US-China Trade War To Accelerate As Restrictions On US Petchem Exports Increase

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Europe, European economy, Naphtha & other feedstocks, Oil & Gas, Olefins, Polyolefins, South Korea

By John Richardson

TAKE a broader view of US-China trading relationship and the picture looks very different from the straightforward, headline big US deficit, as James Kynge points out in this important article in the FT.

It is the presence of US companies in China that also matters. The most recent data, which is for 2015, show that US multinational subsidiaries based in China made $221.9bn of sales to Chinese consumers. US companies with a huge presence in China include Ford, GM, Nike and Starbucks.

This matters for the real extent of the US trade deficit with China – the aggregate economic relationship. “Adjusting external trade flows for such (domestic) sales is tricky and poses caveats. But, if one wanted to do it, the numbers look different indeed,” said Louis Kuijs, head of Asia economics at Oxford Economics, a research firm, in the same FT article.

It is also important in determining whether President Trump’s claim, that “trade wars are easy to win,” turns out to be true in the case of China. China can put increased regulatory pressure on US companies operating in China, a non-tariff barrier.

The White House also claims that because China exports more to the US than the US exports to China, this leaves China very limited in its ability to respond with like-for-like tariffs. But if you take into account this aggregate economic relationship then the picture looks very different.

It might not be just increased regulatory pressure that effects the ability of US companies to do business in China. Also consider patriotism. Chinese consumes shunned South Koreans goods during last year’s THAAD missile dispute between China and South Korea.

The fallout with China is on potentially a much bigger scale because of US demands that China makes major changes to its “Made in China In 2025” campaign.

This could be perceived as an almost existential threat because if the campaign isn’t success, China may fail to escape its middle-income trap and thus see its long-term economic growth stagnate.  Facing this kind of threat, the “Don’t buy anything American” consumer sentiment could be very strong indeed.

Of course there are other interpretations. Perhaps China actually needs the US more than the US needs China when it comes to technologies China needs to escape its middle-income trap. This may put the White House in a very strong position to achieve its objectives, such as opening-up Chinese industries such as insurance to greater overseas competition. I disagree with this view.

Let’s return to the subject of the real extent of the US-China trade deficit. As Teresa Barger, co-founder and CEO of emerging market activist fund Cartica Management writes in this CNBC article: When looking at the value-added content of Chinese exports, the US deficit with China is actually only half of what it seems.  And if we then add back the US surplus in “invisibles” and how much money the United States brings back from investments in China, the US–China deficit shrinks from 2% of US GDP to 0.8%, a report from Oxford Economics revealed.

China adds only $15-30 to the value of a $500 I-Phone because only the basic assembly is done in China, with most of the value accruing to the brand owner, Apple, of course, and the engineers at Samsung.

Both sides likely to dig their heels in

This again means that the White House could be overestimating the real extent of the US trade deficit with China whilst underestimating the economic impact of the trade war. Tariffs on China’s hi-tech goods, which are, in effect, US hi-tech goods, could have the effect of raising costs for US consumers.

This all matters hugely for the petrochemicals and polymers industries. Producers need to game-plan short term multiple scenarios and the effect that this scenarios would have on economic growth and also on petrochemicals trade flows themselves.

One scenario, which I hope will come true, is that both sides will quickly come to the negotiating table and reach compromises that will make both parties happy. But right now, this seems a very distant prospect.

What we should instead see as more likely is that the White House will stick to its trade policies, China will also dig its heels in and the US-China trade war will accelerate, resulting in big economic damage to the US as well as China and other countries.

For one particular polymer, PE, however, there is some good news. It appears that at least for the time being, China’s planned tariffs of 25% of US imports do not apply to most grades of linear-low density PE, only a few speciality grades.

All of low-density PE (LDPE) is however covered by the proposed tariffs. This really matters to the US as 20% of total US LDPE imports went to China in 2017. US net exports of LDPE will rise by 738,000 tonnes between 2018 and 2025 – a 154% increase.

If the trade war escalates, there is also the risk that China will impose import tariffs on all grades of LLDPE, as this is where the US especially vulnerable because of the scale of its LLDPE capacity increases.

Further, buyers may avoid US PE cargoes for the same patriotic reasons highlighted above. Customs officers could also pay more regulatory attention to US imports.

What does this all mean for the next 12-18 months? My base scenario is this:

  • The White House sticks to its trade policies because they are firmly held by President Trump and his key trade staff. Politically, also, the policies continue to play well as the president’s supporters are prepared to give him the benefit of time, even at the expense of short term lower economic growth
  • The damage to US economic growth is a lot greater from a protracted US-China trade war than many people assume because of the trade deficit issues I have raised above. Further, the effects on other countries are very negative indeed. Emerging markets appear very vulnerable to further US dollar strength as investors flee to the safety of the greenback.
  • China enforces its planned tariffs on US crude oil, which will in turn of course add to the damage to the US economy. It will also follow through on its carefully targeted tariffs on exports of US petrochemicals feedstocks, the petrochemicals themselves and polymers.
  • And even where tariffs on US petrochemicals and polymers have not been levied, including on US LLDPE, Chinese buyers are more reluctant to acquire US cargoes. Customs procedures also become more challenging.

I am not ready to at this stage build this into my base case. But you must still plan for China extending its tariffs to all grades of US PE.

This is also not in my base case as yet but the trade war could become global. The US may also fall out with other key trading partners such as the EU, Canada and Mexico. In such event, we would end up in a very deep global recession.

Please, please be careful out there and make sure you spend enough time and resources on realistic scenario planning.

PREVIOUS POST

China Tariffs On US Petchem Feedstocks To Reshape Global Trade And Investment

20/06/2018

By John Richardson TAKE a broader view of US-China trading relationship and the ...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Prepare For A More Regionalised, Fragmented Polymers World

25/06/2018

By John Richardson TAKE a broader view of US-China trading relationship and the ...

Learn more
More posts
China’s dominant role in global PE demand just got even bigger
20/02/2019

By John Richardson WE WERE already living in an incredibly lopsided PE world even before last year...

Read
US PE margins have further to fall on higher production, China weakness
18/02/2019

By John Richardson THE WORST is over for the margin depletion that’s been experienced by US PE pro...

Read
China slowdown: Loss of 7m tonnes of global PP demand points to new investment model
15/02/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S influence on the world economy has grown to such an extent over the las...

Read
China autos and polypropylene: Growth has peaked and will decline
13/02/2019

By John Richardson WHAT if the number of new vehicle sales in China reached a long term peak of 28.9...

Read
Oil at $58-69 over next year as focus switches to demand
11/02/2019

Guest blogger today is again Ajay Parmar in the second his posts. He is a chemical engineering profe...

Read
Trade war dangers for US polyethylene re-emerge as talks appear to flounder
08/02/2019

          By John Richardson ONLY YESTERDAY just about everyone I spoke to ...

Read
China purified terephthalic net exports to reach 2.7m tonnes by 2025
06/02/2019

By John Richardson LET’S START with the good news first. ICIS Data and Analytics had expected ...

Read
China propylene: 6.7m tonne demand hole threatens to swallow-up new projects
04/02/2019

By John Richardson CONVENTIONAL opinion is that the global propylene market is moving from a balance...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more