Asian Chemical Connections

Please read this excellent piece from my colleague Nigel Davis, who is editor of the Insight section of ICIS news.Some further thoughts: if 46% of existing and 45% of future ethylene production is taken offline by flooding, just think of the impact on food pricing and distribution and the resulting social and economic chaos due to the shortage of food--packaging material. These estimates maybe wrong, but if Lehman Brothers are only halfway right God help us, and I don't just mean the chemicals industry. On a more immediate bottomline level, how many banks, consultants and project proponents are factoring in the increased risks of flooding into feasibility studies? Or does anyone really care enough to look beyond their next promotion or their imminent retirement? If you won't be around in 10 years' time, why bother asking awkward and potentially career-threatening questions?

Paul Cherry of Basell gave an excellent paper at the recent ICIS Olefins Conference - Download file
Paul offers some hints on how to survive the next downturn, and provides some sobering predictions on operating rates.
I bet that after 2009-10, or whenever the next downturn arrives, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan will further restructure. And what about Thailand? Is it building too much capacity based on the mistaken belief that it can become a major finished-goods manufacturing hub?
And as for China, its dominance will grow and returning a profit from China will not become any easier.

Quota cheating, lack of investment in oil infrastructure and incredibly low domestic gasoline and other oil-product prices mean that Iran could be forced to exit oil export markets by as early as 2015, according to Roger Stern of John Hopkins University.
The government would be under threat if local prices were jacked up. Cutting back on oil exports would make it hard for Iran to balance its books.
If Stern is right, this makes investments in Iran''s gas-based petrochemicals seem even more risky.
Oh and by the way, there's the slight problem of the affect on global prices if Iran is forced to quit exports.

The news that Iran is accelerating its uranium enrichment process brings the country closer to United Nations sanctions and quite possibly a military strike by the US or Israel.
The No 9 and No 10 Olefins projects are far too progressed to be cancelled - the plants are virtually complete and the only issues remaining are achieving a smooth commissioning process (no straightforward task in Iran) and sorting out utilities problems.
But what of Olefins, No 11, No 12 and No 13 etc? Will any foreign engineering and construction company and technology supplier be prepared to sign on the dotted line as the prospect of sanctions or military action becomes increasingly likely?
If you take these crackers out of olefins and polyolefins balances what will this mean or the timing of the next downturn? Answers, please. No 11-No 13 were supposed to be on stream in 2008.

We heard about this rumour last year, but it's emerged again - Reliance is now said to be in advanced discussions for acquiring Nova Chemicals. Nova's Alberta-based cracker and PE production might be attractive because of pretty competitive, locked-in gas prices, but would Reliance really want its styrenics business - the asset that's officially on the block?
And surely, a tie-up with Dow would be a much better proposition.
At the rate that things are going, India, the Middle, and possibly China, could own nearly all the western petrochemical majors in 10 years time.

A boring topic to harp on about again I know, but this article from my colleague Nigel Davis from the Insight section of ICIS news supports what I have been saying for the past two years.
The industry has overbuilt, and despite all the optimism engendered by project delays and probably cancellations in Iran of No 11 Olefins and beyond, this is still, as Nigel says, an unprecedented wave of new capacity.
The reasons for this overbuilding are the easy liquidity that Paul Hodges of international eChem talks about in our commentary section, the optimism over sustained strong global growth and a continuing demand boom in China and India.
Nigel's report came out on the same day that Ben Bernanke's remarks sent stockmarkets into decline.
Imagine this: a combination of an unprecented wave of Middle East capacity, greater self sufficiency in China due to the large amount of capacity being built there and a US housing sector-driven recession that Bernanke's comments were interpreted as pointing towards.
This could be a great opportunity to pick up some cheap petrochemical shares and bankrupt companies in 2009 and beyond.

Reliance is building the world's first cracker that will be entirely fed by off-gas from its huge refinery expansion at Jamnagar. This technology has been used before, but never on this scale because nobody has had enough refinery capacity to run a cracker 100% on very cheap off-gas.
The Dow strategy includes looking for cheaper sources of ethylene and for "asset light" investments, ie, where it doesn't have to spend a bundle of cash to get its hands on cheap raw material. This has proved a highly effective strategy in Kuwait through the Equate joint venture.
In addition, Dow would get access to the Indian market where the growth potential is huge.
As for Reliance, it wants technologies - Dow's great strength - and also access to the US chemicals market. The US, despite low growth, is still the world's biggest market.
And so, I think, a Dow-Reliance tie-up makes a lot of sense.
As for a leveraged buyout of Dow, the complexities of which are made so simple even I can understand them in this excellent article from my colleague Joe Chang, what about the politics?
Middle East companies would very probably have to be part of such an historically massive to deal; they have the cash and don't have pressure from nervous shareholders. I am not sure whether Sinopec or PetroChina would be interested as their focus is on securing overseas oil and gas assets.
After the Dubai Ports controversy last year, an LBO involving the Middle East would surely be blocked by Congress.

In the old days all you had to do was propose an ethane cracker with PE and MEG downstream and you were away.
But these days if you want to get feedstock, especially in Saudi, you need to offer something a bit different because of the drive to diversify to create jobs.
This is a big opportunity for medium-sized players such as Lucite with the right technologies, hence their methyl methacrylate project with Sipchem.

Quite possibly, yes, despite my instinctiive pessimism. Perhaps emerging markets such as China and India have reached such a critical mass that no matter how much capacity is brought on stream, it will be easily absorbed.
Or maybe some disaster lies just around the corner.
Who cares if you've made your money in the most extraordinary bull run in history and have already cashed in your chips.

As everyone focuses on when the next downturn might arrive, macro issues such as the implications of a likely US withdrawal from Iraq are rarely publicly discussed.
But if I were on the board of any company making investment decisions, I'd be worried.
If the US withdrawal from Iraq is well managed then fears such as those expressed in this article will come to nought. Sadly, "Iraq" "the US" and "well managed" are words and phrases that rarely share the same sentence and so the future looks a little shaky to say the least.

As the Middle East struggles to find labour and raw material supply with contractors' order books bursting at the seams, the Chinese seem to have no difficulty in executing their projects.
See below for detailed analysis of what's happening with the current wave of Chinese crackers. Suffice to say here that nearly all of China's cracker projects will be on time, unlike the Middle East where the delays are mounting.
Contractor markets are forecast to be tight until 2008--09. Could the Chinese be able to leverage their way into joint ventures in the Middle East before the market slackens by offering a one-stop shop of labour, equipment, contractors and financing?
Technology supply, marketing reach and cash have been the traditional means the foreigners have used to get their hands on highly competitive Middle East gas supply. Perhaps the Chinese might also offer lump-sum turnkey contracts plus a dollop of cash from one of China's state-owned banks with highly attractive lending terms, given that they are weaker on technologies and marketing.
The Middle East project builders would be, of course, happy and so would the Chinese government. Its priority is energy security, whether at the oil and gas or basic petrochemical level.

The collective sigh of relief was almost audible late last week when the Fed cut its discount rate - the rate banks charge each other for lending.

Action from other central banks, including the European Central Bank, could follow this week. Analysts also rate the likelihood of the Fed cutting its formal interest rate at its meeting next month at 50 per cent or more. This is the rate charged to companies and other non-bank borrowers.

But still, this credit crisis is not going to away that easily. See more detailed analysis below, but in short here, the implications could be:

*A weaker Chinese economy. Roughly one-third of China's GDP is dependent on exports and if the US goes into recession, this is serious. Many overseas chemical projects have been justified by estimates of persistently strong demand from China for imported chemicals that will be re-exported as finished goods. Sales of locally made chemicals would, of course, also suffer

*Unfunded projects backed by smaller private companies being shelved.

But a lot of capacity in the Middle East and China is too far advanced to be cancelled. In the Middle East, many of the projects already under construction might come on stream bang on time because the producers there can make money in any market conditions. Projects under construction in China start up on schedule because the government wants to gain greater independence from imports.

Let's hope this crisis goes away, but if it doesn't why on earth didn't the supposedly smart people who run the global financial system realise the dangers? Joseph Stiglitz, a genuinely smart guy, has been warning for years about the risks, which he outlines in this excellent article

Methanol producers have been enjoying the best of times, but to paraphrase good old Charles Dickens, they may not necessarily be heading for the worst of times.

There is a staggering amount of capacity due on stream by 2012. By that year, global capacity will stand at 66m tonne/year according to
Mark Berggren of consultancy, MMSA. . This compares with his estimate of global demand of only 50m tonne during that year. 10.58m tonne/year of this capacity will be in the Middle East - representing 25% of the current global total - with China accounting for an even bigger slice of the pie. For more a detailed analysis of methanol see the latest ICIS insight Asia Middle East report Download file

But as Mark and the whole of the methanol world concedes, it is hard to estimate what consumption will be from a whole raft of new end-uses. These include direct blending of methanol into gasoline, dimethyl ether and fuel cells for both cars and computers.

But still, if demand growth is insufficient, you have to pity the smaller, higher cost producers .

In the case of the Chinese coal-based producers, they will be towards the bottom of the cost curve because of low feedstock costs and will increasingly be able to compete with the Middle East.

To carry on with the Dickens quote, from A Tale of Two Cities, he talked of the French Revolution as being "the age of foolishness" and "the age of wisdom".

Perhaps the wonderful world of methanol will also represent such divergent fortunes, with the poor foolish US and European producers facing Madame Guillotine.
I

......how long will it last is the inevitable question. Demand growth has been so strong so far this year with very little new production coming onstream that while crude oil and the price of monomers have set a floor for pricing, they no longer appear to be the main drivers behind fluctuations and increases; in other words, supply is so tight that it is the demand pull rather than the cost push that's the dominant factor behind pricing this year. The attached slides from Chow Bee Lin, Senior Editor at ICIS pricing, illustrate this point - Download file
But Chinese inflation is rising. This has led to negative real interest rates on savings, leading to money being poured into ever-more frothy (remember, lots of froth makes one giant bubble) local equity and real estate markets.
Inflation everywhere could be back with avengeance - made worse by the US interest rate cut that has led to more hot money flowing out of the US into China, India and other developing countries.
Plus there are the long term implications of the global credit crisis beyond. A lot of the polymers being shipped to China and elsewhere are for re-export to the US and Europe as finished goods.
And, of course, the second half of next year marks the beginning up the big new capacity upsurge.
But the doommongers, including myself, have been calling time on the industry upcycle for three years now.
Maybe the super-cycle, as it is now lovingly called, will continue if demand growth in Asia continues to accelerate.

This was the warning from Bob Bauman of Nexant ChemSystems at last week's 25th Annual Petrochemical Conference in Houston, Texas.

Read below for some rather gloomy predictions of where markets could be heading in 2011-12

The article below, from Sean Milmo of ICB, makes the case that the Middle East will not be able or willing to lead pricing in Europe during the next downturn because of the control that European producers will be able to exert on their home market.

I sincerely hope not, but all the signs are there because of:

*A financial crisis which nobody again saw coming, this time with global implications

*What could prove to be too much spending on new equipment and capacity. This time high equity prices have paid for these investments rather than US dollar-denominated bank loans, as was the case in 1997.

The fundamentals are still strong, as today's article from ICIS news on share-price collapses points out. Asian demand is at much higher levels now than 11 years ago.

