ICIS Supply and Demand Database

SAO PAULO (ICIS)–Braskem has firmly denied it was preparing polyethylene (PE) price increases for June in anticipation of antidumping duties (ADDs) on US and Canadian imports, with a spokesperson at the Brazilian petrochemicals major calling such claims "absolutely unfounded". In a phone interview with ICIS, the spokesperson also rejected suggestions Braskem had already communicated potential price rises for June on expected ADDs. The spokesperson later confirmed on Friday that Braskem's PE prices would roll over in June from May. The proposal to implement ADDs on PE was brought forward in 2024 by Braskem, who is the sole PE producer in Brazil. The company has had to grapple with higher production costs than peers in North America, where natural gas-based ethane is widely available and has allowed a revival in polymers manufacturing. "The idea that we were putting up prices for May or for June based on a supposed decision regarding ADDs is absolutely unfounded. Braskem is not the one who sets the price: as the market knows, Braskem sets its prices accordingly to competitive market conditions rather than predetermined strategies," said the spokesperson. The company's representative also deemed necessary to distinguish between general import duties, which affect all countries importing into Brazil, and ADDs, which in this case would only target two countries, if Gecex finally deems PE from US and Canada contravened free trade rules. "For this particular case, it would not be the case that all imports would be affected – only the imports that are from the US," concluded the spokesperson. PE imports from the US and Canada represented in 2024 around 75% of all of Brazil's PE imports, according to the ICIS Supply and Demand Database. BUSY WEEK ENDS WITH A ROLLOVERBrazil's policymakers and polymers players leave behind a busy week in which political decisions get mixed with business planning, irremediably affected by the low operating rates at most Brazilian and Latin American chemical plants. Hit by abundant and lower-priced imports, Brazil's chemicals plants operating rates stand at around 60-65%, according to trade group Abiquim, which represents producers. Braskem's statement on Friday sought to clarify several points of the many published this week about Brazil's trade policy, but mostly the claim by market players that Braskem had already decided to increase prices on expectations of ADDs being imposed on US material. It stressed that any future price adjustments would not be related to antidumping measures, "because they are not in place", and argued it was not aware yet of what way June pricing would go. It has been an intense week for trade policymakers, with the foreign trade committee Gecex sharply increasing ADDs on US PVC from 8.2% to 43.7%, despite the US being only the second largest supplier to Brazil, well behind Colombia. Meanwhile, Gecex postponed without explanation a meeting where it was expected to decide on imposing ADDs on PE imports from the US and Canada, planned for 29 May but rescheduled last minute, leaving Brazil's PE market in uncertainty. Latin America has been one of the most vulnerable regions hit by the global petrochemicals oversupply and low prices. As around half of Brazil and the wider region chemicals demand is covered by imports, it is global prices that dictate the domestic pricing policies – a quintessential 'price-taker' status. After a considerable list of protectionist measures have been implemented in Brazil, fears among importers about rising input costs and overall national inflation rates are increasing. Small and large manufacturers up and down the country, which depend on imports for their production, will now face higher bills due to higher import tariffs on several chemicals as well as several ADDs in place for petrochemicals. However, Abiquim has said the measures' influence on inflation would be minimal, adding they are sensible when taking into consideration that they would in part cushion the nation's beleaguered chemicals producers from even lower operating rates or, in the worst-case scenario, plant closures. Additional reporting by Bruno Menini

