SAO PAULO (ICIS)–The likely increase in Brazil’s import tariffs for dozens of chemicals will start improving beleaguered domestic producers’ poor margins even though petrochemicals prices remain low, according to an analyst at US credit rating Fitch. Marcelo Pappiani, credit analyst for Brazilian chemicals producers, added that imports into Brazil and the wider Latin America remain high and are likely to continue that way as China and the US work through their overcapacities. Despite that, prices have stabilized, albeit at low levels, and “the worst of this downturn” seems to have subsided, said Pappiani. The two largest chemicals producers in Brazil, polymers major Braskem and chlor-alkali and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) producer Unipar, are covered by Fitch. The two companies have posted several quarters of poor financial results on the back of low prices and competition from overseas producers. TARIFFS UPBrazil’s chemicals producers – represented by trade group Abiquim, in which Braskem has a commanding voice – were hoping the Brazilian cabinet would increase import tariffs on dozens of chemicals in September. However, there have been contradictory reports on this, with some expecting the hike to be approved as soon as Wednesday (18 September), while other reports citing government sources have said the decision would be pushed back to December. The increases would follow a public consultation earlier this year in which Abiquim as well as individual companies proposed increasing tariffs in more than 100 products, most of them from 12.6% to 20%. Braskem is, at the same time, partly owned by the country’s state-owned energy major Petrobras, so the Abiquim/Braskem lobbying tandem tends to find open ears in the corridors of power in Brasilia under the current government, which has committed to expand the industrial sector. Pressure not to increase import tariffs has also been strong from other sectors, not least plastic transformers represented by Abiplast, but the producers’ proposals are expected to have won the day. “Petrochemicals prices in Brazil and the wider Latin America seem to have reached the bottom and we are seeing slightly less pressure on companies, despite of course still imports coming into the region in big numbers, from China, the wider Asia and the US,” said Pappiani. “Companies have lobbied the government strongly for an increase in import tariffs as well as other measures to prop up the chemicals industry. Import tariffs seem set to increase and that should soon make Brazilian producers more competitive.” Pappiani is in no doubt higher import tariffs in several chemicals – when around half of the Brazilian industry’s demand is covered imports – are likely to translate into higher prices for consumers, precisely the reasoning used by those who oppose the hike. “President Lula has said he wants to foster the chemicals sector and has met on several occasions with CEOs from the industry as well Abiquim,” said Pappiani. “But, of course, consumers will end up paying for higher import tariffs – this happens in all economic sectors, not just petrochemicals, of course.” COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH TARIFFSAs well as higher prices for consumers, those opposing the hike in import tariffs argue that Brazilian petrochemicals producers should speed up their modernization and diversification, so they are not as dependent on government policy for their profitability. Pappiani said Braskem is a well-managed company with international assets which would make it a profitable enterprise even without government measures which prop up its competitiveness in its domestic market. However, critics of protectionist measures continue their campaign against the increase in import tariffs, although according to most analysts the dice has been cast. On Tuesday, the president of Abiplast published a charged article in Brazil’s daily Estadao in which he wondered if Braskem would always need state indirect help to keep afloat, even if its second largest shareholder is Petrobras, which in theory should make accessing cheaper raw materials easier. “Why are foreign suppliers of petrochemical products able to be more competitive in their exports to Brazil, even bearing the costs of transportation, logistics and exposure to exchange rate variations? Over the past 40 years, we have exported many of these products to China; if the Chinese (and other countries) become competitive by importing Brazilian oil, why can’t Brazilian [petrochemicals] producers become competitive?” said Jose Ricardo Roriz Coelho. “The exaggerated protection of the few petrochemical companies in Brazil results in them directing investments to countries where they face greater competition in order not to lose market share. Europe, which is not competitive due to its lack of raw materials for petrochemicals, has chosen to add value further down the production chain by importing resins from countries that are more efficient in production. “Structural problems, such as insufficient supply of inputs, cannot be solved with short-term remedies. The debate on new tariffs and the production chain is crucial,” concluded Roriz. Indeed, the prospect of high import tariffs being approved as soon as this week has already propped up Braskem’s market capitalization in the past few weeks. On 13 September, for instance, the company’s stock rose by nearly 8% as investors expect an imminent decision on the increase in import tariffs, according to a report by InfoMoney. The increase in import tariffs could automatically translate into higher earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) for Braskem, to the tune of $300 million/year, according to some analysts. Under current business conditions, that would be roughly the same EBITDA amount the producer posted in the second quarter of this year. “In our view, this additional tariff would help contain Braskem’s cash burn in recent quarters. The company would then be better positioned to capture a future cycle of increases in petrochemical spreads,” said analysts at XP cited by InfoMoney. Front page picture: Facilities operated by Brazilian polymers major Braskem in the state of Sao Paulo Source: Braskem Interview article by Jonathan Lopez 

