05 May 2011 15:52 [Source: ICIS news]
By Joe Kamalick
WASHINGTON (ICIS)--Republicans and Democrats in Congress are advancing energy policy legislation in opposite directions, producing a lot of heat and smoke and setting the stage for a 2012 election debate but unlikely to generate any near-term energy growth.
In the House of Representatives, the Republican majority is expected to pass three energy bills this week or next designed to reverse what Republicans call Obama administration energy restrictions and open much more of US offshore areas to oil and gas drilling.
On the other end of the energy policy political spectrum, the Democrat-majority Senate is soon to consider legislation that would strip ?xml:namespace>
US energy policy, or in the current situation the lack of a comprehensive energy policy, is crucial to US petrochemical producers and downstream chemical makers, because they rely on natural gas and natgas liquids for as much as 65% of their feedstocks, and natural gas provides about half of the sector’s power-generating fuel.
In the House, the Natural Resources Committee was poised to approve within days three separate bills, HR-1229, HR-1230 and HR-1231, which together would force the Obama administration to accelerate Gulf of Mexico drilling permits on existing offshore leases, order new lease sales in the Gulf and off the US Atlantic coast, and set new offshore oil and natural gas production mandates for 2012-2017.
According to Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (Republican-Washington), HR-1229 would “end the de facto Obama administration moratorium in the
Hastings, other Republican House members and the
Even after Obama lifted the formal drilling moratorium,
By requiring the Interior Department to act on a drilling permit within 30 days,
HR-1230 would require the Interior Department to conduct oil and natural gas lease sales in the Gulf and in an area off the Virginia coast that earlier had been approved and then withdrawn shortly after Obama took office as president.
“This bill will reverse the Obama administration’s actions and proceed now with the scheduled lease sales in a prompt, timely and safe manner,”
He noted that if the Interior Department had not recently said it would move forward with a new offshore lease sale by the end of this year, “the administration was on course to make 2011 the first year since 1958 that the federal government would not have held an offshore lease sale”.
“However, squeezing in one conveniently timed offshore lease before the end of the year is not enough to undo the Obama administration’s long track record of blocking and delaying American energy production,” Hastings charged.
In an effort to further undo what he called the administration’s go-slow energy tactics,
“Currently, the Obama administration’s 2012-2017 includes no new leasing or drilling, only possible future lease sales in the Gulf,”
Under HR-1231, the Interior Department would be required to issue enough offshore leases and drilling permits in the 2012-2017 period to ensure new production of 3m bbls/day of oil and 10bn cubic feet/day (bcfd) of gas by the end of that plan period.
“President Obama has imposed a drill-nowhere policy that has cost jobs, forfeited revenue and denied access to American energy that would lessen our dependence on foreign sources,”
In sharp contrast, Senate Democrat leaders are working on legislation that would repeal tax credits that oil and natural gas producers enjoy, calling them subsidies.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (Democrat-Montana) was expected to introduce a bill before the end of this week to accomplish that.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Democrat-Nevada), said that “it is long past time to end wasteful subsidies to big oil companies that are raking in record profits”, referring to the targeted tax credits that he also termed “corporate welfare”.
“Instead of giving handouts to big corporations, we should be investing in clean energy development and construction here at home to create jobs, diversify our economy, break our dangerous dependence on oil and make our nation safer,” Reid said.
Democrats also have complained that with
President Barack Obama recently sent a letter to congressional leaders expressing the same goals, urging the legislators to strip energy companies of tax breaks.
American Petroleum Institute (API) president Jack Gerard challenged both the subsidies charge and the high fuel costs.
“The Obama administration and some in Congress say that more taxes on the energy industry are necessary in light of rising gasoline prices,” he said.
“But raising taxes won’t reduce gasoline prices, and raising taxes can’t be justified by false claims about tax breaks,” Gerard said, noting that the tax credits that energy firms get are those that are available to all manufacturers.
“Raising taxes on the energy sector would raise our costs, trim investments in new oil and gas development and drive investment and jobs elsewhere,” he said. “Over time, higher taxes would produce less income for the government by reducing domestic production.”
The conflicting House-Senate energy goals are likely to continue to generate charges and counter-charges, but neither chamber is expected to prevail.
Despite White House backing for eliminating energy sector tax credits, the Senate has twice declined to do so in the last two years, with some Democrats joining minority Republicans in that chamber to kill the measures.
The House, with its solid Republican majority, is virtually certain to pass the Hastings-sponsored troika of offshore energy bills, but those measures face a tougher challenge in the majority Democrat Senate.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats expect their energy measures to pass Congress. Instead, they are using legislation to stake-out policies and campaign points that they hope will help their cause in the 2012 elections.
Democrats want to paint Republicans as in cahoots with Big Oil, providing tax give-aways to the energy sector while Americans pay for it in high gasoline prices. Republicans want to position Obama and other Democrats as driving energy costs higher by blocking domestic drilling at every turn.
That political posturing - and the resulting energy policy stalemate - could carry on through the rest of this year, even though the November 2012 elections are 18 months away.
But all that could change in a hurry if fuel costs should spike further.
If retail gasoline prices, now at $4/gal, should climb further to $5/gal - as some analysts think possible when the peak
Paul Hodges studies key influencers shaping the chemical industry in Chemicals and the Economy
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
Asian Chemical Connections