30-May-2025

Naftogaz expected to ramp up CEE gas imports Company scrambling to refill storage as it compensates for lost production Grid operators mull balance-of-month bundled capacity tender for TBP after initial auction falls through LONDON (ICIS)–The Ukrainian gas incumbent Naftogaz is expected to import up to 1 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas from central and eastern European countries in July after reportedly securing more European funding, traders told ICIS. The company said on 30 May it had been in talks with international lenders including the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to secure financial support to repair and increase local gas production. However, traders active in Ukraine said the incumbent may also have snapped up a €400 million credit line that would allow it to buy between 0.8bcm and 1bcm in July. Upcoming purchases are likely to be consistent with the incumbent import strategy since the beginning of the year. Naftogaz did not reply to questions by publication time. HIGH DEMAND The company has been scrambling to buy gas on central European hubs as it ended the storage season with limited stocks and a large part of its domestic gas production had been destroyed following Russian missile attacks earlier this year. Traders say Naftogaz would need to import around 5bcm by the start of the cold season in November to ensure it reaches a storage target of just over 13bcm. At the end of May Ukraine was importing just over 20 million cubic meters (mcm)/day from Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, but traders say offtakes should ramp up to at least 24mcm/day in June to ensure it secures close to 4bcm by the end of the injection season. However, in order to increase imports it needs access to additional capacity. NEW BUNDLED CAPACITY TENDER Ukraine has been in talks with countries in southeast Europe, including Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria and Greece to launch a bundled capacity transmission product for exports of gas directly from Greece to Ukraine. The first auction held on 29 May fell through because companies did not have sufficient time to prepare. However, a source at one of the regional gas grid operators told ICIS they were assessing the possibility of launching a balance-of-month product for delivery of gas in the second half of June, followed by monthly bundled capacity for the period July–September 2025.

30-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US can maintain nearly all the plastic and chemical tariffs it imposed this year after an appeals court granted on Thursday the government's request to stay the judgment of a lower court. The stay will remain in place while the case is under consideration by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Earlier, the US lost a judgment over its tariffs in the US Court of International Trade. That lower court ruled that the president exceeded its authority when it imposed tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). These IEEPA tariffs included nearly all of the duties that the US imposed in 2025 on imports of commodity plastics and chemicals. Had the appeals court rejected the government's request for a stay, then the US would have had 10 calendar days to withdraw the tariffs it imposed under IEEPA. The tariffs covered by the ruling include the following: The 10% baseline tariffs against most of the world that the US issued during its so-called Liberation Day event on 2 April. These include the reciprocal tariffs that were later paused. The US issued the tariffs under Executive Order 14257, which intended to address the nation's trade deficit. The tariffs that the US initially imposed on imports from Canada under Executive Order 14193. These were intended to address drug smuggling. The US later limited the scope of these tariffs to cover imported goods that do not comply with the nations' trade agreement, known as the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The tariffs that the US initially imposed on imports from Mexico under Executive Order 14194. These were intended to address illegal immigration and drug smuggling. Like the Canadian tariffs, these were later limited to cover imported goods that did not comply with the USMCA. The 20% tariffs that the US imposed on imports from China under Executive Order 14195, which was intended to address drug smuggling. Because the appeals court granted the government's request for a stay, the US can maintain the IEEPA tariffs. The ruling did not cover sectoral tariffs imposed on specific products like steel, aluminium and auto parts, and it does not cover the duties that the US imposed on Chinese imports during the first term of US President Donald Trump. IMPLICATIONS OF THE RULINGIf the ruling is upheld by the higher courts, it could bring some imports of plastics and chemicals back to the US while lowering costs of other products. While the US has large surpluses in many plastics and chemicals, it still imports several key commodities. US states that border Canada import large amounts of polyethylene (PE) and other plastics from that country because it is closer than the nation's chemical hubs along the Gulf Coast. Other significant imports include base oils, ammonia, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), methanol and aromatics such as benzene, toluene and mixed xylenes (MX). RULING COULD REDIRECT CHINESE EXPORTS OF PLASTIC PRODUCTSThe IEEPA tariffs of the US caused countries to redirect exports of plastics and chemicals to other markets, particularly to Europe. The result depressed prices for those plastics and chemicals. If the ruling holds, some of those exports could return to the US and reduce the quantity of exports arriving in Europe. The IEEPA tariffs had a similar effect on the plastic products exports by China. Those exports were redirected to other countries, especially southeast Asia. These redirected shipments flooded those countries with plastic goods, displacing local products and lowering domestic demand for the plastics used to make those products. If the ruling is restored by higher courts, then it could direct many of those shipments back to the US, although they would unlikely affect shipments of auto parts. Those shipments are covered by the sectoral tariffs, and the court ruling did not void those tariffs. RULING REMOVES BASIS FOR RETALIATORY TARIFFS AGAINST US PLASTICS, CHEMSChina had already imposed blanket tariffs in retaliation to the IEEPA tariffs the US imposed on its exports. China unofficially granted waivers for US imports of ethane and PE, but those for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) were still covered by the duty. China relies on such imports as feedstock for its large fleet of propane dehydrogenation (PDH) units, which produce on-purpose propylene. If upheld, the ruling could restore many of those exports and improve propylene margins for those PDH units. The EU was preparing to impose retaliatory tariffs on exports of nearly every major commodity plastic from the US. Other proposals would cover EU imports of oleochemicals, tall oil, caustic soda and surfactants from the US. Canada also prepared a list of retaliatory tariffs that covered US imports of PE, polypropylene (PP) and other plastics, chemicals and fertilizers. If the ruling holds, it would remove the basis for the proposed tariffs of Canada and the EU as well as the existing ones already imposed by China. RULING WOULD NOT ELIMINATE THREAT OF FUTURE TARIFFSEven if the higher courts uphold the ruling and bars tariffs under IEEPA, the US has other means to impose duties that are outside of the bounds of the ruling. Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Such tariffs would be limited to 15%, could last for 150 days and address balance of payment deficits. Tariffs imposed under the following statutes would require federal investigations, which could delay them by several months. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The president can impose tariffs of up to 50% against countries that discriminate against US commerce. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which addresses unfair trade practices. This was the basis on the tariffs imposed on many Chinese imports during the peak of the trade war between the two countries. Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which addresses imports with implications for national security. Trump used this provision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum. The US has started Section 232 on the following imports: Pharmaceutical and active pharmaceutical ingredient (APIs) – Section 232 Semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment – Section 232 Medium and heavy-duty trucks, parts – Section 232 Critical minerals – Section 232 Copper – Section 232 Timber and lumber – Section 232 Commercial aircraft and jet engines – Section 232 Ship-to-shore cranes assembled in China or made with parts from China – Section 301 Shipbuilding – Section 301 The case number for the appeal is 2025-1812. The original lawsuit was filed in the US Court of International Trade by the plaintiffs VOS Selections, Genova Pipe, Microkits, FishUSA and Terry Precision Cycling. The case number is 25-cv-00066. Thumbnail Photo: A container ship, which transports goods overseas. (Image by Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock) Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy

29-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from Asia to the US are already facing upward pressure amid the 90-day tariff pause, but Wednesday’s ruling by a federal court could add fuel to the trend, according to shipping analysts. “The decision of the US Court of International Trade to deem [US President Donald] Trump’s sweeping tariffs as unlawful is good news for shippers – but it could signal the beginning of the next era of confusion in global supply chains,” analysts at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta said. Emily Stausboll, Xeneta senior shipping analyst, said that even if the appeal fails, Trump will not throw in the towel, and he has other levers to pull to achieve the same outcome as the sweeping tariffs. “We only have to look at the US government proposal to introduce port fees on China-affiliated ships and the SHIPS for America Act to understand the range of options at Trump’s disposal in the ongoing trade wars,” Stausboll said. Judah Levine, head of research at online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos, said the 90-day pause on 145% tariffs on Chinese goods has already driven a sharp rebound in ocean freight demand. “Shippers have been frontloading to beat the August expiration,” Levine said. “This ruling may add fuel to that trend, especially if tariffs are actually suspended – even temporarily.”’ Levine said that some shippers deterred by the 30% tariffs may now rush to move goods before the appeals process concludes or new tariff mechanisms are activated. “That could increase container demand even further, adding to the strength of the early start to peak season,” Levine said. RULING ADDS UNCERTAINTY Lars Jensen, president of consultant Vespucci Maritime, said the ruling by the court adds a new level of uncertainty for US importers. “Not only do they have to contend with the risks associated with changing tariffs, now it is also cast into doubt whether or not the announced tariffs will even be implementable – and this also raises the question whether tariffs paid in recent weeks can ultimately be reclaimed,” Jensen said in a post on LinkedIn. If, after appeals, the tariffs are ultimately found to be unlawfully implemented, shippers should have a good case for getting the paid tariffs back, Jensen said. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

