Ethyl acetate (ETAC) & butyl acetate (BUTAC)

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from Asia to the US ticked lower this week, although they could see upward pressure from shippers pulling forward volumes ahead of the 30-day tariff freeze, while rates for liquid chemical tankers held steady. Global average rates fell by 3%, according to supply chain advisors Drewry and as shown in the following chart. Global average rates are down by almost 18% from 1 September, and down by almost 45% from the high of the year in mid-July. Rates from Shanghai to both US coasts fell by 1%, as shown in the following chart. Drewry expects spot rates to decrease slightly in the coming week due to the increase in capacity as container ship order books are at record highs. Judah Levine, head of research at online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos, said his company is already seeing some upward pressure on prices although some could be because of shippers frontloading volumes to beat the 30-day pause before tariffs are enacted. ‘We could expect frontloading ahead of tariffs – which has been a major factor keeping US ocean import volumes and transpacific container rates elevated since November – to intensify until the new tariffs are introduced or called off,” Levine said. Levine said it is hard to determine the impact from volumes being pulled forward since this has likely been happening for several months, and with the market in the lull surrounding the Lunar New Year (LNY) holiday. “But we could expect demand and rates to increase post-LNY,” Levine said. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES STEADY US chemical tanker freight rates as assessed by ICIS were unchanged this week with contract of affreightment (COA) nominations steady for most trade lanes. For the cargoes in the South American trade lane, COAs remain strong leaving very little spot availability. A large parcel of ethanol fixed USG to San Luis, and several others were quoted for second half of February. Similarly, for the USG to ARA trade lane, it was another off week with only a few reported fixtures. However, there were some unusual cargoes fixed for products like caustic soda and ethanol. Some styrene was reported fixed from Lake Charles to ARA. Overall, rates seem to be maintaining current levels particularly for the 3,000- and 5,000-tonne parcels. There was no difference along the USG to Asia routes, as it was another quiet week on this trade lane. Spot rates remain steady as the H1 February space across the regular carriers is sold out. Some of the larger players should have space in the second half of February depending on COA nominations. The chemical COAs have been steady through H1 March, but still in the tentative phase. Several inquiries were seen for methanol, ethanol, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), styrene and MEG. On the other hand, bunker prices were unchanged this week but overall remain strong. PANAMA CANAL UPDATE Panama’s president said the country will not renew its agreement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) after a visit from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. President Donald Trump surprised some when he said that the US should reclaim the Panama Canal, and a US congressman has since introduced a bill that would authorize the purchase of the vital waterway. The actions taken by Panama’s president, Jose Raul Molino, may slow action by the Trump administration to take back control of the canal. Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan

07-Feb-2025

Correction: In the ICIS story headlined “INSIGHT: US tariffs unleash higher costs to nation's chem industry” dated 3 February 2025, the wrong volumes were used for the following imports: Canadian ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms; Canadian polypropylene, in primary forms; Canadian mixed xylene isomers; Mexican polypropylene, in primary forms; and Mexican cyclohexane. The US did not import cyclohexane from Mexico in 2023. A corrected story follows. HOUSTON (ICIS)–The tariffs that the US will impose on all imports from Canada, Mexico and China will unleash higher costs for the nation's chemical industry, create supply-chain snarls and open it to retaliation. For Canada, the US will impose 10% tariffs on imports of energy and 25% tariffs on all other imports. For Mexico, the US imposed 25% tariffs on all imports but the countries' presidents said on Monday the tariffs are being paused for a month. For China, the US will impose 10% tariffs on all imports. US IMPORTS LARGE AMOUNTS OF PE FROM CANADAUS petrochemical production is concentrated along its Gulf Coast, which is far from many of its manufacturing hubs in the northeastern and midwestern parts of the country. As a result, individual states import large amounts of polyethylene (PE) from Canada – even though the nation as a whole has a large surplus of the material. Even Texas imports large amounts of PE from Canada – despite its abundance of plants that produce the polymer. In addition, polyester plants in North and South Carolina import large amounts of the feedstocks monoethylene glycol (MEG) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) from Canada. The US as a whole imports significant amounts of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) from Canada – again, despite its surplus of these plastics. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Canada in 2023. The products are organized by their harmonized tariff schedule (HTS) code. