
News library
Subscribe to our full range of breaking news and analysis
Commodity group
Region
Date
Viewing 21-30 results of 58735
Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate13-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Legislation continues to play a
pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of the
recycled plastics industry. From global policy
framework efforts to community-based mandates,
regulatory development is targeting plastic
waste reduction, increasing recycled content
thresholds, and shifting supply chain dynamics
to engage all stakeholders.
GLOBAL POLICY EFFORTSSince 2022,
the United Nations led Intergovernmental
Negotiating Committee (INC) has convened five
rounds of international negotiations to develop
a legally binding framework to address and
reduce plastic pollution, known as the Global
Plastics Treaty. The next meeting round
(INC-5.2) is located in Geneva, Switzerland,
starting on 5 August 2025, where members urged
to finalize the Treaty. Expectations remain
uncertain as over 100 participating countries
are pushing to align on the language and scope
of the Treaty.
Treaty initiatives include enforceable
obligations for global caps on virgin material
production, recycled content thresholds, and
EPR frameworks.
If finalized, the Treaty could accelerate
demand for recycled materials and pressure
governments and brands to invest in recycling
infrastructure to support the supply chain. By
harmonizing global recycling standards, the
Treaty aims to generate a circular economy
through utilizing legal and financial
incentives for brands and governments to
accelerate demand for recycled materials and
investments into the supply chain.
So far, US officials have maintained a cautious
stance on some Treaty concepts and are
currently displaying an opposing stance towards
initiatives that aim to limit virgin plastic
production. Instead,
expressing that production controls should
be determined at a national level to emphasize
cost effectiveness and job supportive
solutions. This stance is similar to other oil
and gas producing nations that advocate for the
Treaty to focus on waste management and
recycling, rather than imposing upstream
restrictions that would reduce domestic jobs.
US FEDERAL LEGISLATIONWhile the US
does not currently have an active federal
policy targeting plastics recycling, there are
various federal initiatives that influence the
market:
Federal funding: Recent federal loan
distribution adjustments from the Department of
Energy have impacted the funding for recycling
facilities such as
International Recycling Group and
Eastman.
Proposed tax incentives: Formally announced
in July 2025, the
CIRCLE Act aims to encourage investment
in infrastructure by reducing tax liability
on the private entity investor. The
initiative expects accelerated investment in
infrastructure to stabilize consumer
recycling streams, generate domestic jobs,
and reduce reliance on imported material.
Indirect impacts of virgin plastic policy:
The Trump administration has signaled
intentions to expand domestic virgin resin
production, which may increase cost premiums
between virgin and recycled materials as longer
virgin supply brings down virgin markets.
Intended outcomes of this initiative may be
restrained by new tariff dynamics, though the
net outcome is similar, including domestic
oversupply and therefore decreased domestic
operating rates.
Chemical recycling support: There is a
possibility for the federal administration to
support
chemical recycling initiatives,
generating policies that accept the
technology as a manufacturing process rather
than waste process, which can yield financial
benefits and tax incentives to encourage
investments into the industry.
Impacts of shifting trade dynamics: Trade
policy under the current administration favors
reducing dependence on foreign materials. The
US recycling market imports significant volumes
of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) feedstock
to compensate for low domestic collection
rates, particularly that of quality waste.
Potential trade tariffs may challenge the
domestic recycling market to operate cost
effectively while limiting imports.
US STATE POLICYState-level
legislation is creating both opportunities and
compliance challenges for producers and
recyclers. Mixed approaches across states have
created a fragmented landscape, complicating
compliance for national brands.
Highlighting key state-wide plastics recycling
legislation, there is currently no overlap
between the states with active chemical
recycling acceptance and states with active
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) or
Post-Consumer Recycled (PCR) policies.
At this time, brands and recyclers are likely
prioritizing compliance with Oregon EPR
legislation, which officially launched July
2025, while similarly preparing for the rollout
of Colorado and California’s EPR frameworks,
both of which are scheduled to begin phased
implementation this year.
State-by-state laws are transforming the US
recycled plastics landscape into a patchwork of
markets where recycled polymers fluctuate in
value based on the local policy.
Recyclers operating in states with extensive
regulations may command higher premium pricing
in comparison to states with minimal policy.
This may encourage regional sourcing strategies
and investments in local collection and
processing infrastructure.
MARKET OUTLOOKLegislative policy
is a key force shaping investments, innovation,
and pricing in the plastics recycling market.
As more states implement and enforce legal
guidelines, producers and recyclers must adapt
to evolving requirements or face legal
penalties.
For instance,
Washington and
California PCR programs have established a
penalty of 20 cents/lb for every pound of
recycled content the brand falls short of the
policy threshold. While still in the initial
stages of implementation, stakeholders of
plastics-related legislation have responded to
the guidelines with a mix of urgency and
caution.
