05 February 2010 19:04 [Source: ICIS news]
WASHINGTON (ICIS news)--A bipartisan group of US senators wants to extend the existing federal mandate over antiterrorism security measures at high-risk chemical plants for another five years, according to legislation circulated on Friday.
Led by Senator Susan Collins of ?xml:namespace>
The regulations, known formally as the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS), are due to expire in October this year unless they are renewed or extended before then.
However, many in Congress want to see the CFATS law expanded and toughened.
Last year the House of Representatives approved replacement legislation that would give the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) greater authority to dictate security measures at chemical facilities thought to be at high risk for potential terrorist attack.
Under the existing law, the department sets standards for security at some 7,000 chemical production, storage or transit sites, but owners and operators are free to chose what measures they implement to meet the federal requirements.
In the House-passed bill, the department would have authority to impose inherently safer technologies (IST) to reduce a facility’s target value or the offsite consequences of a possible terrorist attack.
With that authority, the department could order changes in a facility’s feedstocks, processes or end products - and shut down any plant that refused to implement safer technologies dictated by the agency.
In introducing her bill, S-2996, Collins warned that the House-approved legislation “would unwisely bring this [current] progress to a halt” by forcing plant operators and the department to retool site security regulatory procedures just three years into the existing law.
“The decision to implement IST should be that of the owner or operator, not a
But leading Senate figures in chemical security are on record as wanting to pass legislation similar to the House bill approved last year.
Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee where Collins is the ranking Republican, has indicated that he wants a new site security law that includes some sort of IST mandate and a provision authorizing private citizens to seek court action against facilities they feel pose a danger.
Although an independent, Lieberman is a former Democrat who still sits with the Democrat caucus in the Senate.
The House bill passed last year also included such a private right of action (PRA) provision, although it would only allow citizen enforcement suits against the department, not individual plants.
In addition, Lautenberg wants a new site security statute to allow state and local governments to impose their own chemical facility security requirements that exceed the federal mandate.
The Collins bill comes amid increasing speculation that the Senate might not have time in this election year to complete work on a comprehensive and controversial rewrite of the existing CFATS.
The White House has already indicated that the existing law could be extended as is for another year.
If passed by the Senate and accepted by the House - both long shots - the Collins bill would allow the existing law to be fully implemented over the next five years but also would hold open the possibility for further changes.
To discuss issues facing the chemical industry go to
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|