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 kilograms 1,319,817,405 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 1,088,071,523 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 420,561,390 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 407,710,439 2905.31.00 Ethylene Glycol kilograms 329,542,378 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 271,201,880 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 188,800,413 2902.44.00 Mixed xylene isomers liters 746,072 2905.12.00 Propan-1-ol (Propyl alcohol) and Propan-2-ol (isopropyl alcohol) kilograms 87,805,095 3901.30.60 Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers kilograms 71,372,396 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM MEXICOMexico is not as large of a source of US petrochemical imports as Canada, but shipments from the country are still noteworthy. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Mexico in 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 69,230,708 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 34,674,435 2915.24.00 Acetic anhydride kilograms 25,294,318 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 24,005,371 2915.31.00 Ethyl acetate kilograms 18,855,544 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 14,469,582 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 8,849,478 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM CHINAChina remains a significant source for a couple of noteworthy chemicals despite the effects of the tariffs that US President Donald Trump imposed during his first term in office. The following table shows 2023 US imports from China. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 29152100 Acetic acid kilograms 21,095,566 39093100 Poly(methylene phenyl isocyanate) (crude MDI, polymeric MDI) kilograms 206,642,886 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) China's shipments of plastics goods are more significant. OIL TARIFFS WILL HIT US REFINERSCanada and Mexico are the largest sources of imported crude oil in the US, and the heavier grades from these countries complement the lighter grades that the US produces in abundance. Those imports help fill out refining units that process heavier crude fractions, such as hydrocrackers, cokers, base oil units and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units. Refiners cannot swap out heavier Canadian and Mexican grades with lighter US grades. Instead, they will need to pay the tariffs or find another supplier of heavier grades, possibly at a higher cost. The following table shows the largest sources of imported crude in 2023. Figures are listed in thousands of barrels/day. COUNTRY IMPORTS % Canada 3,885 59.9 Mexico 733 11.3 Saudi Arabia 349 5.4 Iraq 213 3.3 Colombia 202 3.1 Total US imports 6,489 Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA) US refiners could take another hit from higher catalyst costs. These are made from rare earth elements, and China remains a key source. TARIFFS TO RAISE COSTS FOR FERTILIZERCanada is the world's largest producer of potash, and it exports massive amounts to the US. It is unclear how the US could find another source. Russia and Belarus are the world's second and third largest potash producers. Together, the three accounted for 65.9% of global potash production in 2023, according to the Canadian government. Canada accounts for significant shares of other US imports of fertilizers. The following table lists some of Canada's fertilizer shipments to the US in 2023 and shows its share of total US imports. Figures are from 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUME % 31042000 Potassium chloride metric tonne 11850925 88.8 31023000 Ammonium nitrate, whether or not in aqueous solution metric tonne 295438 76.6 31024000 Mixtures of ammonium nitrate with calcium carbonate or other inorganic nonfertilizing substances metric tonne 29203 75.7 31055100 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing nitrates and phosphates metric tonne 1580 66.1 31022100 Ammonium sulfate metric tonne 947140 49.6 31052000 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing the three fertilizing elements nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium metric tonne 147850 41.4 Source: US ITC SUPPLY CHAIN SNARLSIf US companies choose to avoid the tariffs and seek other suppliers, they could be exposed to delays and supply chain constraints. Other companies outside of the petrochemical, plastic and fertilizer industries will also be seeking new suppliers. The scale of these disruptions could be significant because Canada, Mexico and China are the largest trading partners in the US. The following table lists the top 10 US trading partners in 2023 based on combined imports and exports. Country Total Exports ($) General Imports ($) TOTAL Mexico 322,742,472,406 475,215,965,697 797,958,438,103 Canada 354,355,997,349 418,618,659,183 772,974,656,532 China 147,777,767,493 426,885,009,750 574,662,777,243 Germany 76,697,761,127 159,272,068,221 235,969,829,348 Japan 75,683,130,214 147,238,042,342 222,921,172,556 South Korea 65,056,093,590 116,154,470,335 181,210,563,925 UK 74,315,228,810 64,217,031,774 138,532,260,584 Taiwan 39,956,725,574 87,767,403,487 127,724,129,061 Vietnam 9,842,922,146 114,426,076,081 124,268,998,227 Source: US ITC RETALIATIONUS petrochemical exports would be tempting targets for retaliation because of their magnitude and the global capacity glut. China, in