Propane for the Olympic Flame

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

flame.jpg

Watching the Olympic flame's progress through London and Paris, Lucy Craymer has some chemical thoughts on the subject...

The Olympic flame seems to have ignited people’s views on the problems in Tibet (she writes) but another major one seems to have been forgotten.

No one seems to have questioned what damage the burning of the Olympic flame and the lanterns through 135 cities or what travelling 137,000km across 20 countries in 130 days will do to the environment.

Although propane has been named the fuel of choice for burning the torch because of its low environmental impact, the flame does produce the dreaded carbon dioxide. Add to this the carbon footprint produced by the necessary 20 vehicle convoy and the specially chartered Air China flight and one has to wonder if the Olympic committee has checked with the European Union on whether it needed to buy some carbon credits before “lighting up”.

So while the Free Tibet protesters look likely to become an integral part of the torches procession, perhaps environmental campaigners need to set up camp right beside them.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.icis.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/25030

2 Comments

this sounds like a 'Propane Nightmare' - and on that theme Lucy's Kiwi compatriots - metallic drum and bass merchants Pendulum -have got a single out. Quite what the LPG has done to them is anyone's guess although you can guess from listening to it here

Lucy, Chemsyndicate - nice song on your link, but the video is a bit creepy.

Leave a comment

Want a user icon? Get a Gravatar!

Latest chemical industry news

#epca - Twitter hashtag

    About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by Barbara Ortner published on April 8, 2008 4:45 PM.

    Win a barrel load of goodies was the previous entry in this blog.

    Scarecrows defend oil tankers is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.