But the power of sentiment should not be underestimated.

It's too early to read the long-term effect on petrochemical pricing. More volatility seems certain with sentiment driving shifts in pricing on every piece of negative or positive economic and stock market news.

Lower feedstock costs on cheaper oil will also play a role, but as the extended article below points out, the impact on the real economy will take time to assess. It is this impact that will set the long-term direction and determine whether we the downturn has, finally, arrived.

Very interesting speech from Alan Kirkley, Vice President of Strategy and Portfolio for Shell Chemicals, which first of all goes over the predictable ground of where we are in the cycle and the threat from the Middle East.

However, he then makes the valid point - which I made earlier this week - that the end of the world has not necessarily arrived for the US and Europe.

There are some big question marks over how much more capacity the GCC region will be able to add post-2012, and perhaps even further afield as global LNG markets take off. Gas cracking may no longer as consistently benefit from feedstock at virtually give-away prices.

The likes of Shell and ExxonMobil have existing technology and know-how to make more highly competitive basic petrochemicals - and to take maximum advantage of the petrochemicals/refining interface.

Kirkley predicts that there will be an increasing use of hydrocracking to make petrochemicals, tapping into light ends that have a diminishing value in the gasoline pool and more revamping of catalytic cracking capacity towards olefin production.

Given the likely continued high cost of EPC and raw materials, anybody with a fully depreciated refinery requiring only relatively modest investment could be in a strong position.

But, of course, the first task is to survive the current downturn in one piece.

See below for an extended interview with Shell Chemicals vice president, Ben van Beurden, who talks of the search for new feedstock sources. He raises the possiblity of using syngas from the Pearl GTL project in Qatar to make methanol and then olefins. Or perhaps the high paraffinic naphtha and ethane from the same project will be the way to go for Shell in Qatar?

Meanwhile, more investment in China looks likely. Read on......

....that's the case - in the Middle East case because of advantaged feedstock and in China's case because it will be strategic.

In previous downturns, far more capacity was western, or other Asian, and liquids based and so rate cuts brought markets more quickly into balance.

The graphs below from ICIS Plants & Projects data show that while only 14.8% of existing capacites comprises the M-E and China, this will rise to 62.3% of the new capacities being brought onstream in 2008-12.

This will leave M-E and China accounting for around 27% of total gobal ethylene capacity.

ME gas crackers + China.ppt.....

Back in the 1980s, before Japan's "Lost Decade" of stagnant growth, management gurus lined up to praise the country's collective spirit as the basis of a sustainable economic miracle.

Since then, of course, the West has been consistently espoused as the best.

And even the Japanese wish they could break free of their consensus shackles, according to this week's issue of The Economist -- hence, the huge popularity of management hero Kosaku Shima of conglomerate Hatsubishi Goya Holdings.

He thinks outside the box, acts decisely, is not scared of telling people what he thinks and has been successful even though he has always sat outside political factions within his company.

And in June, Shima (see picture above) truly broke the mould when he was promoted to shacho (president) of his company at the tender age of just 60 - very young by Japanese standards.

There is one slight problem: he is a manga or cartoon character.

"Shima is influential - business people want to be like him but can't," says Yuko Kawamoto, management professor at Waseda Uniiversity in Tokyo.

"Maybe there is hope for Japanese society. We want to change, but do not have the courage."

The grim reality for the average salaryman, according to The Economist, remains a life of drudgery and of stifled opinions because of the dreaded fear of causing a superior to lose face. As a result, bad decisions go unchallenged and become ingrained policy.

Japan's chemical companies have often broken the mould through innovative technologies - and were talkiing about and acting on energy efficiency long before the current oil and environmental crises.

Sumitomo Chemical is also about to start-up a huge petrochemical complex in Saudi Arabia - along with Saudi Aramco - and is talking about a major second wave of investment at the same site. This also involves breaking the mould as it's the first occasion that a Japanese chemicals company has invested on its own in a big overseas cracker project.

But the perception remains, fair or otherwise, that the chemicals industry could and should have undergone more restructuring.

Fair or unfair?

....said the joker to the thief..

I much prefer the Hendrix version. As I get older, Dylan's voice just gets more and more grating - although a wonderful song writer.

Ben Bernanke has brought cheer to the world by claiming that inflationary pressures are easing as a result of the fall oil and other commodity prices.

I suppose any good news in the current climate is better than another kick in the teeth, but the big questions are: how far can crude fall and what's the long-term price of oil that can be afforded chemical producers with no access to advantaged feedstock?

Some of the froth has been taken out of the speculation in commodities as a result of the stronger dollar and a fall in demand for the filthy black stuff in the West. For example, Goldman Sachs estimates that developed countries will use 500,000 fewer barrels a day this year than in 2007.

But emerging market demand will grow by 1.3m barrels a day in 2008 with a 5% increase in consumption in China, the same bank adds. This has led Goldman Sachs to conclude that crude prices will rebound to $149/bbl by the end of the year.

Demand destruction in the West might be occurring. For example, the US could have as many as 12 million fewer motorists by 2015 as those earning $25,000 a year or less get by on one rather than two cars per family.

But for every American that is forced to make do with only one set of wheels there will be hundreds of people in developing countries earning enough to buy their first car.

On a global basis it's therefore more accurate to talk about demand relocation rather than demand destruction.

During the heady days of 2006 everybody in the chemicals industry was making money, even those who are seriously feedstock-impaired. Profitability remained strong for the better-integrated liquids-based producers up until Q4 of last year.

The last couple of quarters have been so dismal that it's understandable that the recent fall in crude has raised expectations the worst might be over.

But you will be hard-pressed to find many energy experts willing to take a punt on prices returning to their levels of a couple of years.

The fundamentals of tight supply haven't changed over the last few weeks as oil prices have retreated - just as much of developing world demand growth will more than compensate for less consumptiion in West.

Rising capital costs mean a lack of sufficient investment in new supply.

Whether or not you believe that Peak Oil is upon is almost irrelevant for the next few years because the lack of investment - also the result of increased resource nationalism - means that the reserves that do exist are not being adequately tapped.

And the irony of the slightly lower oil prices of the last few weeks is that exploiting tar sands and other marginal oil reserves, which require very high capital costs and great technical skills, will seem less attractive. Perhaps this is what the Middle East wants.....

If you don't an advantaged feedstock, either through a position in the Middle East and/or being very smart at refinery/petrochemical integration, you've got big problems.

Maybe there is no way out of here....

Great stuff from the big boss of Dow Chemical in this article from USA Today.

Gems from the interview include "corn-based ethanol, one of the dumbest ideas of all time" and "the whole hydrogen (fuel cell) approach is dumb."

He adds: "Frankly, when free markets prevail, we have to shut down factories and replace overseas in places like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Brazil, Thailand, China and Oman, where governments lock in energy availability, guarantee prices and de-risk our investment."

These are all countries in which Dow has already or plans to invest with the proposed PIC deal the biggest breakthrough for tackling its feedstock disadvantages. Whereas the jury might still be out on whether the US major will win in specialities, it does seem as if it has gone a long way to avoiding being one of the companies I wrote about yesterday.

Liveris makes the much wider point that without an energy policy which makes sense, the US faces a pretty bleak economic future. He quite rightly points out that unless there are some major breakthroughs in renewables, hydrocarbons have to be a major part of a workable policy.

But I don't agree with Liveris when he says "We aren't occupying Iraq for the resources".

I've just started reading David Strahan's The Last Oil Shock, which makes a pretty convincing argument over the real thinking behind the hugely bundled invasion.

Then again, though, perhaps what Liveris means is that the intention of the occupation might have been for resources, but that's not what the occupation is about now because of the hopeless failure of politicans such as Rumsfeld, Cheney etc.

Next stop Iran? At least Bush is on the way out, but the energy stakes are so high perhaps any administration will need to dress up further military action as something else to secure America's economic future.

But surely, this must be less politically acceptable than tackling all the greenies who are blocking offshore drilling and coal gasification and the farmers making a packet out of ethanol?

Maybe not if it's about distribution of votes in those key marginal States - meaning more fat subsidies one of the dumbest ideas of all time.

A full list of all those whose deaths were reported prematurely is included here in this A-Z of journalistic blunders from Wikipedia.

The same could be said of the US commodity chemicals industry. Until very recently, just about everyone was predicting that the States would fairly soon shift from a net export to a net import position due to higher gas prices, the build-up of very competitive capacity elsewhere and the constant drift of manufacturing overseas. The country's chemicals industry has lost 120,000 jobs with 3 million jobs lost in manufacturing over the last five years.

But what's changed over the last few months is gas prices which have become relatively cheap compared with crude and the weak dollar. This has created what consultants predict will be the "last hurrah" for the US styrene industry ahead of the big slew of new Middle East capacity due on stream soon.

Further consolidation is expected once the Middle East wipes out the advantage US styrene producers currently enjoy over competitors supplied by naphtha-based C2s.

From a carbon footprint point of view, it does seem ridiculous that oil is shipped from the Middle East to make benzene in South Korea and the C8s are then shipped to the US. The US combines the benzene with its competitive gas-based ethylene to make styrene which is then shipped to Europe - already a net importer of commodity chemicals.

But the carbon footprint argument, along with rising freight costs, could offer a lifeline to the US chemicals industry in general. There has been much talk of "reverse globalisation" recently. This might lead to the economic justification for building new commodity chemicals capacity in the US and elsewhere in the West.

A very interesting report by McKinsey (you can sign up free for their online newsletter which only takes a minute) expands on the theme of reverse globalisation which I talked about last week.

The cost of shipping a standard 40-foot container has tripled since 2000 and labour cost increases have risen by average of 19% per year in China compared with just 3% in the US.

The consultancy makes the point that you have to do very thorough input-by-input calculations for each product and grade of product before making any decisions. And, of course, you need some reliable forecasts of where the economics of offshoring versus onshoring are heading - including predictions on crude-oil prices. Predicting crude, as I discussed earlier on today, is where I fall short.

You also need to take a view on the direction of environmental legislation - i.e. will there by carbon taxes and/or cap and trade systems introduced globally that penalise producers for extended global supply chains?

If history is anything to go by, McKinsey has worked out that manufacturing a "midrange" product in Asia will cost you an extra $16 today compared with the US when all landed costs are included. In 2003, Asia had a $46 advantage.

Add to this the likelihood that more petrochemical feedstock will become available in the US thanks to declining gasoline demand and perhaps, as again I talked about last week, the industry in the states might be set for a revival. It has been comparatively higher feedstock costs and the drift of downstrean customers overseas that has caused so much damage to the US industry.

For anyone who subscribes to ICIS news, you might find this artice of interest. Allen Kirkley of Shell discusses some of the new emerging feedstock options and converging economics between the West and the Middle East.

A drowning man will grab hold of any floating debris - even a plastic bag made from standard-grade Chinese polyethylene (PE).

Hence, last Friday a statement by Wang Tianpu led to a few days of excited speculation about the cancellation of several Chinese cracker projects.

The president of Sinopec Corp, the Hong Kong-listed arm of the Chinese refining and petrochemical giant, was quoted in press reports as saying that projects that had already been postponed would be suspended indefinitely (taken as a face-saving euphemism for cancellations). He also reportedly said that the pace of other projects would be adjusted.

"Fantastic. At last we are seeing some commonsense," said a Singapore-based executive with a Western polylefins producer.

