Energy and chemicals consulting
Leveraging deep industry expertise to drive sustainable growth and innovation
Strategy & transactions advisory
Driven by the global shift towards cleaner energy and circular materials, sustainable practices are increasingly being adopted throughout the energy and chemical industries. With the shift towards low-carbon product life cycles, business operations and innovation are being fundamentally altered.
This transformation in both the business and regulatory landscape is challenging businesses to adapt without sacrificing competitive advantage, particularly in consumer sectors such as agriculture, textiles, automobiles, packaging, construction and personal care.
Lower your carbon footprint and improve resource and operational efficiency with specialist strategic consultancy. Our dedicated energy, chemicals and sustainability consultants specialise in corporate strategy and investment due diligence across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and the Americas. We advise on all aspects of strategic planning, from accessing recycling materials or implementing more sustainable product development, to gas monetisation, refining integration, hydrogen or M&A and project finance.
How we can help you
With our deep understanding of the key trends shaping energy, chemicals and sustainability we can guide you through every aspect of strategic planning, from early-stage development to new investments and asset evaluations.
Energy transition
How can the chemicals industry achieve climate neutrality?
What is the role of hydrogen in low-carbon chemicals?
Which feedstocks will support the energy transition?
Strategy
How can a country develop its petrochemical industry?
Which products will maximise value from local feedstock?
Is a strategy robust enough in different demand scenarios?
Sustainability
What is CBAM’s impact on industry competitiveness?
What are the carbon emissions per tonne of a product?
Which technology innovations will drive recycling advancements?
Transactions
What are the project risks and mitigants for lenders?
Is a target asset a risky acquisition?
What opportunities for value creation does a transaction present?
Value chain integration
What strategy will best monetise gas feedstock?
How can a refinery mitigate demand risks?
Which solution will maximise refinery-petrochemical integration?
Industry intelligence
What strategy will retain cost competitiveness in global markets?
Which regions offer optimal investment opportunities?
How will future trade patterns impact profitability?
Our leadership
ICIS consultants are industry leaders who have been advising key energy and chemicals stakeholders on the energy transition, sustainability, strategy, transactions, litigation and expert witness services over the last three decades.
To get in touch with the team, please email consulting@icis.com.
Tin Nguyen
Global Head of Consulting, London
Tin is a senior advisor and business leader to a broad range of global clients within the energy and chemicals industry, with a track record spanning more than 20 years. He has a MEng in Biochemical Engineering from University College London.
Stefano Zehnder
Vice President, Consulting, Milan
Stefano has over 35 years’ experience in refining and petrochemical feedstocks, and leads on energy transition projections and scenario modelling. He supports strategy development for energy and chemical majors and the lending community.
Dr. Nuno Faísca
Vice President Consulting, London
Nuno specialises in project finance and M&A, with a focus on technical and commercial due diligence, technology evaluation and strategy development. He holds a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Imperial College London.
Bala Ramani
Vice President, Consulting, Singapore
With a degree in Chemical Engineering and a Global MBA, Bala specialises in thought leadership and strategic decision-making in the petrochemical sector. He covers project screening, investment evaluation and strategic roadmaps, focusing on sustainability and plastics circularity.
Dr. Regan Hartnell
Principal, Consulting, Singapore
Regan designed ICIS’ price forecasting methodology, and specialises in supporting chemical majors and the lending community on due diligence and strategy development. He holds a PhD in Chemistry from QUT, Australia.
James Ray
Vice President, Consulting, Houston
James’ expertise spans supply chain, purchasing advisory, litigation & expert witness for chemical majors and financial institutions. He has a particular emphasis on plastics, sustainability and recycling.
Case studies
Here are a selection of case studies showcasing our consultancy expertise.
A European refinery wanted to evaluate strategic options along the energy and chemicals value chain, to mitigate the risks presented by the energy transition and sustainability policies, while increasing business resilience.
A global chemical association asked us to develop different pathways for the industry to achieve climate neutrality, factoring in uncertainty over future availability of key resources and the roll-out of alternative technologies.
