Market Intelligence: China PET conundrum

22 November 2013 10:02  [Source: ICB]

Assessing new investments in the polyester chain in China serves as a good example of an ever-more complex environment for new projects

If you view China’s polyester chain expansions through the narrow lens of Western economics, you might end up scratching your head to the point of near baldness. The numbers just don’t seem to add up.

For example, as delegates heard during November’s ICIS Asia PET and Polyester Conference in Jakarta, total world capacity in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin is set to reach 34m tons/year by 2016, with most of the increases taking place in China. China’s polyester fibre capacity growth was 14% in 2011, 16% in 2012 and an estimated 14% in 2013, compared with demand growth of 11-8% during the same period. This oversupply, which is led by China, has widespread implications. China’s aggressive expansions fly in the face of standard economic logic.

Firstly, and most importantly of all, China’s economy could face lower GDP (gross domestic product) growth for many years to come because of economic rebalancing.

China’s garments and textiles industries – the end-users of polyester fibre – are also losing their competiveness.

Wage costs are on the rise because of demographic weaknesses that are unlikely to change, despite the announcement that the one-child policy will be relaxed.

This is driving up wage costs, resulting in the migration of low-value garment and textiles manufacturing away from China to countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam. Global retailers are re-adjusting their supply chains to take into account the fact that China is no longer the automatic “go to” location for outsourcing.

The RMB is also strengthening, which, again, reflects efforts to rebalance the economy. This is further eroding the margins of the textiles and garments manufacturers.

And so why, despite all of these competitive pressures, are so many more projects in the polyester chain still being planned in China?

For example, some 6.9m tonnes/year of PET resin and polyester fibre capacity is due onstream in China next year, a cording to industry estimates.

This is where a wider lens is needed in order to accurately view what’s happening in China. Analysts across every industry need to look beyond the standard cost-per-tonne assessments of what makes an individual plant competitive.

Commentators argue that industrial capacity in general continues to be added in China because of how local governments finance themselves. An important source of local government revenue is money from land sales to industrial and property developers. If they stopped selling land, they would be unable to meet their liabilities. Tax income from manufacturers is another important source of income for town, city and provincial governments, add the commentators.

And some 70% of the points awarded to local officials are based on how rapidly they expand a region’s GDP, according to a 15 November article in the Financial Times. These points are used to determine promotions and demotions. An easy way to raise GDP is through building more factories.

But, as a result of policy announcements made after a crucial government meeting – the Third Plenum which took place on 9-12 November – conference delegates were hopeful that China’s polyester chain expansions would slow down.

The cost of capital should increase if Beijing follows through on its pledge to remove the cap on deposit rates.

State-owned banks, because they don’t have to compete for savings through raising deposit rates, are able to provide lots of cheap lending for industrial development.

This makes it even easier for projects to go ahead that, in Western terms, seem unviable. The cost of both land and energy might also increase following the plenum. Both are very cheap at the moment and so provide further subsidies for manufacturing.

Another decision made during the plenum was to add to the “top down authority” of the central government. In the past, local governments have often been able to ignore legislation from Beijing because of lack of central control, and, of course, the sheer size of the country.

The plenum promised that greater efforts would be made to ensure the independence of the judiciary and prosecutors.

“This will make it harder for local government officials to influence court decisions in their favour. At the moment, they are using their influence to avoid legislation designed to limit new industrial capacity, force consolidation of existing plants and improve environmental protection,” said a delegate on the sidelines of the conference.

A reform commission and a security council – akin to the US National Security Council – will be established.

These bodies should give President Xi Jinping, and other senior politicians, greater ability to force-through the shift in economic direction, say observers.

First of all, though, the incentive system which motivates local governments will have be dismantled and re-assembled from scratch, otherwise resistance to reforms will surely remain strong.

With additional reporting by Becky Zhang

By: John Richardson
+65 6780 4359

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.

Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.

Printer Friendly