Mixed plastic waste and pyrolysis oil

HOUSTON (ICIS)–US sustainability companies are starting to buckle, with a chemical recycling plant and a bioplastic producer both going bankrupt. Brightmark's Indiana operations filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11, a move that will protect it from creditors while it tries to sell its underutilized chemical recycling plant. The bankruptcy will not affect the other operations of the parent company or its plans to build another chemical recycling plant in Georgia. Danimer Scientific is winding down operations at its plants in Bainbridge, Georgia, and Winchester, Kentucky. Danimer makes polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and formulates polylactic acid (PLA). DANIMER GOES BANKRUPT AFTER ANNOUNCING PLANT CLOSUREDanimer had bet big on PHA, a renewable polyester made by fermenting natural oils. It became the owner of the world's first commercial scale PHA plant in 2022 after it expanded capacity at its site in Winchester, Kentucky, to 55 million lb/year (25,000 tonnes/year), said Frank Pometti, a partner of AlixPartners, the proposed financial advisor for the company. He made his comments in a court filing. By then, Danimer had already broken ground on another plant in Bainbridge that would have produced another 125 million lb/year of PHA. However, Danimer was increasing capacity faster than its customers were enacting sustainability initiatives. Since 2020, Danimer's operating rates never exceeded 15% of capacity. Moreover, Danimer was expanding capacity right when inflation was taking off. Companies like Phillips 66 were revising cost estimates for capital projects by 50%. Danimer would later suspend work on the new PHA plant after a prospective customer indicated that it wasn't ready to switch to the company's bioplastics. To date, Danimer has sunk nearly $190 million into the project. For years, Danimer had courted what it described as a new and significant customer that would have purchased the company's bioplastic to supply an internationally recognized quick-service restaurant with cutlery for all of its locations in North America. By 2025, securing a firm commitment from that customer became critical. Danimer was facing liquidity challenges, and its shares were taken off the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in January 2025. A firm volume commitment from that customer could allow Danimer to attract fresh capital from a potential investor, from which the company received a non-binding indication of interest. The customer would not provide the commitment. In March, Danimer reached out to its lenders and another customer in a last-ditch effort to secure a deal to keep the business running. That effort also failed. In mid-March, Danimer announced the shutdown of its operations in Bainbridge, home to the company's corporate headquarters, its PHA demonstration plant and its PLA reactive extrusion plant. It also plans to wind down operations at its plant in Kentucky. Days later, Danimer filed for bankruptcy protection in Delaware Bankruptcy Court. It plans to sell its plants and liquidate the uncompleted project in Bainbridge. The case number is 25-10518. BRIGHTMARK'S CHEM RECYCLING PLANT RUNS AT 5%Brightmark's chemical recycling plant in Indiana has required substantial re-engineering and re-design after starting up in 2023, said Craig Jalbert, chief restructuring officer. He made his comments in court filings. The plant needs $800,000/week just to maintain operations and fund improvement projects – all while working under $172 million of senior debt. To date, the plant's upgrade system has not worked, according to Jalbert. That system was made up of a hydrotreater that cleaned the pyrolysis oil (pyoil) and a fractionator that separated the cleaned oil. After starting up in 2023, the plant only managed to produce 10 million lb (4,500 tonnes ) of pyoil, or 5% of its 100,000 tonne/year capacity. So far, three petrochemical producers have bought its pyoil, which it sold under the brand name PyBright. Pybright did command a premium, but it was not high enough to offset the low run rates and the capital needs of the company. That plant will need more than $100 million in capital investments before it can operate at a high enough rate to be profitable, Jalbert said. Brightmark's parent company had been funding the plants operations and capital expenditures through equity contributions. These have totalled more than $210 million. By February, the parent company determined that it could no longer make the contributions. A $12.9 million payment was due on 1 March. The recycling company defaulted on the payment and filled for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on 14 March. Brightmark will continue to operate the Indiana plant while it tries to sell it. If necessary, Brightmark will hold an auction on 7 May. Meanwhile, Brightmark continues to work on its second chemical recycling plant that it is developing in Thomaston, Georgia. The next step is to file for air permits, the company said. The Georgia plant will have a capacity of 400,000 tonnes/year. Brightmark has not said when operations will start. Brightmark filed bankruptcy in Delaware. The case number is 25-10472. Insight article by Al Greenwood