29-May-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Moody’s has cut its rating for Sasol from stable to negative on the back of “continued operating performance deterioration” in the face of weak chemicals and oil markets, the agency said on Thursday. The firm, which assesses the creditworthiness of company debt issuance, expects the South Africa-based major’s adjusted debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) to grow from 2.2 times to 3.0. “The weak performance of Sasol's chemical business during the last 18 months has been characterized by falling prices, subdued demand, and continued capacity growth,” Moody’s said in a ratings note. “This has resulted in high levels of asset impairments as well as continued margin deterioration.” Sasol recently set out a performance programme to improve operational performance, with its chemicals business substantially underperforming peers over the last few years. “Performance over the last four years has not lived up to our own expectations,” said Sasol CEO Simon Baloyi, speaking earlier this month. Earlier this year, the company booked a South African Rand (R) 58.9 billion ($3.3 billion) impairment on its chemicals Americas ethane value chain as a result of softer market conditions, as well as R5.3 billion on its Africa polyethylene chlor-alkali and polyvinyl chain and R7.8 billion on its Secunda, South Africa, liquid fuels refinery. The company has also set out plans to mothball or close four units across its US and European operations by the end of the calendar year 2025, due in most cases to high costs and little expectation of a substantial market recovery. Moody’s projects that Sasol’s EBITDA margin will fall to 20% in 2025 and 2026, compared to 22.5% in 2024 and 25% in 2023. “Sustained low oil prices will result in challenges in Sasol's fuels business, however, the company's hedging program will partly mitigate the downside risk,” Moody’s said. Sasol had not responded to requests for comment at the time of publication. Thumbnai; photo: Sasol's headquarters in Sandton, South Africa (Source: Shutterstock)

29-May-2025

BARCELONA (ICIS)–ExxonMobil is selling its refinery at Gravenchon, France, to Canadian refining group North Atlantic. The two companies have entered exclusive negotiations for North Atlantic to acquire an 82.89% controlling interest in Esso Société Anonyme Française SA and 100%  of ExxonMobil Chemical France. Filing of a tender offer is expected in the first quarter of 2026 for the deal which includes Exxon’s refinery at the Gravenchon site, the second largest refinery in France. The  transaction will be submitted to local trade unions in accordance with French law. In 2024, ExxonMobil sold its Fos-Sur-Mer refinery near Marseille, France, along with fuel terminals in Toulouse and Villette. The company also closed its cracker and downstream production  at Gravenchon in 2024. At the time, the company said the site had lost more than €500 million since 2018 and despite efforts to improve the site’s economics, it remained uncompetitive. According to the ICIS Supply & Demand Database ExxonMobil still has some small chemicals capacities at Gravenchon and nearby Port Gerome including propylene, polyalphaolefins and oligomers. Local trades union, CSEC, said in a press release that ExxonMobil would market chemicals and specialty products on behalf of the new owners. ExxonMobil did not reply to a request for confirmation of this. It also has large base oils capacities in France including 12,000 barrels/day at Port Jerome and 3,200 barrels/day at Gravenchon. In a statement released on 28 May, North Atlantic said it has the ambition to consolidate Gravenchon as a center of French energy and industry for decades and to grow North Atlantic into a transatlantic energy champion. Located on a 1,500-acre site in the Normandy region of France, the combined facility is one of the largest integrated chemical complexes in western Europe. The refinery includes two distillation trains, several conversion units and associated logistics facilities. The site has the capacity to process 230,000 barrels/day of crude oil and other feedstocks, according to North Atlantic. North Atlantic said it aims to develop Gravenchon into a green energy hub to accelerate the deployment of low-carbon fuels and renewable power. The company said it is committed to maintain employment and existing compensation and benefits. Ted Lomond, president and CEO of North Atlantic and president of North Atlantic France said: “This is a pivotal moment for North Atlantic as we enhance our transatlantic presence and commitment to energy security through innovative energy solutions aligned with global energy needs”. Ajay Parmar, ICIS director of energy and refining said: “My view is that Exxon is choosing to sell assets where profitability has been and likely will continue to be dented going forward. Refinery margins in Europe have returned back to around their pre-COVID levels this year, after a few years of bumper profits post-pandemic.” He added: “These refinery assets are less profitable and so the company is probably looking to divest for this reason. Exxon/Esso also sold off the Fos-Sur-Mer refinery last year – I think the strategy is to steadily exit these lower margin businesses.” Photo: Part of an oil refinery complex (Shutterstock) Focus article by Will Beacham