Sadly, though, only a few days later, Tianpu amplified his statement by saying that 2008 petrochemical expenditure would be cut by only $675m - amounting to much less than the cost of one cracker.

The excitement that greeted his first statement was the result of concerns over just how bad conditions could become over the next few years.

The hope was that a much bigger budget cut might take place - affecting the timing, or even the continued existence, of projects slated for commissioning in 2009 and beyond.

ICIS Plants & Projects estimates that 21 per cent of global ethylene capacity additions in 2008-12 will be accounted for by China.

The Middle East will be responsible for a further 36%, resulting in worldwide C2 capacity increasing to 156.3m tonne/year from 135.5m tonne/year.

China has every strategic reason to push ahead with more petrochemical capacity, even if growth looks precarious on the back of the likely frequent boom-and-bust cycles created by tight crude markets.

And we all know about the Middle East advantage, even if it might be eroding a little on tighter feedstock supply and higher capital costs.

"The knowledge society will strike back - eventually. Energy efficiency and renewable energy will be rewarding projects," says Norbert Walker, Chief Economist at Deutsche Bank in his Asia Trip Report 2008.

So if you are not in the Middle East and not in China, are not moving up the innovation curve or don't have good refinery-petrochemical integration (ideally, you will have a combination of all the above) you are in big trouble.

You're only option is to sell your business to some gullible fool during the next up cycle -but you'll have to be quick as the recovery is unlikely to last for long!

The smarty pants at BASF seem to have got it right again with their $6.1bn bid for Ciba Specialty Chemicals and rumours that they might also be after Clariant.

Talking about counter-cyclical investment is one thing, but doing it is quite another. You need to have built up the cash reserves to execute the obvious - and, of course, need the right product portfolio already in place to earn the money in the first instance.

BASF has made and continues to make a packet from its oil and gas business. It's oft-repeated focus on integration and on getting out of the more cyclical commodities is also paying dividends. It was walking the talk about reducing exposure to such commodities long before a certain US-headquartered company jumped on the bandwagon.

Talking about stating the obvious of buying low and selling high, McKinsey does this - but with some useful numbers - in its report, M&A Strategies In A Down Market. Again this is from the consultancy's excellent monthly newsletter, which is free once you have signed up.

The report's authors have also written a book, The Granularity of Growth. It includes a database of 200 global companies that decomposes the most important sources of growth (market momentum, mergers and share gains). Sectors that suffered big upturns or downturns were then analysed in order to rank the importance of these growth sources - with the study also extending to individual companies strategies.

"Two sets of results stuck out," write the authors.

"First, (I wish consultants would learn to write shorter sentences - my comments in italics) of the potential strategic moves companies can take to grow in a downturn - divest acquire, invest to gain a share - an effective acquisition strategy (defined as growth through M&A at a rate higher than 75 percent of a company's pears) created significant value for shareholders (you can pause for breath now).

"During an upturn, on the other hand (surprise, surpirse), divestments created slightly more value that acquisitions did (this presupposes you can find some mug to buy your business at some ridiculously inflated price on the belief that the economic boom will last forever).

"Second, companies often behave in counterproductive ways. Fewer than half as many companies in the segments we studied made acquisitions in downturns rather than in periods of economic growth. Significantly more divested businesses in those market segments in downturns than in upturns."

The global credit crisis and volatility in stock markets "could temporarily disrupt M&A activity and add risk to existing deals," said Scott Anderson, senior economist at Wells Fargo - the US financial services company. He was speaking at the ICIS Chemical Purchasing Summit, which is taking place in Boston, Massachussets.

He added, however, that conditions were right for further consolidation in the chemicals industry as manufacturing customers become larger.

The Middle East has the cash, of course - as do the Chinese if they can be bothered. Sovereign wealth funds could be the vehicles, as well as the petrochemical companies themselves, for a wholesale shake-up of industry ownership.

And as I've already said, those clever people at BASF look likely to be involved. Being right and having senior executives with brains the size of a small planets is very annoying for those of less able (especially if they are also nice to children and animals, actively care about the environment, give a large proportion of their incomes to charity and are good at football when World Cups come round).

The reach of the credit crisis is such that liquidity is even becoming hard to come by in the hugely wealthy Middle East, according to this report.

With so few petrochemical projects officially announced for the region post-2012 (although I am hearing rumours of numerous plans kept from public view, but feedstock is the issue for all of them in the GCC), could we see a big slowdown in the growth of the region's industry?

The irony, of course, is that many of the Middle East and emerging market countries have huge government surpluses and high individual savings rates.

When I was trying to cheer up a downbeat member of staff today, I said that the financial rescue package being proposed by the deadly duo of Paulson and Bernanke might get overseas support from these solvent administrations.

"It's in everyone's interests to keep the US afloat because it is so crucial to the global economy. If this had been 10 or 15 years from now, the Chinese might have done the economic equvalent of flipping the states fhe finger because by then they will be the biggest economy. But the US has got off the hook because of the timing of this crisis."

I sounded so optimistic I almost believed this flannel myself.

More evidence is also emerging of project delay, including the Aramco/Dow Ras Tanura mega-investment. The sheer scale of the thing seems to be the issue here.

As if the problems confronting China's polyolefin markets were not enough, sales have apparently been further hit by the tainted food scares which began with baby's milk.

A wide range of products are now affected with Cadbury becoming the latest global confectionary brand to withdraw some of its products.

The China market was already facing the potential for negative or even flat polyethylene and polypropylene growth in 2008 because of the collapse in export trade to the West due to the global financial crisis.

The problem now, according to a leading Western PE producer, is that just about every exported Chinese food product is being subject to closer scrutiny by regulatory authorities - along with the negative impact on sales of all the product withdrawals. This is making China's converters even less willing to buy resin.

Long term, lower growth in China means it will of course take longer to absorb the new capacities.

The Chinese government also faces the task of rebuilding confidence in its food industries - not only for the sake of export trade but to also tackle local anger. Civil unrest over health concerns surrounding air and water pollution is already a major threat to social stability.

But for those focusing on immediate prospects, the good news is that there are strong rumours of substantial delays to the start-up of two major PE plant sin the Middle East.

The longer that late equipment delivery and technical (or maybe market?) issues push back start-up, the more likely it is that the global economic downturn will at least have reached the bottom of the trough before the big flood of volumes hits supply.

The industry has been very lucky. First came the Iranian delays, which in effect mount to the cancellation of 3-4 crackers all due on stream in 2010-12.

Then we have seen up to three crackers in Qatar delayed to beyond 2012.

And for those projects where building work is almost complete, continued technical and equipment delivery issues have left buyers with the same feeling that Manchester Utd fans had during the 1980s and early 1990s, which was: "Maybe we'll win the championship next year." Sadly, or rather tragically, things changed.

This year was supposed to mark the big ramp-up in PP production, but it hasn't happened.

Yes, I know this blog has gone very quiet - but as the world has imploded, a few more pressing issues have come to the fore.

On a business trip last week the extent of the crisis became apparent when a Middle East producer told me that travel and entertainment budgets are being ferociously cut for 2009 (many companies are busy at the moment preparing their budgets for next year with deadlines for submission due n November).

Everyone asks "how bad is it going to get?" with the hope that someone will offer at least some degree of optimism that will - just for a few fleeting seconds perhaps - relieve the anxiety.

But despite yesterday's stock market bounce, the real economy seems likely to get much worse before it gets better, even if most of the bad news from the financial sector is out of the way.

The trouble is I keep hearing that much more bad news might yet emerge - for example, the enormous size of credit-default swap commitments.

The Middle East producers face:

*Much lower oil prices than just about anyone had forecast, meaning lower margins between their fixed feedstock prices costs current global petrochemical prices, which are set by the oil-based players

*Plants coming on stream in 2008-11 with far higher capital costs than during the last building spree. This is due to soaring raw material, equipment and labour costs and much more complicated project configurations due to diversification downstream away from basic ethylene derivatives

*The decimation of demand. Polyethylene and polypropylene demand could be zero or even negative in China this year. I talked to one industry source who also expects the same for polyester As recently as July, he was forecasting growth of 12% with the market expanding by 17.2% last year

How long will it be before the Middle East producers begin to cut capital expenditure programmes and how will this influence the fate of projects yet to reach the financing stage?

Of course, everything is relative and although the Middle East players may be earning far more thann they anticipated, they have huge cash reserves.

Wouldn't these reserves be better employed buying existing capacity rather than adding new plants?

There will surely be no shortage of suitors, especially those with high leverage who expanded through acquisitions at the wrong time.

Mr Obscenely Rich Got Out In Tiime Banker, please look into these eyes, see the pain from the last Great Depression and maybe you will give some of your obscenely huge bonus towards poverty relief.

And perhaps also you'll be willing to pay for all the counselling that the children of this new Great Depression will need when they grow up into adults. As a rich an educated breed, you should be aware that the first few years of a child's life, how secure and encouraged they feel, determines their entire future.

Anyway, see below for my take on the state of the crisis and its implication for chemicals, written for a good friend and contact.

Chemicals demand is being affected by frozen credit markets and the fall in export trade of finished goods to the West.

The credit markets are showing signs of easing thanks to all the government intervention.

But as you can see from this article, the feedback effect on the consumer, and therefore, manufacturing companies, could get a great deal worse before it gets better. Bad corporate results caused the declines in stock markets yesterday (Wednesday 23 October) and as more consumer loans turn soar and unemployment rises globally, corporate earnings will deteriorate even further - at least for the 12 months, I think.

The good news from the financial is that the much-feared credit-default crisis may not be severe as people had expected.

However, the chemicals industry will remain under severe strain for at least the next year, even if the credit crisis eases enabling letters of credit to be more easily obtained (a global shortage of LC's has left commodity shipments, including chemicals, stranded).

The reasons are:

1.) The export dependency of some economies. China's GDP growth will be around 9% this year compared with 11.9% last year, for example, largely due to the slowdown in export trade. Delegates at the APPEC conference in Singapore this week were talking about very quiet demand for fuel products and chemicals at a time when China should be ramping up manufacturing for exports to the West in time for Christmas. Economies such as Singapore are even more vulnerable
2.) The volatility in energy and chemicals pricing. You could probably produce a graph these days linking crude-oil price movements with the equity markets. So until everyone reaches a consensus that the bottom has been reached, we are going to see constant dramatic day-to-day fluctuations in equities and therefore crude. OPEC might cut production at its next meeting, but this will just mean the volatility is within a higher band ($70-90 a barrel is the prediction instead of the current $60-80 a barrel. You cannot rule out the possibility, even if OPEC does make cuts, of a lower range than today - $40-60 a barrel. This would indicate that the real economy has become a great deal worse). Volatility creates the danger of being caught on the wrong side of the deal for sellers, buyers and traders (e.g. high cost raw materials purchased one day that cannot be passed on in higher-cost finished product because of a sudden fall in crude). For resin buying patterns, the uncertainty over the direction of crude is a crucial factor - in a bull market they stock up and in a bear market they de-stock. Crude is in no-man's land and so, combined with LC issues, worries about the overall economy and cancelled orders from customers buyers are remaining firmly on the sidelines.
3.) Last but certainly not least, is the huge wave of new capacity. Polypropylene was supposed to lead the downturn this year but didn't because of start-up delays. Equipment-delivery problems are being blamed, but market reasons seem likely to be another factor. The problem is that with markets showing no signs of turning, producers with heavy debt commitments can only hold back for so long and so will have to commission capacity soon - even if at operating rates lower than planned. For the Middle East producers, now that there is no immediate sign of markets turning, start-ups might as well take place because at the very least on a cash-cost basis contributions will still be achieved on a cash-cost basis (because of low and fixed feedstock costs), just about no matter how low crude goes - and with it petrochemical pricing.

