COATZACOALCOS, Mexico (ICIS)–Mexico’s new ethane import terminal in the state of Veracruz is poised to transform the country’s struggling petrochemical sector by alleviating critical raw material shortages, according to the chief at the facility. Cleantho de Paiva, CEO at the Terminal Quimica Puerto Mexico (TQPM) in Veracruz’s municipality of Coatzacoalcos, said the terminal should start up in May and be able to import 80,000 barrels of ethane, mostly from the US. Natural gas derivative ethane has become the prime choice to produce polymers in North America after the US’s shale gas boom in the 2010s. The ethane will be primarily delivered to polyethylene (PE) major Braskem Idesa, a joint venture between the Brazilian and Mexican chemicals producers of the same name. TQPM is, at the same time, a joint venture between Braskem Idesa and Dutch company Advario. ICIS visited TQPM on 15 March – a few pictures shown at the bottom. FINALLY, START-UP PLANNED FOR MAYThe terminal’s years-long construction is a key project of Braskem Idesa, which until now has been dependent on supply of inputs mostly from Mexico’s crude oil major Pemex, supply which at a time was unstable and below what had been agreed. The situation became so critical that Braskem Idesa, which operates one of Latin America’s newest PE complexes, was forced to seek alternative supply arrangements. Industry analysts have pointed to Pemex’s supply shortfalls as a major constraint on Mexico’s petrochemical sector growth. The terminal’s financing was at some point in doubt, although the parties agreed to inject further cash last year so it could be finalized in 2025. TQPM will make it easier for Braskem Idesa to secure inputs necessary to produce PE, without depending on Pemex, whom at the same time would be able to redirect the inputs it was delivering to the PE producer to other petrochemicals companies. A common theme for Mexican chemicals companies is the lack of raw materials, so any additional supply is always welcome news, said de Paiva. “This project has a very important impact on the development of the national petrochemical industry, because it’s precisely to complement access to raw materials that we lack today. With a capacity to import up to 80,000 barrels per day of ethane, this will significantly exceed the 63,000 barrels Braskem Idesa currently requires for its operations,” said de Paiva. “The issue of the lack of ethane in the country is structural. Since the US is the largest producer and exporter of petrochemical ethane, building this terminal gives us access to import sufficient raw material. “When the terminal comes into operation, Pemex, which currently has an obligation to supply a certain amount to Braskem Idesa, will no longer have it and will be able to direct this raw material to its own petrochemical complexes and also resume its operating capacity,” he added. This cascading effect could benefit Mexico’s broader petrochemical industry, potentially allowing Pemex to better serve other domestic manufacturers once relieved of its Braskem Idesa commitments. De Paiva described this as a “structuring” event for Mexico’s manufacturing industry as it could allow the country’s petrochemical industry to return to operating its plants at higher capacities. The executive offered a segment-by-segment assessment of Mexico’s chemical industry, noting varying conditions across different product categories. He said polypropylene (PP) production, led by Indelpro – a joint venture between Mexico’s Alpek and the US’s LyondellBasell – as well as production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are performing quite well. It is the PE market which faces significant shortages, said de Paiva. PEMEX ASSETSAddressing questions about the state of Pemex’s aging petrochemical assets, de Paiva suggested that proper maintenance and technological upgrades could extend the operational life of even decades-old facilities. Some players in Mexico’s chemicals industry think there is room for joint ventures with the private sector to revive some of Pemex’s assets. That was the opinion of Martin Toscano, director for Mexican operations at Germany’s chemicals major Evonik, in an interview with ICIS. Other players, however, think the only way forward would be privatization so Pemex, which recurrently needs bailing out from the Mexican Treasury, would stop being a burden for the taxpayer, according to Javier Soriano, director at chemicals distributor Quimisor. De Paiva said he could not opine about Pemex’s assets, but did say that if plants are properly maintained they should be able to run for decades after start-up. “Petrochemical plants must operate for 30, 40, even 50 years, but they must maintain a continuous maintenance and technological upgrade program. Braskem’s