28-May-2025

SAO PAULO (ICIS)–Fears within the Brazilian manufacturing sector about rising input costs and higher inflation if antidumping duties (ADDs) are imposed on US and Canadian polyethylene (PE) “do not hold up” when taking into account a beleaguered chemicals production sector, according to trade group Abiquim. A spokesperson for the trade group, which largely represents the chemicals producing side, said the low operating rates across the country’s chemical plants were partly a result of unfair global competition, and fully supported ADDs being imposed on US and Canadian PE. Brazil’s government body for foreign trade, the Foreign Trade Chamber (Gecex), is to meet on 29 May to take a decision on the matter. The investigation into possible PE dumping by the US and Canada started in November after a proposal by local polymers major Braskem, which has a commanding voice in Abiquim. “The narrative that specific anti-dumping duties, applied to correct unfair trade operations, could pose inflationary risks in the plastics processing production chain and affect production levels in the economy as a whole, simply does not hold up, given that Brazil is a price taker in thermoplastic resins (i.e. it follows variations in the international market),” said Abiquim. “[Moreover] There is an average idle capacity of 36% in the Brazilian chemicals sector (data from 2024) that can be reversed with the implementation of ADDs. Trade defence investigations in Brazil follow a rigorous and technical procedure, focusing on determining dumping margins, damage to the domestic industry and the causal link between the two.” If those technical parameters are met, Gecex will implement the ADDs “in the interest” of the country, adding that the ADDs would strictly follow World Trade Organization (WTO) rules regarding unfair trade. “Allowing dumping is not justified by any reason, since it allows the distortion of international trade rules, allowing the sale of products often below production cost only to aggressively capture the market,” added Abiquim. GROWING PROTECTIONISMHowever, trade groups representing import-heavy manufacturing companies, in a country where half of chemicals demand is covered by imports, have warned that those ADDs and other protectionist measures implemented by Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s administration increase input costs and, ultimately, inflation. The truth is that Lula’s cabinet does listen to industrial producers. The main constituency of the president’s Workers’ Party (PT) is industrial workers, and the health of manufacturing employment is key for its electoral prospects. As the 2026 general election looms, those voters may consider their support for the PT if manufacturing, which already came late to the post-pandemic recovery compared with other sectors, starts faltering again in 2025. This is precisely the argument from the other side. Increasing costs manufacturers could their hit their activity and ultimately employment in manufacturing as a whole could be negatively affected. In a written statement to ICIS this week, Jose Ricardo Roriz, president of the trade group representing plastic transformers Abiplast, reaffirmed his opposition to protectionist measures which increase costs for importers. But that side of the argument has so far failed to turn its lobbying into concrete actions. Since he took office in January 2023, Lula’s cabinet has approved most of the protectionist measures chemical producers demanded. In 2023, it reintroduced a tax break for the purchase of inputs by chemical companies, called REIQ, which was withdrawn by the previous center-right administration. In 2024, the administration re-imposed ADDs on US-origin PP and approved higher import tariffs on dozens of chemicals. Meanwhile, Gecex is investigating another proposal to implement ADDs on polyvinyl chloride (PVC), a proposal by Braskem and caustic soda and chlorine derivatives producer Unipar. In April, Gecex also began a probe into potential polyethylene terephthalate (PET) dumping from Malaysia and Vietnam, a proposal brought forward by Indorama and Alpek. Brazil’s Congress is currently debating a bill contemplating state subsidies or credit lines at a favorable rate for chemicals companies, called Presiq. If approved, the program could be the “savior” of struggling chemicals producers, according to Abiquim's director general Andre Passos in an interview with ICIS.