Conditions could get dramatically worse very quickly. One factor not included above is the run on Asian currencies, and possibly even some banking systems, because of the dollar ironically being used as a "safe haven investment".

In the medium term, (the next 12-18 months) the only upside I can see is short-term recoveries in chemicals buying on signs that government interventions are working (with more likely to happen). But these recoveries, as I said, could be short-lived as more evidence emerges of the delayed effect on the real economy (e.g. further falls in corporate earnings).

To be frank, all bets are off on demand-growth forecasts - (so I am sorry this is not going to help you much in coming up with firm numbers!).

Everyone has been wrong and so it's best to err on the side of extreme caution and with a bit of luck we might be pleasantly surprised.

To give you an example of how quickly things can change, a Chinese PTA producer had been forecasting overall polyester growth in China at 12% are recently as July; now it thinks the market will be lucky to get away with zero.

I'd suggest looking at your forecast numbers, going back to those who have supplied the numbers, and asking them if these take into account their worst-case scenarios. Any forecast that predates September cannot be trusted at all.

Hope this helps!

Best Regards
John

It's all about hoarding cash over the next few years, but survival might not even be possible for even the best managed of companies if Martin Wolf's worst-case scenario comes true. The Financial Times columnist writes of the unravelling of globalisation into the protectionism that characterised the Great Depression years if the Obama stimulus package fails.

There is a good chance it will fail, fears the Federal Reserve in the notes released from its December meeting.

At a chemicals company level, leverage is obviously out and the private equity model thoroughly discredited - perhaps for good.

You can argue that the biggest mistake of the biggest casualty so far, LyondellBasell, was timing as the acquisition of Lyondell Chemicals took place in December 2007. Asset prices were then at their peak with many believing that the boom would continue forever, despite the already rapidly deflating US housing bubble. As recently as March last year, The Economist was talking of Asia's decoupling as the potential saviour of the global economy.

But leverage is itself the problem because of how the extraordinary multiples over tangibe, realisable assets were generated through the shadow banking system, creating the climate for deals such as the Basell takeover of Lyondell to occur. It is this badly regulated, free-for-all system that's brought the global economy down.

Maybe we will never again see the break up chemical companies for sale to private, or public, companies burdened by enormous amounts of debt.

Perhaps the well-integrated chemicals company with sufficient diversification to provide compensating cash flows when a particular subsidiary is struggling is the way forward. Is this yet another case of back to the future?

In an even better position are the state-owned giants in the Middle East and China. They are in the enviable position of cash in hand, and government ownership structures that guarantee funding if that cash was to ever run scarce. These are the only companies I can see able to make the acquisitions the industry now needs.

It's easy to take pot shots at the boss, and everyone of course feels they have been underpromoted and could do the job better themselves. Andrew Liveris is just the latest in a long line of CEOs to experience both envy - and at the moment perhaps a little pleasure at their failures. The gloating reaches extroardinary heights in the comments posted on this Wall Street Journal blog entry.

Sure, he should have seen the crisis coming and not agreed to pay such a high price for Rohm & Haas.

And sure, a man being paid such massive sums of money perhaps should have had sources inside Kuwait who would have forewarned him that the commodities merger was going to collapse.

Perhaps we should also expect him to secure world peace, reverse global warming and prevent Manchester Utd from ever winning a Premiership championship again.

Herein begins an occasional series where I offer advice on how to make a little cash.

By the way, is it me or do I get the sense that a lot companies haven't woken up to the severity of the crisis we are in? A recovery this, and I think quite probably next year, is out of the question. We need to find new sources of growth to replace the US consumer who isn't going to start spending money again in the same volumes as before for a good many years.

Anyway, here is my handy tip: purely by coincidence discover one day that quite fortuitously you have priced your local product so high - way above international levels - that this has attracted competitively priced imports. Take advantage of this wonderful, joyouous happenstance, this glorious instance of serendipity and lodge an antidumping petition.

India has launched a petition for PP anti-dumping action against Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman. This is the first case of this type in India.

Producers, as we predicted on this blog earlier on, will be increasingly attempting to protect their home markets as everyone searches farther and farther afield to place distressed volumes.

Expect also that countries such as India - which much more lower applied than bound tariff rates under its WTO agreement,- will seek to raise tariffs to maximum levels predicted by the international trade body.

,

It would be nice to start the weekend with a little cheer, but I'm afraid no amount of gormless optimism would work.

DuPont, as you can see from this excellent piece from my colleague Nigel Davis at ICIS, has revised its forecast for 2009 global growth down to minus 2.5% from minus 0.6%.

Every chemicals end-use segment you can think off from automobiles to construction to electronics looks a lot weaker than in H1 2008.

We need a new way of thinking to get through this, but as I head for a weekend with my family where the plan is to avoid reading any financial news, I am short of any ideas - other than maybe working for an NGO and accepting a much-reduced standard of material liviing.

Making money in this climate remains extremely hard - although from a business journalist's perspective, it is of course a fascinating time.

The first stage of the 105th Canton Trade Fair - which involves electronic and electrical appliances, hardware and tools, machinery, vehicles and spare parts, building materials, lighting equipment and chemical products - concluded this week. Sales totalled $13.03bn - a 20.8% fall on the same stage last year.

I also read this other report about a surge in job creation in China's cities in Q1 over the the fourth quarter last year. What are all these extra workers doing?

Are they building dangerously high inventories of semi-finished and finished goods?

China's economy is showing signs of recovery, but not enough to replace the 20% fall in exports during the first quarter.

......all the right reasons than to be wrong altogether?

Sounds a dumb question, perhaps - unless you take particular pride in being one of those know-it-alls.

The point I am trying to make (and assuming that chemicals pricing doesn't collapse beforehand on a broader retreat in crude and equites on maybe panic over swine flu or the realisation that a global economic recovery is a long way off) is that I have thought for a while that the fundamentals point to a major price correction from June-July onwards because of:

*New supply from the Middle East. Surely, yes surely, there will be more capacity hitting the market in H2 as PetroRabigh ramps up output - even if YanSab, Sharq and perhaps even the new cracker in Qatar - are effectively pushed into next year

*A lot of new supply in China. My colleagues at CBI Research & Consulting are working on an update of the subtantial amount of additional capacity due on stream in H2, including Fujian Petrochemical & Refining (the latest world on the start-up of which is July)

*The end of the May-June petrochemical turnaround season in Asia

*An increase in naphtha supply (as much as 20-30% in Asia, according to Purvin & Gertz) as a result of higher production from two new condensate splittlers in the Middle East and greater naphtha exports from India

*A I said, my belief that everyone will have to wake up to the fact that the global economy, including China, will not enter recovery in 2009 or perhaps even in 2010. I remain worried about the quality of China's growth (is it too production rather consumption-driven?), how much stimulus-package money has been wasted on speculation, including in building chemicals inventory, and the possiblity that China - directly or indirectly - might start exporting deflation

But today I spoke to some goods contacts and friends at a leading petrochemicals trading company who gave the following additional reasons for their long-held view that prices would tank in July:

*US and European producers upping operating rates in response to strong arbitrage opportunities. The Europeans have already raised rates, apparently, and the US more recently. In the case of propylene, though, stronger demand for refinery-based C3s from several derivative producers might, perhaps, make further US PP shipments unworkable

*Strong interest in shipping petrochemicals from the US and Europe to Asia for arrival after May (all May business was concluded around 20 April). Cargoes could be at sea and uncommitted just as the shift in fundamentals listed earlier starts to take effect. Big quantities have already been shipped from the West to East during Q1, including very large amounts of BTX and polyolefins. Around 200,000 tonnes of US and European benzene is heading for Asia for March and April arrival, according to DeWitt & Co. China imported 114,000 tonnes of benzene in March alone, which compares with just 328,000 tonnes for the whole of 2008 - an average of 2,733 tonnes per month. The surge in toluene shipments from the West to China is equally dramatic: China received 66,000 tonnes in January, 77,000 tonnes in February and 94,000 tonnes in March compared with a 2008 total of 273,000 tonnes.

Inventory pressures in the West have been relieved and some of the big losses suffered in Q4 have been recouped (and some of the traders seem to have done very well indeed).

So batten down the hatches once again.

"Nobody can see until the end of the month - never mind into the third quarter," commented an olefins trader recently.

"The reason is that very senior managers are too busy micro-managing everything, from getting involved in trying to track commodity chemical price direction to insisting on signing off every expenditure over a few hundred dollars.

"The problem with these senior guys when they track markets is that they are so out-of-the-loop - assuming that they have ever actually been in the loop - that they don't know what they are doing."

I heard of one big company where the CEO has even insisted on signing off travel authorisation to next week's APIC conference in South Korea.

In these days of tight credit and collapsed sales, it's understandable that much tighter control on spending is essential.

And during the boom years, can we all honestly say that every single trip we made was entirely commercially justified - and that we were always sufficiently foused on the bottom line to get maximum value out of each trip? Look back at your old expenses forms and count up the number of genuine "drinks with Mr Kim" entries.

It will be interesting to see how the lessons being learnt today will be remembered when the economy has fully recovered.

But from a HR perspective, a tough sign-off regime needs to be well-communicated.

So does the senior guys tracking shifts in chemicals pricing - whether competently or incompetently - otherwise the workers on the ground are likely to become demoralised.

They are unlikely to be able to leave in this current climate, but will surely perform far worse if they feel their opinions are being ignored for no good and well-explained reasons.

Off-the-record, of course, how does your company measure up?

And did you fiddle your expenses during the good times?

How will this one run?

Source of Picture: chemicals-technology.com

In the 12 years I've been covering the chemicals industry I don't think I have come across a time of such exceptional market muddle.

The traders love it. As a wise man said to me the other day, "When I was a trader I only cared about the price today if I was cashing in and not tomorrow."

But for the producers and buyers there are so many more factors that will shape the outcome of the second half, requiring fortunately for me hopefully some more business for ICIS training (one should always live in hope)

Here is Part 1 of what I plan to try and piece together over the next few months. Let's try and keep cooperating on data and analysis - but at the outset, does this make sense to you?

The Impact of Operating Rates, Plant Closures and New Petrochemical Capacities

Production from existing plants

This will be determined by overconfidence versus realistic confidence in the economy. This comes down to your view on the sustainability of the rebound.

To what extent have operating rate and inventory-management lessons been learnt from the oil collapse of H2 last year?

How are imminent new capacities affecting the behaviour of producers and buyers? In the first half, the tightness in some markets (for example, PP and PE) was partly the result of producers and buyers maintaining low stock levels because they expected new-capacity start-ups that didn't happen. To what degree has this experience made them less cautious?

It might be helpful to analyse Q2 chemical company results to get a feel for what production levels might be for the rest of this year.

Do the numbers add up and do the content and tone of what's been said sufficiently take into account all the risks? (Note: there are some individual company numbers on plans for overall average operating rates in H2).

