China’s Damage Limitation: The Reserve Requirement Cut

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, US

Whackamole2Feb2015

By John Richardson

DAMAGE limitation is the motive behind China’s decision cut its reserve requirement  ratio (RRR) by 0.5% to 19.5%.

(The RRR is the amount of money that banks have to set aside against this lending, and so the lower the percentage the more the capacity to lend).

The decision, which was  announced yesterday evening, marked the first time the RRR had been cut since May 2012.

It was predictably greeted by some analysts as a sign of aggressive easing – i.e. the long awaited “blink” by policymakers.

But Xi Jinping, China’s president, said in May of last year that as China moves towards a “New Normal’ of lower growth, “timely countermeasures to reduce potential negative effects” would on occasion be needed. This is one such occasion.

China is, of course, not an economic island. It has been forced to react in this way because of the rise in the value of the US dollar – one of the results of the Fed’s disastrous quantitative easing policies.

Oliver Blade Barron in this Forbes article makes a lot of sense when he argues:

  • The RRR cut will help meet liquidity during the upcoming Lunar New Year Holidays (18-24 February). Liquidity is always injected into the system after the LNY.
  • But the fact that the People’s Bank of China Bank of China (PBOC) chose this tool, rather than normal open market operations, highlights growing strain on the financial system as authorities struggle with increasingly large capital flight and the need to manage the rollover of a rising number of structured financial products [capital flight is the result of investors seeking higher returns from the US dollar, as they also anticipate a US interest-rate rise].
  • Official Yuan outflows last December were the largest for that month since 2007.
  • Recent Yuan appreciation suggests that outflows may have worsened since December.
  • This latest move follows the injection of Yuan 855bn into the financial system last December. The extra liquidity will help banks borrow the money they need to roll over wealth management products and trust products. These are at risk of going bad at a systemically damaging rate as the “shadow lending system” is unwound.

This is consistent with my thinking.

I would add that as capital flight has intensified, collateral trade is at more of a risk of unwinding. The trade has involved buying iron ore, polyethylene (PE) and other commodities in order to raise foreign letters of credit. These letters of credit have then been used to gamble on real estate, via wealth management products and trust products, which are part of the shadow lending system.

As Oliver Blade Barron said, without the RR cut, local banks would not have been able to rollover their wealth management and trust products.This would have caused many “chain effect” bankruptcies of PE distributors, traders and even converters, who are more into speculation than into the buying and selling of polymers. The same would have obviously happened in the iron ore and other commodity sectors.

The RRR cut is also designed to protect local stock market investors, many of whom are individuals – or which are again manufacturing and trading companies.

Borrowing money to gamble on equities is something that the government wants to stop over the long term.

But more immediately, there is the risk that a lack of liquidity could cause banks to call in these loans. This would, of course, cause panic selling of equities and a downward spiral of lost money as the Shanghai market collapsed.

Fifty percent of the total turnover on the Shanghai exchange involves  retail investment activity. This compares with 30% in Hong Kong and 20% in New York.

The irony is that the Shanghai exchange has been on a tear since last year as the real economy has slowed down.

In contrast, when the real economy was booming, in the five years from 2009, the Shanghai index was the worst performing stock market in the world.

“It is incredibly easy to borrow money to buy equities, and so that’s what I have done, and have made a very nice return,” said one of my friends, who works for a shipping company in Guangzhou.

“Part of the reason that I have gone into equities is because I have been priced-out of real estate. House are just too expensive.”

Talk about unintended consequences….

The link between the RRR cut and real estate and stock market speculation shows how careful China has to be as it plays its “whack-a-mole game”. If it plays this game too vigorously and too quickly, the whole economy could implode.

But please do not get the idea that the RRR cut means that the government has stopped playing the game altogether.

Instead, stick with the thinking of this blog and I will offer you continued guidance on how to take full advantage of the ‘new China”.

PREVIOUS POST

Global Economy: "When Elephants Fight, The Grass Suffers"

04/02/2015

HERE are some very disturbing statistics: Over the last five years, US oil and g...

Learn more
NEXT POST

A Perfect World? If Only It Were So

06/02/2015

By John Richardson IN A perfect world everything always turns out for the best i...

Learn more
More posts
China could be in complete polypropylene self-sufficiency by 2022
28/06/2020

By John Richardson SORRY to labour the point but this comes from a genuine concern for the readers o...

Read
Asian polyethylene price recovery faces multiple challenges
25/06/2020

By John Richardson THERE are reports of significant cuts in Middle East polyethylene (PE) operating ...

Read
China’s long-term ambition for paraxylene self-sufficiency seems close to being realised
21/06/2020

On Friday, I examined how China’s paraxylene (PX) net imports could fall to as little 8m tonne...

Read
China’s big declines in 2020 PX and PP imports: the impact on its major trading partners
18/06/2020

By John Richardson CHINA’S refineries and petrochemicals plants came roaring back to almost fu...

Read
Paraxylene demand collapses as higher China production threatens 6m tonne fall in imports
15/06/2020

By John Richardson DON’T SAY I didn’t tell you that a decline in stock markets would happen. The...

Read
Coronavirus will severely damage the developing world unless we take the right steps
12/06/2020

By John Richardson IT IS a fantastic achievement. “Over the last 25 years, more than a billion peo...

Read
Main Street versus Wall Street and the crisis in the developing world
10/06/2020

By John Richardson RISING equity and oil markets do not necessarily point to a V-shaped recovery. I ...

Read
Why the EU could become polyethylene self-sufficient in the post-pandemic world
08/06/2020

By John Richardson ONE OF the many unknowns about the post-pandemic world is the extent to which the...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more
X

Uncover exclusive industry upates from ICIS

Interested to uncover more articles related to this topic? Explore additional news, insights and intelligence, tailored to the markets you are interested in by accessing exclusive content from ICIS.com

DISCOVER MORE