Chemicals

HOUSTON (ICIS)–US-listed shares of chemical companies fell sharply on Friday and performed worse than the overall market following the growing conflict between Israel and Iran. Iranian missiles hit Tel Aviv in a retaliatory attack that reportedly caused injuries, according to the Wall Street Journal. Most of the missiles were intercepted or fell short, according to Reuters and the Wall Street Journal, which reported the Israeli military. Earlier, Israeli warplanes attacked multiple sites in Iran. Following news of the attacks, the major US stock indices followed by ICIS fell, but not as sharply as shares of chemical companies. The following table shows the major indices followed by ICIS. Index 13-Jun Change % Dow Jones Industrial Average 42,197.79 -769.83 -1.79% S&P 500 5,967.97 -68.29 -1.13% Dow Jones US Chemicals Index 832.55 -12.02 -1.42% S&P 500 Chemicals Industry Index 885.14 -15.59 -1.73% The following table shows the US-listed shares followed by ICIS. Name $ Current Price $ Change % Change AdvanSix 23.99 -0.49 -2.00% Avient 34.3 -1.42 -3.98% Axalta Coating Systems 28.79 -1.37 -4.54% Braskem 3.67 -0.07 -1.87% Chemours 10.98 -0.49 -4.27% Celanese 54.63 -2.24 -3.94% DuPont 66.87 -1.57 -2.29% Dow 29.9 -0.24 -0.80% Eastman 76.19 -1.93 -2.47% HB Fuller 54.16 -1.92 -3.42% Huntsman 10.9 -0.64 -5.55% Kronos Worldwide 6.23 -0.22 -3.41% LyondellBasell 60.1 -0.03 -0.05% Methanex 36 1.57 4.56% NewMarket 648.7 -6.24 -0.95% Olin 20.38 -0.67 -3.18% PPG 106.3 -5.73 -5.11% RPM International 108.08 -6.78 -5.90% Stepan 54.42 -1.26 -2.26% Sherwin-Williams 335.88 -20.32 -5.70% Tronox 5.56 -0.23 -3.97% Trinseo 3.4 0.02 0.59% Westlake 77.3 -1.32 -1.68% Methanex shares rose after it passed a regulatory milestone in its $2.05 billion purchase of the methanol business of OCI Global. Meanwhile, Brent and WTI crude futures both rose by nearly $4/bbl. US producers idled three oil drilling rigs, bringing the total to 439, the lowest figure since October 2021. EUROPEAN SHARES FELL EARLIER IN THE DAYEarlier, Europe chemicals stocks and equities markets fell in morning trading on Friday in the wake of Israel’s strikes across Iran, including nuclear facilities, with the prospect of additional attacks chilling sentiment. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed on Friday that Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment facility had been struck in the first salvo of strikes that also hit residential areas as part of attacks on military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, stated on Friday that strikes will continue “for as many days as it takes” to remove nuclear enrichment facilities, as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged the Iranian government not to respond. The IAEA noted on Thursday that Iran is potentially in breach of its non nuclear-proliferation agreements for the first time since the early 2000s, but Rafael Mariano Grossi, director general of the nuclear watchdog, attacked the strikes on Friday. “Nuclear facilities must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances,” he said, noting that there is presently no elevation at the Natanz site. MARKETS Oil prices soared in the wake of the strikes, with Brent crude futures jumping nearly $5/barrel on Friday to $74.31/barrel, the highest level since April, while WTI futures were trading at $73.15/barrel, the highest since January. Equities slumped as commodities surged, with Asia bourses universally closing in the red and all key European stock indices trading down in morning trading. The STOXX 600 chemicals index was trading down over 1% as of 10:30 BST, in line with general markets, with stock prices for a third of the 21 component companies down 2-3%. The hardest-hit were Fuchs, LANXESS and Umicore, which saw stocks fall 3.72%, 3.24% and 2.97% compared to Thursday’s close. The situation has also had a dramatic impact on fertilizers markets, with Iran a key global exporter of urea, and some contacts reporting disruption in Israel’s supply of gas to Egypt. SHIPPING Shipping could also face further disruption, with the UK’s Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) monitor publishing an advisory on Wednesday – before the start of the Israel  strikes – that increased Middle East military activity could impact on mariners. “Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution,” the watchdog said. Around 20% of global oil trade passes through along the Strait of Hormuz, and any move by Iran to block the route could have a huge impact on freight traffic that is still disrupted by firms avoiding the Red Sea in the wake of Houthi strikes. Activity in the Red Sea is understood to have subsided in recent weeks after a US-Houthi ceasefire but shipping firms remain leery of the route, and the attacks on Iran could further inflame tensions in the region. Higher risk and insurance price hikes could also drive shipping prices through the region steadily higher. The upward movement for shipping prices had showed signs of plateauing this week, with China-Europe and China-US route charge steady week on week as of 12 June after weeks of surges, according to Drewry Supply Chain Advisors. Some freight indices continued to climb, however, with the Baltic Exchange’s dry bulk sea freight index up 9.6% as of 12 June, the highest level since October 2024. Thumbnail image: Iran Tehran Israel Strike – 13 June 2025. Iran's IRIB state TV reported explosions in areas of the capital of Tehran and counties of Natanz, Khondab and Khorramabad. (Xinhua/Shutterstock) Additional reporting by Tom Brown

