Asian Chemical Connections

A Famous Ditherer

Source of picture: sarafinewordpress.com

Chasing higher oil prices and/or a response to the now long-running recovery in Chinese demand that's become sustainable?

Not wanting to sound too much like the start of a famous Shakespeare soliloquy, these are the questions that should be wracking everyone's brains as they try to figure out price rises, which continued last week.

Ethylene rose again and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) was up by $50 a tonne to $1,235-1,300 tonne CFR China, according to ICIS pricing.

The polyolefin was at $1,130-1,180/tonne CFR China four week. Click here for a graph showing the price history for all the PE grades since January last year - Olefin-PEprices.ppt.

But interestingly, while the sentiment in the China market was described as bullish due to stronger crude and second and third tier traders and distributors were stocking up, actual end-user demand was characterised by market players contacted by ICIS as weak.

This suggests stocking up ahead of the assumption that oil prices will go higher, even though the outlook for the next few weeks is mixed given recent negative reports over the US economy. 

It then comes down to the sustainability of the eight-month long rebound in demand from China. Head-scratching continues as to where all this stuff is going, more of which later this week.

Asian cracker operators, according to my colleague Peh Soo Hwee, ICIS pricing's ethylene editor in Asia, seem to believe its worth running hard for the time being at least.

"Some of the cracker operators, notably in Japan, had reduced production to below 90% in September-October, partly due to turnarounds at derivative plants," she said in a recent note to one of our customers.

"Most of them now expect to increase rates to close to 100% next month (November)."

"So far, with the exception of a few crackers in the region running at lower rates - Chandra Asri in Indonesia at 75% and South Korea's YNCC at 90% - the bulk of producers aim to keep ethylene production at 90-100% in November."

Supporting these decisions were improvements in margins last week. Ethylene margins rose for the second week in a row as a result of the pace of C2 price increases outpacing those for naphtha, according to the ICIS weekly Asian Ethylene Margin Report.

But still, October ended up as the worst month for ethylene margins since June.

PE margins also rose on a better spread between C2s and the polymer and improved co-product credits, according to our Asian PE Marging Report - also weekly. 

Again, though, overall margins were down in October over the previous month. Stand-alone players did better than integrated operators.

Plan cutbacks and/or sell November stocks early and you miss the potential of better returns. Some polyolefin producers sold October volumes earlier than they should have done because they expected prices to fall.

The flipside of the risk is being left holding overpriced inventory as oil prices fall and more new polyolefin capacities hit the market.

Nothing new in having to make these decisions, of course; the difference is the absence of any consistent and reliable patterns from all the data to support planning.

By John Richardson

Manufacturers yesterday reported rising output and improved employment prospects in the US, Europe and Asia.

China's Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), involving a survey of more than 700 manufacturers, increased for the eighth straight month in a row - and is now back to where it was in May 2008. This is exactly the same length of time that China's chemical imports have been booming.

In the US, too, the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) survey for October showed that the employment index had expanded for the first time in a year.

But dig a little deeper and the same old doubts and muddle re-emerge.

New orders rose at a slower pace in October than in September, added the ISM. This could be an indication that the process of re-stocking is coming to an end, points out the Short View in the Financial Times.

The rate of bank lending to private companies has turned negative in the Euro Zone for the first time since the data was first gathered, according to this post on The Economist's Buttonwood blog.

Nobody in the chemicals industry is getting excited about the prospects for 2010, least of Jurgen Hambrecht of BASf on the release of the German giant's Q3 results..

He warned of the need for more concerted efforts by governments and industries, as there was no easy way out of the crisis.

One easy way might be China. But as we keep going on and on about, what are all the chemicals being shipped to China going into?

As long as this uncertainty lingers, so will the fear that it will come to a sorry and sudden end.

If you're selling in China and merely looking towards your year-end bonus, this endless head-scratching might not matter if China can hold its ground until end-December.

But anyone with a slightly longer-term perspective needs to be a little more worried.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Japanese chemical majors have raised their sales and profit forecasts for the second half of the fiscal year ending 31 March 2010, but the revisions are marginal and companies are still holding a conservative outlook.

Earnings in the first half of this fiscal year have been better than expected but the stock market is not impressed. It appears investors are being guided by the cloudy outlook for H2.

A Tokyo-based analyst highlighted three major risks that Japanese companies foresee:

• Inventory adjustments in China for petrochemicals and globally in the auto and LCD sectors
• A rise in naphtha prices led by higher crude oil prices
• Rising availability of product from new petrochemical capacities in the Middle East.

Mitsui Chemicals has forecast sales of Yen1,210bn as compared to Yen1,487.6bn in 2008-09. Operating loss is expected to narrow to Yen15bn from Yen 45.5bn last year.

Sumitomo Chemical expects to post petrochemical sales of Yen500bn in 2009-10, down 9.6% from the previous year. Total sales are projected at Yen1,620bn, down 9.4%.

At an analyst meeting yesterday Sumitomo Chemical disclosed that operating rates at its joint-venture PetroRabigh complex in Saudi Arabia are still quite low, especially for polyethylene (PE). Although the situation is improving the company expects full operations only at the end of this year.

PetroRabigh has posted losses yet again. Third quarter losses had widened to Riyals844.7m from Riyals155.9m in the same period last year.

Japanese companies are continuing their efforts to widen their footprint in China. Mitsui Chemicals and Sinopec have agreed to proceed with a joint venture for production of phenol and ethylene, propylene diene terpolymer (EPT). At a recent analyst meet, Mitsui's ceo disclosed that the project would be a 50:50 joint venture. Asked if the jv would be expanded to include ethylene and propylene production, the ceo said there was no immediate plan but there was some potential.

Mitsui's ceo is also reported to have said that the company was interested in acquisitions in agro-chemicals or speciality chemicals. Among the Japanese majors, Mitsui is most exposed to commodity chemicals and is under greater pressure to diversify if product portfolio.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

It pays to have a domestic focus and Reliance Industries has shown this again in its results for the first half of fiscal 2009-10.

Its petrochemicals division delivered Rs43bn in earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), a 23.8% growth over the same period last year. The company attributed this to higher margins on improved domestic realisation. The concentration on India helped the company maintain nearly 100% utilisation and hold inventory at low levels.

The Indian market often gets lost in the larger Asian/global picture which is very much dominated by China. But this market has been seeing steady demand growth since last year and it is one of the few markets to have expanded despite the economic crisis.

Reliance estimated PP demand growth at 28% in the last six months; PE at 15%; PVC at 36% and polyester at 15%. Packaging, infrastructure and auto sectors were the key drivers.

The company anticipated a stable margin environment in 2010 as India is expected to keep growing. It also emphasised that it would continue its 'predominantly domestic market orientation in order to sustain high operating rates' - a plan that will no doubt be helped, in the case of PP, by hefty anti dumping duties imposed on imports from Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman. A second investigation on PP imports from South Korea, Taiwan and the US is due to be launched soon and there have also been reports of producers asking for an investigation into PE imports.

Expanding the domestic focus will not be easy. India is oversupplied in PP and likely to remain so for another couple of years despite the high demand growth numbers. PE would also be oversupplied once Indian Oil Corp starts its new cracker complex.

IOC expects to achieve mechanical completion of the cracker by the end of this month and start commissioning activity in December. The derivative plants (PE, PP and MEG) are likely to start at end-March or early April.

This is the schedule on paper. But given the many project delays around the world, don't be too surprised if this one also slips.

Source of picture: www.prisonplanet.com

Misleading perceptions can be very dangerous - especially when they apply to the crude-oil futures markets.

