Industrial output decline follows Depression trend

O'Rourke Jun09.jpg

Sweden is an influential adviser on credit crunch issues. This is because of the lessons it learned during its own major banking collapse in the early 1990′s, which has close parallels with today’s global crisis.

Its central bank argues that the main risk now facing the world is deflation, not inflation. It points to the very worrying parallels between the progress of the current crisis, and that of the Great Depression.

The chart above, from Profs Eichengreen and O’Rourke, summarises the bank’s argument. It maps the decline in global industrial output from the Depression’s start in June 1929, versus the period since April 2008.

Of course, policy responses have been different in this crisis. But chemical production is closely tied to changes in industrial output. Any further decline from current levels would be very bad news indeed.

Footnote, 17 June. The Financial Times today follows up the blog’s posting above on the work of Profs Eichengreen and O’Rourke. After detailed analysis, the FT concludes that “those sure we are at the beginning of a robust private sector-led recovery are almost certainly deluded. The race to full recovery is likely to be long, hard and uncertain.”

About Paul Hodges

Paul Hodges is Chairman of International eChem, trusted commercial advisers to the global chemical industry. The aim of this blog is to share ideas about the influences that may shape the chemical industry over the next 12 – 18 months. It will try to look behind today’s headlines, to understand what may happen next in important issues such oil prices, economic growth and the environment. We may also have some fun, investigating a few of the more offbeat events that take place from time to time. Please do join me and share your thoughts. Between us, we will hopefully develop useful insights into the key factors that will drive the industry's future performance.

, ,

Leave a Reply