Main

Trees Archives

May 21, 2007

Lets talk trees

Lets talk trees for a bit. There is a growing realisation that diverting corn or other food sources into fuel is likely to have severe impacts on the world's ability to feed itself, or at least that the price of food is likely to rise dramatically. 

What does that leave, as renewable alternatives? Wood, grass, biomass and other forms of decomposing or waste vegetation.

I have decided that I need some structure to my general rambling over the web and I guess we're all going to get pretty bored as the mainstream decides vocally in the coming weeks and months, that Corn is only any good for the short term or smaller volumes of biofuels in the future.

I'm going to try explore some of these other biofuels areas in the coming weeks. So I'm going to start with trees, I like trees, they're big, easy to spot and some of the faster growing ones like willow have been use for as renewable energy for many years.

I recently wrote about Brazil has OK-ing the use of GM Eucalyptus trees on its territory (what happens if they out into the forests and run wild, like Rhododendrons in Snowdonia) and this lead to a response on the Australian Biofuels forum from Troy H, with a PDF of a submission to the Australian Government about oil supply from 2006 numbers about the volume of wood that Eucalypts and other fast growing antipodean trees can produce. The report says:

Wood such as E. globulus and P .radiata grown in plantations in high rainfall (>700mm) steep country currently only useful for grazing, can easily produce in the order of 15 - 30 tonnes of biomass per hectare per year from which 5,000- 10,000 litres per ha per year of alcohol should be extractable on a sustainable basis. Species such as oil mallee Eucalyptus, Casuarina and Grevillea sp have been shown by Dept CALM in WA to have sustainable wood production potential (albeit in the range 1-5 tonnes per ha per year) in the 300 - 500 mm rainfall wheat belt areas. (See press release, Appendix). Such wood production from local species has the added benefit of being sustainable in terms of reducing soil loss, being 'drought proof, lowering saline water tables and providing 'greenhouse sinks'.

 Two caveats, The Lorax (which I've referred to in the past) and letting the land recover or farming trees sustainably.

You can see the Eucalyptus thread on the Australian Biofuels forum here.

July 23, 2007

China to grow forests for biofuels

China plans to grow a staggering 13.33 million hectares of forests by 2020 for biofuels, according to a report in English on Hungarian website BBJ , quoting a Chinese official. (If there's not room for Chinese whispers there, then I don't know when there will be). Just for the record, the land area of Alabama is 135,765 square kilometers.

August 17, 2007

Sand willows slow Gobi Desert's spread in Mongolia

Sand willows are slowing the Gobi Desert's spread in Mongolia, according to Greening The Desert blog. The trees will be used to generate electricity at power plants in the region

According to Greening the Desert


In early 2007, the first desert biomass thermal power plant was constructed near to an existing methanol chemical plant, two kilometres away. The power plant uses the waste water from the methanol plant, and the biomass residue can be further processed into potassium fertilizer. The power plant is slated to begin operation early next year and will generate some 180–210 million kWh of electricity annually.

It will be interesting to see if the willows are sustainable, whether they can extract enough water to grow for several cycles of harvesting and whether they can help to stabilise the soil in the longer term.

August 23, 2007

Japan's disposable chopstics are potential biofuel

Japan's government is encouraging people to dispose of their disposable chopsticks carefully, sot that they can be collected and used as biofuel, according to Tree Hugger.com. which says.

Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries is looking to introduce recycling bins to begin collection the country’s hearty supply of disposable chopsticks. It appears, that on average, each of that nations 127 million souls discards 200 sets annually.
The resulting 90,000 tons of wood will be used to make biofuels in some unspecified way.

Whatever happened to wipe-clean hardwood chopsticks that were handed down from father to son, mother to daughter for generations? Would the Japanese government be better popularising socks so that people had some where to stash their reusable chopsticks when they're not in use?

May 7, 2008

Trees could be the future for biofuels

Trees could be the biofuel of the future, according to this analysts report from Jeffries & Company which examines clean technology and industrial biotech following the BIO's Industrial Biotechnology conference in the US recently.

Key quotes for me are

Forestry

Unlike prior conferences, this conference was marked by a significant presence of companies speaking directly to the potential to use forests, rather than dedicated energy crops, as cellulosic feedstocks.