A European recycling industry association engaged us to deliver several studies on collection, sorting and end-use applications of recycled plastics, exploring various scenarios within the announced EU legislative framework.
A Middle Eastern chemicals producer needed assistance in planning its next investment cycle to retain a competitive edge, focusing on proximity to primary consumption markets, with a clear understanding of costs and margins.
An Eastern European company with access to natural gas and regional refinery output partnered with us to develop an investment roadmap that would better monetise gas liquids and maximise value retention within the country.
An investment fund asked us to perform buy-side technical and commercial due diligence on a chemical recycling asset, determining an investment case against a backdrop of multiple technologies and routes under development.
Why use ICIS Consulting?
Single point of contact
Streamline processes with our specialised team combining a wealth of experience in the technical and commercial aspects of the energy and chemical industries. We work as one team to assess risks and opportunities for value creation.
Unrivalled industry intelligence
Gain a competitive edge, with accurate forecasting and strategic planning based on unparalleled industry expertise. ICIS has been a leader in chemical and energy industry intelligence for over 150 years.
Timely, in-depth insights
Act with confidence, knowing that our advice is based on daily, first-hand industry updates and analysis. Our global team of over 300 energy and chemical subject matter experts report on markets around the clock.
Local expertise across the globe
See the full picture across commodities, countries and regions with insights from our network of ICIS energy and chemicals subject matter experts embedded in key markets around the world.
Improved stakeholder credibility
Strengthen your negotiating position and build stakeholder confidence with a trusted advisor by your side. ICIS is recognised as a leading provider to the energy and chemical industries.
Deep techno-economic expertise
Navigate the impact of disruptive technologies on future supply and value chain competitiveness with a team skilled in evaluating intellectual property and techno-economic risks.
ICIS News
Japan's Mitsui, Mitsubishi eye supply tie-up on phenol-related products
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Mitsui Chemicals and Mitsubishi Chemical are studying a potential tie-up on supplying phenol-related products in response to poor domestic demand and oversupply conditions, the Japanese firms said on Friday. These products include phenol, acetone, α-methylstyrene, bisphenol A (BPA) and methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), they said in a joint statement. The two companies "will jointly consider approaches for maintaining product supply during regular major maintenance or facility issues, as well as for the efficient operation of both companies’ tanks". The launch of multiple new production facilities across Asia – particularly in China – since 2022 has resulted in a significant oversupply of these products. This oversupply, coupled with weak domestic demand, has caused a market slump. Mitsui Chemicals in April last year said that it will close its 190,000 tonnes/year phenol plant at the company's production site in Ichihara by fiscal year 2026 (year to March 2027) due to declining profitability. Mitsui Chemicals currently produces phenol at three locations: Ichihara in Chiba, Takaishi in Osaka and Shanghai in China. "Going forward, the company [Mitsui Chemicals] intends to maintain stable product supply by creating a highly capital-efficient, reliably profitable phenol chain centered around the 200,000-ton capacity phenol plant at its Osaka Works," the joint statement noted. Mitsubishi Chemical, which operates a 280,000 tonne/year phenol plant at its Ibaraki Plant and produces derivatives like BPA, is also taking steps to improve its competitiveness. These steps include the closure in March 2024 of its 120,000 tonne/year BPA plant in Kurosaki, Fukuoka. Mitsubishi Chemical has another 100,000 tonne/year BPA plant in Kashima that will continue operating.