experience in Brazil offers a glimpse of this: the company successfully operates plants of similar age, but with consistent investments in modernization,” said de Paiva. Before being appointed CEO at TQPM – a position he will keep for some time after the start-up in May, he said – de Paiva spent decades working for Braskem in Brazil, his country of origin. The terminal’s completion comes at a critical time for Mexico’s manufacturing sector, which has been looking to capitalize on nearshoring opportunities as global companies seek to reduce dependence on Asian supply chains. Industry experts suggest that resolving raw material constraints could position Mexico’s petrochemical sector for significant growth, particularly given its proximity to the US market and competitive labor costs. De Paiva concluded saying that once TQPM is up and running, that will create room for Braskem Idesa to think about potential expansions. The terminal’s storage tanks, being painted The dock where two Braskem Idesa-owned vessels will unload the ethane, to come mostly from the US Work was energetic even on a Saturday (15 March) as TQPM’s two partners want to inaugurate the facility in less than two months Miniature TQPM; right bottom, detail of area’s map and the pipelines (yellow line) connecting the terminal with Braskem Idesa’s facilities, some 10km away Pictures source: ICIS  Interview article by Jonathan Lopez

LONDON (ICIS)–In this ICIS energy podcast, energy news editor Jake Stones is joined by ICIS head of gas analytics Andreas Schroeder and ICIS energy managing editor Jamie Stewart to discuss the role speculative participants play in European gas and power markets today. Schroeder and Stewart provide a summary of recent bull and bear runs in EU energy markets, and look at the significance of speculative financial players’ trading behaviors and how these have transformed market dynamics.

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News from the week ended 14 March. US energy secretary optimistic as tariff proposals in early days The US is still in the early stages of its tariff proposals, which could increase the costs of the steel and aluminium needed for oil and gas production, but vigorous dialogue about their effect on the economy is taking place behind closed doors, the secretary of energy said on Monday. AFPM ’25: Shippers weigh tariffs, port charges on global supply chains Whether it is dealing with on-again, off-again tariffs, new charges at US ports for carriers with China-flagged vessels in their fleets, or booking passage through the Panama Canal, participants at this year’s International Petrochemical Conference (IPC) have plenty to talk about. AFPM ‘25: US tariffs, retaliation risk heightens uncertainty for chemicals, economies The threat of additional US tariffs, retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, and their potential impact is fostering a heightened level of uncertainty, dampening consumer, business and investor sentiment, along with clouding the 2025 outlook for chemicals and economies. INSIGHT: Tariff war escalates as EU new round of retaliation includes US PE, plastic products Yet another front is opening up on the US tariff war – this one with the EU. In retaliation for US 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that took effect on 12 March, the EU plans to not only roll out old measures, but launch new more significant tariffs directly targeting US polyethylene (PE) and other plastic products. AFPM ’25: INSIGHT: New US president brings chems regulatory relief, tariffs The new administration of US President Donald Trump is giving chemical companies a break on regulations and proposing tariffs on the nation’s biggest trade partners and on the world. Dow to announce decisions on European asset footprint on Q1 and Q2 earning calls – CFO Dow plans to announce decisions from its European asset review on its Q1 and Q2 earnings calls, its chief financial officer (CFO) said. Canada’s new prime minister to focus on trade diversification and security Canada’s new prime minister, Mark Carney, will focus on diversifying the country’s trade relationships and improving its security, he said on Friday after officially taking over from Justin Trudeau. AFPM ’25: LatAm chemicals face uncertain outlook amid oversupply, trade policy woes Latin American petrochemicals face ongoing challenges from oversupplied markets and poor demand, with survival increasingly dependent on government protectionist measures.

LONDON (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Chemicals & The Economy by Paul Hodges, which looks at the changes underway in oil markets. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS. Paul Hodges is the chairman of consultants New Normal Consulting.