"The price has more than doubled this year partly because of the belief that the recovery in Chinese oil-import demand is all about booming local consumption" said a source on the sidelines of this week's APPEC oil and gas conference in Singapore.

But China is adding around 25m tonne/year of refinery capacity in 2009, which, of course, requires a lot more oil to operate.

Liberalisation of fuel-price controls has raised refinery profitability, resulting in recent operating rates of more than 80%.

This high throughput hasn't been matched by an equivalent increase in gasoline consumption, despite the humongous increase in vehicle sales.

"People seem to be buying lots of new cars, driving them home to impress the neighbours but not driving them much after that," said Jason Feer, vice-president and general manager, Asia Pacific, of the Argus Media Group in a speech at the conference

Fuel-price liberalisation has pushed the cost of gasoline close to US levels, he added afterwards.

This miss-match between supply and demand could be a factor behind China becoming a bigger exporter of gasoline and diesel.

China exported 505,505 tonnes of gasoline in September - 153% higher than a year earlier, according to China Customs.

Diesel exports have also risen, reaching close to 400,000 tonnes in August and 293,759 tonnes in September.

This led to talk of overseas refinery margins being put under pressure for the long-term by China's exports.

But another source said: "This is just one of those conspiracy theories about China. Any company will export when it makes more economic sense.

"China's refiners are listed, remember, and so operate like listed companies. Exports are not a long-term strategic objective."

Another factor behind the rise in fuel exports was unwinding of big inventories built ahead of last year's Beijing Olympics, he said.

What's clear is that the rise in oil imports this year - expected to be around 5% - isn't just a sign of an immediate surge in domestic consumption.

And as we've already covered on this blog, China's overall growth story is not as straightforward as crude and equity markets appear to believe - another nail in the bull's coffin.

A further misleading view was that we were already in a V-shaped recovery, believed a number of delegates.

"I expect the recovery to be W-shaped," said Gati Al-Jebouri ,Chief Executive Officer of Lukoil, in a speech to the conference.

One of the economic threats he highlighted was fiscal tightening.

Australia has twice raised interest rates over the past few weeks, Norway recently raised rates and India has tightened reserve requirements for the country's banks because of inflation concerns.

A string of comments from US Fed hawks indicate a possible change in direction.

If fiscal tightening isn't timed properly, it might come too soon for a fragile recovery.

Higher interest rates could narrow the contango that's helped make storing crude, gasoline and diesel etc a low-risk option.

Very high storage levels don't fit with current crude prices.

On the New York Mercantile Exchange, light, sweet crude futures for delivery in December traded at $79.71 a barrel this morning, down 69 cents in the Globex electronic session.

December Brent crude on London's ICE Futures exchange fell 70 cents to $78.19 a barrel.

I found it hard to find any delegate who found much logic in today's price of oil.

"It could easily more or less half to $40 a barrel in the New Year. That's where it should logically be," said one delegate.

Admittedly, though, one tends to seek out those who support your biases - and I could be described as a tad pessimistic about this recovery.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

The Indian government has announced 17 November as the date for a public hearing to discuss the provisional anti dumping duties that it had imposed in June on imports of polypropylene (PP) from Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman.

The hearing will give a chance to all affected parties to present their case. Such hearings are usually a formality and do affect the end result which is a confirmation of the provisional duties.

But I have been told that it may be different this time as the Saudis, led by Sabic, are likely to put up a spirited defense. The Saudis have been busy pulling lots of government strings for the duties to be revoked.

Sabic and Advanced Polypropylene were hit the hardest - duties on their PP exports range from $440-$820/tonne. I was told that one of the reasons for the high level of duties was 'the lack of cooperation in sharing data' when the Indian government had sent its questionnaire earlier in the year. However, this attitude appears to have changed.

There's a lot at stake here and this is why the 17 November hearing is crucial. India is already in surplus and looks likely to be in this position for the next couple of years. So there's every reason for Indian PP producers, Reliance Industries and Haldia Petrochemicals, to check competition. On the other hand, many Indian processors are unhappy as the duties would force them to rely on local supply.

For the Saudis, and also other Middle Eastern producers, India is not such a big market for PP. But the ADD threat is a worrying global trend that they want to ensure does not take off.

Besides India, China is investigating methanol and 1,4-butanediol (BDO) imports from Saudi Arabia. And the European Union (EU) is investigating on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) imports from United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Iran.

The growing protectionist measures have provoked a long chain of protests with the most recent one being in October by the Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA).
The GPCA Secretary General Dr. Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun has said that the association will strengthen coordination with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Governments to ensure that exports of petrochemicals and chemicals from the Gulf region are not restricted by anti-dumping regulations and other trade restrictions
"The GCC industry and our governments will not accept the application of anti-dumping regulations against exports of petrochemicals and chemicals from the Gulf. We have seen a surge in protectionist actions brought by countries to block imports. These cases are baseless and violate international rules," he said.
The investigations may not sound fair to GCC producers but they face an uphill task in convincing the Indian and Chinese governments to ease protection to local producers. A lot will depend on what the GCC governments can offer or withhold.

Buy now, pay later....

Source: www.examiner.com

Note: There is a special prize for the first blog reader who can explain the above headline.
 

In the 2001 recession, US consumer spending slowed but did not fall, and picked up again very quickly.

In the early 1990s, it dipped a bit but returned to pre-recession levels in a few quarters.

But this recovery is different because of the long-term changes in consumer behaviour in the West, which we've talked about before.

Unemployment in the States is nearing 10% with consumer spending falling in September after four months of improvements.

These gains look as if they came at the expense of savings as people, quite sensibly, took advantage of cash for Clunkers and other government-backed spending schemes.

Cash for Clunkers is over, but Cash for Appliances is about to begin.

However, the government needs to rebalance its budget and fulfil its pledges to rebalance the economy away from over-reliance on consumption.

So can consumer spending continue to be propped up in 2010? If not, what will this mean for chemicals exports to China re-exported as finished goods to the States?

The gap between the real economy in the developed world and the commodity and equity markets remains as wide as ever.

For example, here are the opening lines from an Associated Press story this morning: "Oil prices rose above $78 a barrel Monday in Asia as a weaker U.S. dollar offset signs of slumping consumer demand.

"Benchmark crude for December delivery was up 94 cents to $78.37 a barrel at midday Singapore time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange".

Some delegates at last week's APPEC oil and gas conference in Singapore believed crude could be overvalued by as much as 50%, based on the fundamentals.

"I expect the recovery to be W-shaped," said Gati Al-Jebouri, Chief Executive Officer of Lukoil, in a speech to the conference.

The upward curve of the W might last for some time longer, he added - but Al-Jebouri had no doubts whatsoever that fiscal tightening would be a major factor in preventing a U-shaped rebound.

If oil does decline next year - when reduced quantitative easing makes speculation less attractive, forcing the market to finally catch up with the prospects for real demand - a flight to the dollar is inevitable.

This is hardly going to help the US government's need to make the economy more export-based.

But with the finance industry so well-embedded in Washington, it's hard to envisage legislation that will make financial markets more helpful to the real economy.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Talk of Reliance Industries acquiring LyondellBasell is once again gaining momentum. A report in today's Economic Times says that the company is close to announcing a major overseas acquisition with the target being part of the assets of LyondellBasell. The announcement is likely to be made on or before Reliance's annual general meeting on 17 November. Reliance shares rose 3.1% in morning trade.

Citing a banking industry source the report states that the transaction could be around $6bn, nearly double the estimate made by another media report in September.

One my industry sources says that something is brewing and Reliance is on a shortlist of companies that will be participating in LyondellBasell's reorganisation. The source was unable to give names of others on this shortlist.