17-Jan-2025
Israel-Hamas ceasefire has little impact on chem markets, could trim geopolitical premium
HOUSTON (ICIS)–A ceasefire and hostage release agreement between Israel and Hamas announced on Wednesday is unlikely to have much of an impact on crude oil and chemical markets, though it could lower the geopolitical premium. The agreement was reached through diplomacy by the US, Egypt, and Qatar, and will be implemented for the most part by the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump, US President Joe Biden said in remarks from the White House. ICIS feedstocks analyst Barin Wise said he does not expect that the deal will have a meaningful impact on crude oil markets because the affected region is not oil producing. “This may trim the geopolitical premium in crude since it eliminates a hot spot in the Middle East,” Wise said. “However, if we look at the market today, crude is up big on other factors, more than offsetting any effect the ceasefire may have.” Crude prices surged on Wednesday largely in response to fresh US sanctions on Russia, which the International Energy Agency said could crimp global supply. Futures prices for WTI settled on Tuesday at $77.50/bbl and rose to $79.51/bbl before midday. WTI settled at $80.04/bbl on Wednesday. IMPACT ON SUEZ CANAL TRAFFIC The agreement could help with capacity constraints in commercial shipping as container ships have been avoiding the Suez Canal for more than a year because of attacks by Houthi rebels on commercial vessels. Ships have been forced to use the much longer route around the Cape of Good Hope, which tightened shipping capacity and pushed costs for shipping containers higher. The reopening of the Suez Canal would have the greatest impact on normalizing the Asia-to-Europe container shipping route, but would also affect Asia-US rates, as shipping capacity would surge once carriers were able to access the shorter route. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers – such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) – are shipped in pellets. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. Thumbnail image shows a crude oil tanker. Photo by Shutterstock
15-Jan-2025
Latest US sanctions could hit Russia oil supply – IEA
LONDON (ICIS)–The latest tranche of US sanctions on Russia’s oil trade could affect flows from the country, while weather-related production shut-ins in North America could also impact global supply, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said. Announced on 10 January, the US imposed aggressive new sanctions on Russia’s oil trade, naming 183 vessels, including Russia-owned tankers and the ”shadow vessels” understood to be utilized to evade trade blockades. The shadow fleet refers to ships indirectly owned or controlled by Russia through shell companies or intermediaries to evade detection and sanctions. Over 100 of the sanctioned tankers had transported Russian crude to China and/or India in 2024, according to Matt Wright, lead freight analyst at data and analytics firm France-based Kpler. "When it comes to buyers, China and India, in general, tend to steer clear of dealing directly with tankers and entities blacklisted by the US Treasury," he said in a note earlier this week. US moves “may affect oil supply flows” the IEA said in its latest oil market report, but official purchases of Russia crude will still be possible at certain price points. “Exports on non-shadow tankers remain viable for Russian oil purchased below price caps,” the IEA said. Further complicating the early 2025 supply picture is scope for production constraints in the US in the event of extreme weather, with a winter freeze last year cutting output in the US and Canada by over 1.8 million barrels/day. A smaller drop is expected this year, but there could still be scope for weather in the region to tighten supplies, the IEA said. Potential for additional US sanctions on Iran-origin oil to be introduced by the new administration could also hit global supplies, the agency added, with sentiment already driving some players to pill back from oil supplies from Iran and Russia. “There is heightened speculation that the incoming US administration will take a tougher stance on Iran's oil exports, compounding the impact of US Treasury sanctions on Tehran,” the IEA said. 1.5 million barrels day of additional supply is expected from non-OPEC countries this year , and total output growth of 1.8 million/barrel day against 1.05 million barrels/day demand growth, according to the agency. While supply growth is likely is likely to be sufficient to cover demand, the fresh Russia sanctions could provide more headroom for OPEC+ signatory countries to release more barrels into the market after delaying the end dates for some production cuts. OPEC, also releasing its latest market predictions on Wednesday, left 2025 demand growth forecasts unchanged at 1.4 million barrels/day, and non-OPEC+ supply growth projections at 1.1 million barrels/day amid global GDP expansion of 3.1%. The cartel projects that demand and non-OPEC supply growth will remain around 2025 levels next year. Focus article by Tom Brown Thumbnail photo: An oil pipeline running through Alaska, US (Source: Shutterstock)
15-Jan-2025
German economy shrinks 0.2% in 2024, Q4 data points to contraction
LONDON (ICIS)–The German economy contracted 0.2% in 2024 – the second consecutive year of economic decline for the eurozone’s biggest economy – driven by energy costs, increasing export competition and economic uncertainty, according to the first calculations from the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). As the country rounds off two years of economic decline, preliminary data for Q4 2024 points to a 0.1% decline, the agency added, with a full announcement incorporating more data scheduled for 30 January. Manufacturing output dropped 3% in the year, according to Destatis, with production in energy-intensive industries such as chemicals and metal-working hit particularly hard. The decline in the construction sector was even sharper, with output shrinking 3.8% over the course of the year. “Cyclical and structural pressures stood in the way of better economic development in 2024,” said Destatis president Ruth Brand.