particular, could impose tariffs on US chemical imports and offset the disruptions by increasing rates at under-utilized plants. So far, none announced plans to target chemicals on Sunday. Canada's plans to impose 25% tariffs on $30 billion in US goods does not include oil, refined products, chemicals or plastics. That batch of tariffs will take place on February 4. Canada will impose 25% tariffs on an additional $125 billion worth of US goods following a 21-day comment period, it said. The government did not highlight plastics or chemicals in this second batch of tariffs. Instead, it said the tariffs will cover passenger vehicles and trucks, including electric vehicles, steel and aluminium products, certain fruits and vegetables, aerospace products, beef, pork, dairy, trucks and buses, recreational vehicles and recreational boats. In a statement issued on Sunday, Mexico's president made no mention of retaliatory tariffs. Instead, she said she will provide more details about Mexico's response on Monday. China said it will start legal proceedings through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and take corresponding countermeasures. RATIONALE BEHIND THE TARIFFSThe US imposed the tariffs under the nation's International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president authority to take actions to address a severe national security threat. In a fact sheet, Trump cited illegal immigration and illicit drugs. Saturday's executive order is the first time that a US president imposed tariffs under IEEPA. Prior IEEPA actions lasted an average of nine years. They can be terminated by a vote in Congress. Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows containers, in which goods are commonly shipped. Image by Shutterstock)

03-Feb-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Customers in several US states closer to Canada than its Gulf Coast petrochemical hubs import large amounts of plastics and chemicals from the country, including materials that the US produces in abundance, and these shipments could soon become subject to tariffs totalling hundreds of millions of dollars. US President Donald Trump has said he could announce on February 1 tariffs of up to 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. Even though the US has large surpluses of many plastics and chemicals, domestic companies still import large amounts of these materials from Canada. These customers face the prospects of higher tariffs from Canadian imports or potentially higher shipping costs from suppliers that are farther away. CANADIAN EXPORTS TO NORTHERN STATESUS plastics and chemicals production is concentrated on the Gulf Coast in the south, which is far from the manufacturing and plastic processing hubs in Michigan, Illinois and Ohio in the north. These and other northern US states are much closer to Canada's petrochemical plants in Sarnia, Ontario province, than they are to the Gulf Coast. The following table shows various plastics and chemicals that Canadian exported in 2023 to Michigan, Illinois and Ohio. The bottom row shows how much customers from each state would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these 2023 exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description Michigan (tonnes) Illinois (tonnes) Ohio (tonnes) 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 30,403 41,967 59,908 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 125,693 66,493 85,328 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 163,543 155,042 88,793 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 6,232 122,970 20,694 3901.30.00 Ethyl vinyl acetate copolymer 55 55,012 2,526 2905.31.00 Ethylene glycol 5 152,746 8,634 Total tariff bill $119,027,186 $243,701,358 $103,054,090 Source: Statistics Canada CANADIAN IMPORTS FROM THE CAROLINASNorth and South Carolina are also large destinations for Canadian exports. These states are home to auto plants as well as facilities that make polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which uses monoethylene glycol (MEG) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) as feedstocks. The following table shows 2023 shipments made to these states. The bottom row shows how much customers would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description South Carolina (tonnes) North Carolina (tonnes) 3904.10.00 PVC, not mixed with any other substances 428 134,433 2905.31.00 Ethylene glycol 66,973 2,731 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts 102,162 162,505 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 25,379 13,076 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 79,301 30,278 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 98,070 40,879 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 38,763 1,033 Total tariff bill $168,380,231 $166,512,281 Source: Statistics Canada Even though Texas is home to many plastics and chemical plants, it is still a destination for a large amount of plastic exports from Canada. The following table shows 2023 shipments made to Texas. The bottom row shows how much customers would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description Texas (tonnes) 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 62,300 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 189,247 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 185,610 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 21,315 Total tariff bill $145,297,714 Source: Statistics Canada CONSEQUENCES OF