The pace of permanent shutdowns in the West to reduce domestic oversupply and weaker exports positions also needs to be tracked.

Last year sudden decisions to temporarily or permanently close whole complexes - which were not necessarily entirely loss making - were forced on companies.

This was the result of the collapse in oil, the credit crisis and steep falls in demand.

To use PP as an example again, 500,000 tonne/year of US capacity-closure announcements were made in 2008 to take effect in the first half of this year.

Oversupply is still big: US PP consumption totalled just above 7m tonnes in 2008, 8% lower than the previous year with capacity still at 9.4m tonnes. So far this year (as of July) there have been no further announcements of closures.

Further factors affecting the pace of permanent closures could be divestments.

Trade buyers for distressed Western assets now seem much more likely than further private equity players and so attitudes to running marginal, or clearly uneconomic, plants might be different.

You also have to take into account environmental clean-up costs and regulations - and contractual and labour commitments.

And next: How will petchem operating rates be affected by refinery economics?

Dealing with the US refineries first:

How will refinery economics affect availability of PP and aromatics in H2? In the first half we saw a big increase in shipments from the US to Asia due to the global rate cuts, production problems in the Middle East, the peak of the Asian refinery and petrochemical turnaround seasons between April-June and the unexpectedly strong Chinese demand.

But since May/June, PP arbitrage from the US has closed on lower refinery operating rates resulting from weak gasoline demand. Benzene trade flows seem to have also reversed - in July we have heard of cargoes moving from Asia to the US, whereas in H1 there were record-high shipments the other way.

What's the outlook for gasoline, middle distillate etc demand for the rest of the year? (gasoline and middle distillate stocks are high on speculation and weak demand)

Some of the same questions need to be asked about Europe with a few
important differences, which are:

*Europe is a major exporter of gasoline to the US and so the price and availability of naphtha, and therefore petchem economics, will also be affected by US demand for the fuel

*Fuel demand in Europe is heavily weighted towards diesel and how will the European economies perform in H2 and what affect will this have on demand for gasoline, more importantly diesel, and how the refineries run? (Note: most propylene in Europe is produced from steam crackers because of the lower gasoline demand. But there is still a big link as naphtha is the main steam cracking feedstock in Europe).

I don't follow currency or shipping and other logistics markets, but these are obviously also critical factors.

Next question: How will the new petrochemical capacities run?

It's worth considering that there could be many more start-up delays, and
problems with operating new plants already on-stream, because resources were so stretched when these projects were planned and they remain stretched.

There is a shortage of engineers with the right levels of experience. Many of the projects were also planned when raw material, equipment and other costs were sky-high.

Budgets were stretched and so choices had to be made - for example, "Do I focus on my PE debottlenecking using ethylene from my new cracker or do I prioritise starting up the cracker and its new plants on time?"

Another problem is "project bunching". There seem to have been attempts to start up too many projects at the same time, further stretching already-scarce resources (a few years ago there was a lot of fevered excitement over the global economy. There was a rush to take advantage of financing while it was available in order to cash in on this growth and to maintain economies of scale).

There is, reportedly, a lack of the right kind of experience. Even companies with long track records in petrochemicals are confronting start-ups of projects bigger in scale and more complex than ever before.

"Here's your entire allocation for this month"

Source of Picture: Adammakwright.wordpress

In the words of a plastics converter from the Philippines: "Markets are so tight at the moment that we are left to pick up the crumbs. Suppliers are concentrating almost entirely on China."

The converters have been waiting for so long for the great supply surge to tip markets in their favour that forecasting is becoming a joke.

"You told me last year that by now I'd be in heaven," added the same converter.

But surely sometime soon it must change.

This converter and many thousands more like him will then enjoy the sweet taste of revenge (that's, of course, as long as China doesn't go belly up. In such an event the last company left standing wiill need to swtich out the lights on the way out of the proverbial room.

Source of Picture: www.autospies.com

Not an easy answer and not one much suited to a few paragraphs of blogging.

But here's one thought as the competitive environment becomes a great deal more difficult due to new Middle East capacity and the potential for China to move towards self-sufficiency in polyethylene and polypropylene: Have a chat with one of those poor old European refiners facing big naphtha surpluses.

Perhaps the refiners will be willing to do deals on long-term offtake deals at very preferential rates in order to keep operating. While gasoline might be falling in value in Europe for both local consumption and exports, diesel certainly isn't.

SWIMMING IN OIL?

Source of Picture: fashionfunky.com

The threat posed by Iran test-firing its Shahab-3 missiles and a rally in US equities on increased M& activity in the drug and technology industries pushed crude slightly higher yesterday after last week's steep declines.

This is yet further evidence that the oil market is why out of sync with real demand for the black stuff and just about all its derivatives.

"July's Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) figures were released last week, with total miles driven clocking in at 263.4 billion miles, up 2.3% from July 2008," writes today's Schork Report, the daily online data and analysis service for energy and shipping markets.

"That is a solid increase but keep in mind: Gasoline prices have decreased by 38% since last year.

"Further, July 2008's VMT figure was 3.5% lower than July 2007. Therefore, this year's 'increase' was 1.3% below 2007 and 0.5% below the 2003-07 time-step, thereby continuing a steady VMT decline."

This is more evidence that we are miles away (excuse the pun) from the credit-fuelled demand levels of 2003-07 for everything from barrels of oil and gigajoules of natural gas to synthetic dog coats.

Chemicals demand in the UK might not return to pre-recession levels until as late as 2020, Oxford Economics has warned.

But don't bet against speculators pushing crude prices back up again, especially if conflict breaks out with Iran over the missile testing and the alleged development of nuclear-weapons capability.

This is despite weak demand, as the Schork Report has pointed out, and deeply oversupplied crude and crude products markets.

Such is the oversupply that even a disruption in Iranian production (Iran is the world's fourth-largest producer) might not make much of a difference, assuming that the conflict doesn't spread to elsewhere in the Middle East.

"Saudi Arabia was running just about flat out in 2007. Now it has 6m barrels a day of spare capacity," said an oil industry observer last week. 

Recent falls in gasoline mean that its pricing could be close to "meltdown", according to this report from Bloomberg.

And as my fellow blogger Paul Hodges pointed out last week, the historically high amount of oil in floating storage is now being delivered to refiners due to a narrowing of the contango.

So I am with those who believe we are heading for $45 a barrel before the end of this year. 

Still, a two-way bet might be advisable - just in case there is another rally.

"Take it from me, peripheral vision isn't all it's cracked up to be, especially if you want to get a decent annual bonus...."

Source of picture: www.whipnspurs.co.nz

Here's a rant for Tuesday - with thanks to Paul Hodges for informing some of the thinking (I'd like to lay credit to certain parts of this...)

Purchasing managers are professionally required to wear blinkers. All they care about is making sure that they are ahead of the game because of the way their performances are measured.

So up until Q4 2008 they ignored headlines such as "US auto demand slumps on surging gasoline costs and slowing economy" and "western house prices plummet on sub-prime mortgage crisis."

Oil prices seemed to be on the forever-up and liquidity was abundant. The result was purchasing in big volumes ahead of anticipated further price rises until the great unravelling post-Lehman Brothers.

Senior strategists - whose job it was to worry about the big picture - were also wearing blinkers, deluded in the belief that 2006-07 demand levels would go on forever.

Cracker operating rates were going to remain comfortably above 80% during the coming down cycle, was the consensus view in the first half of last year.

Now the industry is going to have to live with global averages of between 60-70% over the next few years.

The chemicals industry has lost three years of demand growth as global production is now back to early 2006 levels. It is unlikely to budge much in a favourable direction until at least 2011.

The reason is that real western growth, minus all the froth of commodity and equity markets, is going to remain weak on unemployment and high personal debt problems.

Another concern is unwinding government subsidies.

Too many people might have been misled by Chinese imports over the last 7-8 months.

The strength of these imports wasn't sustainable and was due to temporary factors that have now come to an end.

Banking on China as the leader of a global recovery is utter nonsense when you look at the country's low per capita chemicals consumption and its heavy export dependency.

Any Northeast or Southeast Asian producer high on the cost curve is likely to find it harder to penetrate western markets in 2010.

How can these producers - when they import crude oil - export, say, PE to Europe at fair market prices in the face of much-stronger Middle East competition?

Trade lawyers should do very well from anti-dumping cases in 2010.

This is a protracted supply-driven U-shaped downturn, and we are only just getting towards the bottom of the U.

Lots of Middle East capacity has been delayed - and the next big wave of Chinese start-ups is only just beginning.

Studying the tone of Q3 results statements will be a good indication to what extent senior execs have taken on board this new reality (actually it's not that new - we've been waffling on about this on this blog for months).

Source of picture: www.textually.org

The political sensitivity surrounding Iran is so great that US-based companies are not even allowed to attend presentations by Iranian officials at conferences, a source said.

"I witnessed a recent walk-out during a presentation by the National Iranian Oil & Distribution Company (NIODC)," he said.

But a European office of a US company is able to do business with the Middle Eastern country, provided an entire technology and project is developed by that office.

"If as much as one email passes Europe and the US headquarters, that's enough for an investment to become technically in breach of sanctions," the source continued.

These nightmarishly difficult restrictions come as Iran attempts to build no less than seven grassroots refineries in a attempt to rectify deficits in fuel products - one each at Shahriar, Anahita, Caspian, Khuzestan and Pars and two at Hormuz.

Numerous other expansions at existing refineries are being planned with the likely investment costs running into many billions of Euros.

Scepticism is easy following big delays in previous natural grass processing, refining and petrochemical investments due to sanctions that limit financing and technology and skills transfer.

Doubts have also been raised over the level of investment in maintaining output from the oil fields that would supply this new refinery capacity.

In the case of the two crackers finally brought on-stream at Assaluyeh, the slow pace of growth in gas-processing means that they suffer operating rate cuts and even shutdowns during the winter.  

All the gas being processed during the winter months has to be diverted to domestic use because of a big shortfall in supply.

Honest and hardworking company officials on both sides of the political divide deserve solutions.

THE MOOD seems to have become a little more upbeat in the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) region of the Middle East thanks to the economic recovery.

"The flow of foreign funds into the GCC came to a complete standstill in Q4 and the first quarter of this year, but in Q2-Q3 it reached all-time highs," said a petrochemicals industry source.

"Whilst the mood is still a little depressed, there are signs of hope with the expectation that growth by 2011 will return to normal levels."

The Saudis had budgeted for an average crude price of $40 a barrel for 2009, but $70 a barrel was more likely, creating more leeway for government spending, he added.

"Stimulus measures haven't kicked in yet across the GCC. This should soon be the case in Saudi which will result in lots of money spent on infrastructure and therefore more petrochemicals demand."

This rosy view is reflected in a recent pick-up in project activity in gas processing, refining and petrochemicals.

KBR, for example, won a contract to supply front-end engineering and design work (FEED) and project management services for a natural gas liquids (NGL) plant in Shaybah, Saudi Arabia.

Jacobs Engineering Group has been awarded the FEED contract for Borouge 3 in Abu Dhabi - the polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) expansion due on-stream at end-2013. This would raise the Borouge joint venture's polyolefin capacity to 4.5m tonne/year.

The monster Ras TaNura project in Saudi Arabia also seems to be moving forward.