15-Jan-2025
CNOOC, Shell to proceed with south China petrochemical complex expansion
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Chinese oil company CNOOC and Anglo-Dutch energy major Shell have taken a final investment decision (FID) to expand their joint petrochemical complex in Daya Bay, Huizhou in southern China. The expansion by their joint venture firm CNOOC and Shell Petrochemicals Co (CSPC) is expected to be completed in 2028, Shell said in a statement. Financial details of the investment were not disclosed. The expansion will include a third cracker with a planned capacity of 1.6 million tonne/year of ethylene; as well as associated downstream derivatives units producing chemicals including linear alpha olefins It will also include a new facility which will produce 320,000 tonnes/year of high-performance specialty chemicals such as polycarbonates (PC) and carbonate solvents. CSPC is a 50-50 joint venture owned by Shell Nanhai BV, a subsidiary of Shell, and CNOOC Petrochemicals Investment Ltd, an affiliate of CNOOC. (Recasts first two paragraphs for clarity)
15-Jan-2025
SHIPPING: Carriers to increase blank sailings on Asia-USWC around Lunar New Year
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Ocean carriers will increase blank sailings around the Lunar New Year holiday to support elevated container rates, but now that the labor issues at US Gulf and East Coast ports have been resolved, some analysts think rate growth will slow, or shippers could even see lower rates. Emily Stausbøll, senior shipping analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said spot rates may now begin to fall but warned that shippers still face other supply chain threats in 2025. “Looking ahead, it is likely spot rate growth will now soften on trades into the US from Asia, suggesting a brighter outlook for shippers negotiating new long-term contracts,” Stausbøll said. “Shippers must remain cautious, however, because it will not take much for freight rates to begin spiraling once again, particularly given the ongoing conflict in the Red Sea and the return of [President-elect Donald] Trump to the White House, which could escalate the US-China trade war,” Stausbøll said. Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, defines the four-week Lunar New Year period as the week of the holiday plus the following three weeks. Murphy said carriers have so far scheduled blanked capacity of 9.0%, which is in sharp contrast with the 22.8% blanked in 2024, and the average reduction of 18.3% from 2016-2019. For context, the blanked percentage in 2021 (where pandemic demand was surging) was higher at 10.7%. “Under normal circumstances, this would mean significant blank sailings announcements in the upcoming weeks, since it is highly unlikely that carriers would be satisfied with this level of excess capacity,” Murphy said. “This would result in a situation reminiscent of 2023 and 2024, where significant capacity cuts were made very close to Lunar New Year.” CHANGING ALLIANCES Several major carriers are restructuring alliances in 2025, which is also adding some uncertainty to shipping. Shipping alliances are agreements between carriers to collaborate globally on specific trade routes. This will be the most significant shift in alliances since 2017, according to analysts at freight forwarder Flexport. The changes will see Mediterranean Shipping Co (MSC) breaking from the 2M alliance with Maersk and will service customers alone with its expanded fleet now the largest in the market. MSC said it will incorporate more direct call services. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd will form the Gemini Alliance, with a reduced number of port calls that they say will improve reliability. The Ocean alliance consists of OOCL, Evergreen, COSCO, and CMA CGM. The Premier alliance will be made up of Ocean Network Express (ONE), South Korean shipping line HMM, and Taiwan’s Yang Ming. Judah Levine, head of research at online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos, said it remains to be seen if there will be any improved service metric from the shifts. “The rollout and adjustment period will probably stretch into March,” Levine said. “This is going to coincide with easing seasonal demand, so it could be a factor that pushes rates down if we do see some competitiveness between the new alliances that they compete for customers.” Levine also said the adjustment period could lead to increased schedule disruptions as vessels are being moved into place for these new services. CEASEFIRE, SUEZ CANAL On a side note, container ships have been avoiding the Suez Canal for more than a year because of attacks by Houthi rebels on commercial vessels. A ceasefire in the Gaza conflict could potentially end attacks in the Red Sea, reopening the Suez Canal. This would have the greatest impact on normalizing the Asia-to-Europe container shipping route but would also affect Asia-US rates as shipping capacity would surge once carriers no longer must divert away from the Suez Canal. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. Focus article by Adam Yanelli
14-Jan-2025