20-Mar-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Concerns in the European base oils market about the imminent US-EU trade dispute are limited to the wider economic impact long term, but participants dismissed an immediate effect given an exclusion for oil and oil products. In 2024, base oils were US’s third most exported chemicals into Europe and mostly concentrated on Group II material. According to ICIS Supply and Demand Database, about 800,000 tonnes of Group II volumes were imported  into Europe from the US last year. Existing European domestic supply also comes from the Exxon Mobil-owned base oils plant in Rotterdam established in 2019, which adds about 1 million tonnes of capacity per year. “For the moment I don’t see any impact [from the tariffs], just a lot of tensions and talks and at the end you have to wait and see,” said one market participant. Current market sentiment is focused on the broader effects of the tariffs and retaliatory action from the EU on the wider economy. Any economic impact may also feed into the US dollar exchange rate and therefore may send some ripples into the base oils market. “Anything damaging to the broader economy will hurt base oils demand,” agreed Michael Connolly, principal refining analyst at ICIS. While the tariffs were not perceived as an “an immediate challenge”, some risk remains, market participants told ICIS. “We see the risk in the supply chain is bigger than the tariff itself,” said one source. Some other individual producers may face issues should tariffs be applied on base oils or related commodities, like crude oil, in the future. Base oils hold the top spot for US chemical exports, with flows largely heading to Mexico, the rest of the world and thirdly the EU, closely followed by Canada – also targeted by tariffs this year. Meanwhile, EU exports of base oils to the US  were lower in 2024 than in 2020. Looking at the top chemicals imported from the EU into the US, base oils are ranked seventh. More information on the US tariffs and impact on chemical markets is available on the ICIS topic page. AFPM ‘25: US tariffs, retaliation risk heightens uncertainty for chemicals, economies | ICIS Base oils are used to produce finished lubes and greases for automobiles and other machinery. Graphs by Yashas Mudumbai.

20-Mar-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–ICIS analyst Aviva Zhang analyzes the recent sharp fall in China's domestic styrene prices in March, and the potential impact of tight supply due to extensive plant maintenance. Lower costs driven by declining crude oil and benzene prices; market closely monitors crude fluctuations. East China styrene inventories transition from accumulation to drawdown; plant turnarounds expected to increase in March and April. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) producers maintain need-to-basis purchasing due to slow destocking and reduced operating rates. ICN

20-Mar-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Indonesia’s central bank kept its policy rate unchanged at 5.75% on Wednesday, a day after local stocks closed nearly 4% lower, on concerns over the country’s economic growth prospects and government finances. Jakarta composite index shed 3.8% on 18 March Rupiah remains under control, central bank says Economy projected to grow by 4.7-5.5% in 2025 Bank Indonesia (BI) kept the benchmark seven-day reverse repurchase rate steady at 5.75% and left its overnight deposit facility and lending facility rates unchanged at 5.00% and 6.50%, respectively. The rupiah (Rp), which initially fell in early trade, stabilized after BI’s announcement at Rp16,515 per US dollar, near its lowest level in five years. The BI’s move to keep rates stable was “consistent with efforts to keep the 2025 and 2026 inflation forecasts” within the target of 2.5% plus or minus one percentage point; “maintain rupiah exchange rate stability in line with fundamentals amidst persistent high global uncertainty, and contribute to economic growth”, the central bank said in a statement. BI also said that the rupiah exchange rate remains under control, supported by stabilization policies. The rupiah strengthened by 0.94% against the US dollar in March after weakening by 1.69% in February 