13-Jun-2025

Energy markets price in increased risk following Israeli strikes on Iran but impact on fundamentals limited Retaliation from Iran highly likely, strong response expected given Israeli attack severity But energy market participants cautious on longer-term escalation risks, citing regional examples of geopolitical tension with limited lasting price impact Brent crude would need to near $100/bbl for oil-linked LNG contracts to match current LNG spot market prices Unfolding situation further supports already bullish picture for coming months across energy markets In the early hours of 13 June, Israel launched a wave of attacks targeting Iran’s nuclear programme, with strikes on nuclear infrastructure as well as the killing of scientists and military figures. Iran’s foreign minister called the attacks a “declaration of war” and vowed to retaliate. ICIS experts share views on the potential next steps and the future impact across the energy complex.  Did the strike take energy markets by surprise? (Matthew Jones, Head of Power Analytics) An Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear capabilities has been a significant market risk for many months. Back in January, we predicted this occurrence in 2025. While there had not been much sign of an impending attack in the first few months of the year, there were reports in late May that Israel was preparing a move, while the US began to pull staff out of the Middle East on Tuesday 10 June, after news emerged that strikes could be imminent. The exact timing was not clear, but markets were aware of rapidly increasing risk. What price impact have we seen so far across the commodity complex? (Gemma Blundell-Doyle, Crude Market Reporter) Oil prices spiked by almost 10% on Friday morning, to their highest since January this year. Brent crude reached $78.48/barrel at 03:41 London time. At 14:30 it remained elevated at $74.33/barrel. (Rob Dalton, Senior Gas Market Reporter) European gas prices rose on Friday morning with the ICIS TTF front-month up 6% to €38.50 ($44.30)/MWh, a three-month high. (Anna Coulson, Senior Power Market Reporter) Bullish European gas supported power prices, with the German front month rising 2.2% from Thursday’s close to €82.75/MWh by 13:50 on Friday. (Ed Cox, Global LNG Editor) East Asian LNG (ICIS EAX) spot prices rose 8% on Friday to $13.43/MMBtu, the highest since March. Asian spot prices have been increasing since early June, in line with a firmer ICIS TTF. Global gas price forward curves 13 June 2025, Source: ICIS, CME Is the price impact risk-based, or have we seen a direct impact on fundamentals so far? (Gemma Blundell-Doyle) Oil fundamentals were on Friday afternoon unchanged. The National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said refining and storage facilities had not been damaged and continued to operate. (Rob Dalton) The immediate, price-driven response across the TTF was fuelled by rising risk premiums and speculative positioning, with particular concern surrounding the shutdown of Israel’s offshore gas fields. Market participants remain cautious about the longer-term risks of escalation, with many pointing to the 2024 Israel-Iran conflict as an example of geopolitical tension with limited lasting impact on pricing. (Ed Cox) No immediate fundamental LNG impact with outright spot LNG demand limited from key Asian buyers, partly due to market prices sitting well above oil-linked LNG contracts. LNG buyers closely monitor oil prices, which are still used to price most Asian LNG procurement. Most oil-linked contracts take a historic oil price of at least three months previous, so higher Brent today would impact LNG contracts later in the year. Brent would need to go closer to $100/bbl for oil-linked LNG contracts to match current LNG spot prices and to encourage buyers to switch to more spot offtake. ICIS understands that Egyptian fertilizer producers have already shut down at least three urea plants because of measures taken by Israel to temporarily halt gas production. Israel supplies over 30 million cubic metres/day of gas to Egypt, which already faces major supply shortages. Any extended reduction in Israeli gas supply could mean Egypt has to buy additional LNG cargoes to cover the shortage. Egypt has recently committed to buy what could be close to 10 million tonnes of LNG in 2025 and 2026 from a variety of sellers through large tenders. It may call on the market for additional cargoes which in turn could further support global spot prices. What next? (Matthew Jones) You could see different levels of response from Iran. The least consequential would be similar to the events of April 2024 playing out again, in which Iran fires missiles and drones at Israel, which shoots most of them down. Given Iran’s weak position this cannot be ruled out. But it seems more likely that Iran will attempt a stronger response given the severity of the Israeli attack. That could include attacks on targets in the Persian