China’s Reform Process Jeopardised

China, Company Strategy, Economics, Japan

ChinaHouseholdConsumptionIMF

By John Richardson

LAST week’s decision by China to give its banks the freedom to compete for borrowers, by removing the floor on lending rates, has been praised by most analysts.

“This is one of the biggest steps they could have taken. It tells you something about the trajectory,” Mark Williams, chief economist at Capital Economics, told Reuters.

And the US Treasury weighed in with praise with its spokeswoman, Holly Hunter, saying that this was a “further step in the reform and liberalisation of China’s financial system”.

The theory is that scrapping the lending floor, which had been set at 70% of the benchmark borrowing rate, will force banks to better price risk. They will be compelled to allocate capital more efficiently, which will help to rebalance an economy burdened by overinvestment and overcapacity across many industries, including chemicals, it is argued.

And the hope is that by removing the lending floor, borrowing costs for individuals and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will be reduced. Artificially high rates have benefited state-owned enterprises (SOEs) at the expense of the SMEs, say analysts. The SMEs, which are struggling to source and afford lending, make up the bulk of China’s chemicals and polymer buyers.

But some economists were sceptical about the extent of the direct economic benefit of the decision, as few banks had fully utilised the limited freedom they already had to levy interest rates slightly below benchmark rates, choosing instead to keep their rates slightly above the previous floor, added Reuters.

The decision might, therefore, be more of an indication of the trajectory, as Williams said – i.e. Beijing’s determination to press ahead with financial sector reform.

But what if the decision is more about protecting heavily indebted SOEs, big private-sector employees and local government financing arms?

“I’m a little sceptical of the appraisals that this is a big, big reform move,” said Patrick Chovanec, managing director and chief strategist at Silvercrest Asset Management in New York, in this second Reuters article.

“My concern in the short run is that what will happen is that a bunch of local government financing vehicles will get lower interest rates,” he added.

International bankers and investors active in China added that the timing of the reform – coming around a month after the crackdown on the shadow banking system – could be less about banks issuing new loans and more about keeping existing debt from going into default.

And very worryingly, foreign bankers and investors drew parallels with Japan in the 1990s, when banks avoided restructuring loans to their biggest banks and refinanced them at lower rates, added Reuters. This “extend and pretend” policy helped create zombie companies and was said to be the reason for Japan’s two decades of economic stagnation, said the wire service.

In addition, China has yet to also remove the ceiling on deposit rates, currently set at a maximum annual 3%.

Getting rid of the cap on deposit rates is viewed as an essential step towards encouraging much-greater household domestic consumption – and a much bigger deal than removing the floor on lending rates.

Private consumption as share of economic growth was just 45.2% in H1 2013. This compares very poorly with other economies (see the above chart).

The potential for a household spending explosion is enormous as, according to this article in the New York Times, “household deposits tucked away in banks have doubled during the last five years, and stood at Rmb2.7 trillion, or about $7 trillion, as of May”. This is equal to 83% of last year’s GDP!

China’s savers had little option but to stick their money in low-yielding local deposit accounts because the cross-border movement on money remained tightly regulated, added the NYT.

Real average household deposit rates were negative, after adjustments for inflation, during the decade that President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister Wen Jiabao were in power, said Nicholas Lardy, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, who was quoted in the same NYT article.

Thus, removing the cap on deposit rates would not only unlock a big increase in consumption, but was also “a path towards greater social justice”,  said Lardy.  China’s hard-pressed middle income earners are demanding a better deal from their government, and so greater social justice appears to be a political priority.

If not now, when will the deposit ceiling be removed?

Not in the near term, whatever that means, according to an adviser to the People’s Bank of China, who was quoted in the Chinese newspaper, the 21st Business Herald.

Why? Perhaps because keeping deposit rates artificially low will preserve the health of banks, and will allow low-cost finance to continue to be channelled to inefficient SOEs and other favoured lenders.

It is thus possible to interpret both the decision to get rid of the floor on borrowing costs, and the reluctance to act on deposit rates, as evidence that China’s “vested interests” are successfully fighting back.

The whole reform process might, as a result, be in jeopardy.

PREVIOUS POST

US Stocks Defy China Reality

23/07/2013

  By John Richardson ALL is right with the world if you are one of the smal...

Learn more
NEXT POST

China's "Mini-Stimulus" Package

25/07/2013

By John Richardson The big question this morning for anybody concerned about Chi...

Learn more
More posts
China’s “Common prosperity” uncertainties multiply as we head into the unknown
21/10/2021

By John Richardson DON’T SAY I didn’t warn you. This article in The Wall Street Journal confirms...

Read
China provides major climate hope as latest IEA report underlines that it is all about the developing world
18/10/2021

By John Richardson WHEN I worked for a UK local newspaper as a “cub” or junior reporter in the 1...

Read
China’s less commodity intensive future requires major petchem strategic rethink
14/10/2021

By John Richardson THE THING about the collapse of China is that, like commercially viable nuclear f...

Read
China pulls multiple policy levers to fix energy shortages but don’t forget secular fall in demand
11/10/2021

By John Richardson Executive Summary CHINA’S POWER shortages could fixed by the end of this month ...

Read
China petchem project cancellations on “common prosperity” may not mean higher imports
06/10/2021

By John Richardson IT IS BEING suggested that China’s “common prosperity” policy pivot, the bi...

Read
China traditional Q4 petchems demand increase unlikely because of economic rebalancing
04/10/2021

By John Richardson A NEW RESEARCH PAPER by economists Kenneth Rogoff and Yuanchen Yang underlines th...

Read
China carbon limits and Evergrande tied together as short term growth challenges build
28/09/2021

By John Richardson Executive summary THE LIKELIHOOD that 227,000 tonnes of China’s polyethylene (P...

Read
Challenges facing China as it tries to bridge the rural-urban wealth divide
26/09/2021

By John Richardson THIS COULD be the biggest event in our industry since at least the Global Financi...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more