More action needed at Mitsubishi Chem

Analysts Reports, Business, Company Strategy, Japan, M&A

By Malini Hariharan

Japan’s largest chemical company Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings has been actively restructuring this year but more needs to be done to complete its transformation.

High on the list is reorganization of its cracker operations at Mizushima. Mitsubishi and Asahi, which also has a cracker at the same site, have been talking since 2007 about unifying operations.

The two had even made an announcement in June that a study on this would be completed within two months. But that deadline has passed and it is uncertain if they can start joint operations at the site from the earlier target date of April 2010.

The official line from the two companies is that the study is still in progress.

Industry players in Japan acknowledge that 1-2m tonnes of ethylene capacity in the country will need to close given the rising competition from the Middle East. But while companies have announced plant closures for derivatives they have been hesitating when it comes to crackers.
mitsubishi1.jpg
The biggest reason for the slow pace is culture, says one industry analyst. In addition to this, cracker structure at most Japanese sites is complicated with many companies involved in offtake contracts. It is difficult to move quickly, he adds.

Mitsubishi’s other challenge will be to digest the proposed merger of Mitsubishi Rayon Co (MRC). The Yen228bn ($2.57bn) deal, due to be completed in March 2010, gives Mitsubishi access to the methyl methacrylate (MMA), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and carbon fibre businesses.

Mitsubishi’s aim is to achieve a cost synergy of Yen3bn and operations synergy of Yen7bn by fiscal 2012-13.

But analysts are not convinced about the synergies especially as buying into MMA takes Mitsubishi away from its strategy of expanding in specialities. Even carbon fibre, they say, is not very exciting.

Carbon fibre is a value added product and demand is quite promising. But competition is likely to be intense,” says a second analyst.

Analysts say that the merger was driven by financial reasons and pushed through by Bank of Mitsubishi-Tokyo which had funded MRC’s $1.6bn acquisition of Lucite earlier this year.

In a recent research report analysts at Nomura said that while major synergies are unlikely, the merger gives Mitsubishi an opportunity to reconfigure its business portfolio for higher growth.

“If Japanese chemical makers are to capitalize on growing overseas demand, we think they will need to create a portfolio of businesses that are among the global leaders in terms of market share. The merger will make Mitsubishi the world leader in MMA and could facilitate major progress in compiling a full line of LCD [liquid crystal display] materials, leveraging comprehensive strengths in carbon fibre, and going on the offensive in water-treatment products. We think the merger is really aimed at leveraging MRC’s strengths more fully than it can do on its own.”

They pointed out that MRC did not have the capital to scale up its carbon fibre business on its own.

But they also emphasised the need for further restructuring at Mitsubishi.

“If the company can put together an all-Japan team comprising olefins, polyolefins, terephthalic acid, phenol, and polycarbonate resin, we think it could see sharp cost reductions and a business platform capable of competing worldwide.”

PREVIOUS POST

Shell would like to build two MEG plants in Qatar

14/12/2009

By Malini Hariharan Japan’s largest chemical company Mitsubishi Chemical H...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Will Reliance decide today on LyondellBasell?

14/12/2009

By Malini Hariharan Japan’s largest chemical company Mitsubishi Chemical H...

Learn more
More posts
China’s paraxylene imports in 2019-2025 face major downside risks
21/05/2019

By John Richardson NEVER underestimate China’s ability to execute vast and highly complex manufact...

Read
China benzene spreads at ten-year low on misplaced trade deal hopes
19/05/2019

By John Richardson THE ABOVE chart shows that in April the average spread between CFR Japan naphtha ...

Read
Longer trade war: Impact in numbers on China polymers demand
15/05/2019

By John Richardson WE MUST now start to quantify the impact on the petrochemicals industry of no end...

Read
Plastics pollution crisis: Impact on polyethylene margins in 2022-2027
13/05/2019

By John Richardson ALMOST all countries late last week signed a UN deal to monitor the flow of hard-...

Read
China PE demand boom will not stop further margin declines
10/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S polyethylene (PE) market is being temporarily weighed down by overstock...

Read
China holds all the petchems demand aces as it digs in for longer trade war
08/05/2019

By John Richardson THE STRENGTH of China’s position in the intensifying trade war is further under...

Read
President Trump’s Tweets increase risk of no trade deal until 2021
06/05/2019

By John Richardson THE PROSPECTS of a trade deal seem to have have faded into the distance as a resu...

Read
Pressure on US builds as PE exports to China tumble and EU considers tariffs
03/05/2019

By John Richardson DONALD TRUMP insisted in early March that he was willing to walk away from a bad ...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more