TARIFFSWhether the US proposes the tariffs on February 1 is still up in the air. Trump has used the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tool in the past, as he did against Mexico during his first term and against Colombia earlier this month. In both cases, the US reached agreements with the countries without imposing the tariffs. If the US does impose the tariffs, customers could pay the additional tax, or they could find another supplier. For states closer to Canada, new suppliers could increase shipping times and costs. If the tariffs are broad enough, customers will be competing for cargo space with other companies that are also procuring supplies from new suppliers. The tariffs could make the US plastic and chemical markets more vulnerable to weather disruptions because most of its production is concentrated along the Gulf Coast. This region of the US is vulnerable to hurricanes and, increasingly, to sub-freezing temperatures. Since 2021, the Gulf Coast has had spells of sub-freezing temperature every winter season. The region's plants were not designed to operate in such low temperatures, so they typically suffer from unplanned outages during the winter. Canadian material made US chemical and plastic supply chains more resilient by offering an alternative to Gulf Coast material. HOW CANADIAN TARIFFS COULD UNFOLDIf the US does pursue tariffs against Canada, it will likely do so under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, said Jacob Jensen, a data analyst for the American Action Forum (AAF), a think tank. The IEEPA allows the president to propose actions to address a severe national security threat. In the case of tariffs, immigration, fentanyl or both would be declared as national emergencies, and that would trigger IEEPA. Once the president notifies Congress through a letter or a speech, the tariffs could be imposed. Imposing tariffs under IEEPA would be a first for the US, Jensen said. It could also be long term. The average duration of an IEEPA order is nine years. They can be terminated by a vote in Congress. The US can impose tariffs under other laws, but the ones that Trump proposed for Canada do not meet the parameters under those regulations. Tariffs under Section 301 address unfair trade practices and require investigations. The US has not started such an investigation on Canadian trade practices. Tariffs under Section 232 cover specific products and are not broad-based like the ones Trump proposed against Canada. Tariffs under Section 201 are intended to provide temporary relief for a group of products or an industry. They are not broad-based. Tariffs under Section 122 have a limit of 15%. Tariffs under Section 338 have no precedence and could face court challenges. OTHER POTENTIAL TARIFFSSince winning the election, Trump also proposed tariffs of 25% on imports from Mexico and 10% on imports from China. During his campaign, Trump proposed the following tariffs: Baseline tariffs of 10-20% on all imports. Tariffs of 60% on imports from China. A reciprocal trade act, under which the US would match tariffs that other countries impose on its exports. Insight by Al Greenwood

30-Jan-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–European oxo-alcohols and derivatives markets have been slow to start up in the new year as familiar factors suppress consumption. Players were hoping for reasonable restocking activity this month, following the destocking period that took place in late Q4 2024, but spot activity has been below expectations for many players down the value chain. Oxo-alcohols and butyl acetate reporter Marion Boakye speaks to acrylate esters reporter Mathew Jolin-Beech and glycol ethers reporter Cameron Birch about conditions down the oxo-alcohols value chain.  

27-Jan-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Trades in Asia’s petrochemical markets have slowed down ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday, with a general oversupply in the region and the threat of US tariffs clouding the outlook in February. Some downstream plants start shutting down two weeks before the holiday Buyers mostly stay on sidelines while some suppliers raise prices Players cautiously optimistic over post-holiday demand Demand across oleochemicals, polyethylene (PE) film, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN) has softened as factories wind down or shut operations ahead of the Lunar New Year holidays. The Lunar New Year, which falls on 29 January, is celebrated in most parts of northeast and southeast Asia, with China on holiday from 28 January to 4 February. Uncertainty over US trade policy under Donald Trump’s administration, which expressed its intention to impose 10% tariffs on China from 1 February, has weighed on market sentiment going into and during the holiday. “China is slowing down ahead the Lunar New Year. Buying interest is low as market players are going away back to their hometowns,” said a source in the PE pipe grade market. A southeast Asia-based glycerine producer said: “We have not been getting any enquiries from China recently for glycerine, so we have been focusing on other regions.” Same conditions were observed in Vietnam, which is on holiday from 27 January to 3 February. Spot transactions were minimal in Asia, with trade discussions mostly deferred until after the holidays. MARKET ACTIVITY TO RESUME H2 FEB In the Asian recycling market, active trades may only resume when major exporters in China and Taiwan are back in the second