10 November 2009 20:18 [Source: ICIS news]
The decision, from 2007, was no longer justifiable in light of looming energy shortages, rising prices and the fallout from the global economic crisis, Michael Vassiliadis said in an address to a coal industry convention in ?xml:namespace>
“The exit from coal was the wrong choice before [September’s] federal election, and it remains wrong after the election,” he said.
Proponents argued the exit would save €1.4bn ($2.1bn)/year in subsidies, he said.
Coal’s environmental impact could be addressed through carbon capture and storage technology, where
Also, there were opportunities within the chemical industry for the productive use of carbon dioxide, he said.
RAG, coal foundation charged with overseeing the phase-out, had been looking to list Evonik and use the proceeds to pay environmental expenses as mines are closed in a programme running to 2018.
In 2008, RAG sold a 25.01% stake in Evonik to private equity firm CVC and shelved plans to list Evonik because of unfavourable capital market conditions. However, it remained committed to eventually listing Evonik and raise additional funds, it said at the time.
Evonik, for its part, recently dissolved its investor relations department. However, a listing could happen “in the medium term”, depending on captial market conditions, according to information still posted on the investor section of its website,
($1 = €0.67)
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|
Asian Chemical Connections