LONDON (ICIS)–Here are some of the top stories from ICIS Europe for the week ended 14 March. European naphtha slides as demand wanes, refineries roar back Sentiment in Europe’s naphtha spot market was weighed down by upstream crude volatility, weak blending demand and limited export opportunities in the week to 7 March despite ample liquidity in the physical space. Flagship Maasvlakte POSM plant to close in October – union The largest propylene oxide/styrene monomer (POSM) production complex in Europe is expected to close in October, union FNV said on Tuesday, after an agreement was reached between operator LyondellBasell and employees at the site. Europe chems stocks claw back losses as markets firm despite tariffs European chemicals stocks firmed in early trading on Wednesday as markets rebounded from the sell off of the last week, despite the onset of US tariffs on aluminium and steel and Europe’s pledge to retaliate. ‘Game changer’ for Europe PE as EU plans retaliatory tariffs on US European polyethylene (PE) players are braced for a potentially big impact from the EU’s retaliatory tariffs on plastics from the US, in the latest twist of the growing trade war. INSIGHT: Can the chemicals sector tap into Europe’s rearmament era? Europe’s drive to drastically ramp up defence spending is likely to drive a wave of investment into the region’s beleaguered industrial sector, but existing military spending patterns and technical requirements could limit uplift for chemicals.

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Weak downstream demand, exacerbated by economic and geopolitical uncertainties, keeps sentiment bearish and buyers cautious across petrochemical markets in Asia. Sluggish demand to continue into Q2 amid oversupply China’s surging exports a concern among Asia producers China, South Korea prepare stimulus measures amid US tariffs REGIONAL PRODUCERS FEEL STRAIN China’s aggressive capacity expansion which led to increased exports has been exerting pressure on other Asian producers. For caprolactam (capro), the country turned into a net exporter in 2024, with shipments doubling from two years ago. This flood of Chinese exports has intensified regional competition, forcing capro plant closures in Japan and Thailand due to unsustainable margins. In the ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) market, massive capacity expansions in the next three years are projected to push China’s production capacity to 63% of the global total by 2027. As a result, the country’s EVA imports are likely to decline further, while exports are projected to continue increasing. In the naphtha market, supply constraints due to limited arbitrage cargoes and higher demand from new cracker start-ups in China and Indonesia have driven intermonth spreads to the highest levels seen in a year on 11 March. Refinery maintenance in China has also further restricted domestic naphtha supply, tightening overall availability in Asia. For aromatics such as benzene, toluene, xylene, paraxylene (PX), and mixed xylene (MX), prices fell in the week ended 14 March, weighed down by ample inventories and subdued demand. For acetone, prices have risen on tight supply because of plant maintenance, squeezing the margins of downstream isopropanol (IPA) producers, with LG Chem planning to shut its plant for a month from end-March. Meanwhile, palm oil prices in southeast Asia remain elevated due to lower production and stock levels, prompting a shift to cheaper alternatives like soybean oil in key markets such as India. Meanwhile, palm oil prices in southeast Asia remain elevated due to lower production and stock levels, prompting a shift to cheaper alternatives like soybean oil in key markets such as India. Consequently, downstream fatty alcohols prices increased. Although plants in Malaysia and Indonesia have expanded capacities, these will be offset by expected turnarounds during March to May. BEARISH SENTIMENT AMID TRADE WARS Industry players are navigating highly volatile markets amid the revival of the US-China trade war, with fears of a more widespread trade disruption amid the US’ protectionist measures under President Donald Trump. Buyers are generally cautious about building too much inventory amid continued weakness in demand. In the MX market, buyers in southeast Asia are maintaining sufficient inventories and avoiding additional spot purchases. For methyl methacrylate (MMA), domestic market in China remains sluggish due to high stocks and lackluster demand, while a strong US dollar was further dampening export demand. Similarly, the vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) market is also facing weak demand in China, with traders struggling to offload high inventories due to slow spot trade activity. US’ tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports which took effect on 12 March are adding to regional economic concern, particularly for South Korea, which is as major steel exporter to the world’s biggest