Details about the proposed buy are still sketchy and today's media report, like the previous one, raises more questions than answers. In what form is Reliance likely to participate - will it be by acquiring an equity stake that LyondellBasell's creditors will soon get through the company's rights offer? Or will it be an outright purchase of some/all assets? Can it happen before LyondellBasell completes its reorganisation or will Reliance be participating in the reorganisation by buying assets/equity?

One analyst thinks that today's report of an imminent announcement is a little premature and a major development is likely only after LyondellBasell emerges from Chapter 11.

It is difficult to evaluate how beneficial the deal would be to Reliance without knowing much of the details. There are certainly parts of LyondellBasell that would be a good fit for Reliance - its PP assets, a global marketing and distribution network and the technology portfolio.

Reliance certainly has the cash for a big ticket acquisition. But the company is not known to be very aggressive when bidding for overseas assets and this is one of the reasons why it lost out on acquisition opportunities in the past. Will it be the same story this time?

.......and no trite Public Relations-speak answers, please!!!

This is not me, by the way, (my computer is an older model) but the expression about sums it up

www.scienceblogs.com

No matter where you seem to turn these days, whether it's to the refinery industry or to any chemicals production chain, the story is more or less the same: A wide gap between the expectation of recovery - already priced into crude and equity markets - and actual production and consumption.

The demand-growth numbers from China, taken in isolation and not placed into the context of declines elsewhere, continue to amaze.

Auto sales in China continued to boom in October, though at a slower pace than in previous months, according to data from the semi-official China Association of Automobile Manufacturers.

Sales rose 72.5% from a year earlier to 1.23 m vehicles, slower than September's 77.9% increase and August's rise of 81.7% - the year's peak growth rate so far.

Sales have been boosted by government stimulus measures that include rural subsidies and a purchase tax cut on vehicles with engine capacities of as much as 1.6 litres.

Demand for textiles used in cars has been so strong that workers have been forced to put in extra hours following mass lay-offs earlier this year.

But, turning to the styrenics chain, an industry sources said: "Downstream demand in all the big derivatives - acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polystyrene (PS), expandable PS (EPS) and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) is very weak.

"EPS had a good H1, but it's now the down season for construction because its winter. Even taking this into account, consumption is very poor."

Spot PS and ABS prices have been stagnant over the past few weeks while feedstock costs have increased, according to ICIS pricing.

"My worry is that it's all cost-push at the styrene end of the chain and so buyers run the risk of repeating the mistakes of H2 2008, but of course on a much smaller scale." the source added.

What on earth is really going on? This blog will dedicate a big chunk of the rest of its life to try and find out.

Just picked up on the interesting news (not sure how big a deal this is) after attending one of those long interminably-long internal planning meetings. But on this occasion we at least were discussing something useful - not just the new colour for the carpet in reception.

So why has Qatar Petroluem bought into Petrochemical Corp of Singapore (PCS) and The Polyolefins Co (TPC).

Interesting that the PetroRabigh marketing arm - the joint venture betweeen Saudi Aramco and Sumitomo for the new plant in Saudi Arabia - is run from Singapore by Sumitomo.

This Dow Jones report, from a former colleague of mine, quotes Ben Van Beurden, executive vice president of Shell, as saying the following: "One of the critical success factors of any petrochemical venture...is access to competitive feedstock.

"I'm hopeful that condensate and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) will flow from Qatar to Singapore as a result of QPI taking an interest in these joint ventures."

That makes a lot of sense as feedstock advantage is going to be crucial for an older and smaller cracker-derivatives complex such as PCS-TPC to compete in the and far more difficult environment.

The giant new Middle East crackers have big scale and raw material advantages.

One of the responses to date from the very experienced and very capable guys at TPC has been to work the trade advantages within the Asean region, concentrate on relationships and higher value-added grades.

Shell Eastern Petroleum operates a 500,000-bbl/day refinery on Pulau Bukom.

The company is building a petrochemical complex comprising an 800,000-tonne/year steam cracker and MEG unit, using Shell's Omega technology, due on-stream in Q2 2010.

This cracker will be fed by hydrowax from an updgraded hydrocracker at the same site and so it is not clear whether feedstock from Qatar will also be an option for this facility.

In Qatar, Shell and Qatar Petroleum are building the $18bn Pearl gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant scheduled for completion by the end of 2010.

Condensate will be be produced from the GTL plant, which has been entirely funded by Shell. This condendate has been evaluated for producing petrochemicals in Qatar.

Shell has a cracker project in Qatar likely to start-up only after 2012.

The Anglo-Dutch major has also talked about more petrochemicals in China to build on its existing CNOOC joint-venture Nanhai cracker and derivatives project.

Again, whether the closer relationship with Qatar will have any implications for these plans remains to be seen. The Chinese want mainly one of two things from any potential new petrochemical JV partner - energy supplies (oil or gas) and/or technology.

"If we contemplate new ­investments in chemicals, they only make sense if we can continue to build integrated positions and they rank favourably with our overall capital investment programme," van Beurden told me in an interview last year.

"Everything we want to do in chemicals must be integrated with the rest of Shell. Capital goes first to upstream projects and so chemical investments have to make a lot of sense and clear very high hurdles."

Sumitomo retains its interest in PCS and TPC and so - as often is the case in deals like these - the internal parent-company competitive landscape has shifted.

The Sumitomo part of TPC, now with Qatar Petroleum as a partner, is competing with the Sumitomo share in a new Middle East producer - PetroRabigh!

Singapore's Jurong Island

Source of picture: www.pcs.com

Qatar Petroleum International (QPI) sees Singapore as a good base for expanding in to the Far East, said CEO Nasser Al-Jaidah yesterday after the announcement of the new partnership with Shell.

QPI and Shell signed a series of agreements on Wednesday to jointly own 50% of Petrochemical Corporation of Singapore (PCS) and 30% of The Polyolefin Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd (TPC), to be held through a joint venture company called QPI and Shell Petrochemicals (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Sumitomo Chemical's 70% stake in PCS and 50% share of TPC remain unchanged.

Singapore is becoming an increasingly important energy-storage and trading hub. QPI's closer relationship with the island state - through the Shell deal - could be key in helping to market and sell big new volumes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

Qatar's enormous LNG ambitions, through joint ventures with the likes of Shell and ExxonMobil, also leave the issue of getting maximum value out of co or by-product LPG.

There are several options for LPG.

The LPG (propane and butane) can be extracted during natural gas and LNG processing.

It could be used by Qatar for petrochemicals in Qatar itself or elsewhere in the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) region.

Another option is to ship the LPG to petrochemical and other customers overseas.

"One of the critical success factors of any petrochemicals facility, whether it is in the Middle East or here in Singapore, is access to competitive feedstock," said Ben van Beurden, executive vice-president of Shell Chemicals, when the deal was announced.

"I'm hopeful that condensates and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) would flow from Qatar to Singapore as a result of [Qatar Petroleum] taking an investment in these joint ventures."

As we discussed yesterday, this would enable the PCS-TPC joint ventures to better compete against the new wave of bigger feedstock-advantaged Middle East crackers.

Singapore is building an LNG terminal due for completion in mid - to late 2012.

Another probably very unlikely option is to ship "wet" LNG and then extract LPG on arrival. This extraction also involves removing ethane - and so again there's a petrochemical option here.

And finally, some LNG customers - such as power generators - prefer their gas delivered as "wet", creating competing economics for extracting LPG and ethane for petrochemicals.

The QPI-Shell deal raises several more questions which this blog is seeking to answer:

*Will this give extra feedstock flexibility to the new Singapore cracker, due on-stream next year? We understand it will be run mainly on hydrowax from an up-graded hydrocracker. But will an option now be to use condensate/naphtha feedstock via Qatar? How would this work as, if at all, as Shell Eastern - which operates the cracker project - is a separate subsidiary?