2025, “influenced by reduced foreign capital inflows into regional stocks, including Indonesia, in line with global uncertainty”, BI said. “Bank Indonesia is looking for opportunities to lower rates, but a rate cut this month may come too soon following the policy easing in January. We look for the next policy rate cut in Q2,” said Lloyd Chan, senior currency analyst at Japan-based MUFG Global Markets Research Asi, in a note. In January, the central bank issued a surprise rate interest rate cut to support economic growth amid expectations of continued low inflation in 2025 and 2026. The move had sent the rupiah tumbling to a six-month low against the US dollar. BI’s decision comes after its benchmark Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) had slumped by 5%, triggering a temporary trading halt, and fell by as much as 7% at one point upon resuming trade, partly fueled by speculations that finance minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati is resigning. Sri Mulyani late on 18 March dispelled the resignation rumors, according to media reports, saying she will stay on as the finance chief, emphasizing that Indonesia’s fiscal health remains sound and the budget deficit for 2025 will stay at 2.5% of GDP. A budget deficit is a shortfall that occurs when government expenditures exceed revenues. The JCI was volatile in early Wednesday trade, initially tumbling by more than 1%, before rebounding to trade 1.42% higher at 6,311.66 as of 09:00 GMT. Indonesia’s sole cracker operator Chandra Asri's shares were up by 13.4% on Wednesday. Indonesia is a net importer of several petrochemicals, including polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP); while it is a major exporter of crude palm oil (CPO) and its downstream oleochemicals. ELEVATED FISCAL RISKS Japan’s Nomura Global Markets Research in a note said that it continues to see elevated fiscal risks and forecast a widening of the fiscal deficit to 2.9% of GDP in 2025, from 2.3% last year and versus the government's target of 2.5%. “Recent changes pushed by President [Subianto] Prabowo, including an expansion of his priority programs, will cost an additional 0.9% of GDP, by our estimate,” Nomura said. The Indonesian government has not introduced any new revenue-generating measures, instead relying on enhanced tax administration efforts, which are expected to have a limited impact, it said. “President Prabowo’s instruction to perform budget cuts worth 1.3% of GDP could provide some offset, but this will likely be very difficult to achieve, given public pushback, in our view, and would weigh on domestic demand,” Nomura said. “Local sentiment, in our view, has dropped significantly, as these domestic policy concerns are exacerbating external risks.” 2025 GROWTH Indonesia's economic growth is projected to remain strong in the range of 4.7-5.5% in 2025, despite persistent global uncertainties, BI said. Southeast Asia’s largest economy expanded by 5.03% in 2024, slowing from the 5.05% growth in 2023. Prabowo’s government aims to increase the real GDP growth rate to 8% within two to three years, from the 5% average over the past 10 years (excluding the Covid pandemic years of 2020-2021). This optimistic outlook is supported by robust household consumption, bolstered by consumer confidence, government spending and seasonal demand, BI said. Increased private investment, driven by positive producer sentiment and expanding order volumes, is expected to contribute significantly to this growth, it said. While external factors present challenges, particularly in mining and processing, growth in non-oil and gas exports and the agricultural sector are anticipated to offset these effects. Focus article by Nurluqman Suratman

19-Mar-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Japan’s chemical exports rose by 7.5% year on year to yen (Y) 1 trillion in February, supporting the fifth consecutive rise in overall exports abroad, official preliminary data showed on Wednesday. The country’s exports of organic fell by 2.1% year on year to Y180.7 billion in February, while shipments of plastic materials were up by 10.8% at Y282.5 billion, Ministry of Finance (MOF) data showed. By volume, shipments of plastic materials fell by 1.7% year on year to 429,716 tonnes. Japan’s total exports rose by 11.4% year on year to Y9.19 trillion in February, while imports slipped by 0.7% to Y8.61 trillion. This resulted in a trade surplus of around Y584 billion. By destination, Japan's overall exports to China rose by 14.1% year on year in February, reversing the 6.2% decline in January. Total exports to the US rose by 10.5% year on year in February, while overall shipments to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)  were up by 13.3%.