economy. China, whose economy has been slowing down, plans “promote reasonable wage growth by strengthening employment support in response to economic conditions”, to boost domestic consumption, its State Council said on 16 March. Among the new economic stimulus measures are implementing paid annual leaves for workers, expanding property income channels and accelerating development in new technologies. Focus article by Jonathan Yee Additional reporting by Jasmine Khoo, Angeline Soh, Samuel Wong, Isaac Tan, Chris Qi, Helen Yan, Rita Wang, Elaine Zhang, Yvonne Shi, Li Peng Seng and Joanne Wang Thumbnail image: Qingdao Port Trade, China – 13 March 2025 (Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News Asia and the Middle East for the week ended 14 March. Asia petrochemicals under pressure from China oversupply, US trade risks By Jonathan Yee 10-Mar-25 12:42 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Sentiment in Asia’s petrochemical markets remains cautious with prices of some products – particularly in the southeastern region – were rising on tight supply, amid escalating trade tensions between the US and its major trading partners, including China. Asia petrochemical shares track Wall Street rout on US tariff, recession worries By Jonathan Yee 11-Mar-25 11:30 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Shares of petrochemical companies in Asia tumbled on Tuesday, tracking Wall Street’s rout overnight on fears of a US recession caused by tariffs. Asia naphtha bull-run intensifies; potential risks ahead By Li Peng Seng 12-Mar-25 13:21 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Tight supplies and stronger-than-usual demand have driven Asia’s naphtha intermonth spread to nearly a year’s high on 11 March, but upcoming cracker maintenance and rebounding arbitrage volumes could derail the current bull-run. Asia caprolactam spot prices decline, China plant operating rates reduce By Isaac Tan 12-Mar-25 20:32 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Caprolactam (capro) spot prices in Asia-Pacific declined in the week ended 12 March 2025, driven by weak benzene costs and sluggish downstream demand. China EVA industry: navigating capacity expansion amid demand uncertainty By Chris Qi 13-Mar-25 11:27 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China’s ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) industry is expected to brace for a second wave of capacity expansion during 2025-2027. The country is now the world’s largest EVA producer following intensive plant start-ups during 2021-2023. BLOG: A Different Kind of Downturn: Why This Cycle Won’t Simply “Right Itself” By John Richardson 13-Mar-25 11:55 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Asian Chemical Connections by John Richardson. INSIGHT: Poor demand dominates Asian isocyanates markets, oversupply caps Mideast gains By Shannen Ng 13-Mar-25 13:00 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Soft demand for key isocyanates polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (PMDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) in Asia and the Middle East is expected to persist throughout March, with lengthy supply also likely to weigh on sentiment. South Korea prepares full emergency response as US tariffs take effect By Nurluqman Suratman 14-Mar-25 12:51 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–South Korea is initiating full emergency response measures as US steel and aluminum tariffs take effect, aiming to mitigate the impact on its economy, which is already grappling with weak exports and domestic consumption.

TORONTO (ICIS)–Canada’s new prime minister, Mark Carney, will focus on diversifying the country’s trade relationships and improving its security, he said on Friday after officially taking over from Justin Trudeau. The new government’s top priority would be “protecting Canadian workers and their families in the face of unjustified foreign trade action”, he said with reference to the US tariffs on goods from Canada. Canada would be “building here at home” to become stronger while working “with different partners” abroad, he said. Carney plans to travel to France and the UK next week to talk about trade diversification and security with European leaders, he said. Although he has no immediate plan to meet US President Donald Trump, Carney was looking forward to speaking with Trump “at the appropriate moment”, he said. Canada joining the USCarney explicitly rejected Trump’s repeated suggestions that Canada should join the US as its 51st state. Following a G7 foreign ministers meeting in La Malbaie in Canada’s Quebec province on Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Trump’s position is that Canada would be better off joining the US “for economic purposes.” Asked about these remarks, Carney said: “It’s crazy, [Trump’s] point is crazy, that’s it.” “We will never, ever, in any shape or form, be part of the United States”, he said. Regarding the trade conflict, Carney