Cellulosic biofuels

Several speakers highlighted the difficulty involved in cellulosic ethanol enzyme cocktails (more than 200 different enzymes involved in reducing biomass);

We know that route is tricky, and the paper notes:

Several new technologies were discussed, included a combination pyrolysis/fermentation process that feeds the orgnanisms syngas (demo plant starts up April 2009) and one that used a catalytic process to convert C5 and C6 sugars into hydrocarbons, including aromatics, rather than ethanol.

Download file

Cheers Doris.

November 19, 2008

Saving forest is beyond the power of Indonesia's government

Saving forest is beyond the power of Indonesia's government, according to a report in the Jakarta Post. Here's the extract

Agriculture Minister Anton Apriyantono on Tuesday defended Indonesia's drive to expand oil palm plantations, despite a demand by environmentalists for a moratorium on deforestation.

Speaking in his keynote address at the opening of the sixth annual meeting of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Nusa Dua, Bali, Apriyantono said any moratorium, including that recently called for by Greenpeace, was beyond the control of the Indonesian government. 

It must be that there are other forces at work. Surely, it would be more environmentally sensible to intensify production in existing plantations.

If you've been following the debate on energy intensity on the Big Biofuels Blog, mostly buried in the comments, (and perhaps more relevantly here) then you'll know that I've been interested in the cradle to grave carbon dioxide position of palm oil. I'm indebted to Almuth on biofuel watch, who points me to this page .

Here's the key Passage

Deforestation also releases amounts of carbon which is held by the vegetation, ie above soil. Indonesia's old growth forests are estimated to hold around 306 tonnes of carbon per hectare.5 86% of that carbon are lost during 'selective logging', which tends to be followed by land clearance for plantations or agriculture. A mature oil palm plantation only holds less carbon than logged forest, around 63 tonnes per hectare, but those plantations have an average life-time of only 25 years.

As Almuth says in answer to a question about how much carbon dioxide can be attributed to biodiesel from  palm oil...

If you are looking for precise information as to how much of this is related to producing palm oil from biodiesel - no such information is available.  It would require detailed auditing but the palm oil supply chain is not transparent and not traceable. Apart from the very partial reporting requirements in the UK, there are no requirements on biodiesel producers or suppliers to disclose the origin of their feedstock (although a lot of them are very open about using palm oil for biodiesel). In any case, as you will be aware, there are serious question marks over the relevance of putting too much reliance on direct impacts.




January 19, 2009

Could Moringa be the new Jatropha?

It is not that I'm bored by Jatropha yet, in the same way that I'm bored by some of the feverishness about corn ethanol, but there is another protential tropical biofuel from a tree called Moringa. Wikipedia sugests the trees could produce 112-185 gal/acre/year. The oil contains 65-75% oleic acids.

Thanks for the tip David!

February 25, 2009

Belgium and Netherlands may grow GM poplars for biofuels

Belgium and the Netherlands may find themselves in a race to grow the first GM poplars for biofuels.

According to a story in Nature Biotechnology and quoted by Biofuel Watch in an email, the Dutch Government may approve the planting of poplars for biofuel. If you can get to a library, you can see the article in  Nature Biotechnology volume 27 number 2 February 2009 p. 107. Alternatively it will cost you $32 to view the article on line.

The gist is that...
Researchers at the Ghent, Belgium-based Flanders Institute of Biotechnology (VIB) have developed transgenic poplars deficient in the enzyme cinnamoyl-CoA reductase. This reduces the lignin content making them more suitable for bioethanol production, although so far their benefits have only been demonstrated in the lab.

A final decision from the Dutch government is due in spring 2009.

Information extracted by Hayley Birch. Well done Hayley.

Today the Dutch language, but Belgian, engineeringnet.be says The VIB has gained approval in Flanders, Belgium.  So could the race be on?

The VIB website has some interesting stuff... The process it went through to get permission to grow the plants in Belgium, for instance. The fact that VIB has been working on GM poplars for about 10 years...

It is also worth making a note of cinnamoyl-CoA reductase. Remember it. I'm going to guess that it is one of the key components in work by seed/trait companies who are hoping to develop easier-to ferment non-food biofuels. There's quite a bit of interest in cinnamoyl-CoA reductase.  