19-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–As the landmark year, 2025, swiftly passes, many within the US recycled polyethylene terephthalate (R-PET) industry doubt the demand and market growth promised by voluntary brand goals and regulatory post-consumer recycled (PCR) content minimums will come to fruition. Despite this reality, the market has and will continue to see slow progress, with forecast growth even in the face of trade and macroeconomic uncertainties heading into this year’s Plastics Recycling Conference (PRC). MARKET SNAPSHOTOver the course of 2024, average US R-PET market prices saw increases across the board ranging from 2 cents/lb to over 6 cents/lb. More muted growth is expected throughout 2025. At present, East Coast bale, flake and pellet prices remain steady, on sufficient supply and unchanged demand trends despite March typically being a period of transition for the market. On the West Coast, bale prices remain under pressure from Mexican export interest, though domestic players are muted. Flake and pellet prices have shifted in line with bales, but remain under pressure from competitive recycled and virgin imports. Demand expectations across the US for the full spring season are mixed. Historically, demand from thermoformers who cater towards agricultural markets increases in the spring and summer alongside growing season. At the same time, demand from the beverage industry also tends to increase in the spring in preparation for summer bottled beverage consumption. Though, this year, ramp-up timing and intensity remains uncertain due to the impacts of tariffs and inflation on consumer spending. On the fiber side, demand is expected to remain weak and is typically not as seasonally driven. BRAND DEMAND AND SUPPLY LANDSCAPEWhen assessing PCR demand, there are two factors of influence: firstly, the overall product demand as referenced above, but then secondly, the transition from virgin packaging materials to recycled content. Hinging on the same macroeconomic uncertainty, late last year and early this year several brands have publicly stated it is likely they will miss their 2025 sustainability goals. Under this mentality, PCR sellers have noted that many brand and converter customers have downsized PCR growth plans throughout this year as a cost-savings mechanism. This comes as the most recent fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) data suggests slowing progress, or even in the case of the 2023 Canadian Plastics Pact annual report, negative progress. According to the latest Ellen MacArthur Foundation Global Commitment report, nearly 1.6 million tonnes of additional recycled plastic would be needed for signatories to meet their 2025 targets, as compared to 2023 PCR volumes. On top of the overarching trend, much of the market presently remains in wait-and-see mode due to the whiplash effect of proposed US tariffs, though few players are heard to be operating strongly with consistent year-round demand. The fragmentation of the market persists, as was highlighted during off-peak season last year, and underscores the evolving landscape of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling infrastructure. While some large players who have become entrenched as a premier provider of R-PET see strong order books, other standalone players continue to struggle. Adding to the mixed messaging, several players expect expanded capacity in 2025 such as Republic Services, D6 and Circularix, while another player, Evergreen, has announced a partial facility closure. Future investments in R-PET, whether domestic or international, have largely been paralyzed by the risk that market sentiment and trade policies could shift with each administration, and investments take several years to come to fruition. POLICYWhile not a primary driver of US international trade, plastic scrap and recycled plastic do have strong exposure to international markets, particularly Canada and Mexico as waste is regional and typically market economics hinge on location proximity. To be clear, the proposed 25% tariff on imported goods from Canada and Mexico does include recycled plastic and plastic scrap. When looking at bale and flake supply, tariffs could push US recyclers who are close to Mexico and Canada away from international supply, and towards domestic volumes, thus further straining the limited collection system. The US imported 133 million lbs of PET scrap in 2024, with Canada leading the globe as the US's strongest PET scrap trade partner, followed by Thailand, Ecuador and Japan. Moreover, several US converters and brands have partnered with Canadian and Mexican recyclers over the last several years and now may seek supply relationships with domestic recyclers to avoid additional tariff-related costs. This could be seen as a positive force for the domestic recycling market, though players expect little further support from the current administration, as sustainability and environmental progress has not been identified as a key priority. No federal policies are expected. Despite the ongoing negotiations of the Global Plastics Treaty, based on President Trump's second withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, it is unlikely the US will support another global sustainability effort. Instead, state-level legislation is expected to continue carrying PCR momentum, with several proposed extended producer responsibility (EPR) bills as well as some PCR mandates active within