Gulf, including on tankers or oil refineries. Iran could conclude that creating energy market turbulence is the best way to get the US to restrain Israeli action. The most consequential response would be the closing of the Straits of Hormuz through which massive volumes of global oil and LNG travel. Such an event would have major bullish consequences for global energy markets but should be seen as low probability as Iran will be very reluctant to alienate key allies like China. It would also be physically very difficult for Iran to close the Strait even if it wanted to. (Ed Cox) For LNG, the narrative around a potential Straits of Hormuz closure will return, even if this would represent a major further escalation from Iran with little clarity on practical implementation. Almost 20% of global LNG production will pass through Hormuz from Qatar and the UAE in 2025 so the global LNG market will naturally focus closely on events. LNG and wider shipping flows via the nearby Suez Canal remain constrained due to the risk of attack and there is limited scope for a major impact on LNG shipping given the large number of new vessels coming to the market which is suppressing charter rates. But we should expect major LNG buyers to analyse current stocks and review emergency supply security plans in response to these events. Global LNG exports and share of trade using the Strait of Hormuz. Source: ICIS (Andreas Schroeder, Head of Gas Analytics) A wider Middle East conflict could have serious implications for Egyptian gas markets. The country has switched to becoming an importer of LNG since 2024 and is set to increase imports going forward. A major buy tender was issued recently. There is now talk of around 100-110 cargos needed overall in 2025 instead of the previously expected 60-70. We forecast 6.3 million tonnes of LNG imports, nearly tripling the 2.4 million tonnes of 2024. Egypt also receives LNG via pipeline from Jordan’s Aqaba import terminal, which imported 0.8 million tonnes in 2024. In addition, Israel is a major pipeline supplier to Egypt with around 10 bcm/year covering a fifth of Egyptian demand. Should a regional conflict escalate further, an extended stop of Israeli gas exports to Egypt could imply even stronger LNG intake into Egypt for the remainder of 2025. Egyptian LNG imports. Source: ICIS (Gemma) The US and Iran are set to meet in Oman on 15 June to continue ongoing nuclear talks. The Israeli strike on Iran will be on the agenda. US president Trump has urged Iran to make a deal regarding its nuclear programme and to prevent further attacks from Israel, bit it is unlikely Iran will concede without retaliation. Where could commodity prices go in coming days and weeks? (Ajay Parmar, Director, Energy & Refining) We expect Iran to retaliate and tensions to escalate further. This will likely cause oil prices to remain elevated for the coming weeks. If a resolution is found later this month, prices could begin to retreat, but for now, we see them remaining elevated in June and July as a result of this escalation. (Ed Cox) The TTF is ever more influenced by geopolitical events given Europe’s dependency on LNG imports. Often, TTF volatility does not match changes in regional gas fundamentals as traders are changing positions to consider wider macro views. It is possible the TTF could swing by 5-10% daily while uncertainty over further escalation continues. Even though oil pricing plays a limited role in European gas price formulation, it is likely the TTF would follow higher Brent in the context of an overall bullish energy market. (Rob Dalton) Even before recent developments, the near-term outlook for European gas markets had already tilted bullish due to a summer injection demand gap. An escalating conflict would heighten the risk of a broader move higher across the entire near curve, placing increased emphasis on refilling storage sites in the near term. How does the news impact your broader view of the current energy market complex? (Matthew Jones) We held a webinar on 12 June in which we presented a bullish view for the European energy commodity complex in H2 2025. We see significant upside risk to prices in the coming months, stemming from expectations for rising carbon prices, gas storage targets shifting volume risk to winter, the potential continuation of low wind speeds and fears over the return of stress corrosion issues at French reactors. The Israeli attack on Iran and the potential consequences we have outlined here further support that bullish picture for the coming months. (Ed Cox) From an LNG perspective, the fundamental outlook from Asia is not strong in the short term, largely due to weak economic performance from China. European gas looks more bullish. But the correlation between the TTF and Asian spot LNG is strong with the potential for prices in both markets to rise further on Middle East concerns, even if the immediate fundamental impact is focused on Israeli gas supply to Egypt.