half of February from a prolonged holiday. China and Taiwan have the largest exporters of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET), recycled polyethylene (rPE) and recycled polypropylene (rPP) pellets. Meanwhile, suppliers of PE pipe grade, titanium dioxide (TiO2), and caprolactam (capro), have either reduced spot supply or hiked prices before the holiday even though demand remains weak. In the TiO2 market, players deemed the price hike on 21 January was more in anticipation of some improvement in post-holiday demand. “I don’t expect many trades to happen before LNY [Lunar New Year]. Most buyers said they are covered,” one market player said. TRUMP WORRIES CONTINUE For capro, styrene monomer (SM) and monoethylene glycol (MEG), demand is expected to improve post-holiday on seasonal restocking or improved opportunities for Chinese exporters. However, uncertainties over US President Donald Trump’s trade policies, including potential 10% tariffs on Chinese products from 1 February, and oversupply in key markets are tempering optimism in the near term. In December 2024, ABS and SAN end-users ramped up production to frontload shipments of contractual volumes to the US ahead of Trump’s widely anticipated tariffs of as much as 60% on Chinese goods. This led to a marked increase in China’s styrenics exports for the month. Starting January, these end-use factories reduced their run rates, having met their contractual obligations, with some having shut their plants as early as last week. The pre-Lunar New Year period typically sets the stage for post-holiday recovery, when inventories are cleared and demand resumes. Market players were keeping a cautiously optimistic outlook on demand recovery. “Ethyl acetate (etac) inventories will rise [post-Lunar New Year holiday] with production, but [Chinese domestic] demand will remain weak in February,” said a China-based market source. All eyes are focused on how soon Trump will impose his promised tariffs, with actual market impact likely to be felt a month after the announcement, according to market players. Focus article by Jonathan Yee Additional reporting from Yvonne Shi, Izham Ahmad, Arianne Perez, Helen Yan, Angeline Soh, Seng Li Peng, Isaac Tan, Joson Ng, Tan Hwee Hwee, Luffy Wu, Yvonne Shi, Melanie Wee, Judith Wang Thumbnail image: At Qingdao Port in Shandong province, China, on 23 January 2025. (Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

27-Jan-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News Asia and the Middle East for the week ended 24 January. INSIGHT: Asia braces for Trump's trade upheaval By Nurluqman Suratman 20-Jan-25 12:00 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Asian policymakers are bracing for the return of Donald Trump, dubbed "Trump 2.0," with heightened concerns over increased trade tariffs, ahead of his inauguration as US president on 20 January. Oil prices mixed as Israel-Hamas ceasefire begins; supply concerns persist By Jonathan Yee 20-Jan-25 13:49 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Oil prices were mixed on Monday afternoon amid easing tensions in the Middle East as the Israel-Hamas ceasefire took effect on 19 January, although supply concerns remain amid US sanctions on Russia’s energy sector. Asia PV-grade EVA market firms on supply curbs in China, outlook mixed By Helen Lee 21-Jan-25 17:21 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–After a slow start to the new year, Asia’s photovoltaic (PV)-grade ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) prices rose for the first time since early December 2024 on revived demand for January and February shipments into the key China market. INSIGHT: Firming crude, plant outages provides support across Asia petchems in Jan By Jimmy Zhang 21-Jan-25 20:00 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–A substantial proportion of Asia petrochemical prices are expected to increase in January, with rising crude values providing the bulk of upward support early in the month, buoyed further by plant outages in some markets. Asia caustic soda pre-Lunar New Year supply may be crimped By Jonathan Chou 22-Jan-25 12:36 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Asia's liquid caustic soda supply conditions may be tighter than expected ahead of the upcoming major regional Lunar New Year holidays amid some regional producers’ turnarounds and the possibility of capped operating rates due to sluggish co-product conditions. Tonnage shortfall pulls back China solvent exports to Taiwan By Hwee Hwee Tan 23-Jan-25 10:52 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–An escalated trade spat has hindered regional tanker supply from adjusting in favor of changing petrochemical trade flows between China and Taiwan. Malaysia keeps key interest rate steady; steady GDP growth to be sustained in 2025 By Nurluqman Suratman 23-Jan-25 15:37 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Malaysia's central bank kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged on 22 January, amid expectations that the domestic economy will be able to sustain its growth momentum this year on manageable inflation levels. Gap between Asia rPET and PET prices stay wide despite recent gains By Arianne Perez 24-Jan-25 15:18 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Asian spot prices of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) remain substantially higher than virgin plastics despite the recent double-digit increase in spot PET prices.