It will cost anywhere between $20-27bn and will produce either 8m tonne/year or 11m tonne/year depending on which reports you believe. Start-up is either 2014 or 2015.

Two consultants working on the project for different companies have told the blog that it is progressing.

Dow Chemical is still very much involved after suggestions earlier this year that the US major's financial difficulties might force Saudi Aramco to seek a new partner, they added.

A sign that sentiment has improved was evident from reports about the financing of the Aramco-Total refinery project at Al-Jubail.

Bids from potential lenders left the $12.8bn project 30 times over-subscribed, Reuters said last week.

Technip has won engineering and procurement (EPC) contracts to build a hydrocracker and a fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) at what will be a 400,000 barrels a day full-conversion refinery - due to start commercial production in March 2013.

The project also includes 700,000 tonne/year of paraxylene (PX).

But gas supply remains tight for petrochemicals as this excellent article from my colleague Malini Hariharan explains.

Only one cracker might go ahead in Qatar instead of the scheduled three projects - involving Qatar Petroleum and Honam Petrochemical, ExxonMobil and Shell.

The economic rebound is constraining electricity supply throughout the GCC, resulting in priority being put on supplying gas to the power sector during the summer months.

New associated gas is dwindling with undeveloped non-associated fields containing a high sulphur content of 25-30%.

Processing this extremely sour gas would become economic only at a gas price of $5-7/mBTU, according to Justin Dargin of the Dubai Initiative at Harvard University.

Are the days of cheap gas for petrochemicals in the GCC over for good?

How economic will naphtha-based production be compared with building a new naphtha cracker in Asia?

One feedstock option for the Middle East and Asia could be to make use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which according to a Singapore-based business development executive with a publishing company, will be "as cheap as chips" over the next few years.

This will be the result of a big increase in liquefied natural gas (LNG) output, where LPG is a by or co-product, and refinery expansions.

Indeed, the petrochemical industry source we quoted at the beginning of this post added: "There's going to be lots of propane available in the GCC."

Aramco was also exploring under the Red Sea for the first time for oil and gas after previously concentrating exploration on Saudi's Eastern province, creating the potential for more petrochemical feedstock, he added.

At the moment, though, you can just about count the number of petrochemical on the fingers of one hand, beyond the ones already financed. This is provided you count the 35 or so plants planned for for Ras Tanura as one!

There's another problem that's as long-standing as gas feedstock, which might also be getting worse.

"I know of a refinery in the GCC that's planning a turnaround in three years. It's already worried about a shortage of engineers to execute the turnaround. India has become a much bigger draw," said a refinery industry source.

"YES, I HEAR YOU - I'M LISTENING...."

Source of picture: New York Daily News

How ridiculous does crude-oil pricing have to become before regulatory reforms occur that limit the role of financial speculation in a helpful way?

This was the question being asked by a refining industry source today after he had read this story from the Financial Times.

Call options are about to kick in which could drive the price of oil even higher even though the fundamentals are "mildly bearish", according to the FT.

Put options, when they take effect in significant numbers, have the opposite effect.

Real demand is still a long way from catching up with oil markets so heavily influenced by the financial or non-commercial players.

"Whatever too ridiculous is, and I'd argue last year was a stupid as it can get, the Saudis are likely to get on the Bat Phone to the White House at some point and demand some changes. The US government will be obliged to listen," added the source.

Inability to plan an economy because oil is so out-of-sync with the fundamentals is playing havoc with the Saudi budget-planning process, he continued.

The same applies to every government. If the other major oil producers backed Saudi Arabia, we might seem some useful changes.

This year is a positive for the world's biggest crude producer - as we discussed on Monday. The Saudi government had budgeted for an average oil price in 2009 of $40 a barrel, but this is likely to be closer to $70 a barrel, giving more leeway for infrastructure spending.

But the unpredictability of a market skewed by short-term financial sector interests could just as easily work against the Saudis.

They are pursuing a hugely important economic and social agenda which requires constant and steady funding.

At a chemicals industry level, tracking activity on the Nymex, the International Continental Exchange and the Dubai Mercantile Exchange is critically important if you want to make meaningful financial forecasts.

These forecasts should influence chemicals pricing decisions. Why push for an increase that isn't in line with the fundamentals in your markets if you believe that a spike is entirely paper-trade driven and won't last?

The danger is that if you ignore what might be underlying weaknesses in your markets, you will suffer on the downslide as customers attempt to recover their losses.

I am still thinking, as we've also mentioned before, that this rally will continue until the New Year at least - when all the fund managers' bonuses will be in the bank.

Profit taking could take place in Q1. Positions could then be rebuilt when another bottom has been reached in crude and equities ahead of the 2010 bonus payouts!

Source of picture: wartakota.co.id

WESTERNERS can often by unbelievably patronising about Asia's efforts to climb up the economic self-sufficiency ladder.

"South Korea has no business being in petrochemicals," said a very annoying US industry executive many years ago - one of those situations where your correspondent wanted to punch someone's lights out (this wouldn't have been such a good idea as he later informed me, over a couple of beers, that he used to play quarterback for his college Gridiron team).

Similarly, I became defensive on behalf of Indonesia and Pertamina the other week when criticism was levied at a "hybrid" plan to add new refinery and petrochemicals capacity.

I know too well, though, as Indonesia used to be my "patch" in the late 1990s, that corruption has been an issue.

The country's refining and petrochemical industries have repeatedly promised much, but have failed to live up to expectations.

And you could say to Pertamini, "Why bother?" seen as so much refining and petchem capacity is being added in the Middle East.

China might even end up being self-sufficient in refinery products.

But the state-owned oil, gas and refining major recognises this - hence the idea of adding capacity and sourcing from overseas, said Heru Sutrisno, the company's vice-president of strategic development and business development.

He was speaking at last week's Asia Downstream Roundtable event in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia - organised by the World Refining Association. Click here for a copy of the presentation - 3 Heru Sutrisno.pdf.

Standing still would mean Indonesia would be short of 289,000 barrels per day of refinery capacity by 2012.

The main shortages are forecast to be in Java and Bali where two-thirds of oil-product demand might have to be imported by 2015.

Capacity additions would include building a new 300,000 barrels per day refinery - in two stages of 150,000 barrels per day - at Banten Bay in West Java. National Iranian Oil Co has committed 150,000 barrels a day to the project for 25 years.

Also under study is using condensate to boost petrochemical production and constructing a linear-alkyl benzene (LAB) plant fed by n-paraffin feedstock

Work is progressing on a 250,000 tonne/year polypropylene (PP) project, due on-stream at the Balongan refinery complex in West Java in 2011.

Dow Chemical's UNIPOL technology has been selected for the new facility which will receive feedstock from a residue fluid catalytic cracker.

There have been a lot of positive political and economic changes in Indonesia since the late 1990s, making an investment case for refining and petrochemicals far stronger. 

 But does the Pertamina plan really add up?

As this updated table from my colleagues at CBI in China illustrates, cracker-complex delays in China have the potential to further stagger the arrival of new volumes into the market.

Chinanewcapacitytable.doc

This follows the widespread problems in starting up new capacity in the Middle East.

The 800,000 tonne/year Fujian Petrochemical/ExxonMobil/Saudi Aramco cracker is on-stream, but there have been operating issues with downstream PE.

The 1m tonne/year Sinopec/SABIC Tianjin cracker will undergo trial runs from 28 December and so commercial production won't be until H1 2010.

But the Dunshanzi complex, centred on a 1m tonne/year, was commissioned on schedule in September. The operating rate is reported to be 85% with product being sold across China.

2.56m tonne/year of capacity is due to start-up this year compared with the original 3.56m tonnne/year.

In Thailand, the new  400,000 tonne/year PTT linear-low density polyethylene (LLDPE) plant is due to start next week, but the 1m tonne/year cracker won't be on-stream until the end of the year/Q1 2010.

A new 300,000 tonne/year low-density polyethylene (LDPE) project is not due to be commissioned until Q3 next year, according to ICIS Plants and Projects.  

The start-up is being fed by ethylene from existing crackers, but it's not clear whether this will be sufficient to quickly achieve optimal rates

Further out, there appears to be some more good news for existing producers from China.

The 800,000 tonne/year Fushun cracker, originally scheduled for 2011, has been delayed to 2102. An associated refinery has already started up, but only preliminary work has taken place on the petrochemicals complex.

Wuhan - a Sinopec and SK Energy joint venture - has been pushed back from 2011 to 2012-13, as has the PetroChina-owned Daqing project.

There are also unconfirmed reports of operating problems at several Middle East complexes brought on-stream this year.

"I think an on-going problem in the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) region is going to be the shortage of natural-gas supply," said an industry source.

"Every summer, until this problem is resolved, you are going to see a big pull of gas into the power sector at the expense of petrochemicals."

He suggested that there might also be issues with stabilising production at several new gas-phased polyethylene (PE)  plants due to their scale.

Existing crackers in Iran are expected to continue to experience deep rate cuts in winter as gas is diverted for domestic and power-generation consumption. Iran has plenty of natural-gas reserves, but political difficulties have slowed down investment in extraction.

A Famous Ditherer

Source of picture: sarafinewordpress.com

Chasing higher oil prices and/or a response to the now long-running recovery in Chinese demand that's become sustainable?

Not wanting to sound too much like the start of a famous Shakespeare soliloquy, these are the questions that should be wracking everyone's brains as they try to figure out price rises, which continued last week.

Ethylene rose again and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) was up by $50 a tonne to $1,235-1,300 tonne CFR China, according to ICIS pricing.

The polyolefin was at $1,130-1,180/tonne CFR China four week. Click here for a graph showing the price history for all the PE grades since January last year - Olefin-PEprices.ppt.

But interestingly, while the sentiment in the China market was described as bullish due to stronger crude and second and third tier traders and distributors were stocking up, actual end-user demand was characterised by market players contacted by ICIS as weak.

This suggests stocking up ahead of the assumption that oil prices will go higher, even though the outlook for the next few weeks is mixed given recent negative reports over the US economy. 

It then comes down to the sustainability of the eight-month long rebound in demand from China. Head-scratching continues as to where all this stuff is going, more of which later this week.

Asian cracker operators, according to my colleague Peh Soo Hwee, ICIS pricing's ethylene editor in Asia, seem to believe its worth running hard for the time being at least.

"Some of the cracker operators, notably in Japan, had reduced production to below 90% in September-October, partly due to turnarounds at derivative plants," she said in a recent note to one of our customers.

"Most of them now expect to increase rates to close to 100% next month (November)."

"So far, with the exception of a few crackers in the region running at lower rates - Chandra Asri in Indonesia at 75% and South Korea's YNCC at 90% - the bulk of producers aim to keep ethylene production at 90-100% in November."

Supporting these decisions were improvements in margins last week. Ethylene margins rose for the second week in a row as a result of the pace of C2 price increases outpacing those for naphtha, according to the ICIS weekly Asian Ethylene Margin Report.

But still, October ended up as the worst month for ethylene margins since June.

PE margins also rose on a better spread between C2s and the polymer and improved co-product credits, according to our Asian PE Marging Report - also weekly. 

Again, though, overall margins were down in October over the previous month. Stand-alone players did better than integrated operators.