various state legislatures. Moreover, as existing policies continue to take shape, such as defining the regulations of California’s Senate Bill 54, or the implementation of Oregon’s EPR program starting this July, the industry hopes that regulation provides a stronger foundation for recycled plastic market growth over voluntary goals which shift with economic sentiment. Hosted by Resource Recycling Inc, the PRC takes place on 24-26 March in National Harbor, Maryland. ICIS will be presenting "Shaping the Future of Recycled Plastics: Trends and Forecasts" on Monday, 24 March at 11:15 local time in room Potomac D. As well as attending our session, we would love to connect with you at the show – please stop by our booth, #308. Visit the Recycled Plastics topic page Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Macroeconomics: Impact on chemicals topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page Focus article by Emily Friedman

18-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US polyvinyl chloride (PVC) market is facing continued headwinds as tariff-related uncertainties persist heading into this year's International Petrochemical Conference (IPC). The domestic PVC market is expected to grow between 1-3% in 2025 but continues to face challenges in housing and construction. Meanwhile, export markets continue to wrestle with the threat of protectionist policies and tariffs at home and abroad. The domestic PVC market has been healthy to start the year but has been saddled with excess supply following capacity additions in late Q4. The new capacity, coupled with strong run rates, resulted in high levels of inventory to start the year. This added supply comes in contrast to a US housing market plagued by high prices and high borrowing costs. The pressure of these variables, coupled with exceptionally cold weather, was evident in January housing statistics, where housing starts slumped 9.8% to a 1.366-million-unit pace led by a steep 13.5% decline in the multifamily segment. Despite this, production and sales remained firm in February. Production was expected to decline in March due to turnarounds by two US producers. There was some positive economic news with 30-year mortgage rates easing in March and falling to their lowest levels of 2025 at 6.63% in early March before inching to 6.65% in mid-March. Still, current levels were well above levels considered necessary to spur demand, generally considered to be around 5.0-5.5%. Additionally, inflation appeared to stabilize in February, coming in at 2.8%, lower than the forecast 2.9% and below January levels of 3%. Despite these developments, consumer confidence remains weak. The US PVC export market will also face its share of challenges coming primarily via protectionist policies. Potential 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada could present challenges as the US exports significant volumes of PVC to each country and then brings back the converted goods for use in medical, building and construction, auto and industrial applications. Reciprocal tariffs could increase the cost of these imports and dent US PVC demand. Additionally, US PVC exports face existing and potential tariff threats from a number of other trading partners including India, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and the EU. Given the challenges in the domestic market and current growth levels, US producers will need to export more than one-third of their production to maintain operating rates in the mid-80s% range, a tall task considering adequate supply and the proliferation of tariffs and antidumping duties (ADDs). To the south, the Latin America PVC market also faces significant challenges, with demand trends differing across key regional markets. A combination of economic pressures and the potential of US tariffs is reshaping the landscape, influencing both supply and demand dynamics. In Brazil, PVC demand remains weak, largely due to persistently high interest rates and ongoing economic uncertainty. These factors have led to buyer hesitancy, reducing the country's dependence on US PVC imports. The outlook for Brazil’s construction sector in 2025 presents a mixed scenario that could influence PVC market dynamics in different ways. The Brazilian Chamber of the Construction Industry (CBIC) projects a 2.3% growth in the sector’s GDP. At the same time, Sinduscon-SP and Fundacao Getulio Vargas (FGV) have a slightly more optimistic forecast, expecting a 3.0% expansion. This growth is primarily driven by ongoing projects and newly contracted developments set to begin in the coming months, particularly in infrastructure and real estate. However, broader macroeconomic factors may temper this momentum. The expectation of slower economic growth, higher inflation exceeding the target ceiling and rising interest rates could cool investment and business activity. If these conditions lead to tighter credit and reduced consumer confidence, demand for new real estate developments could soften, impacting the need for PVC-based materials used in construction applications like pipes, fittings and profiles. Colombia is also experiencing economic difficulties, though the exact demand trends remain unclear. The overall sentiment is cautious, with expectations for stable-to-weak demand in the near term. Meanwhile, Argentina faces persistent investment shortfalls in critical sectors, which continue to hinder PVC demand. This adds to the difficulties for US exporters separately aiming to maintain market share in the country. Mexico, as a key importer of US PVC, brings in around 350,000 tonnes annually. However, the introduction of new tariffs is expected to raise costs for downstream segments that export goods to the US, which reduces the competitiveness of US exports and demand could soften. Pricing dynamics are also likely to shift, if the additional tariff scenario among Mexico, Canada and the US changes in April, as the US Gulf PVC producers could face lower operational rates if demand from their primary export destinations declines. This could lead to production cutbacks, raising per-unit production costs. For the Americas as a whole, uncertainty remains a prevalent theme. 