reminded that Canada was the largest client of the US in many industries. “We respect the United States, we respect President Trump”, he said. Canada understood Trump’s priority to address “the scourge of fentanyl”, which was also a problem in Canada. It also understood the importance Trump places on American workers and jobs, Carney said and went on to say: “We want him [Trump], and his administration, to understand the importance we put on Canadian workers and jobs”. Carney noted that Trump was a “successful businessman and deal maker”, and he expressed the hope that the US will understand Canada’s position. As for Canada’s consumer carbon tax, Carney said that the new government would move quickly to abolish it. Carney said previously he would retain Canada’s industrial carbon pricing. Carbon pricing has been important in attracting investments in low-carbon projects, led by Dow’s Path2Zero petrochemicals complex under construction in Alberta province. He did not say when he will call an election. Carney, who is a former governor of the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada, does not have a seat in parliament. In the wake of Trudeau’s resignation announcement on 6 January and the trade conflict with the US, Carney’s Liberal Party has caught up with the opposition Conservatives in opinion polls about the next federal election. Elections must be held before the end of October. Please also visit US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy Thumbnail photo of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney; source: Liberal Party of Canada

The following text is from a white paper published by ICIS called Trump peace talks bring further uncertainty over Russian oil and LNG sanctions. You can download the pdf version of this paper here. Written by: Aura Sabadus, Barney Gray, Andreas Schroeder, Rob Songer As US president Donald Trump pushes for Ukrainian-Russian peace negotiations, it is uncertain whether he might seek to strengthen or unwind some of the sanctions imposed on Russian oil and LNG over the last three years. Trump has also been pursuing a blend of tariffs and sanctions, complicating an already difficult landscape. This latest ICIS paper proposes to help companies navigate a complex environment, reviewing the impact of new tariffs and existing sanctions on markets, the likelihood that they may be scrapped and asks whether unilateral European sanctions on Russian oil and gas could be just as effective.  INTRODUCTION US President Donald Trump’s second term has ushered in a whirlwind of economic measures sparking volatility across markets and shaking the global economy. Since his return to power at the end of January, US trade policies have focused on a blend of tariffs and sanctions targeting import partners, Canada and Mexico but also political adversaries, Iran and Venezuela. From this vantage point, his wider economic measures have the potential to spur inflation and a global economic slowdown that could weaken energy demand at a time of surging global oil and gas supply, weighing heavily on prices. With events unfolding at rapid speed as policies are announced and rolled back within days or even hours, it is becoming increasingly difficult for companies to assess the direction that oil and gas markets will take in the longer-term. Perhaps the biggest wild card in this unpredictable environment is the US’ position on Russian oil and LNG sanctions. On 7 March, the US president said he was strongly considering an array of tariffs and sanctions on Russia but many observers do not exclude the possibility of a u-turn on restrictions as Washington has been doubling down on efforts to conclude a peace deal with Moscow over Ukraine. These sanctions could be eased either during peace negotiations or once the war ends. SANCTIONS AND LOOPHOLES Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the US together with the EU and the UK imposed over 20,000 sanctions, targeting primarily its oil sector. Nevertheless, despite the sweeping sanctions, Russia still made close to €1tr in oil and gas sales since the start of the war, as the two account for up to half of Russia’s tax revenues, according to estimates from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). Although the US and the EU introduced limited restrictions on Russian LNG, the country lost most of its European pipeline gas market share after cutting close to 80% of its exports following the invasion of Ukraine. Following the expiry of the Russian-Ukrainian pipeline gas transit agreement at the beginning of 2025, the Russian share of LNG and gas in Europe is 11%. Since then, the shortfall has been plugged primarily by the US, which now accounts for nearly a quarter of European gas supplies. RECORD IMPORTS In January alone, a record 58% of LNG imported into Europe came from the US, while Russia’s market share including pipeline and LNG exports accounted for 11%, dropping from close to 40% in 2021. While Europe has become