BARCELONA (ICIS)–Petrochemical markets are likely to remain depressed while China and other countries continue to add significant capacity, unless big wave of closures and demand improvement help to achieve balance. Global capacity additions far outstrip demand growth China, Middle East, US likely to continue expansions China drove the petrochemical supercycle, but no longer China chemicals demand growth likely only 2-4%/year Prospect of global deflation Europe can focus on specialty chemicals, other niches In this Think Tank podcast, Will Beacham interviews ICIS Insight editor Nigel Davis, ICIS senior consultant Asia John Richardson and Paul Hodges, chairman of New Normal Consulting. Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the presenter and interviewees, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS. ICIS is organising regular updates to help the industry understand current market trends. Register here . Read the latest issue of ICIS Chemical Business. Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson’s ICIS blogs.

Ursula von der Leyen announces key energy roles for Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands Teresa Ribera will oversee delivery of the bloc’s Green Deal, with former Danish energy minister Dan Jorgensen to take the energy brief Parliamentary hearing needed to confirm candidates in post LONDON (ICIS)–European Commission president Ursula Von der Leyen named former Danish energy minister Dan Jorgensen as her pick for the energy brief on 17 September, as she unveiled the structure of the incoming College of Commissioners. The role is likely to work closely with big green portfolios for Spain and the Netherlands, as von der Leyen presented a leaner, more cross-cutting college than in the previous mandate. Spain’s Teresa Ribera, one of six executive vice-presidents, will be responsible for a “clean, just and competitive transition”. Her work will involve ensuring the EU stays on track to meet its goals under the bloc’s Green Deal and proceed with both decarbonising and industrialising the economy in parallel. Ribera has been Spain’s ecological transition minister since 2018, a role which covers both energy and environmental policy. She was a key figure in finalising a number of energy files, including the electricity market reforms, when Spain held the rotating EU presidency in the second half of 2023. Ribera will also pick up responsibility for competition policy from outgoing Danish commissioner Margrethe Vestager. Current Dutch commissioner Wopke Hoekstra will retain the climate brief he has held since August 2023, becoming commissioner for “climate, net-zero and clean growth”. His responsibilities will include climate diplomacy and decarbonisation, alongside implementation and adaptation. The former Dutch finance minister will also pick up responsibility for taxation. Jorgensen’s work will focus on lowering energy prices, investment in clean energy and cutting dependencies. His brief will also cover housing, which covers aspects including energy efficiency. Von der Leyen told reporters that Jorgensen’s broad experience as an energy minister made him a good fit for the role. She pointed to topics including the energy crisis, building an energy union and lessening Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels as key agenda items, alongside deepening Europe’s interconnections and supply corridors. Von der Leyen also said Jorgensen was well suited to continue work on joint energy procurement, which she called “one of the top topics to increase the market power of the [EU] on the global energy market”. Jorgensen was Denmark’s minister for climate, energy and utilities from 2019-2022, before he became minister for development cooperation and global climate policy. The commissioners-designate must be approved by the European Parliament before they take up their roles. Von der Leyen said it was impossible to say when the process would be complete but she hoped it would be soon. The initial goal was 1 November, but that may slip. The parliament can accept or reject the whole Commission, and has previously used its role to replace certain candidates and demand adjustments to portfolios. COORDINATION IS KEY Asked about overlap between Ribera’s and Hoekstra’s briefs, von der Leyen told reporters that all commissioners and executive vice-presidents would need to work closely together. “You cannot put reality in little boxes and separate the different topics from each other. “Reality: everything is intertwined and interlinked,” she said, stressing that coordination and cooperation were paramount. Von der Leyen also cut an additional layer of commission vice-presidents in the new college, which she said meant a “leaner structure, more interactive and interlinked”. CZECH DEVELOPMENTS Josef Sikela, a contender for the energy job, will instead become commissioner for international partnerships. Sikela was well regarded for his work during the energy price crisis, when the Czech presidency convened multiple energy councils in the second half of 2022 to stabilise the situation. His work will involve oversight of the €300bn Global Gateway programme, which invests in infrastructure abroad. Von der Leyen said the role had links with energy and trade, pointing to examples of working with African countries on renewable energy or critical raw materials to help underpin the bloc’s competitiveness.

