PRESIDENT TRUMP said yesterday that his discussions with President Xi Jinping were “moving along nicely” following a “very good” telephone call ahead of their critical G20 meeting at the end of November.

But on the same day that the US president made his comment, the US Justice Department issued indictments against Chinese and Taiwanese semiconductor companies over allegations of intellectual copyright theft.

We have to consider US vice president Mike Pence’s speech in early October in which he criticised previous US presidents for their engagements with China. He re-characterised China as an adversary ever since the Korean War.

We also need to consider last November’s revised US National Security strategy. China was for the first time categorised as a geopolitical and economic opponent.

The battle for global influence between the US and China may intensify, forcing countries to choose sides in an echo of the last Cold War:

Will countries support the US and in so doing lose access to the world’s biggest consumption market for chemicals, finished goods and services? Or will they support China and in so doing risk isolation from the vast US consumer-driven economy, the US-led global financial system and the US defence security umbrella?

A sign of this struggle comes from the BDI – the German industry federation. It is to publish a position paper in Januaryin which it will advise German companies to loosen ties with China.

What would it take for all of these tensions and complications to entirely disappear and for the US and China to step away from not only a trade but also a new Cold War? :

  1. The US would have to step back from categorising China as a geopolitical and economic adversary. It would also have to abandon attempts to make China dismantle its economic growth model, which has long been based on heavy state subsidies for manufacturing.
  2. Or China would have to agree to all the main US demands – and in so doing give up on its geopolitical ambitions whilst risking economic stagnation.

Your base case must as a result remain an intensification of the trade war/Cold War during 2019.

The effect on PE markets

Next year sees further big increases in US PE production with the risk that the US is largely unable to access the key Chinese import market because of the trade war.

China’s PE import market is becoming more and more important by the year as its import growth increases on booming domestic demand and an inability to meet that demand with local capacity:

China hasn’t released any official trade data for any products since March. But one industry estimate is that Chinese PE imports will have grown by some 20% in 2018 over last year when the data is finally made available.

The risk is greatest in LLDPE where US production will see the biggest increase. We now forecast that the country’s LLDPE production will rise to 6.9m tonnes in 2019 – a 14% increase over 2018. Our previous forecast had been for a 12% increase. Meanwhile, our estimate for the rise in local demand remains unchanged at a 2% increase to 4.8m tonnes.

This has led me to increase my estimate for 2019 US LLDPE exports to 3.7m tonnes from my earlier forecast of 3.6m tonnes. This would compare with actual 2017 exports of 2.2m tonnes.

My estimate is based on 56% of production going to exports, in line with what we saw in January-July of this year. The January-July percentage of exports over production is the highest on record.

Our Supply & Demand Database only forecasts net imports and net exports on a global basis. So, let’s think through what the implications would be on this net basis for the global LLDPE business if the US is unable to export to China:

  • In January-July 2018, US LLDPE imports were 60% of exports. 60% of my estimate of US exports in 2019 comes to net exports of 2.3m tonnes.
  • Include China’s net imports in 2019 in total global net imports and the number is 8.3m tonnes. Take China away from this number and global net imports fall to just 2.2m tonnes.
  • If the US were able to export to China, it would need 27% of the global net import market.
  • This rises to 53% of the remaining global net import market if the trade war makes it impossible for the US to ship to China.

If the US were to win 53% of the remaining market it would have to flood other major importers such as Europe, Turkey and some of the countries in Southeast. This would cause a major compression in pricing and margins – and a likely call for trade protection from LLDPE producers in these other regions and countries.

A transactional president

When President Trump first came to office, my Chinese contacts tell me that Chinese government officials were not alarmed. Despite some of the rhetoric, they saw President Trump as a transactional president willing to do deals.

Over the last year, this view has changed. Chinese officials now worry that geopolitics as well as trade is influencing the president’s thinking.

Chinese officials are also said to have a lot of “face” in adversarial meetings with US government officials. This seems to be making compromises even more challenging.

But this could all change. President Trump may in the end be transactional. China could also meet the US and the rest of the West halfway on improving intellectual property rights protection and access to its domestic market.

All of us must hope for this outcome. But for the PE industry, the rest of the chemicals industry and the global economy hope is not a strategy. That is why you need to speak to ICIS so we can help you plan for what an extended trade/Cold War would mean for your company.

PREVIOUS POST

Polymers industry risks sleepwalking into sustainability crisis

31/10/2018

PRESIDENT TRUMP said yesterday that his discussions with President Xi Jinping we...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Negative Asian polyolefins margins show need for recession planning

05/11/2018

PRESIDENT TRUMP said yesterday that his discussions with President Xi Jinping we...

Learn more
More posts
China benzene spreads at ten-year low on misplaced trade deal hopes
19/05/2019

By John Richardson THE ABOVE chart shows that in April the average spread between CFR Japan naphtha ...

Read
Longer trade war: Impact in numbers on China polymers demand
15/05/2019

By John Richardson WE MUST now start to quantify the impact on the petrochemicals industry of no end...

Read
Plastics pollution crisis: Impact on polyethylene margins in 2022-2027
13/05/2019

By John Richardson ALMOST all countries late last week signed a UN deal to monitor the flow of hard-...

Read
China PE demand boom will not stop further margin declines
10/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S polyethylene (PE) market is being temporarily weighed down by overstock...

Read
China holds all the petchems demand aces as it digs in for longer trade war
08/05/2019

By John Richardson THE STRENGTH of China’s position in the intensifying trade war is further under...

Read
President Trump’s Tweets increase risk of no trade deal until 2021
06/05/2019

By John Richardson THE PROSPECTS of a trade deal seem to have have faded into the distance as a resu...

Read
Pressure on US builds as PE exports to China tumble and EU considers tariffs
03/05/2019

By John Richardson DONALD TRUMP insisted in early March that he was willing to walk away from a bad ...

Read
China 2019 PE demand grows in double digits as PP struggles
01/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) markets continue to tell us so...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more