11 February 2013 15:00 [Source: ICIS news]
By John Richardson
PERTH (ICIS)--THE chart below shows that China's polyethylene (PE) demand growth (the green solid line) has been well below that of overall GDP (the red dotted line) for most of the years between 2006 and 2012.
This might support the argument, made by some economists, that economic growth has been too heavily focused on investment rather than consumption, given that the majority of PE goes into packaging and agricultural film applications rather than construction.
Another big factor behind the sub-GDP growth performance could have been increasing use of imported scrap, or recycled, plastic during periods of high virgin polymer prices.
In 2006-2008, for instance, a surge in resin prices, on the back of expensive crude, forced many plastic processors in China to switch to recycled material and/or to increase the use of fillers. Most of China's plastic processors are small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with limited cash-flows.
In 2009, the recycling market dipped on new regulations and reduced availability. 2009-H1 2010 saw a huge increase in apparent PE demand growth (imports plus domestic consumption), which was partly because of the drop in the availability of recycled material.
The main reason for the rise in demand was China’s giant economic stimulus package, introduced in late 2008 to mitigate the impact of the Global Financial Crisis.
Polymers in general were being used as collateral for circular trades in other commodities and even property, as financing was much more easily available thanks to a large increase in bank lending that was part of the stimulus package.
A trader would, for example, buy PE just to get the credit to trade in, say, copper or to buy a condo in Beijing.
There was also a big build-up in inventories of both resin and of finished goods made from PE, as the easy lending conditions made taking long positions seem like a one-way bet.
But then, from April 2011, credit conditions became a lot tighter as the government grappled with inflation.
The first to suffer were the SMEs because of their poor access to credit and so they began to buy resin on a hand-to-mouth basis.
SMEs have long struggled to access credit because the state-owned banking system is set up to serve the state-owned enterprises.
This became an even greater problem when credit was rationed from April 2011, leaving the SMEs last in the queue for state-owned bank lending. They were forced to either cut production or go to private lenders who charge very high rates of interest.
Big stocks of both PE and finished goods made from PE, thanks to the credit binge, further depressed PE demand growth.
Q1-Q3 of last year seemed to be largely the same as the April-December period of 2011: A shortage of credit amongst the SMEs, whilst demand growth was depressed by lingering inventory problems.
But from May 2012, Beijing launched another stimulus package, but on a much smaller scale than the one introduced in late 2008. This latest package was designed to shore up support for China's new leaders as they prepared to take office, according to Paul Hodges of the UK-based chemicals consultancy, International e-Chem.
Up until the fourth quarter of last year, commodity and financial markets were full of the notion that China might be heading for a hard landing.
“Markets now believe that China will enjoy a sustainable recovery,” said a Perth, Australia-based resources analyst.
“Equity markets and oil and other commodity prices have also increased because people think the West is sorted out.
“I am not entirely convinced. A lot of the rise in Chinese bank lending and government spending in May-October 2012 seems to have gone to more unneeded infrastructure and has re-inflated the property bubble.
“Plus, I think the jury has to be very much out on whether the recent recoveries in the US and Europe can be kept up.”
It could be argued, therefore, that there is no difference between this cycle and previous cycles in the PE business because:
*The new stimulus package has made rebalancing even harder, thus potentially further suppressing the growth of consumption as a driver of economic growth.
*Inflationary pressures are building. For instance, input prices for manufacturers are now at their highest levels since mid-2011, even though consumer-price inflation in January fell to 2.0 from 2.5% in December. The February ICIS Petrochemical index for Northeast Asia (see graph below) showed that overall prices compared with January had risen by 3.2%. Inflation could eventually force the government to reduce lending, and possibly raise interest rates, as happened in April 2011. The SMEs, which make up the bulk of chemicals and polymer buyers, might again suffer the most from a reduction in credit. They are already struggling from higher chemicals, polymer and fuel prices.
*Chinese manufacturers, including chemicals buyers, seem to be in the midst of a strong restocking phase. It appears as if they are attempting to hedge against further price rises, whilst also preparing for the post-Lunar New Year demand recovery.
*This is fine as long as the current rally in commodity prices is maintained, but some commentators fear that prices have risen too quickly, and by too much, on switch to a “risk on” approach in equity and commodity markets. A collapse in commodity prices could again leave manufacturers sitting on high-cost, loss-making raw material inventories.
*A lot of new PE capacity is on the way, which the market could struggle to absorb.
As always though, it is possible to take the same set of “facts” and end up with entirely different conclusions. A much more positive view of the world seems to be dominating thinking at the moment.
“You won’t get much buy-in to a negative outlook at the moment because everyone is convinced that there is a ray of light,” said a source with a global polyolefins producer.
|ICIS news FREE TRIAL|
|Get access to breaking chemical news as it happens.|
|ICIS Global Petrochemical Index (IPEX)|
Asian Chemical Connections