LONDON (ICIS)–Hopes of a recovery in Germany’s economy are fading, think tank ZEW said on Tuesday, as its economic sentiment indicator fell for the third month in a row. The research group’s September economic sentiment indicator declined by 15.6 points from August to 3.6 points, while its assessment of the current situation in Germany was down by 7.2 points to -84.5 points, the lowest since May 2020. Both indicators also fell sharply in August from the previous month. The economic sentiment indicator began its 2024 downward trend in July. “The hope for a swift improvement in the economic situation is visibly fading,” said ZEW president Achim Wambach. “In the latest survey, we once again observe a noticeable decline in economic expectations for Germany.” The outlook for the eurozone was also gloomy, with the September economic sentiment indicator down by 8.6 points to 9.3 points. The assessment of the current situation in the eurozone fell by 8 points from August, remaining firmly in negative territory at -40.4 points.

LONDON (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Chemicals & The Economy by Paul Hodges, which suggests OPEC+ risks losing control of oil markets. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS. Paul Hodges is the chairman of consultants New Normal Consulting.

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Asian Chemical Connections by John Richardson. I did the same exercise on global ethylene markets almost exactly a year ago as I do in today’s post. This makes me wonder why there is talk of early signs of a global recovery in olefins and derivative markets. Based on the new calculations, what would it take to return global operating rates to their very healthy 1992-2023 average of 88%? Assuming global production, which is about the same as demand, stays unchanged from our base case, global capacity would have to grow by an average of around 2m tonnes a year versus our base case of 6.2m tonnes a year. This implies capacity closures elsewhere to get to the 2m tonnes a year of 2024-2030 capacity growth. Global capacity would need to grow at an average 1% per year to achieve a 2024-2030 operating rate of 88%. This would compare with the 1992-2023 average of 4%. One might argue that we have underestimated global demand given the likelihood of a loosening cycle by the Fed, perhaps a big dose of Chinese economic stimulus, and booming economies in the developing world such as India’s. But what happens in the rest of the world is less consequence compared with events in China. Today’s second chart – showing China’s percentage shares of global demand for the major ethylene derivatives in 1992 (at the start of the Chemicals Supercycle) and by the end of this year – underlines the disproportionate role that China has come to play in driving global consumption: In 1992, from a 22% of the global population, China’s average share of global demand across these ethylene derivatives was 6%. China’s share of global demand is forecast to reach 40% from only an 18% share of the global population by the end of 2024. The Economist wrote in its 7 September issue that the real Chinese economic picture may be bleaker than is commonly painted. “The official [Chinese government] numbers show that the GDP growth rate has reverted to pre-pandemic level, despite the moribund housing industry and low investment in infrastructure,” wrote the magazine “This is a risible claim, says Logan Wright of Rhodium Group, a consulting firm. ‘The broader problem is simply that the GDP data have stopped bearing any resemblance to economic reality,’ he explains. My ICIS colleague, Kevin Swift, has looked at disagreements over China’s population level. In the blog’s 30 August post, he wrote: “Demographer Yi Fuxian at the University of Wisconsin has questioned assumptions about current Chinese population and the likely path forward. He examined China’s demographic data and found clear and frequent discrepancies. These should parallel each other, and they do not. “Yi posits that China population in 2020 was 1.29bn, not 1.42bn, an undercount of over 130m.” If China’s population was smaller than commonly assumed in 2020, so perhaps was its chemicals demand, making today’s global oversupply worse. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS.

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a conditional commitment for up to $1.559 billion to Wabash Valley Resources to help finance a commercial-scale waste-to-ammonia production facility using carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. The government funding would be part of a total investment of $2.4 billion that Wabash Valley Resources would secure for the project through private investment. Located in West Terre Haute, Indiana, the project is being planned to produce 500,000 tonnes of anhydrous ammonia annually and permanently sequestering 1.6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. Officials said it will have the potential to be the world’s first, carbon-negative ammonia production facility and that the company would be repurposing an industrial gasifier to utilize petroleum coke. This will be the US’ first efforts to utilize petroleum coke to produce ammonia and store the associated emissions via permanent geologic sequestration. Wabash Valley Resources said it is their intention to demonstrate a commercially and environmentally viable end-use alternative for petroleum coke, which is a waste product generated during the oil refining process. Officials said this project would play a critical role in securing domestic fertilizer supply for the region commonly known as the Corn Belt, contributing to both food security and climate goals. This low-carbon ammonia would be cost-competitive compared to existing ammonia imports, helping to drive down costs for local businesses and consumers. It was noted that while ammonia fertilizer is a crucial element of the US agricultural system, its production is a significant contributor to climate change. Globally, the manufacturing of the nutrient accounts for 1% to 2% of all carbon dioxide emissions. Through this project, Wabash Valley Resources is striving to reduce the agricultural industry’s emissions. In addition to its environmental benefits, the project is expected to create 500 construction jobs and 125 operations jobs.

