS news)--The exact economic impact of climate change legislation is difficult to predict, but costs are certain to rise for the US manufacturing industry, households and the economy in general, various experts said at a US Senate hearing on Wednesday.
In a hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that cap-and-trade emissions mandates pending in the US House and Senate “would lead to higher prices for energy from fossil fuels and for energy-intensive goods” and would lower ?xml:namespace>
The CBO - the analytical arm of Congress - also said that a cap-and-trade mandate would shift income among households and that “policymakers could counteract some but not all of those income shifts” by providing rebates to the hardest-hit consumers through fees paid by the industry for emissions permits or allowances.
In addition, the CBO noted that in the absence of a coordinated worldwide effort to halt global warming, “impacts in the
The cost of the
In its cost analysis of HR-2454 - the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act passed by the US House in June - the CBO said that US GDP would be reduced by as much as 3.5% by 2050 and jobs would be lost as the nation worked to shift from carbon-based energy to non-carbon or low-carbon resources such as wind, solar, biomass and nuclear power.
In its testimony, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) noted that “a considerable amount of low-carbon [power] generation will have to be built under HR-2454” to meet the bill’s emissions reductions targets.
The CRS - the research arm of Congress - emphasised that “technological development will be critical” in meeting the legislation’s emissions cuts without causing significant economic harm.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also testified that its analysis of factors affecting the costs of meeting HR-2454’s emissions targets “are inherently uncertain, such as ... the potential for technological advances” in carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).
“There is much uncertainty about the rate at which various technologies will penetrate,” the agency said.
An official representing the Energy Information Administration (EIA) - the statistical and analysis division of the Energy Department - said that the extent to which technical breakthroughs could mitigate increased energy costs is also uncertain.
“It is well known that some key technologies for reducing emissions face a variety of technical challenges,” he said, citing the uncertain potential for carbon capture and sequestration.
And, in some cases, he said, there are “additional questions regarding public acceptance of their widespread deployment arising from concerns unrelated to global climate change”, such as public opposition to the sitting of nuclear power plants or wind farms.
Senator Lisa Murkowski of
“However, every analysis projects two thing in common: higher energy prices and lower economic growth,” she said.
The Senate will begin further hearings on climate change legislation later this month.
To discuss issues facing the chemical industry go to
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|