increasingly dependent on the US, the same could be said about the US, as 80% of its LNG exports have been heading to Europe in recent months, according to ICIS data. With US LNG production set to double in the second half of this decade, unwinding sanctions against Russia’s Arctic LNG2 project would create direct competition to US producers. In contrast, by removing some of the sanctions on the oil sector, the Trump administration might hope to offset the inflationary effect of tariffs through falling oil prices and greenlight the return of US companies to Russia. Meanwhile, with the EU and the UK pledging to weaken Russia economically as part of efforts to help Ukraine negotiate from a position of strength, the onus would be on Brussels and London to continue sanctions on their own but that raises questions about their effectiveness. An EU transshipment ban prohibiting the transfer of Russian LNG via European terminals could have the perverse impact of redirecting these LNG volumes into European markets when it comes in force at the end of this month. Last year, more than 50% of Russian LNG exports ended up in Europe, which means that with the trans-shipment ban even more volumes could enter the market just as the EU is preparing to announce a roadmap for the scheduled 2027 Russia fossil fuel import phaseout. TARIFFS Donald Trump’s administration has had a profound impact on the global crude market in only a few short weeks. His mix of tariffs on friendly countries and sanctions on adversaries have led to ramped-up volatility and uncertainty with a distinct bearish tinge. Tariffs against Canada and Mexico announced in February, paused for a month and reintroduced in March only to be suspended again, have sparked fears of a global trade war. Canada is the US’ largest source of imported crude, representing over 4 million barrels/day or 62% of total imports in 2024. US refiners rely on Canada’s heavier, sour grades for which many US Gulf Coast refiners are specifically adapted to process. The US has placed a tariff of 10% on Canadian imports, adding more than $5/barrel to the current cost of Canada’s Western Canadian Select export grade. This will adversely impact refiners’ margins and may encourage them to seek replacement barrels from overseas, boosting demand for non-tariffed Middle Eastern or Brazilian grades. While the majority of Canada’s export pipeline infrastructure is dedicated to serving US customers, Canada is likely to ramp up exports through its Trans Mountain pipeline on the Pacific coast targeting Asian customers. Such a move could compete with Middle Eastern exports to Asia as higher volumes of Canadian grades find their way to South Korea, China and Japan. US tariffs on Mexican imports are a more punitive 25%, impacting around 465,000 barrels/day. While Mexican imports could dip in the short term, most Mexican production is coastal and offshore, and the country has the option to reroute exports more readily than Canada. However, with Mexico’s OPEC+ partners starting to return 2.2 million barrels of production cuts to the market over the next 18 months from April, surplus Mexican oil on the global market is likely to pressure prices. Meanwhile, with OPEC+ seeking to increase monthly production by around 138,000 barrels per day, US sanctions will try to remove supply from Iran. Iranian production dipped sharply under Trump’s first term only to rally again during president Biden’s tenure to 3.26 million barrels/day in 2024. While US sanctions could pare this back by 1.0 million barrels/day, offsetting global supply gains elsewhere, it is likely that this number is optimistic as consumers in China and India continue to ignore US sanctions on Iran. The US is likely to be more successful sanctioning Venezuelan imports which currently average around 220,000 barrels/day. Since Trump cancelled Chevron’s license to operate in the country, imports of Venezuelan oil are now likely to cease completely with these barrels competing in the global heavy, sour market. RUSSIAN SANCTIONS US president Donald Trump’s tariffs and sanctions policies so far this year have weakened oil prices. These policies, along with likely increased supply of competing grades from Canada, Mexico and the Middle East, mean medium and heavy-sour benchmark oil prices could weaken even further this year. One implication is that president Trump may sacrifice the growth of the US oil sector for lower oil prices as a net benefit to the US economy. Should he also relax sanctions on Russia, the prospect of up to 0.6 million barrels/day of spare capacity hitting the market comes closer to reality, which could tank prices. What decision the Trump administration takes regarding Russian oil and gas will be pivotal for global markets, determining not only immediate price movements but also the long-term direction of the industry. Recent diplomatic events suggest the US is sympathetic to Moscow’s cause, as it pushes for an immediate peace deal with Ukraine. Many observers say that lifting sanctions could be detrimental to US oil and LNG producers and could have major oil price downside. Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, western partners, including the US, UK and the EU have introduced over 20,000 sanctions against Russia, expecting to dissuade it from pursuing its aggression against Ukraine. Most of these sanctions target its oil and LNG sectors, which account for more than a third of Russia’s annual revenue. They took the form of either sanctions on production and services, or a price cap designed to limit revenue while not creating global supply imbalances. These were bolstered by a comprehensive package introduced in the final days of the previous Biden administration, directed at 183 oil tankers, some of which overlap with the 90 vessels blacklisted by the UK and another 80 sanctioned by the EU. Since the G7 plus Australia introduced a $60/bbl cap on the price for seaborne Russian-origin crude oil, prohibiting service providers in their jurisdictions to enable maritime transportation above that level, Russia has built a shadow fleet of tankers stripped of ownership, management and flagship to help circumvent the restrictions. It spent over $10 billion in acquiring the vessels and is thought to have earned around $14 billion in sales, according to CREA. CREA also noted the comprehensive sanctions on oil production might cut up to $20 billion from Russia’s oil and gas revenue forecast of $110 billion this year. Following tougher US sanctions introduced earlier this year, India and China halted the purchase of Russian oil.  But the effectiveness of sanctions lies not only in their enforcement but also in the perception that they would be imposed. With Donald Trump driving the US increasingly towards Russia, that perception will be diluted, raising questions about the effectiveness of the sanctions in the longer-term. LNG SANCTIONS To date, the most wide-reaching sanctions to be imposed on Russian LNG ships and infrastructure have been through the US treasury. The most significant European sanctions, clamping down on LNG ship-to-ship (STS) transfers in European ports, come into effect at the end of March and are intended to reduce Russia’s ability to supply its Arctic LNG to markets outside Europe. However, they could result in increasing European imports of Russian LNG, since less will be able to be exported. To minimize disruption to the US’s European allies, US treasury sanctions did not target the established 17.4 million tonne per annum (mtpa) Yamal LNG and 10.9mtpa Sakhalin 2 liquefaction plants. Nor did they initially target much Russian shipping, although this soon followed. HITTING LNG PRODUCTION Instead, measures were aimed squarely at the 19.8mtpa Arctic LNG2 (ALNG2) liquefaction plant, which was sanctioned before it had loaded a commercial cargo, as were two giant brand-new floating storage units (FSUs), each with a storage capacity of 362,000cbm. These two FSUs, named Saam and Koryak, were intended to be installed as storage hubs at Murmansk in Europe, and Kamchatka in Asia, respectively, allowing laden Arc7 ice-class vessels to shuttle cargoes away from icy conditions, so they could be reloaded via STS transfers onto more lightly winterised vessels. In keeping with the theme of sanctions targeting new, rather than existing Russian infrastructure, four newbuilds built by South Korea’s Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) called North Air, North Way, North Mountain and North Sky were all sanctioned, preventing them from being put to work at the neighbouring Yamal LNG facility. However, four more vessels also intended to perform this role but arriving slightly later from another South Korean shipyard – Hanwha Ocean – have only recently been delivered. As a result, these four vessels – called North Moon, North Light, North Ocean and North Valley –  managed to escape the last of the Biden-era sanctions and are being used for Yamal LNG STS operations. The operator of Arctic LNG2 turned to smaller, older vessels to try to circumvent the loading ban, and these vessels – which were characterized by regular changes to their names, flags and byzantine ownership structures – were also sanctioned. Finally, in January 2025, the outgoing Biden administration slapped sanctions on existing liquefaction plants for the first time, seemingly calculating that their small sizes would not greatly inconvenience buyers. These were the 1.5mtpa Portovaya midscale and 0.66mtpa Vysotsk small-scale liquefaction plants, along with two Russian-owned vessels, the Gazprom-chartered Pskov, since renamed Pearl, and Velikiy Novgorod, which Gazprom used to load Portovaya cargoes. As it stands, some 15 LNG vessels are the subject of US treasury sanctions, according to ICIS LNG Edge, including Saam and Koryak. It should also be noted that less specific sanctions targeting technology transfers have also meant that five Arc-7 carriers that were being completed in