Crude buoyed by cold weather, sanctions, China recovery – oil CEO
HOUSTON (ICIS)–The rally in crude markets could get continued support from cold weather, sanctions and a recovery in demand from China, the CEO of US crude producer Hess said on Tuesday. Oil markets are important to the US chemical industry because prices for crude influence prices for several commodity petrochemicals. Since the first day of trading in 2025, front-month Brent crude futures have risen by nearly 7%. Oil demand could be several hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil a day higher because of the cold winter, said John Hess CEO of Hess and chairman of the American Petroleum Institute (API), an oil trade group. He made his comments during API's State of American Energy presentation. A further rise in oil demand could come from continued economic growth in the US and a recovery in China. "They are going to do everything they can to stimulate their economy," he said "I would not bet against China for two years in a row." During the end of 2024, Hess suspects that oil demand shrank in China because of the slowdown in the nation's economy. The third leg of support for oil markets will come from geopolitical tensions, Hess said. On 10 January, the US Department of the Treasury introduced more sanctions on vessels that carry Russian oil. "The initial numbers that are out there are up to a million barrels a day of impact of supply that might have trouble getting into the market for Russia," Hess said. "There could be another 1 million barrels a day from Iran." If sanctions and other factors cause a large enough spike in oil prices, Saudi Arabia and other members of OPEC have spare capacity that they can use to stabilize the oil market, he said. PROSPECTS FOR PERMIT REFORM, EXTENDING TAX CUTSSenator John Thune (Republican, South Dakota) said Congress may opt to address energy, military spending and border security in one bill and extending tax cuts in a second bill. The tax bill will make permanent nearly all of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). This was a campaign promise made by Donald Trump, who will be sworn into office on 20 January. WAYS TO ROLL BACK EV PERKSThune said Congress could use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal a waiver that California needed to adopt its Advanced Clean Car II (ACC II) program, which gradually phased out sales of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines. The California program is a lynchpin for similar programs adopted by 12 other states and territories. If California loses its waiver, then those other states and territories cannot adopt their programs. The fate of the ACC II program could become a legal dispute over state versus federal power that would need to be settled in court. Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, introduced two other auto programs that critics say are so strict, they act as effective bans on ICE vehicles. The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) recent tailpipe rule, which gradually restricts emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from light vehicles. The Department of Transportation's (DoT's) Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program, which mandates stricter fuel-efficiency standards. Thune doubts that Congress can use the CRA to roll back the tailpipe rule. Nonetheless, Trump may find other ways to scale back or repeal the tailpipe rule and the stricter CAFE standards during his first days in office. Even though EVs make up a small share of overall US auto sales, they are important to the chemical industry because they consume more plastics than their counterparts that are powered by internal combustion engines. EVs are also creating demand for new polymers and fluids that can meet their unique material challenges. Thumbnail shows snow. Image by Xinhua/Shutterstock
14-Jan-2025
PODCAST: Gaza ceasefire could reopen Suez Canal, reset container trade system
BARCELONA (ICIS)–A ceasefire in the Gaza conflict could potentially end attacks in the Red Sea, reopening the Suez Canal and normalizing the Asia-to-Europe container shipping route. Gaza ceasefire could stop Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping Route via Cape of Good Hope takes 10 days longer than Suez Canal Reopening Suez would add 10 days of inventory to the market Europe would be open to more Asia exports Freight rates could fall as container capacity is freed up Ceasefire negotiations ongoing ‘Stunning’ levels of overcapacity expected in China in 2025 New Cefic report highlights need for new Europe industrial deal for chemicals In this Think Tank podcast, Will Beacham interviews Nigel Davis and John Richardson from the ICIS market development team and Paul Hodges, chairman of New Normal Consulting. Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the presenter and interviewees, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS. ICIS is organising regular updates to help the industry understand current market trends. Register here . Read the latest issue of ICIS Chemical Business. Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson's ICIS blogs.