2025 looks to be a challenging year and the effect of proposed tariffs from the Trump administration and retaliatory tariffs on PVC demand is unclear, with economic and inflationary factors adding further uncertainty to the 2025 outlook. Policy and economic health will continue to drive demand in 2025 and producers will need to manage production and inventories closely, control costs and target alternative outlets for exports to mitigate the risks that lie ahead. Hosted by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the IPC takes place on 23-25 March in San Antonio, Texas. Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Macroeconomics: Impact on chemicals topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page Focus article by Kevin Allen and Daniel Lopes Thumbnail source: Shutterstock

18-Mar-2025

TORONTO (ICIS)–Depending on who wins the next election, Canada may soon be without federal carbon pricing. Opposition Conservatives to scrap carbon pricing Ruling Liberals would retain industrial carbon pricing Industry sees carbon pricing as “backbone” of decarbonization Canada’s opposition Conservatives have finally clarified their position on federal industrial carbon pricing – they would abolish it, if they win the next election, they said, along with the federal consumer carbon tax. This would lower prices in the Canadian steel, aluminum, natural gas, food production, concrete and all other major industries, boost the economy, and allow “our companies to become competitive again with the United States”, the party said on Monday. Canada’s provinces could still address carbon emissions “as they like but will have the freedom to get rid of these industrial taxes that the federal government has forced them to impose”, party leader Pierre Poilievre said. Instead of carbon pricing or a carbon tax, the Conservatives would use technology "to protect our environment” they said. In particular, they would expand the eligibility for certain investment tax credits (ITCs), they said. The Conservatives’ announcement came after Canada’s minority Liberal government, under its new prime minister, Mark Carney, suspended the consumer carbon tax. The suspension was one of Carney’s very first actions after taking over from Justin Trudeau last week. However, Carney said that his government would retain and improve federal industrial carbon pricing as the most effective measure to control emissions. The premier (governor) of oil-rich Alberta province, Danielle Smith, said that she was concerned Carney’s government would “significantly increase the industrial carbon tax”, which would be just as damaging to Alberta’s economy as the consumer carbon tax had been. She suggested that federal industrial carbon pricing was a hidden carbon tax, rather than a transparent one. CHEMICALS Industrial carbon pricing is seen as key in attracting investments in low-carbon projects, such as Dow’s Path2Zero petrochemicals complex under construction in Alberta province. Trade group Chemistry Industry Association of Canada (CIAC) supports industrial carbon pricing. Carbon pricing and programs offering incentives for low-carbon chemical production plants were needed to get those facilities built in Canada, the group has said. “We support industrial carbon pricing as the backbone of decarbonization across this country,” CIAC and other industrial trade groups said in a joint statement last year. Industrial carbon markets were the most flexible and cost-effective way to incentivize industry to systematically reduce emissions, they said. ENVIRONMENTALIST Environmental Defense said that Canada’s industrial carbon pricing has “effectively driven down pollution levels more than any other measure”. The group also said that federal carbon pricing was needed if Canada is to diversify its exports towards other markets, away from the US. For example, Canada would not be able to access the European market without strong environmental rules like industrial carbon pricing, the group noted. The EU is implementing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) that puts a price on the emissions of carbon-intensive goods imported into the EU. CANADIAN ELECTION Carney, who does not have a seat in parliament, is expected to call an election possibly as early as this week. Once called, the election will likely take place in late April or early May. Following Trudeau’s resignation announcement on 6 January, the tariff threat from the US, and US President Donald Trump's repeated suggesting that Canada should become part of the US, the Liberals have caught up with the opposition Conservatives in opinion polls about the next federal election. By law, the elections must be held before the end of October. Focus article by Stefan Baumgarten Thumbnail photo source: International Energy Agency