Russia’s Zvezda shipyards, their hulls having been built in South Korea by SHI, are yet to be commissioned, two years after they were supposed to be delivered. In addition, a further ten SHI hulls have since been cancelled, which will likely slow down future Arctic LNG projects planned by Russia. Given the Trump administration’s current cordiality to Russia and antagonism towards Ukraine, it seems unlikely at this stage that further sanctions on LNG vessels will be implemented. Instead, it is arguable that existing sanctions now stand more chance of being rolled back. The sanctioned vessels are as follows: UNWINDING SANCTIONS? With the US pivoting towards Russia, there are two questions that will dominate discussions in global oil and gas markets: Will the US unwind the sanctions imposed so far and, if so, can unilateral European sanctions be equally effective? Alexander Kolyandr, a sanctions specialist and non-resident senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) said several conditions must be taken into consideration. Firstly, with Trump’s tariff policies likely to lead to inflation that would hit both his blue-collar Rust Belt electorate and tech companies in California, lifting some sanctions on Russian oil production could pressure crude prices, offsetting the impact of tariffs, he said. As steep price falls could hit current and future oil output, such a measure would have to be weighed against the interests of US producers. Kolyandr said the blacklisting of Russian oil companies Gazprom Neft and Surgutneftegas has a relatively minor impact because their combined production is around one million barrels per day, or less than a tenth of Russian overall production. More critical are sanctions against the so-called shadow fleet that has been carrying 78% of Russian seaborne crude oil shipments in in 2024, according to a report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). When EU and UK sanctions are added to those imposed by the US, the number of blacklisted oil tankers increases to 270, around a third of Russia’s shadow fleet. APPROVAL Kolyandr said another factor that will determine the unwinding of US sanctions is ease of removal. “Some sanctions derive from CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act), which need Congressional approval and are more difficult to remove and some were introduced through emergency acts, which are easier to unwind,” Kolyandr said. Although sanctions against Russian LNG are limited in scope, the likelihood of removing them, particularly against the Arctic LNG2 project , is lower as adding more LNG to a production glut that is expected to build up in coming months would hit US producers. However, it is unlikely the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) will seek to expand the scope of sanctions beyond Arctic LNG2 and the smaller Portovaya and Vysotsk to the bigger Yamal LNG and Sakhalin II exports as these would create major disruptions in a global LNG market set to remain tight in the mid-term. EUROPEAN SANCTIONS If the US did unwind critical sanctions against Russia’s oil and LNG shadow fleets as well as against oil production, could European measures prove as effective? Some observers believe that a possible US exit from the G7 price cap would not pose a problem to Europe because most of the Russian oil dodging the cap is exported via EU-controlled chokepoints in the Baltic Sea, giving the bloc leverage to control and enforce the cap. Russian LNG exports are equally critically dependant on European insurance. In 2024, 95% of LNG volumes were transported on vessels insured in G7 + countries. More than half of these vessels belonged to UK and Greek companies, making them vulnerable to European leverage, according to CREA. Ongoing price volatility and tight market conditions expected for the rest of the year will likely leave the EU unable to join the UK in banning Russian LNG imports, at least for the time being. However, the EU could work with Ukraine to ban remaining land-based oil exports to Hungary, Slovakia and Czechia via the Druzhba pipeline. The expansion of the Transalpine Pipeline from Italy to the Czech Republic could help replace some of the volumes transiting Ukraine. FINANCIAL MARKETS To restart Russian oil and gas operations, western companies would need access to markets, where the major global financial centres of the EU and UK could also exert pressure. On March 13, there were reports that a waiver introduced by former president Joe Biden exempting 12 Russian banks used for oil payments may have lapsed on March 12 without being renewed. As the waiver lapsed, the May Brent future price fell below $70/bbl but regained some of the lost premium the following day to hover around that level. Kolyandr said that in the case of Gazprombank, which had received a separate exemption to allow payments from pipeline gas buyers from Turkey, the waiver may still be on for now. By: Barney Gray, Aura Sabadus, Andreas Schroeder, Rob Songer