PRESIDENT TRUMP said yesterday that his discussions with President Xi Jinping were “moving along nicely” following a “very good” telephone call ahead of their critical G20 meeting at the end of November.

But on the same day that the US president made his comment, the US Justice Department issued indictments against Chinese and Taiwanese semiconductor companies over allegations of intellectual copyright theft.

We have to consider US vice president Mike Pence’s speech in early October in which he criticised previous US presidents for their engagements with China. He re-characterised China as an adversary ever since the Korean War.

We also need to consider last November’s revised US National Security strategy. China was for the first time categorised as a geopolitical and economic opponent.

The battle for global influence between the US and China may intensify, forcing countries to choose sides in an echo of the last Cold War:

Will countries support the US and in so doing lose access to the world’s biggest consumption market for chemicals, finished goods and services? Or will they support China and in so doing risk isolation from the vast US consumer-driven economy, the US-led global financial system and the US defence security umbrella?

A sign of this struggle comes from the BDI – the German industry federation. It is to publish a position paper in Januaryin which it will advise German companies to loosen ties with China.

What would it take for all of these tensions and complications to entirely disappear and for the US and China to step away from not only a trade but also a new Cold War? :

  1. The US would have to step back from categorising China as a geopolitical and economic adversary. It would also have to abandon attempts to make China dismantle its economic growth model, which has long been based on heavy state subsidies for manufacturing.
  2. Or China would have to agree to all the main US demands – and in so doing give up on its geopolitical ambitions whilst risking economic stagnation.

Your base case must as a result remain an intensification of the trade war/Cold War during 2019.

The effect on PE markets

Next year sees further big increases in US PE production with the risk that the US is largely unable to access the key Chinese import market because of the trade war.

China’s PE import market is becoming more and more important by the year as its import growth increases on booming domestic demand and an inability to meet that demand with local capacity:

China hasn’t released any official trade data for any products since March. But one industry estimate is that Chinese PE imports will have grown by some 20% in 2018 over last year when the data is finally made available.

The risk is greatest in LLDPE where US production will see the biggest increase. We now forecast that the country’s LLDPE production will rise to 6.9m tonnes in 2019 – a 14% increase over 2018. Our previous forecast had been for a 12% increase. Meanwhile, our estimate for the rise in local demand remains unchanged at a 2% increase to 4.8m tonnes.

This has led me to increase my estimate for 2019 US LLDPE exports to 3.7m tonnes from my earlier forecast of 3.6m tonnes. This would compare with actual 2017 exports of 2.2m tonnes.

My estimate is based on 56% of production going to exports, in line with what we saw in January-July of this year. The January-July percentage of exports over production is the highest on record.

Our Supply & Demand Database only forecasts net imports and net exports on a global basis. So, let’s think through what the implications would be on this net basis for the global LLDPE business if the US is unable to export to China:

  • In January-July 2018, US LLDPE imports were 60% of exports. 60% of my estimate of US exports in 2019 comes to net exports of 2.3m tonnes.
  • Include China’s net imports in 2019 in total global net imports and the number is 8.3m tonnes. Take China away from this number and global net imports fall to just 2.2m tonnes.
  • If the US were able to export to China, it would need 27% of the global net import market.
  • This rises to 53% of the remaining global net import market if the trade war makes it impossible for the US to ship to China.

If the US were to win 53% of the remaining market it would have to flood other major importers such as Europe, Turkey and some of the countries in Southeast. This would cause a major compression in pricing and margins – and a likely call for trade protection from LLDPE producers in these other regions and countries.

A transactional president

When President Trump first came to office, my Chinese contacts tell me that Chinese government officials were not alarmed. Despite some of the rhetoric, they saw President Trump as a transactional president willing to do deals.

Over the last year, this view has changed. Chinese officials now worry that geopolitics as well as trade is influencing the president’s thinking.

Chinese officials are also said to have a lot of “face” in adversarial meetings with US government officials. This seems to be making compromises even more challenging.

But this could all change. President Trump may in the end be transactional. China could also meet the US and the rest of the West halfway on improving intellectual property rights protection and access to its domestic market.

All of us must hope for this outcome. But for the PE industry, the rest of the chemicals industry and the global economy hope is not a strategy. That is why you need to speak to ICIS so we can help you plan for what an extended trade/Cold War would mean for your company.


Polymers industry risks sleepwalking into sustainability crisis


GLOBALLY some 75% of aluminium is recycled, 86% of steel and 40% of glass. Why s...

Learn more

Negative Asian polyolefins margins show need for recession planning


ASIAN PE and PP spreads turned negative in October this year for the first time ...

Learn more
More posts
Global polypropylene could also move from inflation to deflation in Q1 next year

By John Richardson WE ALL NEED TO ASK ourselves whether the global patterns in polyethylene (PE) and...

Global polyethylene could move from inflation to deflation by as early as Q1 2022

By John Richardson THE BALTIC DRY INDEX, one of the excellent barometers of overall economic activit...

As China coal shortages end, polyolefins margins reach historic lows on oversupply

By John Richardson AGAIN, DON’T say I didn’t tell you. In my 11 October blog post, having talked...

Dip in Chinese PP exports only temporary with Q1 2022 resurgence looking likely

By John Richardson TRADE DATA when combined with price assessments, supply and demand estimates and ...

Global polyethylene supply could lengthen, becoming a buyers’ market, sooner than many people think

By John Richardson RARELY, IF EVER, have events felt so bafflingly complex in the global polyethylen...

China could either see net imports of 63m tonnes in 2021-2031 or net exports of 18m tonnes!

By John Richardson CONFUSED BY the above chart? Once again I certainly hope so, provided confusion i...

After the COP26 disappointment, the “blame game” will get us nowhere

The implications of last week’s disappointing COP26 meeting in Glasgow are so complex and so numer...

New China HDPE import scenarios for 2021-2031 in the context of Common Prosperity

    By John Richardson IF YOU THINK that forecasting the direction of China’s petrochemi...


Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more


Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more