One rule for banks, another for manufacturers

The excellent Gretchen Morgenson makes a good point in her New York Times column today. As she puts it, “here in Bailout Nation, you’ll be surprised to learn, some of us are more equal than others”.

Her argument is that Congress is operating to double standards. Last week, it refused to support $14bn of lending to the auto industry, on the basis that “we cannot ask the American taxpayer to subsidise failure”. Yet in October, it allocated $700bn to rescue the banks, where “taxpayers are financing not only failure, but also outright recklessness and greed”.

Equally, she notes, that before even considering the automakers rescue, Congress required them to submit detailed business plans, sell their private jets, and negotiate pay-cuts for the workers. Yet the banks have not been required to produce business plans, stop paying excessive bonuses, or sell their jets.

The blog takes no position on the merits of the proposed automakers bailout itself. But it does remain very concerned that the banks’ $700bn bailout is still being run by a 35 year old ex-Goldman Sachs banker with just 5 permanent staffers.

About Paul Hodges

Paul Hodges is Chairman of International eChem, trusted commercial advisers to the global chemical industry. Paul is also an invited member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council. The aim of this blog is to share ideas about the influences that may shape the chemical industry over the next 12 – 18 months. It will try to look behind today’s headlines, to understand what may happen next in important issues such as oil prices, economic growth and the environment. We may also have some fun, investigating a few of the more offbeat events that take place from time to time. Please do join me and share your thoughts. Between us, we will hopefully develop useful insights into the key factors that will drive the industry's future performance.

, , ,

Leave a Reply