*The Pearl gas-to-liquids project (another joint venture between Shell and Qatar Petroleum) will produce condensate as well as ultra-low sulphur diesel. Will this condensate, split into naphtha, be sold directly into the merchant market or used for producing petrochemicals in Qatar? Is this still a possible feed for the Shell cracker project in Qatar and/or are other petrochemical options in Qatar? The background to this we understand that there's a shortage of new gas allocations available from the North Shelf due to an extended moratorium, making it difficult for all the cracker projects in Qatar to go ahead.

*Could the condensate/naphtha from Pearl be supplied to Singapore instead?

*Is developing a new project in China now a priority with QPI over petrochemicals in Qatar?

In China, QPI has a joint venture with PetroChina and Shell (China) Ltd to build a refinery and petrochemical complex at Taizhou in Zhejiang province.

"We are hoping to get approval [for the project] by the end next year," said Al-Jaidah.

Perhaps the biggest of all the priorities might be this joint venture.

But whether or how the closer relationship between QPI and Shell will accelerate this project is not clear.

China is on the whole looking for one of two things from future petrochemical joint-venture partners: Energy supplies (oil and gas) and technology.

The existing QPI and Shell relationship already firmly ticked both of these boxes.

It seems as if Lex of the Financial Times is finally catching up with this blog by questioning the validity of some of the official data coming out of China. We take this as a compliment.

In today's column it talks about how the total for first-half Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth numbers for China's 31 provinces was almost 10% higher than the overall figure put out by the National Bureau of Statistics.

This suggests that provincial officials are being encouraged to report high numbers to help create the impression that everything is coming up roses. How can we trust micro numbers, on chemicals production and consumption, for example, if distortions in big headline numbers are taking place?

Retail sales growth of 16.2% in October was also questioned by Lex. These numbers are not a good proxy for real consumption growth because they include shipments to retailers and various types of corporate and government spending.

Strong year-on-year petrochemical production growth recorded for September might be believable because in the same month last year the world economy came to a halt as Lehman Bros folded. Ethylene output grew by 29.4% and polyester production by 33.9%.

The polyester sector might have benefited from market-share gains made in export markets as a result of the 2009 depreciation of the Yuan against other developing-world currencies.

This is the result of a re-pegging of the Yuan to the US dollar, which on Wednesday hit a 15-month low against a basket of trade-weighted currencies.

But China's Central Bank, ahead of a visit to China by President Obama, yesterday acknowledged there was a case for a stronger Yuan.

As if often the chase with the Chinese government, though, only a few days earlier commerce minister Chen Deming had called for the creation of currency stability in order to protect exports.

So it's far from clear if and when China will let the Yuan rise in value, which would likely reduce the volume of chemical imported to be re-exported as finished goods.

As we've said before, lack of clarity on real over apparent domestic demand-growth continues to prompt a nagging suspicion that re-exports are more important than some people think in the recovery story.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said at the weekend that the Yuan had become "significantly undervalued" since it was linked again to the dollar.

If insufficient ground isn't given on the Yuan to satisfy the West, how long before politicians start targeting other "unfair" advantages such as this year's reductions in raw-material import tariffs and increases in export-tax rebates?

On an individual industry level, pressure for anti-dumping and other trade measures is likely to only grow - a long with measures outside the control of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) such as safety and environmental standards - if developed economies don't achieve sustained recoveries.

 Shelf-space to be in short supply again?

Source of picture: www.zrdata.com

ASIAN naphtha prices hit their highest level for more than a year yesterday - reaching $701/tonne CFR Japan for second-half December open-spec material on "improved market conditions".

Earlier this week we picked up more reports of bleak demand in styrenics and fibre intermediates that countered continued optimism in equities and crude markets.

This is also usually the quiet season as petrohemical production declines on weak seasonal demand.

Is the Asian petrochemicals industry ramping up production because it thinks crude is going to get stronger and the real economy is set to improve?

Oil fell to below $77 a barrel yesterday on evidence that US motorists and businesses were cutting back on energy use, according to this Associated Press report.

Have we returned to the demand destruction which caused the economic downturn in the first place?

Despite soaring auto sales in China, there are reports that gasoline consumption is being affected by higher crude, the impact of which is being more keenly felt this year as a result of fuel-price liberalisation.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its weekly report that US oil and gas supplies grew more than expected last week, even though many oil companies have shuttered refineries as fuel consumption slumps.

US refineries had slowed production to the lowest levels since September 2008 and they were importing nearly 15% less crude than last year, the report added.

This is worying when you think of the state of the economy this time last year. Most other comparative numbers are showing improvements.

What perhaps helps to explain the 15% decline is big new refinery capacities in India and China etc putting pressure the developed-world players.

With refinery runs reduced everywhere in the world except China (where the Chinese refineries are enjoying improved profitability as a result of the fuel-price liberalisation), reduced supply could be another factor behind the rise in naphtha.

But let's take it as read that better demand from petrochemicals is the main driver behind the increase in naphtha.

It would be a very risky business to build inventories right at this moment - given all these uncertainties and the big surge in new petrochemicals capacity.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Sumitomo Chemical and Saudi Aramco appear to be in a generous mood. After successfully launching the first phase of their joint venture and starting work on the second phase the two are willing to welcome others to the Rabigh party.

Pic source: Saudi Aramco

Ziad Al-Labban, president and ceo of the joint venture Petro Rabigh, is reported to have said that discussions are underway with companies, including Japanese firms, to invest in production synthetic fibre and other products at Rabigh. He expects a total of 50 companies, including some from Japan, to eventually set up operations at the site.

The product slate for PetroRabigh's second phase, due to be completed in 2013-14 includes aromatics, synthetic rubber, nylon 6 and speciality chemicals. What more can be produced and what makes Rabigh so attractive?

There is of course the feedstock that will be readily available from the PetroRabigh complex and the benefits of shared world class infrastructure. But local markets are small with not very exciting growth prospects, especially for products like synthetic fibres. I certainly can't see a big textile industry developing in Saudi Arabia or the GCC.

I have often heard that the attractiveness of the Middle East fades as you move down the product chain. The closer you are to the cracker the more profitable it is as you then get full advantage of cheap feedstocks.

But Saudi Arabia's plans for a diversified chemical industry are slowly but steadily progressing. And Abu Dhabi is also working on a similar model. What incentives are being offered to make these countries an oasis for downstream chemical production?

Stay cool and don't panic!

Source of picture: www.wired.com

By John Richardson

THE growth of the carry trade US dollars - leading to a sharp depreciation of the greenback and possibly of many other unintended consequences - represents a major threat to the chemicals industry in 2010.

Any corporate planner with her or his salt should factoring in, and hedging against, the danger that the many warnings about the damage from this trade come true.

Warnings have been issued over the last few weeks by the Chinese government, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Hong Kong chief executive Donald Tsang and Dallas Fed chairman Richard Fisher.

Economist Nouriel Roubini, who accurately predicted the current economic crisis, has been proclaiming loudly from every available rooftop that this is the "mother of all of carry trades".

He believes that, potentially, it could cause even more damage to the financial system than the crisis from which are still struggling to recover.

But this blog was able to find two people who disagreed: A UBS analyst and a hedge-fund trader. Nothing to worry about, then!

Just as a reminder, the carry trade involves borrowing at zero interest rates in dollars (because of the ultra-loose Fed monetary policy) - and also shorting the US currency on the assumption that it will depreciate.

As the dollar has tumbled - creating extremely good returns - investors have also piled into equities and commodities, incurring very high leverage.