Some stakeholders are quickly launching
long-term contracts with partners to support
circular targets, while those that tail behind
cite struggles to achieve circular goals due to
challenges conforming to fragmented policy,
rising costs, and shortage of quality material.
While the US recycling market is currently
challenged with cost-sensitive materials and
uncertainty around trade policy impacts, the
key driving forces of the market – such as
legislation and brand sustainability goals –
are expected to continue driving long-term
demand for recycled materials. Specific
categories such as post-consumer recycled
material and food grade certified recycled
material are expected to experience significant
market competition with bottleneck supply
constraints. As stakeholders face increased
pressures to develop a circular economy,
understanding and anticipating the policy and
supply-chain landscape are becoming critical
steps for brands and recyclers seeking to
maintain compliance, competitiveness, and
credibility.
Insight article by Corbin
Olson
Speciality Chemicals12-Aug-2025
BARCELONA (ICIS)–As a completely new chemical
industry landscape unfolds before us, leaders
should harness AI, innovation and consolidation
opportunities in high cost regions.
Industry faces structural – not cyclical –
challenges
Overcapacity and competition squeeze Europe
Demand decouples from GDP, shrinking market
size
AI can boost efficiency and forecasting
accuracy.
Specialties and low-carbon products need
careful thinking
Global chemical companies withdraw from
Europe
Local chemical companies can gain market
share via mergers & acquisitions (M&A)
M&A and national champions may drive
consolidation
Defence sector offers immediate,
well-funded opportunities
In this Think Tank podcast, Will
Beacham interviews Richard
Carter from Carter Consultancy and
Paul Hodges, chairman of
New Normal Consulting.
Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion
piece. The views expressed are those of the
presenter and interviewees, and do not
necessarily represent those of ICIS.
ICIS is organising regular updates to help
the industry understand current market trends.
Register here .
Read the latest issue of ICIS
Chemical Business.
Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson’s
ICIS
blogs.
Crude Oil12-Aug-2025
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Singapore has upgraded its
2025 GDP growth forecast to 1.5-2.5% from 0-2%
previously, amid better-than-expected economic
performance in Q2 2025, the Ministry of Trade
and Industry (MTI) said on Tuesday.
Improved Singapore GDP growth forecast amid
tariff suspensions in May
US tariff effects to cloud GDP growth in
2025
Manufacturing to slow down as export
front-loading moderates
The economic outlook, however, remains “clouded
by uncertainty” and headwinds may shrink growth
further this year, MTI said in a statement.
Economic growth in most advanced and regional
economies, which include ASEAN, has been better
than expected as a 90-day suspension on US
tariffs delayed negative trade impact,
alongside a de-escalation of trade tensions
between major economies including China, Japan,
the EU, and many southeast Asian countries.
“Meanwhile, the US and China continue to be
engaged in trade talks, with indications that
the 90-day tariff truce between the two
countries could be extended,” MTI said.
On Tuesday, China and the US announced that
they had
agreed to a further 90-day extension on
“reciprocal” tariff suspensions until 10
November.
As front-loading of exports moderates and US
tariffs take effect from 7 August, Singapore’s
growth is expected to slow in the second half
of the year as demand weakens in manufacturing,
MTI said.
While Singapore is subject to 10% baseline
tariffs by the US, other Asian economies apart
from China have received between 15-25% levies.
Singapore grew by 4.4% year on year in the
second quarter, while on a quarter on quarter
seasonally-adjusted basis, the Singapore
economy expanded by 1.4%, swinging from a 0.5%
contraction in the first quarter.
Growth was primarily driven by the wholesale
trade, manufacturing, finance & insurance,
and transportation & storage sectors,
particularly as export front-loading took place
amid US trade tariffs levied on most countries
in April.
In the second quarter, the manufacturing sector
expanded by 5.2% year on year, following the
4.7% growth in the previous quarter.
Manufacturing growth during the quarter was
driven by output expansions across all except
the chemicals and general manufacturing
clusters, MTI said.
Meanwhile, non-oil domestic exports (NODX) grew
7.1% year on year in the second quarter, up
from 3.3% growth in the first quarter,
according to Enterprise Singapore
(EnterpriseSG) on Tuesday.
Trade statistics for the month of July will be
released on 17 August.
Focus article by Jonathan
Yee

Global News + ICIS Chemical Business (ICB)
See the full picture, with unlimited access to ICIS chemicals news across all markets and regions, plus ICB, the industry-leading magazine for the chemicals industry.
Ethylene12-Aug-2025
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China and the US have agreed
to suspend tariffs on each other’s goods for an
additional 90 days to 10 November, following US
President Donald Trump’s executive order signed
on 11 August.