18-Mar-2025

Taiwan’s incumbent announces higher March prices CPC continues to grapple with LNG costs Island ramps up receiving LNG capacity SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Taiwan’s main power company announced a hike in its posted prices for natural gas in March, citing globally higher LNG prices, according to an official notice . This comes as it faces pressure to buy more LNG supplies from the US and manage a sharp energy transition from nuclear and coal power generation fuels. Electricity prices will rise by 3%, while industrial users will face a 10% increase, as CPC Corp grapples with mounting financial pressure. The price adjustments come amid a sustained surge in global LNG costs that has pushed up prices of imported LNG cargoes into the island. According to data collected by ICIS, spot cargoes into Taiwan have ticked up in the recent months, at higher prices. CPC has held onto a policy to absorb the increase costs for residential users, a practice set to continue in March, despite a government-approved pricing formula that typically passes on these costs to consumers. However, with the company’s debt ratio reaching 93%, absorbing such losses is becoming unsustainable, according to the notice. Soaring LNG prices, driven by a cold snap and heightened European demand as well as EU stockpiling regulations have led to stiff competition for LNG. All of which has stretched Taiwan’s energy budget in the past months. The state-owned company has mostly absorbed losses to shield residential users from price hikes, holding rates for users steady through January and February citing ongoing Lunar New Year festivities alongside its price-stabilization policy. While industrial prices last rose in December, residential rates have remained unchanged for months and were even cut last May. At the same time, Taiwan has also looked to shore up its trade ties with the US after President Donald Trump took office and began issuing a slew of import tariffs and calling for more onshoring of manufacturing from trade partners with a surplus, such as Taiwan. In response, Taiwan has said it could invest in the proposed Alaska LNG project and buy more US LNG cargoes. As well, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has also pledged to invest in high-end chip manufacturing in the US. Taiwan also relies on de facto US military support as it faces a push for reunification with the Chinese mainland that could be enforced by a blockade of post and incoming LNG shipments. Taiwan has some offtake from the US including deals with TotalEnergies for Cameron LNG, and supplies from US producer Cheniere. LNG TO BECOME DOMINANT ENERGY SOURCE Even as the island grapples with high costs of bringing in LNG cargoes, it remains committed to its LNG push, expanding infrastructure at a rapid clip . Taiwanese incumbents, both the state-owned CPC Corp and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) are investing in large-scale LNG storage tanks, regasification units, and gas-fired power plants. For instance, under expansion plans, Taipower will add 2.7mtpa by 2026 and another 3mtpa by 2029, taking its total receiving capacity to close to 11mpta. Meanwhile, Yung An terminal will be boosted by 2mtpa. Still, energy security remains a key concern as Taiwan leans heavily on imported liquefied natural gas to meet rising demand. “Taiwan has no piped gas and minimal domestic production, so LNG accounts for nearly 100% of the country’s gas supply,” said ICIS analyst Yuanda Wang. This leaves the island vulnerable to price swings alongside geopolitical uncertainty. Compounding the challenge is a nuclear-free policy shuttering two nuclear reactors . Taiwan will become fully nuclear-free in May 2025 as the 950MW Maanshan Unit 2 shuts down, leaving an 8.8TWh power shortfall , according to forecasts by ICIS. Last year, Jane Liao, a vice president at CPC, told a conference that the utility expects to see more LNG purchases into 2025 on the back of the retirement Taiwan’s nuclear plants. “We need to continue the purchasing,” Liao added. Premier Cho had also in July reaffirmed the commitment to reduce reliance on coal. As the island phases out these sources, it will inevitably turn to LNG to fill in the gap in its energy mix. ICIS modeling forecasts Taiwan’s power demand will rise by 12.5% in the first quarter of 2025, with LNG imports expected to hit 21.1 million tonnes in 2025. As energy prices rise and Taiwan doubles down on its LNG ambitions, businesses and consumers brace for higher costs. The island now faces a delicate balancing act: maintaining price stability while deepening its long-term reliance on LNG. (ICIS analyst Yuanda Wang contributed to this story)

18-Mar-2025