27-Jan-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from east Asia and China to the US plunged this week, as did global average rates amid the typical slowdown around the Lunar New Year (LNY) holiday. Meanwhile, shipowners are out with surcharges on various trade lanes, which could support rates at current levels even with the slowdown in volumes. Global average rates fell by 11% according to supply chain advisors Drewry and as shown in the following chart. Rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles fell by 8%, while rates from Shanghai to New York fell by 7%, as shown in the following chart. Drewry expects spot rates to decrease slightly in the coming week on the back of the Chinese Lunar New Year holidays. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos also showed decreases, with a 10% fall from Asia to the West Coast and a 3% drop to the East Coast. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, said the lull around LNY is pressuring rates lower. CMA CGM has announced a congestion surcharge of $300/FEU originating from Callao and San Antonio to the US East Coast and US Gulf. Global shipping major Maersk announced peak season surcharges of $1,000 for all sizes of containers for shipments from Middle East countries to the US and Canada East Coast, effective 1 February. Hapag-Lloyd has announced peak season surcharges of $600/container from Chile to Asia. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. RETURN TO SUEZ CANAL NOT IMMINENT While the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas led to some optimism that transits through the Suez Canal could resume, passage of commercial vessels through the waterway are not imminent. Levine said there remains skepticism among shipping analysts that the Houthi rebels will refrain from attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea even during the first stage of the ceasefire. Negotiations on the second phase of the agreement are scheduled to begin on 5 February. Levine said ocean carriers do see the ceasefire as a promising first step, but only CMA CGM has said it will increase its use of the Suez Canal. Most carriers will not take the costly and complicated concrete steps to return to the Red Sea until they are confident that the route is and will remain safe. Many shippers and freight forwarded are also hesitant to change course. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said carriers will want assurance they have safe passage for crews and ships in the long term and that the situation will not suddenly deteriorate. PANAMA CANAL President Donald Trump surprised some when he said that the US should reclaim the Panama Canal. A US congressman has since introduced a bill that would authorize the purchase of the Panama Canal. The US is the largest user of the canal, with around 70% of all traffic heading to or coming from US ports. About 40% of US container traffic use the canal. The US relinquished control of the canal on 31 December 1999 in The Panama Canal Treaty, signed by then US President Jimmy Carter. Panamanian President Jose Raul Molino said the treaty, along with The Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, established the permanent neutrality of the Canal, guaranteeing its open and safe operation for all nations. The Panama Canal remains the primary route for trade between Asia and the US Gulf and East Coast. LIQUID TANKER RATES US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were largely stable week on week, with just the USG to Brazil trade lane seeing a slight increase on smaller volumes but overall unchanged. The market remained quiet this week, with COA volumes steady. For cargoes moving in and out of South America some space remains available, capping the gains seen on the week. Strong interest that was seen over the past two months is waning, which is likely to put additional pressure on freight rates. Volumes from the US continue to flow, but cargo moving into Asia is slowing because of the Lunar New Year holiday. However, monoethylene glycol (MEG) and ethanol entered the market for February loading. A different scenario is playing out on the transatlantic eastbound route where February loading space is already available for spot but on a limited basis. On the other hand, there seems to be a lot of interest on the USG to India trade lanes as there is a lot of lube oils interest for January with limited spot space remaining as owner await COA nominations. Several inquiries were seen for methanol, ethanol and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM). Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan

24-Jan-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–US President Donald Trump did not propose any new tariffs on his first day in office, but he did issue an executive order that calls for his administration to conduct the investigations needed to impose them under several sections of the law – in many cases, repeating the same playbook Trump used during his first term in office. While the investigations take place, the US can use the threat of possible tariffs to negotiate agreements. If the negotiations fail, the US would have taken the steps necessary to respond with tariffs. Trump did indicate that he is considering imposing tariffs on Canada and Mexico as early as 1 February. This could rely on using existing laws in unprecedented ways. The US chemical industry is vulnerable to tariffs because it has deficits in commodities such as benzene, melamine and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Its large exports of plastics make it vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs. TRUMP LAYS FOUNDATION FOR TARIFFSAmong the investigations that will be launched by Trump's executive order, those into national security could lead to Section 232 tariffs, which Trump imposed on steel during his first term. Discriminatory trade practices would open the door to Section 201 tariffs, which were imposed on washing machines and solar panels. Unfair trade practices could lead to Section 301 tariffs. The US imposed these against numerous Chinese imports. That unleashed a trade war, with China imposing retaliatory tariffs, many of which targeted US exports of plastics and chemicals. POSSIBLE NEW TARIFFSTrump's first-day order pointed to other reviews that his administration could complete faster and lead to new tariffs imposed under different sections of the law. These could fall under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA), Section 338 and Section 122. Trump's first-day order did not mention these specific laws, but it did mention national security, discriminatory actions against US products and balance of payment deficits – all issues that these laws were designed to address. These laws could allow Trump to impose tariffs on a faster schedule. The IEEPA only requires consultation with Congress, and Section 1222 can apparently be imposed unilaterally, according to the American Action Forum (AAF), a think tank. THREAT OF CANADIAN, MEXICAN TARIFFS ON 1 FEBRUARYTrump would need such speed if he were to impose 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico goods on 1 February, a possibility that he mentioned on Monday, according to CNBC and other publications. Drug trafficking and immigration could provide the national security basis needed under these laws. REVISITING THE PHASE 1 AGREEMENT WITH CHINATrump's first-day order called for a review of the Economic and Trade Agreement to determine if China is living up to its end of the deal. The agreement is more commonly known as the phase one deal, and the two countries signed it in January 2020. It included commitments by China to purchase more goods from the US; to adopt policies that will protect intellectual property; and to reduce pressure on companies to transfer technology. China has not fulfilled its import commitments under the agreement, and Trump's order said the country could impose additional tariffs in response. US CHEMS VULNERABLE TO TARIFFSUnless Trump carves out exceptions, his proposed tariffs on China and Mexico could raise costs for US chemical producers. Canada provides US refiners with heavier grades of oil that are not produced in sufficient quantities domestically for the nation's refineries. Canadian oil complements the light grades of oil that the US produces in abundance from its shale fields. Regional US markets may rely on Canadian imports because they are closer than the more distant sources along the US Gulf. Those customers will have to reroute their supply chains if they want to avoid tariffs. For the broader tariffs that Trump proposed in his campaign, they could prompt countries to impose retaliatory duties on US shipments of plastics and chemicals. The US is vulnerable to such tariffs because it has large surpluses of many plastics and chemicals, such as vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), methanol, ethylene glycols (EG), polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Tariffs on Chinese imports of rare earth materials would increase production costs for catalysts. Tariffs on fluorspar and hydrofluoric acid (HF) could increase costs for US producers of fluorochemicals and fluoropolymers. Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows cranes and containers, which make up important infrastructure used in international trade. Image by Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

21-Jan-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–India’s currency – the rupee – slumped to a record low in the week, pushing up both domestic and import prices of some petrochemicals in the south Asian country amid stable demand. Strong US dollar sends Indian rupee tumbling Acetone, EVA import prices jump India inflation within central bank target range The Indian rupee (Rs) is currently trading at above Rs86 against the US dollar, having shed more than 3% since the early November, when Donald Trump won the US election. At 07:10 GMT, the rupee was trading at Rs86.49. A strong US dollar and heavy outflows of short-term investments sent the currency tumbled to a record low of Rs86.9964 on 14 January, according to foreign exchange platform xe.com. India’s demand for overseas goods will likely be dented as a weaker currency makes imports more expensive. PETROCHEMICAL BUYERS TURN CAUTIOUS With import prices of several products on uptrend amid the rupee weakness, some buyers have adopted a wait-and-see attitude on markets. India is a major importer of petrochemicals including polymers. Rupee’s tumble has notably adversely affected PE Black 100 pipe import offers from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Asian sellers as buyers switch to domestic PE Natural. PE Black 100 and PE Natural are specific grades of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) used primarily for high pressure water pipes. In the recycled polyethylene (rPE) and recycled polypropylene (rPP) markets, downstream converters in India that import cargoes from northeast Asia are feeling the pinch. Fewer India-bound rPE and rPP cargoes are expected in the coming weeks, compounded by high intra-Asia freight rates. For exporters