Oil increasingly moves in inverse correlation to the dollar these days so, I suppose, this whole business has gained its own self-perpetuating momentum: The more that investors short the dollar, the more it goes down and the more crude goes up. Sounds like daylight robbery.

Stronger crude - which we've frequently said doesn't reflect current supply and demand - is seen as a false sign that the world economy is in firm recovery.

And so, hey presto, equities rise in response to higher oil prices, resulting in yet more fat profits for the speculators.

The dollar could appreciate by as much as 25% if, all of a sudden, traders are forced to cover their shorts (a phrase that, I am afraid never ceases to appeal to my puerile sense of humour), warns Roubini.

He predicts that one of four events could trigger this new financial calamity:

*The dollar value cannot fall to zero and at some point it will stabilise. The cost of carry would then become zero rather than negative (no more money being made on shorting the greenback)

*The Fed cannot suppress volatility forever. Its $1,800bn purchase plan of mortgage-backed securities and government agency debt such as Fannie Mae's etc will be over by the Spring

 *If growth is on the upside in the third and fourth quarters, markets may start to expect Fed tightening sooner rather than later

*A flight from risk could occur due to concerns over a double-dip recession or a geopolitical crisis - e.g. a US/Israel and Iran conflict

Before listing some of the possible implications for chemicals, it's worth adding the following context.

Big increases in Asian property prices (for example, Hong Kong's are up by 28% this year) start to add up in light of the Fed's ultra-loose monetary policy that's prompted the carry trade.

Asian countries have been forced to follow the Fed in order to prevent their currencies from appreciating too much. 

This is creating dangerous real-estate bubbles in Singapore and South Korea as well as Hong Kong, with all the associated higher levels of consumption which come with the property wealth-effect.

China is different as it's re-pegged the Yuan to the dollar.

But the country's huge economic stimulus package has created the well-documented big rise in property prices and a boom in auto, home appliance and other retail sales.

Meanwhile, China is also benefiting from improved export competitiveness as a result of its currency being reconnected to the weaker greenback.

So those chemicals corporate planners worth their salt should be worrying about:

*The risk of being on the wrong side of overbuilt inventories, or even just the normal 45-60 days of working capital tied up in raw materials, when and if crude takes a tumble

*Confusion over sustainable levels of chemicals demand-growth in housing, autos etc in Asia. If the Fed tightens in response to worries over the impact of excess liquidity so will the rest of the world

*Damage to underlying, or fundamental, demand caused by crude being too high at this point in the economic recovery. My fellow blogger, Paul Hodges, points out that this concern is high within OPEC.

*Chemicals import volumes into China destined for re-exports as finished goods have been supported by the weaker Yuan. These imports could obviously decline if the dollar lurches upwards

*US petrochemicals producers have benefited from dollar weakness and the fall in natural-gas prices relative to crude (70% of US ethylene is derived from natural-gas liquids). Thermoplastic exports are up 16% in the year-to-date with domestic sales down nearly 14%, according to the latest American Chemistry Council (ACC) weekly report. So, again a surge in the greenback would threaten this much-needed compensation for a weak home market. 

When might the carry trade unwind? Nouriel Roubini is not prepared to offer any prediction, but warns that the longer this bubble inflates the worst the consequences will be when it deflates.

Source of picture: www.walletpop.com

By John Richardson

In his own words Paul Hodges of International e-Chem - and also a fellow blogger - puts in a nutshell some of the dangers confronting the chemicals industry as we approach the New Year, with a few interspersed further thoughts from this blog:

"If crude were to fall back to $40 a barrel - where based on fundamentals it should be - this would further cloud visibility about the real state of end-user demand. It would become hard to distinguish between a fall in demand down the chain because of de-stocking and greater caution, and a fall in the final consumption of chemicals.

"Oil at its current price is hindering rather than helping the recovery because we are seeing demand destruction again. This is because we are already seeing greater caution on the part of those companies that recognise the risks of lower demand for chemicals. "For example, as the gasoline price has gone up, people are driving less to the shopping malls in order to buy stuff made from plastics - i.e. discretionary spending."

There are even reports of this happening in China as a result of higher crude and fuel-price liberalisation.

"In Our Feedstocks for Profit Study, and I think this still holds, we saw a green light for growth was $25 a barrel, an amber light $50 a barrel and red at $75-80 a barrel.

"It's generally accepted that demand destruction occurs at $80-100 a barrel."

The last US recession began in December 2007 when crude touched $100 a barrel. This came at the same time as the sub-prime crisis. An important question now is with real wages in the West in decline and unemployment rising are we talking about demand destruction much closer to the $80 a barrel level?

"The crude price is being driven by irresponsible bankers, who are simply focused on generating maximum short-term trading profits (and personal bonuses for themselves). The money to support these trading activities is effectively being provided by taxpayers, as a result of the bailouts that have taken place," continued Hodges.

"The strength in crude oil is directly correlated to movements in the value of the US$, often on a minute by minute basis. This is not about free markets. It is about bankers using the low interest rates now on offer in the US, caused by their earlier greed and reckless lending, to once again bite the hand that feeds them.

"Bankers need to behave more responsibly, especially at a time of crisis such as today. If they are not prepared to do so of their own will, we need effective legislation.

"When this unwinds you could see a big return to dollars, strengthening the currency significantly," Hodges continued.

"This is hardly going to help progress in the US government's effort to make the economy more export-based - part of the global rebalancing efforts."

"Today's oil prices are not the fault of chemicals companies, but they will suffer as a result."

The risk is that the unwinding of these trades causes further disruption. As oil prices fall, so will chemical volumes as everyone de-stocks.

"This is why chemicals companies need good hedging strategies," said Hodges.

"Another problem is the cost in terms of working capital. This will lead to a further problem as demand recovers. When demand is really weak, it's possible to conserve working capital by cutting operating rates and other costs - hunkering down until the recovery arrives.

"But when the recovery does arrive, the difficulty is estimating how much to ramp up rates at the expense of working-capital preservation.

"Demand visibility - even without as yet a collapse in crude - is already extremely poor, making planning very difficult. "

"More companies go bust in an upturn than a downturn, because of the inevitable increase in working capital. This is a major risk in 2010, given the fragile state of the financial system, and banks' unwillingness to lend."

 "They are so cheap, I might even buy one as a hedge against global warming"
Source of picture: www.formalwilderness.blogspot.com

This blog has spent a lot of time tormenting itself over the sustainability of China's extraordinary economic rebound during 2009.

"Just where are all those imports of chemicals and polymers (polymers up 50% year-to-date) going?" we keep on asking.

Perhaps we've got completely the wrong end of the stick, a source politely suggests.

"There's no real need to worry about where this stuff goes because as long as the government is solvent - and it still has massive cash reserves - it will keep GDP (gross domestic product) growth at a minimum of 8-9% per year. The reason is the need to create enough jobs to maintain social stability.

"Quite frankly, if they had to they had to bury polymers and unsold washing machines, fridges and autos etc in landfills, they would do it to keep industrial production moving along at the right level.

"And quicker than you imagine, they will wean the country off too much depedence on industrial production and exports towards better local consumption."

But in the meantime, he has heard of Chinese refrigerators, which contain polymers including polycarbonate (PC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polypropylene (PP), flooding export markets.

"It seems that some refrigerators were manufactured for domestic sales and so benefited from government subsidies - but still found their way on to container ships."

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

The 17 Nov public hearing arranged by the Indian government at Delhi to discuss provisional anti dumping duties levied on PP imports from Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman was postponed at the very last minute causing a great deal frustration among lawyers and industry executives who had flown in from out of the country.

The hearing was postponed because of bereavement in the family of the government bureaucrat heading the hearing. Efforts to get another bureaucrat proved to be futile. A new date has yet to be set but I am told it should be soon.

