There's an interesting article about how India's policies are stopping India create biofuel on the Hindu business line. They're subsidising the wrong thing, apparently. I think.
« US ethanol replaced about 2.6% of gasoline demand | Main | BioEnergy Africa to list on the UK Alternative Investment Market today. »
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 1, 2008 1:46 PM.
The previous post in this blog was US ethanol replaced about 2.6% of gasoline demand.
The next post in this blog is BioEnergy Africa to list on the UK Alternative Investment Market today..
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (3)
I too was a little confused by the article.
"The experience in Chhattisgarh and Thailand has clearly shown that the debate is entirely pointless and that promotion of the use of even edible oils for the production of bio-diesel has not affected the food situation there."
The article mentions an experience about growing jatropha (a non-food crop) in Chhattisgarh, but the above paragraph confuses this as a food crop.
The sugar barons (Sharad Pawar, the Minister of Agriculture, being one among them) do wield considerable political power. One practical problem with producing ethanol on the small scale in India is the potential for contamination & abuse(deaths from toxic substances (methanol..) in moonshine liquor do occur).
That said, I think producing ethanol from sugarcane (to make fuels) is not a good idea. In the future, I might make a few calculations about this to post back here.
Posted by Draka | September 2, 2008 5:57 AM
Posted on September 2, 2008 05:57
Hey Draka,
I guess the truth is in that article... somewhere. I would be very interested to see your calculations. I've not been able to find any that really show why sugar cane is such an excellent material for ethanol production. I suspect it is economic to use sugar cane in Brazil because a lot of the transport and processing infrastructure already exists. So the price of this does not have to be factored into the economics of production.
Posted by Simon Robinson
|
September 2, 2008 9:24 AM
Posted on September 2, 2008 09:24
Simon,
I dug up a paper on sugarcane production in India and its subsequent conversion to ethanol. It has a table comparing Indian, Brazilian and U.S. sugarcane/corn-derived ethanol.
There is not a lot of difference in costs between Indian and Brazilian sugarcane-derived ethanol. However, India does need to ramp up its sugarcane production to meet any realisitic blending regulations set by the central (federal) government (sugarcane takes up a lot of water - a scarce resource).
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/apr252007/1071.pdf
It should be accessible without a subscription, let me know otherwise and I can post the table from the article here.
Posted by Draka | September 4, 2008 1:56 AM
Posted on September 4, 2008 01:56