At the moment, a shell-shocked chemicals industry is still recovering from the impact of destocking following the huge inventory write downs in Q4.
The next step will be to measure the state of genuine, end-user demand and how this compares with the fantastic growth we saw in 2003 right through until the end of H1 2008.
Comparisons will inevitably look bad, even if, as some hope, recovery arrives in the second half of this year. This is bound to have a pyschologically dampening effect on markets.
Plus, chemicals and plastics markets are about to be roiled by large amounts of new capacity.
Recent price rises in the aromatics and olefins chains might, therefore, be reversed.
And so cost will remain King in the second of 2009, and perhaps for several more years.
The rise of private equity in chemicals, which I examined in a previous post, resulted in claims that the sector's more efficient management techniques would result in money being made "even at the bottom of the cycle".
But key to survival may no be longer innovative financial engineering and cutting costs social and bureaucracy costs incurred by previously much bigger, listed companies.
It might instead be all about chemical engineers getting every last cent of value out of production processes through optimising "every pipe and every valve," says my colleague Nigel Davis - editor of the Insight section of ICIS news.
It will be fascinating to watch how this plays out - and what becomes of chief financial officers.
Comments (1)
Dear Author,
Very true, financial engineering may not be the answer to the current financial crisis and chemical engineers and all others in business for that matter need to be innovative. As I see it those with a sound financial base would surely be able to survive in the current trough in demand and supply, but when the cycle reverses and we move towards the crest, institutions with new technologies/ innovative products/ services would lead.
Also, what is required now is for suppliers and customers to work jointly. As customers, institutions need to understand the strengths and weaknesses of their suppliers whereas as suppliers they need to understand the actual requirement of the customer and provide innovative and mutually beneficial solutions.
Regards,
Hemant Rajan Naidu
Posted by Hemant Rajan Naidu | February 6, 2009 8:21 AM
Posted on February 6, 2009 08:21