And I have received some information from Japan on the likely candidates for the Rabigh party. One of the products being considered by Petro Rabigh for its second phase is superabsorbent polymers (SAP). As Sumitomo Chemical does not have technology for this product, it is rumoured that Nippon Shokubai or Sumitomo Seika could be joining Petro Rabigh for this project.

Abu Dhabi ahead in the race?

Source of picture: www.gulftrackservices.com

By John Richardson

The global basic chemicals industry is likely to end up under the dominant control of the Middle East, and possibly Asia, within the next 3-5 years, a senior chemicals industry source told this blog.

"We have known for a long time that the centre of gravity is shifting from West to East, but the economic crisis has accelerated this whole process.

"It was easy credit that enabled the West to keep on growing despite high oil prices with some of that credit going into speculation that helped drive energy costs higher.

"Now that the credit bubble has burst we are left with deeply entrenched and very long-term problems, while the Middle East is sitting on a hydrocarbons cash-pile thanks to the extraordinary global economic growth of 2005-2008."

The only barrier to acquisition of a lot more Western assets - including quite possibly high-value technology positions that have to date remained off the table - was politics, he said.

But a second source added: "While I agree that the shifting of ownership has been speeded up by the crisis, I think the West will keep hold of technology positions - especially in downstream specialities.

"Chief executive officers (CEOs) of US and European countries are under pressure to move away from basis chemicals, and so differentiation needs to be preserved.

"But it is true that we have already seen transfer of very valuable polymer technologies."

SABIC's acquisition of GE Plastics was one such transfer with the renamed SABIC Innovative Plastics now seeking to buy high-end polycarbonate (PC) technologies.

The economic recovery, which the second source believed would be sustained, would also give the CEOs some breathing space to negotiate better terms with prospective buyers of basic petrochemicals.

These comments came after ICIS reported that the Abu Dhabi-based International Petroleum Investment Co (IPIC) was in talks with Bayer MaterialScience and four other global petrochemical groups.

But an IPIC spokesman later said: "At present there are no firm plans to do anything with Bayer MaterialScience, or any other chemical company. A number of initiatives are under consideration internally, but nothing has been decided."

IPIC has already acquired Canadian-based polyolefin major Nova Chemicals and is planning the huge Chemaweyaat chemical city in the new Mina Khalifa Industrial Zone.

It also has a 64% of Austria-based polyolefins group Borealis.

"What's interesting about the Chemaweyaat project is, first of all, its sheer scale (it includes several crackers, including a 1.45m tonne/year one due to start-up in 2012) and the fact that the range of derivatives downstream will be more diversified than is already common in the Middle East," the first source added.

"On a straight cost competitiveness basis, you might think that liquids cracking, which is going to happen at Chemaweyaat, doesn't make sense. But this is more than being about straight economics - it's about economic development and job creation."

And my colleague, Nigel Davis, recently wrote: "Dow Chemical on 12 November laid its cards on the table regarding its so-called 'asset light' strategy.

Dow is working through an arbitration process following its failed deal in Kuwait. The company says it is now talking to two potential partners for a proportion of it olefins assets and its polyethylene business. "

The future ownership of US petrochemicals assets in the US is also attracting a great deal of interest because, despite what could be deeply ingrained economic problems, it's a huge polymer and chemicals market.

And as Nubuo Tanaka - executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA) - said in a presentation in Singapore earlier this week, shale gas had resulted in a "silent revolution" in US natural-gas supply since 2007.

With 70% of US ethylene production based on natural-gas liquids, according to the American Chemistry Council (ACC), the ground has shifted thanks to this unconventional shale-gas supply.

"Gas supply has become tight in the Middle East and abundant in the US perhaps for the long term, meaning that US petrochemicals is not dead and buried," claimed the first source.

"I expect export competitiveness from the US to be strong for at least the next three years on the comparatively low prices of natural gas over naphtha."

Thermoplastic exports from the US rose by 16% in the year-to-date as a against a 14% decline in domestic sales, said the ACC in its latest weekly report.

SABIC's GE Plastics acquisition gave the Saudi giant a foothold in this huge market, where handling and distribution costs can act as an effective trade barrier.

There have also been unconfirmed reports of Reliance Industries being interested in acquiring LyondellBasell.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

China's immense appetite this year for all petrochemicals has been puzzling many of us. This blog has been regularly asking questions and some answeres for the polyester and PTA markets were provided by YJ Kim of PCI Xylenes & Polyesters at the Indian Petrochem 2009 conference earlier this week.

Kim pointed out that preparatory work for the Shanghai Expo in May 2010 was a major demand driver. The budget for the Expo is twice that of the Beijing Olympics in 2008.

The Olympics is estimated to have created nearly 1m tonnes of polyester demand. So if you double the budget then surely polyester demand would be way above 1m tonnes.

If this is true for polyester I think it is also safe to assume that the Expo is also a major driver for polymer consumption.

Kim also observed that the a fall in transaction volumes at the Shaoxing textile market should not be interpreted as a decline in overall business as six more wholesale markets have sprung up in China, and there is even one in Xinjiang. The average daily trading volume at Shaoxing has fallen to 4-5m metres this year from a peak of 6m metres.

Here are a few other highlights from Kim's very good presentation.

• China's 2nd 10-Year West Development Plan will create another polyester boom. Production growth is likely to be around 7% for the next three years but will swing to double digit post 2011 once demand explodes in western China. Polyester production forecast for 2009 is 21.8m tonnes.
• Global PTA inventories are very low and the industry needs to build up stocks. In China, 18-21 days is the normal PTA stock level. But the market is currently living on less than two weeks inventory. If China rebuilds stocks by 500,000 tonnes over the next six months it could swing global operating rates by 2%.
• Firm PTA prices this year have been driven by a recovery in demand and involuntary production cuts due to shortage of paraxylene. PTA margins have been exceptionally strong this year
• China is likely to import nearly 6.5m tonnes of PTA in 2009 and would need to import around 6m tonnes annually for the next three years. The trade grid for PTA could change once China complete its antidumping investigation into PTA exports by South Korea and Thailand. A review has been completed but it appears that Korean and Thai producers are individually negotiating with the Chinese commerce ministry. If Korea is hit by antidumping duties it will be forced to look for new markets. India, the Middle East and Europe would be the likely targets. The Korea-EU free trade agreement is due to start from July 2010 which would allow for zero duty imports.

Source of picture: www.managingthedragon.com

By John Richardson

I love the phrase used by Andrew Peaple of the Wall Street Journal in this article on China's property "bubble": Getting a straight answer is like "nailing jelly to a wall", in other words xxxxxx impossible. I will be in Shanghai next week on a business trip so will attempt to do some first-hand nailing.

The World Bank, Peaple points out, says that income growth in China is keeping up with price rises. This is a view supported by the China Economic Quarterly, which also makes the point that there remains a lot of pent-up demand for housing.

Property prices rose by 3.9% in 70 of China's large and medium-sized cities, but there does seem to be the possibility that highly localised much bigger bubbles are being inflated. Housing affordability in Beijing looks to stretched and prices in October rose by 13.8% in Shenzhen.

Still, in three of the 70 cities surveyed property prices actually fell.

The again, though, Zhang Xin, chief executive of Soho China - one of the country's most successful privately owned property developers - was quoted in several media reports as saying that a big bubble was, indeed, being pumped up. She blamed this on the big increase in bank lending, the cornerstone of the government's economic stimulus.

"Real estate prices should only go up because people want to actually use the space, but at the moment we can see more and more empty buildings across the whole country and in every real-estate segment," she was quoted as saying.