28-May-2025

SAO PAULO (ICIS)–Brazil’s polyethylene (PE) sellers this week are encouraging customers to bring forward purchases on the assumption that the government is to impose antidumping duties (ADDs) on US and Canadian material from June. – Braskem’s PE ADDs proposal could be approved this week – Sources said prices are increasing ahead of measure – ADDs on PVC still being analyzed by government According to several sources, the ADDs on US and Canada PE could be approved by the government’s body for foreign trade, the Foreign Trade Chamber (Gecex), at a meeting to take place on 29 May. Gecex’s investigation into possible PE dumping by the US and Canada into Brazil started in November after local polymers major Braskem filed the proposal arguing unfair competition. ADDs are tariffs imposed on imported goods that are sold at prices lower than their normal value, potentially harming domestic producers, and are widely used as a protectionist measure from unfair competition. Brazilian PE sellers are this week encouraging their customers to bring purchases forward, warning them that the ADDs could potentially be effective from as soon as 2 June. While this could be seen as a strategy by sellers to prop up their sales, the assumption that the ADDs on US and Canada’s PE will be imposed is not senseless, given that it would follow a series of protectionist measures implemented by the government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in the past two years. ICIS put to Gecex the markets’ assumptions about an almost certain green light for the ADDs, but in a written response it said it would not comment. “We cannot make any comments or provide information regarding the progress of the investigation. Likewise, we cannot make any inferences regarding market information provided by third parties,” said Gecex. These ADDs would be provisional, while Gecex would have up to 18 months to decide whether they will become permanent. If PE dumping from the US and Canada could not be proved in the end, the measure would cease to exist. If proved, the measure could become permanent until further notice. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR HIGHER COSTSIn two letters to customers seen by ICIS, two distribution companies warned about the ADDs, with one of them taking for granted they will be imposed and be effective in June. Global chemicals distributor Vinmar’s Brazil subsidiary warned their customers that any potential “financial loss” from the potential ADDs would not be assumed by the distributor but by the customer. “We are on the verge of the potential entry into force of ADDs on PE imported from the US and Canada. We would like to emphasize that Vinmar, as always, cannot be held responsible for any financial loss of the importer if any import tariffs are implemented or adjusted during the logistic process of delivering the cargo to its recipient,” said Vinmar in the letter. “The cargo cannot be canceled or undergo any adjustment of price/commercial condition as a form of compensation, even if the cargo has not complied with the maximum agreed shipping deadline.” To cover its back entirely, Vinmar concluded the letter clarifying to its customers that “logistic process of delivering the cargo” means from beginning to end: since the containers are loaded, in this case in the US or Canada, until delivery at the port of destination in Brazil. Vinmar had not responded to a request for further comment at the time of writing. Another distributor’s letter to customers said: “As of June 2025, the ADDs will come into effect, which will directly impact costs of PE materials. In addition, Braskem announced a price adjustment for June, which should result in increases in the cost of materials.” Braskem had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing. A source at a distributor said on Monday, however, that these warnings about potential price increases outside a company’s control are common in the chemicals sector. Consequently, the source said its company had been including in contracts with its customers a clause from the beginning of 2025 highlighting the Gecex investigation, so it can cover its back on the potential higher costs emanating from the ADDs. Meanwhile, Gecex continues investigating another proposal for ADDs on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) brought forward by Braskem and Brazilian caustic soda and chlorine derivatives produce Unipar, also arguing unfair competition. Management at Braskem has publicly stated they were lobbying the government for this measure to be approved, since PVC is one of the plastics which is suffering the most the global oversupply and the consequent low prices. Gecex is currently working on the “preparation of the final report” for those ADDs on PVC, according to information on its website as of Monday. Gecex also started in April an investigation into potential polyethylene terephthalate (PET) dumping in material coming from Malaysia and Vietnam, a proposal brought forward by Indorama and Alpek. MORE PROTECTIONISMIf approved, the ADDs on PE from the US and Canada would add to a list of protectionist measures implemented by the Brazilian government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in the past two years, such higher import tariffs for dozens of chemicals from October 2024. Meanwhile, the Brazilian government re-imposed ADDs on US-origin PP and has approved programs contemplating state subsidies or credit lines at favorable rates for chemicals companies, such as Presiq. Brazil’s chemicals producers – represented by trade group Abiquim and including names such as Braskem, Unipar, and Unigel – have been lobbying for protectionist measures against what they see as unfair competition from overseas markets such as the US and China. Aided by lower production costs, companies in those two countries, but also others such as Canada or nations in the Middle East, are blamed by Brazil’s domestic producers for their historically low operating rates, hovering around 60-65%, and the closure of some plants which were not competitive. In an interview with ICIS earlier in May, the director general at Abiquim said the continuation of protectionist measures was key for Brazilian chemicals producers to stay afloat. "Nothing has fundamentally changed in our situation in the past few months. The scenario remains the same, perhaps even worsening with [US President Donald] Trump's trade measures, and we continue suffering with low capacity utilization rates,” said Andre Passos. “Brazil's chemical production has been on a downward trajectory since 2016. Capacity utilization level of our plants [has gone] from above 80% before 2016 to around 60% now." However, importers of polymers and other petrochemicals are understandably on the opposite side of the debate. They argue measures such as high import tariffs or ADDs negatively affect manufacturers who are dependent on chemicals imports and increase inflation, affecting consumers’ purchasing power. Around half of Brazil’s chemicals demand is covered by imports, given the country’s trade deficit in chemicals, a common feature in the wider Latin America. Trade group Abiplast, representing plastic transformers, has repeatedly showed opposition to protectionist measures which increase costs for importers. Front page picture: Port of Santos in Sao Paulo, Latin America’s largest Source: Port of Santos Authority Additional reporting by Bruno Menini Focus article by Jonathan Lopez

