The key paragraph is
Based upon this evidence the RFA have concluded that there is a significant risk
the current policy will not deliver its intended objective of significant net GHG emissions
savings. Accordingly, the RFA believe it would be unwise to proceed with
the introduction of biofuels in the manner, or at the pace, presently envisaged.
He doesn't think that a Moratorium is a good idea...
A moratorium is likely to lead to a stagnant, unprofitable industry that is less prepared and able to invest in new technologies or source feedstock that does not cause land-use change.
An EU-wide moratorium is also likely to lead to a further increase in fossil fuel prices (due to the additional demand created from the removal of biofuels) with knock-on impacts for both food prices and the poor. A moratorium on biofuels could also discourage much needed investment in agriculture that is required to address increasing global food demands and to
encourage the development of a more productive agricultural system. This could
have particular benefits for the poor in the medium and long term.
His recommendations to reduce the rate of increase in the UK's renewable transport fuel obligation looks sensible, with an aim of 5% of fuel by volume by 2013.
His suggestion that the
EU should not allow Member States to supply more than 5.75% (by energy) of biofuels; and allow more cautious Member States to supply to 4% biofuels (by energy).
Looks like he could be paving the way for the UK to limit its uptake of biofuels. Given the tenor of his report its possible.
His suggestion that
A target range of 5% to 8% (including 1-2% from advanced technologies) with a higher target triggered only if milestones in 2013/14 are met.
Is also very sensible.
If you argue with this type of point in this report then, you really should whether you're into biofuels for the right reasons. For what its worth this is the kind of biofuel policy that should be adopted by the European Union, and could resonate well in other heavy biofuel areas like the US. Of course the farming lobby and the big grain producers are likely to disagree in the short term.