Vacancy rates in the Pudong district of Shanghai are as high as 50% as more buildings keep going up, Zhang added.

"In Manhattan they have vacancy rates of 10-15% and they feel like the sky is falling."

The danger for chemicals consumption is that changes in government policy for the property sector could have a big detrimental effect.

Tax breaks, low interest rates and smaller down-payment requirements have fuelled this year's boom - along with the plentiful bank lending.

Another connected issue is assessing how much chemistry goes into China's construction sector.

In the US, for example, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) assesses that the construction sector purchases $8 of every $1,000 of chemicals output.

"A big problem in China is the huge variance on what people do to their homes, from very basic equipping of steel and concrete box-like apartments to, of course, the super-rich who are ripping out tiles and refitting kitchens almost as often they change their underwear," said a Shanghai-based office worker.

Nailing jelly to the wall would no doubt have been a fair description of getting reliable data out of the US economy during the early part of the last century.

But back then it mattered far less to the rest of the world.

Reliance Industries has made an offer for LyondellBasell says an official statement released yesterday on the LyondellBasell website:

"LyondellBasell has received a preliminary non-binding offer from Reliance Industries Limited to acquire for cash a controlling interest in the company contemporaneously with the company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization.

"This offer is in addition to the previous non-binding equity financing proposals received by the company and represents a potential alternative to the initial plan of reorganization previously filed by the company."

This confirms months of rumours to this effect. According to an unnamed merchant banker quoted by the Times of India, Reliance would have to pay at least $12bn - double an earlier estimate by the Economic Times.

India could be playing a major role in the shift of basis chemicals ownership from West to East - along with the Middle East

After failing in its efforts to capture Innovene and then Dow Chemical's commodity petchems unit, this is Reliance's fresh attempt to move into the global top league. The ICIS top 100 places LyondellBasell at the No 4 slot of top chemical companies globally.

A marriage of the two companies would result in a formidable giant with an annual turnover in excess of $75bn, including Reliance's earnings from its growing oil, gas and refining portfolio. It would also create the largest PP producer and also a top player in PE and give Reliance access to LyondellBasell's profitable technology portfolio.

Reliance's offer is subject to due diligence and sufficient credit support. The company issued a very cautious statement: "This review is ongoing and there can be assurance of the outcome with respect to any of the opportunities under review."

Reliance, it appears, is evaluating other opportunities too in its core businesses.

LyondellBasell's statement confirms that Reliance had earlier placed non-binding equity financial proposals and the latest offer represented was a 'potential alternative to the initial plan of reorganization'.

LyondellBasell was the first petrochemical giant to stumble at the start of the crisis last year. And it looks like it could well be the first big ticket M&A deal in what promises to be a busy season ahead.

We have already heard of IPIC on the prowl for European and US chemical assets and then Mitsubishi Chemical confirmed that it is looking to acquire Mitsubishi Rayon for $2.5bn.

An investment banker said last week that it was only in the last few months that he has seen an interest in boards and ceos. Capital market conditions have improved substantially and money will not be a deterrent, especially for companies like Reliance which are already sitting on huge piles of cash.

Relaince's biggest problem in the past has been its conservative valuations which have seen the company lose out to other global bidders, except in a few instances (Trevira and Hualon). There are already reports of rival bids emerging for LyondellBasell from Chinese companies and private equity investors. And ICIS news reported last week that analysts believe that LyondellBasell would also be a good fit for IPIC.

So will Reliance change its mindset and be bolder this time?

Reliance Industries - which is attempting to buy LyondellBasell - is offering $10-12bn, according to this report from Reuters quoting two sources with direct knowledge of the deal. 

This would be one of the biggest-ever acquisitions by an Indian company. In 2007, Tata Steel bought Corus for $13bn.

Reliance raised $660m through a share sale in September.

It has $4bn in cash, $8bn in treasury stock that can be sold and if it doubles its current net debt-to-equity of 0.35x it can borrow another $10bn, the Reuters report adds - quoting a recent Macquarie research note.

He's not bad at making money
Source of picture: www.dealbreaker.com

SOME of the logic behind Reliance Industries' bid for LyondellBasell could be a recognition that the globalisation of petrochemicals markets may have gone into partial reverse.

A climate bill passed by the House of Representatives has a provision for taxing imports from countries where emissions standards are more lax than the US.

This defensive measure, no doubt the result of pressure from heavily polluting industries such as refining and chemicals, recognises that the business-as-usual scenario outlined by the International Energy Agency in its World Energy Report 2009 won't come true.

The scenario involves no significant improvements in energy conservation and no great shift to renewables, leading to a rise in global temperatures of 6 C.

Even if an international carbon tax and/or cap-and-trade system isn't established, individual countries seem likely to step up their efforts to lower hydrocarbons consumption.

Whether or not global warming is man-made, energy security is by itself a big enough reason to boost energy efficiency and develop green technologies.

Then there is what Nubuo Tanaka, Executive Director of the IEA, calls "the silent revolution" since 2007 of increasing US gas supply.

Breakthroughs in shale-gas technology and very long global liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply are contributing to what the IEA describes as a worldwide supply glut that could have "far-reaching consequences for the structure of gas markets".

This will put LyondellBasell's US polyethylene (PE) assets in a strong position in the medium and possibly even the long term.

It has long been assumed that when the US polyolefin market is eventually in deficit, the shortfalls will be supplied by the Middle East and Latin America - notwithstanding extra logistics costs that amount to effective trade barriers.

But a sufficiently high price on carbon would undermine this assumption, along with cheap US natural gas.

This is still the world's biggest economy and therefore the world's biggest chemicals and polymer market when all the hot air about China has been expelled.  

What was right for Warren Buffett could prove to be right for Reliance.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Reliance's bid for LyondellBasell is likely to be a long drawn out affair with potential for complications from competitive bids.

I talked to some sources familiar with the transaction and they say that Reliance is unlikely to be the only company interested in LyondellBasell. There is no official confirmation yet but some obvious names are being suggested -IPIC, Sinopec and Saudi Aramco.

One source says that the strongest contender would be Len Blavatnik of Access Industries who is trying to regain control of LyondellBasell.

This report also talks of offers by private equity players too though these are in the form of equity financing proposals to LyondellBasell's plan of a rights issue and not a cash offer like Reliance. The rights issue is part of the company's proposed reorganisation plan.

But Reliance still stands a good chance as some of the other probable contenders are likely to be busy working on other acquisition opportunities, he adds.

One opportunity is Dow Chemical's basic chemicals and plastics unit. Andrew Liveris, CEO of Dow, recently said that the company is in talks with two potential partners, although no timeframe has been set for striking a deal.

Dow's senior vice-president of hydrocarbons and basic plastics has also said that Dow's partner would have substantial hydrocarbon and refining assets.

Any company that is successful in partnering Dow would have to forego the LyondellBasell opportunity because of antitrust issues in the US and Europe. It would not be possible for a single company to own all the assets of Dow and LyondellBasell.

Then there is IPIC's stated interest in Bayer MaterialScience. Although the company has said that it is evaluating other opportunities it might be preoccupied in seeing this through, says the source.

He also adds that there are not too many companies globally that can prove that they have the capacity to run LyondellBasell.

Meanwhile, there are already indications that the transaction could stretch through 2010. LyondellBasell asked the bankruptcy court yesterday for time until 6 September 2010 to get sufficient creditors to vote for its reorganisation plan. The current deadline is 15 December.

Until the deadline, LyondellBasell has sole right to file a reorganisation plan. Once it expires, creditors can file their own reorganisation plans for the company.

Creditors, who are keen to recover as much money as possible, would be keen to see alternatives to the company's plan.