Trump made the
announcement of the tariff suspension on
his social media platform Truth
Social.
All other tariff measures with China will
continue to apply, according to the
White House.
The two countries had held talks in Stockholm,
Sweden on 28-29 July and in London in June
leading up to the announcement, led by He
Lifeng, Vice Premier of China’s State Council,
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US
Trade Representative Jamieson Greer,
China affirmed in a joint statement on Tuesday
that it will continue to suspend its additional
tariffs on US goods for 90 days starting 12
August, while retaining a 10% baseline
‘reciprocal’ tariff, and that the US would do
the same to Chinese goods.
Both countries will continue trade
negotiations, with the US describing talks as
“constructive”
The original deadline for tariff suspensions
was 12 August, after negotiations between China
and the US in May followed a trade war that
skyrocketed levies on each other in excess of
100%.
Thumbnail photo shows Qingdao Port in
Shandong province, China. (Source:
Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)
Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on
chemicals and energy topic page
Caustic Soda11-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Tropical Storm Erin has formed
in the Atlantic Ocean just west of the Cabo
Verde islands and could become the first
hurricane of the 2025 Atlantic hurricane
season, but is not expected to threaten the US.
Meteorologists at the National Hurricane center
(NHC) said Erin is moving west at 20 miles/hour
and is expected to continue on this path for
the next several days.
The following image shows the storm could be
nearing Puerto Rico by Saturday.
Source: National Weather Service
Earlier satellite wind data indicated that
maximum sustained winds are near 45 miles/hour
(75 km/hour) with higher gusts. Gradual
strengthening is forecast over the next several
days.
Tropical-storm-force winds extend outward up to
35 miles (55 km) from the center.
Last week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) and the
Colorado State University’s (CSU’s) Weather and
Climate Research department each maintained
their predictions of an above-average Atlantic
hurricane season.
Hurricanes directly affect the chemical
industry because plants and refineries shut
down in preparation for the storms, and they
sometimes remain down because of damage.
Power outages can last for days or weeks.
Hurricanes shut down ports, railroads and
highways, which can prevent operating plants
from receiving feedstock or shipping out
products.
Most US petrochemical plants and refineries are
on the Gulf Coast states of Texas and
Louisiana, making them prone to hurricanes.
Other plants and refineries are scattered
farther east in the states of Mississippi,
Alabama and Florida – a peninsula that is also
a hub for phosphate production and fertilizer
logistics.
Caustic Soda11-Aug-2025
MADRID (ICIS)–Unipar faces minimal direct
exposure to US tariffs but is suffering
indirect effects as global supply chains are
hit by trade tensions creating high levels of
uncertainty, the CEO at the Brazilian
chloralkali and vinyls producer said.
Rodrigo Cannaval said that downstream segments
and key end markets are suffering the impact of
the increased tariffs imposed by the US on
several countries, not least Brazil which is
subject to a 50% import tariff.
“Unipar doesn’t export to the US so, in that
regard, is little impacted by this tariff
issue, but we have to observe the impacts on
our clients’ chain,” said Cannaval, speaking to
reporters and chemical equity analysts late on
Friday.
“For example, take a report from the Rio Grande
do Sul footwear industry which said they were
being impacted by these measures and this, in
turn, impacts PVC [polyvinyl chloride] demand.”
Cannaval said that while current impacts remain
“incipient,” Unipar is keeping a vigilant
monitoring of potential demand effects as trade
policy consequences filter through industrial
supply chains.
Beyond specific tariff effects, the CEO
highlighted how trade tensions contribute to
general market instability affecting global
petrochemical flows and pricing dynamics.
“There is great uncertainty in the global
market, given all the tariff theme, which is
also making freight prices and flows quite
uncertain. At this moment, we need to foster
demand. And once this demand exists, then we’ll
see the impacts of new sources and competitive
freights reaching Brazil,” said Cannaval.
“This means we have to have, again, rigidity,
cautious management and much control to be
passing to the next periods. This is today’s
vision, given all this scenario and this
industry context.”
Last week, Brazil’s polymers major Braskem said
the potential negative
impact from US import tariffs to Brazilian
goods would be “negligible” as only under 1% of
its sales in the first half of 2025 were
shipped to the US.
Unipar has emerged as one of the best
performing Brazilian chemical producers amid a
generalized downturn which has hit other
companies hard.
Unipar’s second-quarter earnings and net
income rose
sharply, year on year, while Brazilian
polymers major Braskem’s earnings
fell and the company continued posting
a net loss during the period.
The company’s CFO Alexandre Jerussalmy also
confirmed earlier talks with Braskem for a
potential acquisition of some of its assets,
adding that Unipar is “ready to grow” although
nothing is certain yet.