COATZACOALCOS, Mexico (ICIS)–Mexico’s new ethane import terminal in the state of Veracruz is poised to transform the country's struggling petrochemical sector by alleviating critical raw material shortages, according to the chief at the facility. Cleantho de Paiva, CEO at the Terminal Quimica Puerto Mexico (TQPM) in Veracruz’s municipality of Coatzacoalcos, said the terminal should start up in May and be able to import 80,000 barrels of ethane, mostly from the US. Natural gas derivative ethane has become the prime choice to produce polymers in North America after the US’s shale gas boom in the 2010s. The ethane will be primarily delivered to polyethylene (PE) major Braskem Idesa, a joint venture between the Brazilian and Mexican chemicals producers of the same name. TQPM is, at the same time, a joint venture between Braskem Idesa and Dutch company Advario. ICIS visited TQPM on 15 March – a few pictures shown at the bottom. FINALLY, START-UP PLANNED FOR MAYThe terminal’s years-long construction is a key project of Braskem Idesa, which until now has been dependent on supply of inputs mostly from Mexico’s crude oil major Pemex, supply which at a time was unstable and below what had been agreed. The situation became so critical that Braskem Idesa, which operates one of Latin America's newest PE complexes, was forced to seek alternative supply arrangements. Industry analysts have pointed to Pemex's supply shortfalls as a major constraint on Mexico's petrochemical sector growth. The terminal’s financing was at some point in doubt, although the parties agreed to inject further cash last year so it could be finalized in 2025. TQPM will make it easier for Braskem Idesa to secure inputs necessary to produce PE, without depending on Pemex, whom at the same time would be able to redirect the inputs it was delivering to the PE producer to other petrochemicals companies. A common theme for Mexican chemicals companies is the lack of raw materials, so any additional supply is always welcome news, said de Paiva. "This project has a very important impact on the development of the national petrochemical industry, because it's precisely to complement access to raw materials that we lack today. With a capacity to import up to 80,000 barrels per day of ethane, this will significantly exceed the 63,000 barrels Braskem Idesa currently requires for its operations,” said de Paiva. “The issue of the lack of ethane in the country is structural. Since the US is the largest producer and exporter of petrochemical ethane, building this terminal gives us access to import sufficient raw material. "When the terminal comes into operation, Pemex, which currently has an obligation to supply a certain amount to Braskem Idesa, will no longer have it and will be able to direct this raw material to its own petrochemical complexes and also resume its operating capacity," he added. This cascading effect could benefit Mexico's broader petrochemical industry, potentially allowing Pemex to better serve other domestic manufacturers once relieved of its Braskem Idesa commitments. De Paiva described this as a “structuring” event for Mexico’s manufacturing industry as it could allow the country's petrochemical industry to return to operating its plants at higher capacities. The executive offered a segment-by-segment assessment of Mexico's chemical industry, noting varying conditions across different product categories. He said polypropylene (PP) production, led by Indelpro – a joint venture between Mexico’s Alpek and the US’s LyondellBasell – as well as production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are performing quite well. It is the PE market which faces significant shortages, said de Paiva. PEMEX ASSETSAddressing questions about the state of Pemex's aging petrochemical assets, de Paiva suggested that proper maintenance and technological upgrades could extend the operational life of even decades-old facilities. Some players in Mexico’s chemicals industry think there is room for joint ventures with the private sector to revive some of Pemex’s assets. That was the opinion of Martin Toscano, director for Mexican operations at Germany’s chemicals major Evonik, in an interview with ICIS. Other players, however, think the only way forward would be privatization so Pemex, which recurrently needs bailing out from the Mexican Treasury, would stop being a burden for the taxpayer, according to Javier Soriano, director at chemicals distributor Quimisor. De Paiva said he could not opine about Pemex’s assets, but did say that if plants are properly maintained they should be able to run for decades after start-up. "Petrochemical plants must operate for 30, 40, even 50 years, but they must maintain a continuous maintenance and technological upgrade program. Braskem's experience in Brazil offers a glimpse of this: the company successfully operates plants of similar age, but with consistent investments in modernization,” said de Paiva. Before being appointed CEO at TQPM – a position he will keep for some time after the start-up in May, he said – de Paiva spent decades working for Braskem in Brazil, his country of origin. The terminal's completion comes at a critical time for Mexico's manufacturing sector, which has been looking to capitalize on nearshoring opportunities as global companies seek to reduce dependence on Asian supply chains. Industry experts suggest that resolving raw material constraints could position Mexico's petrochemical sector for significant growth, particularly given its proximity to the US market and competitive labor costs. De Paiva concluded saying that once TQPM is up and running, that will create room for Braskem Idesa to think about potential expansions. The terminal’s storage tanks, being painted The dock where two Braskem Idesa-owned vessels will unload the ethane, to come mostly from the US Work was energetic even on a Saturday (15 March) as TQPM’s two partners want to inaugurate the facility in less than two months Miniature TQPM; right bottom, detail of area’s map and the pipelines (yellow line) connecting the terminal with Braskem Idesa’s facilities, some 10km away Pictures source: ICIS  Interview article by Jonathan Lopez

17-Mar-2025