Will growth spread quickly enough?

Source of picture: www.oraclemarketplace.co.uk

By John Richardson

Global chemicals production had returned to 2006 levels by October of this year, according to this slide ACCProduction09Versus06.ppt from the American Chemistry Council (ACC).

Worldwide chemicals growth rates might not return to 2008 levels until 2012, Jurgen Hambrecht, CEO of BASF, warned on the release of the company's Q3 results.

The overall picture is being made to look bad by structural overcapacities and deep-seated economic problems in Europe and the US.

Booming emerging markets, particularly China, matter more than ever to Western chemicals producers.

So the big question being asked as we approach the New Year is whether China's almost hard-to-believe growth in chemicals demand in 2009 - reflected in a big surge in imports - can be maintained.

High-density polyethylene (HPDPE imports rose by 73% with low-density (LDPE) imports up by 85% in January-September, according to Shanghai-based commodities information service CBI.

Total PE imports in 2008 were 4.5m tonnes, but had China imported 3.75m tonnes by the end of H1 of this year alone, added CBI.

"China will enter a long period of slower and more volatile growth in probably 2-3 years when fiscal stimulus runs out", warned Michael Pettis, former Wall Street trader and professor at Peking University's Guanghua School of Management

This would force the country to make adjustments it had so far tried to avoid, added Pettis on his blog, China Financial Markets.

These adjustments, accordinng to a Shanghai-based expatriate, involve a major shift away from export and industrial investment-led growth to a more broad-based rise in consumer spending.

"What's holding back consumption is the lack of a decent welfare system, forcing people to maintain high savings levels to cover education and health costs," he added.

A lot of the wealth generated by China's growth was concentrated in the hands of the state-owned enterprises, Pettis added.

Higher dividend payments to company shareholders (sometimes no dividends are paid at all) and broader financial sector liberalisation were needed, said the professor.

China's critics argue that the response to the global economic crisis has so far been mainly more of the same: Providing a huge increase in funding for a big build-up industrial capacity and infrastructure.

The infrastructure, including 120,000 kilometres in high-speed rail lines, has the potential to accelerate urbanisation.

"There is little doubt that China's hope for prosperity in the long run lies in transferring the majority of farmers into higher-productivity jobs in the cities," wrote the well-respected Beijing-based economic research publication, the China Economic Quarterly, in an article earlier this year

"But simply moving a farmer into a city does not make him an economically significant consumer."

Chinese households with annual expenditure of below $5,000 - i.e. about 90% of the population - spent most of their money on housing, food and clothing, the CEQ added.

Those with income levels high enough to be able to spend more than $5,000 per year, the so-called "consumption households", mainly live in three regions - the Yangtze River Delta, The Pearl River Delta and the Beijing-Tianjin corridor, the article continued.

Each of these regions surrounds megacities, whereas other "consumption households" are more thinly scattered across the rest of China.

"Although there are a growing number of these households dispersed across the rest of the country, they are not concentrated enough to justify a sales and distribution presence for many products and services," the research publication added.

"Research my MasterCard suggests that multinational consumer-goods companies require a concentration of at least 20,000 consumption households to establish a viable market."

Distribution costs remain a barrier for setting up in the hinterland, despite big improvements in transportation over the last decade, said the CEQ.

"Logistics costs account for 20% of average goods prices in China compared to 10% in the US, according to the US Department of Commerce," the CEQ added.

Plenty of reasons, perhaps, for chemicals companies to be a little cautious over their forecasted growth rates in China over the next few years.

By John Richardson in Shanghai and Malini Hariharan

China is set to see polyolefins demand growth of 30% or more this year, depending on the which particular grade, according to preliminary estimates prepared by companies and market analysts.

Even if you take into account last year's relatively low growth rates (I say relative because despite the economic crisis, demand for some grades of PE grew by as much as 7% - which by itself would be the envy of most other countries), the 2009 forecasts take your breath away.

We will give you more details of the numbers next week.

As always with unexpected events, the search for after-the-facts reasons has begun.

One factor is the sharp drop in availability of recycled material that has forced converters to concentratre more on virgin resin.

A further reason is, of course, China's enormous economic stimulus.

This has included a big rise in bank loans, a factor behind the third explanation behind the forecasts: A sharp rise in speculation.

"Non-traditional traders entered the market who only wanted to get their hands on polyolefins in order to use the 90 days' credit for something else," said an industry source.

"They would take the credit and use it to speculate on say equities. Sometimes they made such big profits out of the stock market that they were willing to sell PE and PP at a loss."

The strong growth - combined with big cuts in production by Chinese producers in Q4 last year and early 2009 - help to explain the surge in polyolefin imports.

HDPE imports were up 73% in January-September and LDPE by 85%, according to China Customs.

The question now, obviously, is whether this great performance will be repeated in 2010.

We've been saying this so many times this year, but new capacities are a threat.

They keep getting delayed, but on paper China is set to increase PE capacity by more than 40% next year.

And will the Chinese government, worried about asset -price bubbles, reduce economic stimulus?

By John Richardson

A lot of the projects which have pushed the world into severe overcapacity were based on the assumption that China would remain in big deficits for many basic commodity chemicals and polymers.

It was thought that the world's most-important market would remain a sink for surpluses for a very long time at a time when tough questions over financing were rarely asked.

But it's become clear over the past few years that many of the assumed deficits won't be there.

China is seeking very high levels of self-sufficiency through building a big wave of new refineries integrated downstream with crackers, polymers and other derivatives.

Now the search for what to build - and what to provide storage and other support services for - outside China to supply China is likely to be a great deal more rigorous and selective.

The usual approach to this problem would be to conduct a study looking at the announced projects while also examining where China lacks the economics and the technology in a particular product.

"I am afraid this won't work in the political context of this country," a Westerner based in Shanghai told me last week.

"If a chemical looks like being in big deficit and even if China has no obvious competitive advantages or technology to start production, this doesn't mean it won't be built.

"The government would rather haemorrhage money than be dependent on imports for anything they regard as strategic."

Those able to read the minds of China's senior leadership should therefore be able to do very good business.

Another approach might be one of bitter regret if you haven't already got substantial capacity on the ground in China.

More constructively, if you have missed the boat what would be better is to take China's demand largely out of the equation when deciding your strategy for basic chemicals.

On A Very Sticky Wicket

www.theage.com.au

By John Richardson

As one my colleagues said - it's a good job the US stock markets were closed for Thanksgiving.

Lots of efforts are being made to talk the Dubai World crisis and down - and despite drops in Middle East market equities - Asian markets rallied today.

But the next few days could still be important with a lot depending on how neighbouring governments respond.

Oil markets have been pretty much out-of-sync with real demand since 2003.

But with the rise in the US dollar carry trade and Western growth so fragile, the risk of another sharp correction is higher now than when the world economy was in good shape. Such a collapse would be a mini version of what happened in Q4 last year.

I did a very unscientific survey of 30 traders, producers, buyers and logistics people at the APPEC oil and gas conference in Singapore a few weeks ago.

Twenty three said oil prices, based on fundamentals, should be $40-50 a barrel (three of those who disagreed and thought should be where they are now were financial analysts!).

So perhaps the biggest immediate risk from Dubai is a big strengthening of the dollar and a connected drop in equities and crude. 

As I mentioned in my previoust post, I was in Shanghai last week. The local linear-low density polyethylene (LLDPE) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) futures contracts all dipped sharply when the Dubai news broke.

My colleagues at CBI China said that because of the dip in these contracts, very few buyers were willing to acquire physical cargoes on Thursday and Friday.

This could continue as long as the markets worry that this might be another Lehman Bros (fortunately, this seems very unlikely at the moment).