14-Jan-2025
Repeal of US EV perks, LNG freeze possible on Trump's first day – US oil group
HOUSTON (ICIS)–On his first day in office as president, Donald Trump could repeal the pause on permits for new liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals and automobile policies that are so restrictive, critics say they favor electric vehicles (EVs) over those powered by internal combustion engines (ICE), an oil and gas trade group said. Repealing those polices are among the goals of the American Petroleum Institute (API), and they would have indirect effects on the US chemical industry. LNG exports affect US chemical markets because they support prices for natural gas by providing another source of demand. Natural gas prices influence those for ethane, the main feedstock that US crackers use to make ethylene. EVs consume more plastics than their counterparts that are powered by internal combustion engines. EVs are also creating demand for new polymers and fluids that can meet their unique material challenges. REMOVING THE HALT ON NEW LNG PERMITSThe US has effectively frozen the issuance of new LNG permits since January 2024, when President Joe Biden issued the order. The freeze applies to terminals that will export LNG to countries that lack free trade agreements with the US. "I think the LNG pause is something that they can address on day one," said Mike Sommers, API president. He made his comments in a briefing earlier in the week. Trump takes office on 20 January. If Trump removes the freeze, it would not automatically lead to a flood of new permits for LNG terminals. US companies may be reluctant to build more terminals when global LNG capacity is expected to increase. Rising US costs for material and labor have made LNG projects less attractive. Legal challenges could arise during the permitting process. REMOVING EFFECTIVE RESTRICTIONS ON ICE VEHICLESTrump could ax two Biden automobile policies his first day in office, Sommers said. The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) recent tailpipe rule, which gradually restricts emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from light vehicles. The Department of Transportation's (DoT's) Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program, which mandates fuel-efficiency standards. The group also wants Trump to withdraw a waiver that the federal government granted to California, which allowed the state to adopt a program that will gradually phase out ICE vehicles. California's program, called Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II), is the lynchpin for similar programs adopted by 12 other US states and territories. If Trump can successfully withdraw the waiver, then it would prevent California and the 12 other states and territories from adopting ACC II style programs. The fate of the ACC II program could become a legal dispute over state versus federal power that would need to be settled in court. OTHER POLICY GOALS OF THE APIEVs and LNG permits make up two of the five policies that the API will promote to the new administration. The other three include permitting reform, tax policy and issuing a new five-year offshore leasing program. Under these five policy goals, the API has outlined more than 70 actions that the administration could take, many of them possible on Trump's first day in office. Others may require acts from Congress. This could be challenging because Trump's party holds a two-seat majority in the lower legislative chamber of the US. API TO DISCOURAGE TARIFFS ON CANADIAN CRUDEPrior to taking office, Trump had threatened to impose tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada. Trump did not indicate that he would exclude Canada's sizeable shipments of crude oil. In 2023, Canadian oil made up nearly 60% of all crude imported by the US, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Canadian oil is heavier than that produced in the US, so the two grades complement each other in the nation's refineries. "40% of the American refinery kit is not tooled to refine the kind of oil that is found in the US," Sommers said. "We're confident that the Trump administration understands the importance of that kind of trade, and we're going to work with them as they consider their trade policy over time," he said. PIECEMEAL PRESERVATION OF IRAThe API would like the government to preserve some of the tax credits created by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Those include the carbon capture tax credits under Section 45Q and the hydrogen production tax credits under Section 45V. Many API members are developing carbon capture and hydrogen projects. Meanwhile, it would like the government to repeal the IRA's methane fee.