March 4, 2009

Michigan state in big cellulosic ethanol drive

The Michigan Messenger has a story about converting 375,000 chords of timber into 40m gal ethanol for biofuel. I think that this may be the start of a concerted campaign by environmental groups to stop or modify the plan. I don't think that Mascoma will help itself if it fails to make someone available to directly answer the concerns raised in the article.

According to a report on Michigan Timber Harvest Trends, 375,000 chords is about of the amount of timber harvested from the land owned by the State of Michigan. ( of the See Graph on page 39 of the report). The Mascoma company is involved in the process, according to the Messenger. Mascoma has technology for digesting cellulose. A special meeting of the Michigan State Finance and Claims Committee and the State Administrative Board on 2 December last year approved a $20m grant over five years for Mascoma to estabilish a commercial scale cellulosic ethanol facility in Kinross, MI.

A cord of wood is 128 cubic feet (The Economist World Measurement Guide ISBN 0 85058 045 5) 375,000 chords= 48m cubic feet. The EWMG tells me that 48m cubic feet is equivalent to 360m gal (US). Mascoma process apparently reduces this to 40m gal. So the yeild looks quite low. Are the numbers right? I guess that there are opportunities to do something with waste streams, like sell them. Perhaps Someone from Mascoma could add a little here. The company's website is a little thin in this respect. (Though it looks very nice)

Michigan has 19.3 million acres of forest covering more than half its lands. Private land owners hold more than 12 million acres, the State of Michigan holds approximately 4 million acres and the federal government just under 3 million acres.

March 10, 2009

More on Michigan State's big cellulosic ethanol drive

I wrote a couple of days ago about a company called Frontier Renewable Resources, a joint venture between JM Longyear and Mascoma that is planning to convert trees in Michigan into ethanol for biofuel. There has been a follow up story in the Michigan Messenger. Patrick K. Egan at the Messenger has managed to talk to Longyear CEO, Steve Hicks about project.

Egan's written a nice feature about what the arrival of the Mascoma plant might mean for the northern Michigan Peninsula.
There are some concerns about job losses. There is mention of the cost of  generating the cellulosic ethanol jobs. There is some speculation that Frontier Renewable Resources might import timber from Canada... It is worth reading.

It is also worth noting that Hicks says that there have been a couple of timber plant closures in the past couple of years that has increased the amount of timber available by around 2m acres of forest land (about 800 000Ha).

The piece is well balanced and also touches on some of the cost of jobs generated by the grant. I guess that the fear is that these will simply be temporary jobs and that once the money has gone then the jobs will disappear too. Though in 2009 is there such a thing as a permanent job? 

March 13, 2009

Two Michigan Universities gain grants to study sustainable biofuel from trees

Two universities in Michigan have won grants to study how to use the state's forests sustainably to make biofuels.

Hopefully it will add some clarity to the current concern in the state about there being enough suitable timber in the forests of Michigan's Northern Peninsula to sustain biofuels production.

March 17, 2009

Arkansas: promised land for biofuel

Could Arkansas be a promised land for biofuel. This article from Delta Farm Press seems to think so. Of course it doesn't explain how all the biofuel that could be producecd in the state could be got to the markets that need it? I Wonder how long it would take to get from Little Rock to New York/San Francisco by ethanol tanker.

But hats off to them, they are interested in cellulosic biofuels from wood.

May 11, 2009

25x25 warns on restricting cellulosic biomass

25x25 a pressure group in the US is warning that some proposed legislation in the US could severely restrict the amount of cellulose available for biofuels in what is effectively a call for managed woodlands. I can see why the Waxman-Markley proposal wants to ensure that the forests are not completely denuded of trees or cover for wildlife. But I am at a loss to see why so much  Federally owned woodland should be excluded.

I whole heartedly agree with this sentiment from 25x25:

It is incredibly short-sighted to not include as a renewable energy resource the millions of acres of dead and dying trees that, with one spark, could go up in wildfires, releasing billions of tons of greenhouse gases.

Much better to convert at least some of it into automotive fuel before converting it to carbon dioxide.

About Trees

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to The Big Biofuels Blog in the Trees category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

Trade Association is the previous category.

Veg Oil is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 4.37

Click here to get your own player.