26-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Asian Chemical Connections by John Richardson. I could present a dozen charts such as the main one in today's post on polypropylene (PP) — for example on polyethylene (PE), ethylene, propylene and styrene—and the patterns would be similar though, of course, the numbers would differ. During the pandemic, while demand dipped in many places, China’s PP consumption rose—from 7% growth in 2019 to 9% in 2020, then stayed strong at 7% in 2021. The same trend played out across other chemicals and polymers. This was the “China in, China out” story: Rising imports of feedstocks to make finished goods that lockdown-affected, cash-rich Westerners were snapping up, backed by stimulus. Margins climbed—not just from demand, but also from refinery feedstock shortages as fuel demand dropped and refinery rates were cut. But 2022 marked a shift. As ICIS Data and Analytics illustrates, multiple headwinds kicked in: The Evergrande Turning Point, China's constantly deteriorating demographics, and a China petrochemicals self-sufficiency drive dating back to 2014. Focusing on China's PP self-sufficiency and exports: China's PP capacity as a percentage of domestic demand is expected to surge from 89% in 2014 to 134% by 2028. In 2020, China’s PP exports were around 500,000 tonnes. In 2023 they reached 1.3m tonnes and climbed to 2.4m tonnes in 2024. ICIS data suggests China’s exports in 2025 could reach 3.1m tonnes. On current trends, China’s exports to ASEAN could exceed 1 million tonnes to ASEAN in 2025 versus less than 900,000 tonnes in 2024. The trade war? Hard to say if it's moved the needle. These structural trends were in motion long before it began—and they’ll likely outlast it too. Sentiment swings (as seen since April’s “Liberation Day”) will keep influencing prices and buying patterns, but the fundamentals remain. The Chemicals Supercycle is over. What comes next? That’s the big question. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS.