Front page picture: A Unipar production
site in Brazil
Picture source: Unipar
Speciality Chemicals11-Aug-2025
BARCELONA (ICIS)–ICIS is proud to reveal the
winners of the 2025 ICIS Innovation Awards for
companies that have made the greatest
contribution to the industry’s future.
The winners, selected from shortlists by a
panel of independent judges, will celebrate
their success along with the judges at London’s
Savoy Hotel in November, where the overall
winner will also be revealed.
Congratulations to these companies that have
led the way in chemical industry innovation
across each of this year’s award categories.
Best Digital Innovation, sponsored by
Azelis: Dow
Best Process Innovation from a large
company: Johnson Matthey
Best Process Innovation from a small to
medium sized enterprise (SME): Future Origins
Best Product Innovation from a large
company: Verbio SE
Best Product Innovation from a SME,
sponsored by Indorama Ventures: GFBiochemicals
Click
here to see full details of the winning
entries.
ICIS Chemical Business deputy editor Will
Beacham, who chaired the panel of judges said:
“In the midst of extremely challenging market
conditions, these companies are investing in
their future, and providing solutions which
help customers make the world a better place.”
Click
here to register your interest in the 2026
awards.
Criteria for winning entries:
Make sure your entry is concise, detailed
and complete
It should have the “Wow” factor
Stage of commercialisation is important:
judges admire innovations with “steel in the
ground”
Impact on society and the chemical
industry: the broader the potential impact the
better
Evidence of partnerships along supply
chains: these are important in the drive to net
zero carbon
To get the top award you need to offer
something which is really different and truly
innovative
Speciality Chemicals11-Aug-2025
LONDON (ICIS)–Here are some of the top
stories from ICIS Europe for the week ended 8
August.
Europe R-PP packaging
demand remains high, but so does
consolidation risk
The European recycled polypropylene (R-PP)
market remains sharply divided between
end-uses with high regulatory pressure on
sustainability, such as packaging, and
end-uses primarily driven by cost-saving
against alternatives, such as construction.
This is likely to intensify as the market
moves closer to 2030.
Europe MTBE supply to
remain supported by imports in H2
Looking ahead to the second half of 2025, the
European methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
market is expected to be remain supplied by
imports, mostly from northeast Asia.
Green transition an
era-defining challenge for EU and Spain’s
chems sector – union
Adapting to the green economy will be the
key, long-term challenge for the EU and
Spain’s chemicals sector, while the current
focus on energy costs is misplaced, according
to Spain’s main trade union.
OMV
needs regulatory certainty before it can
further scale up chemical recycling
OMV needs a more secure regulatory
environment before it is willing to risk
further investment in scaling up its chemical
recycling facilities, according to the
company’s CEO.
Europe MEG market
unconcerned by plant shutdowns amid weak
demand
Lacklustre demand and oversupply will likely
characterize Europe’s ethylene glycols (EG)
markets through 2025, but sellers are hopeful
that plant shutdowns, export opportunities
and winter seasonality will provide some
support.
Crude Oil11-Aug-2025
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Saudi Arabian producer
Methanol Chemicals Co (Chemanol) is facing a
lawsuit seeking Saudi riyal (SR) 73 million
($22.4 million) in relation to the
80% equity acquisition of specialty and
fine chemicals manufacturer Global Company for
Chemical Industries (GCI) in May 2024.
The former owners of GCI, consisting of five
plaintiffs, filed the lawsuit against the
company before the Damman Commercial court,
Chemanol said in a filing to the Saudi bourse,
Tadawul, on 10 August.
According to the statement of claim, a sale
agreement was signed in May 2024 during the
term of the former board of directors.
Under the agreement, 80% of the shares in GCI –
owned by the plaintiffs – were sold to
Chemanol.
The sellers are now demanding Chemanol to pay
the remaining amount of the deal as per the
share purchase agreement.
“Regarding the expected financial impact, it
cannot be determined at this stage. Any
developments concerning this case will be
announced in due course,” said Chemanol in a
statement.
“While Chemanol denies the claims made by the
former owners of the Global Company for
Chemical Industries and rejects any
responsibility towards them, it is not possible
at this stage to assess liability until the
lawsuit is concluded,” the company added.
In April 2025, Chemanol had hired a specialized
legal firm to “study its legal position”
regarding the acquisitions of both GCI and
ADDAR Chemicals Company (ACC), along with the
circumstances surrounding the two deals,
concluded during the previous Board of
Directors’ term.
The
84% acquisition of ACC, valued at SR46.2
million, was completed in February 2024.
($1 = SR3.75)
Contact us
Partnering with ICIS unlocks a vision of a future you can trust and achieve. We leverage our unrivalled network of industry experts to deliver a comprehensive market view based on independent and reliable data, insight and analytics.
Contact us to learn how we can support you as you transact today and plan for tomorrow.
READ MORE