14-Jan-2025
Ukraine energy minister summoned to address corruption concerns after nuclear project spat
MPs renew call for German Galushchenko to address ministry corruption concerns The summon comes after minister and MPs disagree over nuclear capacity relying on Russian technology MPs raise fears over major costs, no transparent project supervision LONDON (ICIS)– The Ukrainian energy minister German Galushchenko has been summoned to parliament to explain accusations of corruption in the ministry, two members of parliament confirmed to ICIS on 13 January. Galushchenko was summoned in parliament in September 2024 after a deputy minister was fired for accepting a bribe. The minister refused to attend at the time. MPs have now renewed the request for Galushchenko to appear in the unicameral parliament of Ukraine this week after a major dispute erupted over a government push to build multi-billion dollar nuclear capacity reliant on Russian technology. Last year, the government resurrected plans initiated in the 1990s to build two new reactors with an installed capacity of 2GW, whose costs at current levels could reach $4 billion. The project, which benefits from the support of German Galushchenko and the nuclear producer Energoatom, involves buying two old reactors purchased by Bulgaria from Rosatom some 15 years ago. The reactors were secured for the construction of the Belene nuclear power plant in northern Bulgaria but had not been used amid an arbitral dispute with Rosatom which eventually forced the southeast European country to pay $620 million to the company for them. The Ukrainian government now wants to buy these reactors and use them at the Khmelnitsky nuclear power plant in southwestern Ukraine. PROJECT DETAILS MPs including some members of the majority Servant of the People party oppose the deal, claiming Galushchenko had not been providing updated technical details and financial estimates for the project. They also raised concerns about the minister’s reference to some members of the EU delegation in Kyiv, whom he described as ‘mid-level diplomats,’ not authorized to express an official position. The government wants the project to be discussed and approved in the full chamber but no official date has been set yet. Speaking to ICIS, Inna Sovsun, a MP from the opposition Holos party and member of the parliament’s energy committee, said Galushchenko appeared in parliament last week and submitted documents dating back to 2018, which are no longer valid. “He provided an estimate of Ukraine Hryvnia (UAH) 77 billion (€1.8 billion) but, considering Ukraine’s high inflation rate since the start of the war, this cost is at least double that between UAH150-UAH200 billion,” she said. Sovsun said Galushchenko himself accepted the cost may be higher and added that he submitted technical specifications for a project that was slightly different to the one that is supported by the government. The government insists Ukraine needs secure electricity capacity to replace the thermal power plants which had been destroyed by Russian missiles. However, Sovsun said it would take years to build the nuclear capacity, offering cold comfort to millions of Ukrainians who had endured power cuts since the start of Russia’s full-scale war. “Is this [the nuclear capacity] the best option now? We need things done quickly and as cheaply as possible,” she said. FINANCING Sovsun also raised questions about the financing of the project, noting that it may be difficult for Energoatom to secure funds from international financial institutions. This is because the company still has no functional supervisory board to oversee its operations. If Ukraine fails to secure funding from IFIs it may need to increase end consumer electricity tariffs to fund the project. Sovsun noted that considering the sensitivity of the project it may be subject to no public scrutiny, which could open up opportunities for corrupt practices. A supervisory board was appointed at Energoatom in June 2024 but has not been meeting or publishing activity reports since then, according to Oleksandr Lysenko, a Ukraine-based corporate governance specialist who confirmed this to ICIS. Speaking to ICIS Andrii Zhupanyn, an MP and deputy head of the energy and utility committee said minister Galushchenko’s reference to members of the EU’s delegation to Kyiv as mid-level diplomats not authorized to make an official statement on the matter was being ‘carefully read’ in western embassies. He said the minister had referred to private correspondence between Sovsun and some members of the EU delegation. Sovsun conceded neither US nor EU partners had not expressed an official view on Ukraine’s nuclear power plans. The ministry of energy did not reply to questions from ICIS but said in a statement posted on its website: “Within the framework of the relevant public discussions, private correspondence of mid-level diplomats, not authorized to express the official position of the EU or its member states, was used.”
13-Jan-2025