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Expected to make landfall late Monday in South Carolina but not develop further, the next round of tropical weather is already delivering wind and rains to the region but for the fertilizer industry, it was not seen as being the type of threat that Hurricane Francine was last week. While South Carolina and North Carolina have significant agriculture activities and infrastructure along with crop nutrient operations and distribution, fertilizer manufacturing is less prevalent than in other parts of the US. The storm was being classified as a tropical rainstorm with potential to produce several inches of rain per hour with it expected to trek northward once it makes landfall. There have been tropical storm-force winds seen from this event but there has not been a defined center of circulation. In terms of major fertilizer activity, Canadian producer Nutrien has the Aurora Phosphate plant in Aurora, North Carolina, with the city located near the coast. The company said it is keeping aware and taking necessary steps. “We are actively monitoring the tropical storm system and have comprehensive emergency response plans in place to ensure the safety of our people and operational integrity of our facilities,” said a Nutrien spokesperson. Like the previous tropical weather that has struck the US, this storm’s wrath will bring the most damage to crops. Harvesting of corn and soybeans are underway, with cotton and other crops now maturing also in jeopardy, with the heavy rainfall likely causing some localized flooding. Harvesting campaigns in both South Carolina and North Carolina have been halted, with this trend possibly carrying into the surrounding states. If the rain is extensive the delay could be several days, if not longer depending on rainfall amounts. The concern is with a delay in these activities it creates an additional lag for starting post-harvest field activities like end-of-the-year fertilizing. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported that 47% of the corn crop had been completed with only 1% of soybeans having been harvested in North Carolina. There were no results provided for South Carolina. As with Hurricane Francine which hit both Louisiana and Mississippi much more severely, the true impact of this latest tropical system will be felt in crop damage rather than damaged fertilizer plants or retail operations. There is concern that any loss of yields will mean less income for farmers which then could cause a sizeable decrease in buying for further volumes.

HOUSTON (ICIS)–As the US recycled polyethylene terephthalate (R-PET) market continues to develop and new players establish supply relationships across members in the value chain, pricing mechanisms have shifted significantly over the course of the last 5+ years. Historically, R-PET pricing was linked to virgin pricing, but at a deficit, meaning recycled resins were expected to be cheaper than virgin. Now, the tables have turned, particularly for sought after “sustainability-driven” grades of recycled resin which typically command a premium to virgin due to the tight supply and high demand of these higher quality, clear resins. Pricing for these grades of recycled resins has shifted within the R-PET industry, such that pellet prices are largely based on their own feedstock and production costs. While spot pellet pricing is subjected to the additional lens of local supply and demand, including substitution with imports or cheap virgin, contract pellet pricing is now largely based off of bale feedstock formulas, with some contracts specifying individual step inputs, and others specifying the bale index and then an adder to represent the processing cost. Eventually, the market may move to a uniform indexed pellet price, settled on a routine frequency by the market, similar to how R-PET pricing is established in Europe, or how other commodity resin prices are established in the US, such as polyethylene (PE). Within the ICIS US R-PET commodity services, two new price series have been introduced which represent food grade pellet pricing calculated via a formula, starting with bale feedstock costs. While each contract will have unique formula inputs which are largely kept private, the following prices are meant as an indicator of average pellet pricing based on formula, as this can vary significantly from active spot market transactions – depending on the current market supply and demand. There is one assessment for the East Coast and one for the West Coast based on various bale feedstocks. The formula is listed below: [([(Bale price indicator + bale freight ) ÷ bale yield] + bale to flake processing costs) ÷ flake yield] + flake to pellet processing costs = pellet price Formula input descriptors: Bale price indicator: What quality (curbside or deposit) and region (East Coast vs West Coast) descriptors are used for selecting base pricing for bale feedstock costs in relation to the type most often used by local recyclers. Bale freight: Cost to transport material from bale producer (typically material recovery facility (MRF)) to bale buyer (typically the recycler/reclaimer). Bale yield: Factor to account for loss of material due to contamination within the bale; Curbside bales have higher contamination levels and thus lower yields. Bale to flake processing costs: Associated production costs from sorting, washing, grinding processes, including but not limited to facilities costs, utilities, labor, etc. Flake yield: Factor to account for loss of material due to contamination from flake to pellet stage. Flake to pellet processing costs: Associated production costs from pelletization, including but not limited to facilities costs, utilities, labor, etc. The numeric input values were gathered from market participants, with median values used among responses. The inputs are subject to change pending further feedback or market cost changes, such as the recent inflation of production costs within the last ~2-4 years. This price excludes delivery costs of the final pellet. This price also excludes explicit margin adders, though some processing costs may include inherit margin depending on the processing yield fluctuation. For more information on these new series, or to share feedback, please contact Emily Friedman at Emily.friedman@icis.com.