13 April 2012 21:11 [Source: ICIS news]
Earlier on Friday, the White House issued an executive order by President Barack Obama to establish a 13-agency task force to look into private-sector development of shale gas, especially the hydraulic fracturing drilling technique that has drawn criticism from environmentalists and some policymakers.
At least ten different federal agencies have already launched as many as 14 separate regulatory initiatives aimed at determining the environmental impact of “fracking” and whether federal regulation or restriction of the technique is needed.
Some in the
“We are pleased that the White House recognises the need to coordinate the efforts of the ten federal agencies that are reviewing, studying or proposing new regulations on natural gas development and hydraulic fracturing,” said Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute (API).
Gerard said that API had called on the White House “to rein in these uncoordinated activities” and to avoid unnecessary rulemaking and overlapping federal regulatory efforts targeting shale gas.
But while welcoming the White House plan to coordinate the multiple federal inquiries, Gerard cautioned that the federal government should leave shale gas and fracking regulation to state-level officials and avoid “applying additional layers of federal regulation from
The American Chemistry Council (ACC) also expressed qualified support for the Obama administration’s effort, emphasising the executive order’s own observation that “states are the primary regulators of onshore oil and gas activities”.
Also citing the multiple investigations and regulatory initiatives by the ten federal agencies, the council said that “we are concerned that these rules may duplicate existing state regulations, creating additional barriers that will slow down permitting and increase production costs”.
ACC member companies and a wide range of other manufacturers have begun to benefit significantly from the newly abundant supply of shale gas.
The council said it would be “watching closely” as the new White House working group develops.
The Institute for Energy Research (IER), an oil and gas industry think tank, was more hostile to the White House plan, charging that Obama is “once again playing charades with the American public, pretending to support energy production”.
“Meanwhile, he’s creating more labyrinthine regulatory hurdles and pointless councils” to oversee private sector energy development, the institute said.
Senator James Inhofe (Republican-Oklahoma) was even more harsh, charging that the new White House task force is only another facet of the Obama administration’s “disastrous war on fossil fuels”.
Inhofe, a long time critic of the administration’s energy and environmental policies, said that while Obama “makes disingenuous claims about how this working group is to increase natural gas production, we all know that the more layers of government involved, the greater the likelihood that he can stall efforts toward development”.
Obama, said Inhofe, “is trying to pretend he supports natural gas production, while ensuring that the federal government does everything possible to impede hydraulic fracturing”.
Paul Hodges studies key influences shaping the chemical industry in Chemicals and the Economy
For the latest chemical news, data and analysis that directly impacts your business sign up for a free trial to ICIS news - the breaking online news service for the global chemical industry.
Get the facts and analysis behind the headlines from our market leading weekly magazine: sign up to a free trial to ICIS Chemical Business.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX). Download the free tabular data and a chart of the historical index|
Asian Chemical Connections