26-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Thailand's PTT Global Chemical (GC) is deepening its commitments to feedstock flexibility, high-value specialty and bio-based & green chemicals, as CEO Narongsak Jivakanun urges regional coordination within ASEAN to tackle global supply chain disruptions and overcapacity. Supply chain reorganization a major concern Proposes regional coordination, not just joint ventures GC targets net-zero emissions by 2050 Highlighting the unprecedented challenges facing the chemical industry currently, Jivakanun said, “We've all seen the same situations. It’s simply a period of high uncertainty, making it challenging to manage the business daily.” The CEO was speaking with ICIS on the sidelines of the two-day Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) in Bangkok, Thailand, which ended on 16 May. Jivakanun added that “the recent tariffs will blur the picture”. He noted that supply chain issues are a dominant concern, with companies reorganizing their business operations to circumvent potential tariffs and trade barriers. “I think everyone's trying to figure out how best to reorganize their supply chain,” Jivakanun noted. He observed “a big uptick in terms of volumes” before 2 April, followed by a slowdown in some value chains and a trade flow change. CALL FOR ASEAN COLLABORATION AMID OVERSUPPLY Addressing the pervasive industry concern of oversupply, Jivakanun called for regional coordination among ASEAN member countries. “What I envision and propose to all the players is coordination,” Jivakanun said, distinguishing this approach from conventional joint ventures. “We may look at Southeast Asia as a region. If we were to build an ecosystem or supply chain for the future specialty market, we should know where we're heading in terms of market end-use and then work backward,” Jivakanun explained. He believes “now is the time for us to think about that.” He acknowledged data suggesting 2028 would be a turning point for chemicals oversupply conditions, expressing hope for “more careful, more disciplined” capacity building. In response to questions about the current downturn in demand, Jivakanun said “Everyone is trying to keep their assets going as much as they can, aligning with marginal cost.” He added that such conditions are “not sustainable,” anticipating further industry consolidation and rationalization. FOCUS ON THREE STRATEGIC AREAS GC has diversified considerably from being a purely commodity-based business primarily focused in Thailand, and is now focusing on three strategic areas: feedstock flexibility, diversification into bio-based products, and specialty chemicals. GC commands robust feedstock flexibility, allowing it to utilize a wide range of raw materials from ethane to propane and liquid naphtha, he said. “GC derives ethane from the gas fields in Thailand, and we'll continue to maximize that. Now, GC sees an opportunity to bring ethane from the US,” Jivakanun said. This strategic import project will see “400,000 tonnes of ethane from the US to Thailand,” enhancing cost savings from alternative feedstocks. The company expects to begin receiving imported ethane in 2029. This move comes as more companies, from Europe to India and China, are growing comfortable with long-distance ethane shipments, driven by the competitiveness of US shale gas. ADVANCING BIO/GREEN CIRCULARITY AND NET-ZERO ASPIRATIONSBio-based initiatives are among the key focuses for GC. The company began with oleochemicals through its joint venture Emery Oleochemicals, and developed PLA biopolymer via NatureWorks. A significant milestone is the upcoming PLA biopolymer production plant in Thailand, which will utilize sugarcane as a raw material. “The plant is due to be completed by the end of the year and start commercial operation next year,” Jivakanun said. While acknowledging increasing supply in the market, he emphasized that demand growth will stem from “new application” development, citing examples in 3D printing, tea bags, and coffee capsules, particularly driven by Asian markets. More recently, GC has expanded into the biorefinery business, launching an initiative this year using co-processing technology. The co-processing technology allows GC to integrate “non-fossil fuel-based feedstocks into our petroleum-based refinery with very minimal modification,” Jivakanun explained, enabling the production of bio-based products. GC is also Thailand’s first commercialized producer of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), employing the mass balance approach and is certified by the ISCC CORSIA standard. These efforts align with GC’s commitment to becoming a net-zero company by 2050 through a three-pronged approach: optimizing production to reduce carbon footprint, diversifying to low-carbon and high-value businesses, and implementing CCUs. The company is collaborating with PTT Group on a major CCU infrastructure project in Thailand, and is openly inviting international cooperation in this area. “These strategies define how we aim to grow our business while simultaneously decarbonizing our footprint,” Jivakanun added As for the third pillar, Jivakanun said that one of the company’s growth platform is centered on building regional hubs. “We believe these hubs are vital solutions for the future,” Jivakanun said. GC’s wholly owned subsidiary allnex is now replicating its hub model in India after successfully establishing one in China, with its Phase 1 capacity expansion expected to finish by year-end. The company’s final investment decision for a new allnex southeast Asia hub in Thailand is expected by early next year, leveraging its fully integrated infrastructure in Map Ta Phut, Rayong. Interview article by Nurluqman Suratman Thumbnail image: A PTTGC production facility. (Source: GC company factsheet)

26-May-2025