Plan cutbacks and/or sell November stocks early and you miss the potential of better returns. Some polyolefin producers sold October volumes earlier than they should have done because they expected prices to fall.

The flipside of the risk is being left holding overpriced inventory as oil prices fall and more new polyolefin capacities hit the market.

Nothing new in having to make these decisions, of course; the difference is the absence of any consistent and reliable patterns from all the data to support planning.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Japanese chemical majors have raised their sales and profit forecasts for the second half of the fiscal year ending 31 March 2010, but the revisions are marginal and companies are still holding a conservative outlook.

Earnings in the first half of this fiscal year have been better than expected but the stock market is not impressed. It appears investors are being guided by the cloudy outlook for H2.

A Tokyo-based analyst highlighted three major risks that Japanese companies foresee:

• Inventory adjustments in China for petrochemicals and globally in the auto and LCD sectors
• A rise in naphtha prices led by higher crude oil prices
• Rising availability of product from new petrochemical capacities in the Middle East.

Mitsui Chemicals has forecast sales of Yen1,210bn as compared to Yen1,487.6bn in 2008-09. Operating loss is expected to narrow to Yen15bn from Yen 45.5bn last year.

Sumitomo Chemical expects to post petrochemical sales of Yen500bn in 2009-10, down 9.6% from the previous year. Total sales are projected at Yen1,620bn, down 9.4%.

At an analyst meeting yesterday Sumitomo Chemical disclosed that operating rates at its joint-venture PetroRabigh complex in Saudi Arabia are still quite low, especially for polyethylene (PE). Although the situation is improving the company expects full operations only at the end of this year.

PetroRabigh has posted losses yet again. Third quarter losses had widened to Riyals844.7m from Riyals155.9m in the same period last year.

Japanese companies are continuing their efforts to widen their footprint in China. Mitsui Chemicals and Sinopec have agreed to proceed with a joint venture for production of phenol and ethylene, propylene diene terpolymer (EPT). At a recent analyst meet, Mitsui's ceo disclosed that the project would be a 50:50 joint venture. Asked if the jv would be expanded to include ethylene and propylene production, the ceo said there was no immediate plan but there was some potential.

Mitsui's ceo is also reported to have said that the company was interested in acquisitions in agro-chemicals or speciality chemicals. Among the Japanese majors, Mitsui is most exposed to commodity chemicals and is under greater pressure to diversify if product portfolio.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

The Indian government has announced 17 November as the date for a public hearing to discuss the provisional anti dumping duties that it had imposed in June on imports of polypropylene (PP) from Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman.

The hearing will give a chance to all affected parties to present their case. Such hearings are usually a formality and do affect the end result which is a confirmation of the provisional duties.

But I have been told that it may be different this time as the Saudis, led by Sabic, are likely to put up a spirited defense. The Saudis have been busy pulling lots of government strings for the duties to be revoked.

Sabic and Advanced Polypropylene were hit the hardest - duties on their PP exports range from $440-$820/tonne. I was told that one of the reasons for the high level of duties was 'the lack of cooperation in sharing data' when the Indian government had sent its questionnaire earlier in the year. However, this attitude appears to have changed.

There's a lot at stake here and this is why the 17 November hearing is crucial. India is already in surplus and looks likely to be in this position for the next couple of years. So there's every reason for Indian PP producers, Reliance Industries and Haldia Petrochemicals, to check competition. On the other hand, many Indian processors are unhappy as the duties would force them to rely on local supply.

For the Saudis, and also other Middle Eastern producers, India is not such a big market for PP. But the ADD threat is a worrying global trend that they want to ensure does not take off.

Besides India, China is investigating methanol and 1,4-butanediol (BDO) imports from Saudi Arabia. And the European Union (EU) is investigating on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) imports from United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Iran.

The growing protectionist measures have provoked a long chain of protests with the most recent one being in October by the Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA).
The GPCA Secretary General Dr. Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun has said that the association will strengthen coordination with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Governments to ensure that exports of petrochemicals and chemicals from the Gulf region are not restricted by anti-dumping regulations and other trade restrictions
"The GCC industry and our governments will not accept the application of anti-dumping regulations against exports of petrochemicals and chemicals from the Gulf. We have seen a surge in protectionist actions brought by countries to block imports. These cases are baseless and violate international rules," he said.
The investigations may not sound fair to GCC producers but they face an uphill task in convincing the Indian and Chinese governments to ease protection to local producers. A lot will depend on what the GCC governments can offer or withhold.

Just picked up on the interesting news (not sure how big a deal this is) after attending one of those long interminably-long internal planning meetings. But on this occasion we at least were discussing something useful - not just the new colour for the carpet in reception.

So why has Qatar Petroluem bought into Petrochemical Corp of Singapore (PCS) and The Polyolefins Co (TPC).

Interesting that the PetroRabigh marketing arm - the joint venture betweeen Saudi Aramco and Sumitomo for the new plant in Saudi Arabia - is run from Singapore by Sumitomo.

This Dow Jones report, from a former colleague of mine, quotes Ben Van Beurden, executive vice president of Shell, as saying the following: "One of the critical success factors of any petrochemical venture...is access to competitive feedstock.

"I'm hopeful that condensate and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) will flow from Qatar to Singapore as a result of QPI taking an interest in these joint ventures."

That makes a lot of sense as feedstock advantage is going to be crucial for an older and smaller cracker-derivatives complex such as PCS-TPC to compete in the and far more difficult environment.

The giant new Middle East crackers have big scale and raw material advantages.

One of the responses to date from the very experienced and very capable guys at TPC has been to work the trade advantages within the Asean region, concentrate on relationships and higher value-added grades.

Shell Eastern Petroleum operates a 500,000-bbl/day refinery on Pulau Bukom.

The company is building a petrochemical complex comprising an 800,000-tonne/year steam cracker and MEG unit, using Shell's Omega technology, due on-stream in Q2 2010.

This cracker will be fed by hydrowax from an updgraded hydrocracker at the same site and so it is not clear whether feedstock from Qatar will also be an option for this facility.

In Qatar, Shell and Qatar Petroleum are building the $18bn Pearl gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant scheduled for completion by the end of 2010.

Condensate will be be produced from the GTL plant, which has been entirely funded by Shell. This condendate has been evaluated for producing petrochemicals in Qatar.

Shell has a cracker project in Qatar likely to start-up only after 2012.

The Anglo-Dutch major has also talked about more petrochemicals in China to build on its existing CNOOC joint-venture Nanhai cracker and derivatives project.

Again, whether the closer relationship with Qatar will have any implications for these plans remains to be seen. The Chinese want mainly one of two things from any potential new petrochemical JV partner - energy supplies (oil or gas) and/or technology.

"If we contemplate new ­investments in chemicals, they only make sense if we can continue to build integrated positions and they rank favourably with our overall capital investment programme," van Beurden told me in an interview last year.

"Everything we want to do in chemicals must be integrated with the rest of Shell. Capital goes first to upstream projects and so chemical investments have to make a lot of sense and clear very high hurdles."

Sumitomo retains its interest in PCS and TPC and so - as often is the case in deals like these - the internal parent-company competitive landscape has shifted.

The Sumitomo part of TPC, now with Qatar Petroleum as a partner, is competing with the Sumitomo share in a new Middle East producer - PetroRabigh!

Singapore's Jurong Island

Source of picture: www.pcs.com

Qatar Petroleum International (QPI) sees Singapore as a good base for expanding in to the Far East, said CEO Nasser Al-Jaidah yesterday after the announcement of the new partnership with Shell.

QPI and Shell signed a series of agreements on Wednesday to jointly own 50% of Petrochemical Corporation of Singapore (PCS) and 30% of The Polyolefin Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd (TPC), to be held through a joint venture company called QPI and Shell Petrochemicals (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Sumitomo Chemical's 70% stake in PCS and 50% share of TPC remain unchanged.

Singapore is becoming an increasingly important energy-storage and trading hub. QPI's closer relationship with the island state - through the Shell deal - could be key in helping to market and sell big new volumes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

Qatar's enormous LNG ambitions, through joint ventures with the likes of Shell and ExxonMobil, also leave the issue of getting maximum value out of co or by-product LPG.

There are several options for LPG.

The LPG (propane and butane) can be extracted during natural gas and LNG processing.

It could be used by Qatar for petrochemicals in Qatar itself or elsewhere in the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) region.

Another option is to ship the LPG to petrochemical and other customers overseas.

"One of the critical success factors of any petrochemicals facility, whether it is in the Middle East or here in Singapore, is access to competitive feedstock," said Ben van Beurden, executive vice-president of Shell Chemicals, when the deal was announced.

"I'm hopeful that condensates and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) would flow from Qatar to Singapore as a result of [Qatar Petroleum] taking an investment in these joint ventures."

As we discussed yesterday, this would enable the PCS-TPC joint ventures to better compete against the new wave of bigger feedstock-advantaged Middle East crackers.

Singapore is building an LNG terminal due for completion in mid - to late 2012.

Another probably very unlikely option is to ship "wet" LNG and then extract LPG on arrival. This extraction also involves removing ethane - and so again there's a petrochemical option here.

And finally, some LNG customers - such as power generators - prefer their gas delivered as "wet", creating competing economics for extracting LPG and ethane for petrochemicals.

The QPI-Shell deal raises several more questions which this blog is seeking to answer:

*Will this give extra feedstock flexibility to the new Singapore cracker, due on-stream next year? We understand it will be run mainly on hydrowax from an up-graded hydrocracker. But will an option now be to use condensate/naphtha feedstock via Qatar? How would this work as, if at all, as Shell Eastern - which operates the cracker project - is a separate subsidiary?

*The Pearl gas-to-liquids project (another joint venture between Shell and Qatar Petroleum) will produce condensate as well as ultra-low sulphur diesel. Will this condensate, split into naphtha, be sold directly into the merchant market or used for producing petrochemicals in Qatar? Is this still a possible feed for the Shell cracker project in Qatar and/or are other petrochemical options in Qatar? The background to this we understand that there's a shortage of new gas allocations available from the North Shelf due to an extended moratorium, making it difficult for all the cracker projects in Qatar to go ahead.

*Could the condensate/naphtha from Pearl be supplied to Singapore instead?

*Is developing a new project in China now a priority with QPI over petrochemicals in Qatar?

In China, QPI has a joint venture with PetroChina and Shell (China) Ltd to build a refinery and petrochemical complex at Taizhou in Zhejiang province.

"We are hoping to get approval [for the project] by the end next year," said Al-Jaidah.

Perhaps the biggest of all the priorities might be this joint venture.

But whether or how the closer relationship between QPI and Shell will accelerate this project is not clear.

China is on the whole looking for one of two things from future petrochemical joint-venture partners: Energy supplies (oil and gas) and technology.

The existing QPI and Shell relationship already firmly ticked both of these boxes.

 Shelf-space to be in short supply again?

Source of picture: www.zrdata.com

ASIAN naphtha prices hit their highest level for more than a year yesterday - reaching $701/tonne CFR Japan for second-half December open-spec material on "improved market conditions".

Earlier this week we picked up more reports of bleak demand in styrenics and fibre intermediates that countered continued optimism in equities and crude markets.

This is also usually the quiet season as petrohemical production declines on weak seasonal demand.

Is the Asian petrochemicals industry ramping up production because it thinks crude is going to get stronger and the real economy is set to improve?