of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET), meanwhile, there was no upsurge in shipments despite the rupee’s weakness. India continues to position itself as net exporter of rPET cargoes,  mainly bound to long-haul buyers in the Americas and in Europe. India’s aggressive expansion of rPET materials have posed competition to other Asian producers, particularly those in southeast Asia. In the toluene di-isocyanate (TDI) and ethanolamines markets, market sentiment is mixed. “Import and domestic prices for India TDI are unchanged from last week, but sentiment is mixed due to positive demand versus the weak rupee/US dollar rate,” a market player said. TDI is primarily used in the production of flexible polyurethane foams, which are widely used in furniture, bedding, and automotive seating. Meanwhile, after several months of decline, ethanolamines’ domestic prices moved higher, with players attributing the sudden rebound on the steep devaluation of the rupee, while demand was stable. For ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and acetone, import and domestic prices have spiked while demand was stable. EVA restocking momentum and discussions have been weighed down by the falling rupee due to higher cost of imports, market players said. “I have not booked yet because of the currency depreciation; import costs have gone up so it has really impacted importers… we'll wait for negotiations with suppliers,” said a distributor. For acetone, fresh import demand is being hampered by the weak rupee amid a prevailing supply surplus in the Indian domestic market. US DOLLAR TO REMAIN STRONG The US dollar remains strong on better-than-expected job growth in the world’s largest economy, while the unemployment rate fell to 4.1%, reducing the chances of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in February. A weaker currency fuels inflation as it raises the cost of imported goods. “The RBI intervened extensively in the FX market last year but the appointment of a new central bank governor last month has raised market expectations of a less active intervention approach to smooth the rupee’s volatility,” Netherlands-based banking and financial service firm ING said in a note on 13 January. “The recent equity market correction, foreign institutional investor (FII) outflows and overvaluation of the Indian rupee suggest that the rupee will continue to face downward pressure in the near term,” ING added. DEC INFLATION EASES; NOV INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT UP 5% India’s inflation rate eased to a four-month low of 5.22% in December from 5.48% in the previous month, continuing its decline from 6.21% recorded in October, official data showed. The December figure was within the 2.0% to 6.0% tolerance band set by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Easing food prices had some analysts predicting a possible cut in RBI’s repurchase rate as early as February, but the weakness of the rupee could delay adoption of a looser monetary policy. “We maintain our base case for RBI to begin monetary policy easing via a 25 bps points reduction to the repo rate in the upcoming Feb 2025 … meeting,” Singapore-based UOB Global Economics & Markets Research analysts said in a 14 January macro note. Meanwhile, India’s factory output in November, as measured through the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), rose 5.2% year on year driven by growth in manufacturing activity and power generation. Manufacturing output growth in November accelerated to 5.8% year on year from 1.3% in the same period last year. In April to November 2025, industrial output posted a slower year-on-year growth of 4.1% from 6.5% in the previous corresponding period. India, which is a giant emerging market in Asia, is expected to post a slower GDP growth of 6.6% in the fiscal year ending March 2024, down from 7.2% in the previous year, based on RBI’s projections. Nonetheless, India is still predicted to be the fastest-growing country in Asia, according to ING, which forecasts 6.8% growth for India for the current fiscal year. Focus article by Jonathan Yee Additional reporting by Helen Lee, Clive Ong, Shannen Ng, Veena Pathare, Nadim Salamoun and Arianne Perez Thumbnail image: Indian rupee notes – 5 January 2025 (Firdous Nazir/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

16-Jan-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–HB Fuller plans to shut down nearly one-third of its plants globally and drastically reduce the number of warehouses it has in North America, the US-based adhesives producer said on Wednesday. When HB Fuller completes the shutdowns in its fiscal year of 2030, it will have 55 plants globally, down from 82, the company said. By the end of 2027, HB Fuller will have 10 warehouses in North America, down from 55. HB Fuller expects to cut annual pre-tax costs by $75 million/year by the time it completes the shutdowns. The company expects to spend $150 million over the next five years to shut down the sites. “Our manufacturing footprint consolidation, coupled with our planning and logistics reorganization, are important steps in our strategic plan to achieve an EBITDA margin consistently greater than 20%," said Celeste Mastin, CEO. "These actions will not only reduce costs through improved capacity utilization, they will also enable us to better serve our customers and reduce future capital expenditure requirements.” As an adhesives producer, HB Fuller's raw materials include tackifying resins, polymers, synthetic rubber, plasticizers, and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).

15-Jan-2025