Oil fell to below $77 a barrel yesterday on evidence that US motorists and businesses were cutting back on energy use, according to this Associated Press report.

Have we returned to the demand destruction which caused the economic downturn in the first place?

Despite soaring auto sales in China, there are reports that gasoline consumption is being affected by higher crude, the impact of which is being more keenly felt this year as a result of fuel-price liberalisation.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its weekly report that US oil and gas supplies grew more than expected last week, even though many oil companies have shuttered refineries as fuel consumption slumps.

US refineries had slowed production to the lowest levels since September 2008 and they were importing nearly 15% less crude than last year, the report added.

This is worying when you think of the state of the economy this time last year. Most other comparative numbers are showing improvements.

What perhaps helps to explain the 15% decline is big new refinery capacities in India and China etc putting pressure the developed-world players.

With refinery runs reduced everywhere in the world except China (where the Chinese refineries are enjoying improved profitability as a result of the fuel-price liberalisation), reduced supply could be another factor behind the rise in naphtha.

But let's take it as read that better demand from petrochemicals is the main driver behind the increase in naphtha.

It would be a very risky business to build inventories right at this moment - given all these uncertainties and the big surge in new petrochemicals capacity.

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

Sumitomo Chemical and Saudi Aramco appear to be in a generous mood. After successfully launching the first phase of their joint venture and starting work on the second phase the two are willing to welcome others to the Rabigh party.

Pic source: Saudi Aramco

Ziad Al-Labban, president and ceo of the joint venture Petro Rabigh, is reported to have said that discussions are underway with companies, including Japanese firms, to invest in production synthetic fibre and other products at Rabigh. He expects a total of 50 companies, including some from Japan, to eventually set up operations at the site.

The product slate for PetroRabigh's second phase, due to be completed in 2013-14 includes aromatics, synthetic rubber, nylon 6 and speciality chemicals. What more can be produced and what makes Rabigh so attractive?

There is of course the feedstock that will be readily available from the PetroRabigh complex and the benefits of shared world class infrastructure. But local markets are small with not very exciting growth prospects, especially for products like synthetic fibres. I certainly can't see a big textile industry developing in Saudi Arabia or the GCC.

I have often heard that the attractiveness of the Middle East fades as you move down the product chain. The closer you are to the cracker the more profitable it is as you then get full advantage of cheap feedstocks.

But Saudi Arabia's plans for a diversified chemical industry are slowly but steadily progressing. And Abu Dhabi is also working on a similar model. What incentives are being offered to make these countries an oasis for downstream chemical production?

By Malini Hariharan (Malini is now joint blogger for Asian Chemical Connections)

The 17 Nov public hearing arranged by the Indian government at Delhi to discuss provisional anti dumping duties levied on PP imports from Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Oman was postponed at the very last minute causing a great deal frustration among lawyers and industry executives who had flown in from out of the country.

The hearing was postponed because of bereavement in the family of the government bureaucrat heading the hearing. Efforts to get another bureaucrat proved to be futile. A new date has yet to be set but I am told it should be soon.

And I have received some information from Japan on the likely candidates for the Rabigh party. One of the products being considered by Petro Rabigh for its second phase is superabsorbent polymers (SAP). As Sumitomo Chemical does not have technology for this product, it is rumoured that Nippon Shokubai or Sumitomo Seika could be joining Petro Rabigh for this project.

Abu Dhabi ahead in the race?

Source of picture: www.gulftrackservices.com

By John Richardson

The global basic chemicals industry is likely to end up under the dominant control of the Middle East, and possibly Asia, within the next 3-5 years, a senior chemicals industry source told this blog.

"We have known for a long time that the centre of gravity is shifting from West to East, but the economic crisis has accelerated this whole process.

"It was easy credit that enabled the West to keep on growing despite high oil prices with some of that credit going into speculation that helped drive energy costs higher.

"Now that the credit bubble has burst we are left with deeply entrenched and very long-term problems, while the Middle East is sitting on a hydrocarbons cash-pile thanks to the extraordinary global economic growth of 2005-2008."

The only barrier to acquisition of a lot more Western assets - including quite possibly high-value technology positions that have to date remained off the table - was politics, he said.

But a second source added: "While I agree that the shifting of ownership has been speeded up by the crisis, I think the West will keep hold of technology positions - especially in downstream specialities.

"Chief executive officers (CEOs) of US and European countries are under pressure to move away from basis chemicals, and so differentiation needs to be preserved.

"But it is true that we have already seen transfer of very valuable polymer technologies."

SABIC's acquisition of GE Plastics was one such transfer with the renamed SABIC Innovative Plastics now seeking to buy high-end polycarbonate (PC) technologies.

The economic recovery, which the second source believed would be sustained, would also give the CEOs some breathing space to negotiate better terms with prospective buyers of basic petrochemicals.

These comments came after ICIS reported that the Abu Dhabi-based International Petroleum Investment Co (IPIC) was in talks with Bayer MaterialScience and four other global petrochemical groups.

But an IPIC spokesman later said: "At present there are no firm plans to do anything with Bayer MaterialScience, or any other chemical company. A number of initiatives are under consideration internally, but nothing has been decided."

IPIC has already acquired Canadian-based polyolefin major Nova Chemicals and is planning the huge Chemaweyaat chemical city in the new Mina Khalifa Industrial Zone.

It also has a 64% of Austria-based polyolefins group Borealis.

"What's interesting about the Chemaweyaat project is, first of all, its sheer scale (it includes several crackers, including a 1.45m tonne/year one due to start-up in 2012) and the fact that the range of derivatives downstream will be more diversified than is already common in the Middle East," the first source added.

"On a straight cost competitiveness basis, you might think that liquids cracking, which is going to happen at Chemaweyaat, doesn't make sense. But this is more than being about straight economics - it's about economic development and job creation."

And my colleague, Nigel Davis, recently wrote: "Dow Chemical on 12 November laid its cards on the table regarding its so-called 'asset light' strategy.

Dow is working through an arbitration process following its failed deal in Kuwait. The company says it is now talking to two potential partners for a proportion of it olefins assets and its polyethylene business. "

The future ownership of US petrochemicals assets in the US is also attracting a great deal of interest because, despite what could be deeply ingrained economic problems, it's a huge polymer and chemicals market.

And as Nubuo Tanaka - executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA) - said in a presentation in Singapore earlier this week, shale gas had resulted in a "silent revolution" in US natural-gas supply since 2007.

With 70% of US ethylene production based on natural-gas liquids, according to the American Chemistry Council (ACC), the ground has shifted thanks to this unconventional shale-gas supply.

"Gas supply has become tight in the Middle East and abundant in the US perhaps for the long term, meaning that US petrochemicals is not dead and buried," claimed the first source.

"I expect export competitiveness from the US to be strong for at least the next three years on the comparatively low prices of natural gas over naphtha."

Thermoplastic exports from the US rose by 16% in the year-to-date as a against a 14% decline in domestic sales, said the ACC in its latest weekly report.

SABIC's GE Plastics acquisition gave the Saudi giant a foothold in this huge market, where handling and distribution costs can act as an effective trade barrier.

There have also been unconfirmed reports of Reliance Industries being interested in acquiring LyondellBasell.

Reliance Industries has made an offer for LyondellBasell says an official statement released yesterday on the LyondellBasell website:

"LyondellBasell has received a preliminary non-binding offer from Reliance Industries Limited to acquire for cash a controlling interest in the company contemporaneously with the company's emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization.

"This offer is in addition to the previous non-binding equity financing proposals received by the company and represents a potential alternative to the initial plan of reorganization previously filed by the company."

This confirms months of rumours to this effect. According to an unnamed merchant banker quoted by the Times of India, Reliance would have to pay at least $12bn - double an earlier estimate by the Economic Times.

India could be playing a major role in the shift of basis chemicals ownership from West to East - along with the Middle East

After failing in its efforts to capture Innovene and then Dow Chemical's commodity petchems unit, this is Reliance's fresh attempt to move into the global top league. The ICIS top 100 places LyondellBasell at the No 4 slot of top chemical companies globally.

A marriage of the two companies would result in a formidable giant with an annual turnover in excess of $75bn, including Reliance's earnings from its growing oil, gas and refining portfolio. It would also create the largest PP producer and also a top player in PE and give Reliance access to LyondellBasell's profitable technology portfolio.

Reliance's offer is subject to due diligence and sufficient credit support. The company issued a very cautious statement: "This review is ongoing and there can be assurance of the outcome with respect to any of the opportunities under review."

Reliance, it appears, is evaluating other opportunities too in its core businesses.

LyondellBasell's statement confirms that Reliance had earlier placed non-binding equity financial proposals and the latest offer represented was a 'potential alternative to the initial plan of reorganization'.

LyondellBasell was the first petrochemical giant to stumble at the start of the crisis last year. And it looks like it could well be the first big ticket M&A deal in what promises to be a busy season ahead.

We have already heard of IPIC on the prowl for European and US chemical assets and then Mitsubishi Chemical confirmed that it is looking to acquire Mitsubishi Rayon for $2.5bn.

An investment banker said last week that it was only in the last few months that he has seen an interest in boards and ceos. Capital market conditions have improved substantially and money will not be a deterrent, especially for companies like Reliance which are already sitting on huge piles of cash.

Relaince's biggest problem in the past has been its conservative valuations which have seen the company lose out to other global bidders, except in a few instances (Trevira and Hualon). There are already reports of rival bids emerging for LyondellBasell from Chinese companies and private equity investors. And ICIS news reported last week that analysts believe that LyondellBasell would also be a good fit for IPIC.

So will Reliance change its mindset and be bolder this time?

He's not bad at making money
Source of picture: www.dealbreaker.com

SOME of the logic behind Reliance Industries' bid for LyondellBasell could be a recognition that the globalisation of petrochemicals markets may have gone into partial reverse.

A climate bill passed by the House of Representatives has a provision for taxing imports from countries where emissions standards are more lax than the US.

This defensive measure, no doubt the result of pressure from heavily polluting industries such as refining and chemicals, recognises that the business-as-usual scenario outlined by the International Energy Agency in its World Energy Report 2009 won't come true.

The scenario involves no significant improvements in energy conservation and no great shift to renewables, leading to a rise in global temperatures of 6 C.

Even if an international carbon tax and/or cap-and-trade system isn't established, individual countries seem likely to step up their efforts to lower hydrocarbons consumption.

Whether or not global warming is man-made, energy security is by itself a big enough reason to boost energy efficiency and develop green technologies.

Then there is what Nubuo Tanaka, Executive Director of the IEA, calls "the silent revolution" since 2007 of increasing US gas supply.

Breakthroughs in shale-gas technology and very long global liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply are contributing to what the IEA describes as a worldwide supply glut that could have "far-reaching consequences for the structure of gas markets".

This will put LyondellBasell's US polyethylene (PE) assets in a strong position in the medium and possibly even the long term.

It has long been assumed that when the US polyolefin market is eventually in deficit, the shortfalls will be supplied by the Middle East and Latin America - notwithstanding extra logistics costs that amount to effective trade barriers.

But a sufficiently high price on carbon would undermine this assumption, along with cheap US natural gas.

This is still the world's biggest economy and therefore the world's biggest chemicals and polymer market when all the hot air about China has been expelled.  

What was right for Warren Buffett could prove to be right for Reliance.