13-Jun-2025

BARCELONA (ICIS)–The worst chemicals downturn in living memory is forcing ratings agencies to downgrade more companies,  raising fears of bankruptcies. Chemical company earnings have been bottom-of-cycle since 2023 Leverage (borrowing) is high compared to historical levels Low earnings increase pressure on leverage, raises risk of default Fitch has downgraded more chemical companies over last 12-18 months Extended trough in chemicals may lead to bankruptcies Operating rates have not recovered as they did after Global Financial Crisis Fitch expects gradual recovery from 2026 A lot more closures needed to rebalance market Ratings agencies look at company costs, strategies and compare to peers Diversification of geography and product helps manage risk In this Think Tank podcast, Will Beacham interviews Guillaume Daguerre who leads Europe chemicals for ratings agency Fitch, John Richardson from the ICIS market development team, ICIS Insight Editor Tom Brown and Paul Hodges, chairman of New Normal Consulting. Click here to register for the ICIS/European Association of Chemical Distributors (Fecc) distributors CEO round table on Monday 16 June. Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the presenter and interviewees, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS. ICIS is organising regular updates to help the industry understand current market trends. Register here . Read the latest issue of ICIS Chemical Business. Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson's ICIS blogs.

13-Jun-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–The EU's trade surplus fell in April from the previous month, driven down by a sharp decline in the chemicals sector. The EU’s April trade balance fell to €7.4 billion, down from €35.5 billion in March, official data showed on Friday. “This drop was primarily driven by the contraction of the chemicals sector surplus, which fell from €41.6 billion to €20.4 billion – a reduction of over 50%,” statistics agency Eurostat said in a statement. Source: Eurostat In the eurozone, the trade surplus fell in April to €9.9 billion, down from €37.3 billion in March. Chemicals almost halved to €22.1 billion from €42.8 billion. On a year-on-year basis, the April trade surplus was lower in both blocs but by a lesser magnitude, attributed to declines in the machineries and vehicles sector. The EU chemicals trade balance was slightly higher in April, increasing to €20.4 billion from €19.5 billion in the same month of 2024. Source: Eurostat Prices for Europe chemicals fell in April on weak demand and uncertainty over US trade tariffs.

13-Jun-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Europe chemicals stocks and equities markets fell in morning trading on Friday in the wake of Israel’s missile strikes across Iran, including nuclear facilities, with the prospect of additional attacks chilling sentiment. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed on Friday that Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment facility had been struck in the first salvo of strikes that also hit residential areas as part of attacks on military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, stated on Friday that strikes will continue “for as many days as it takes” to remove nuclear enrichment facilities, as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged the Iranian government not to respond. The IAEA noted on Thursday that Iran is potentially in breach of its non nuclear-proliferation agreements for the first time since the early 2000s, but Rafael Mariano Grossi, director general of the nuclear watchdog, attacked the strikes on Friday. “Nuclear facilities must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances,” he said, noting that there is presently no elevation at the Natanz site. MARKETS Oil prices soared in the wake of the strikes, with Brent crude futures jumping nearly $5/barrel on Friday to $74.31/barrel, the highest level since April, while WTI futures were trading at $73.15/barrel, the highest since January. Equities slumped as commodities surged, with Asia bourses universally closing in the red and all key European stock indices trading down in morning trading. The STOXX 600 chemicals index was trading down over 1% as of 10:30 BST, in line with general markets, with stock prices for a third of the 21 component companies down 2-3%. The hardest-hit were Fuchs, LANXESS and Umicore, which saw stocks fall 3.72%, 3.24% and 2.97% compared to Thursday’s close. The situation has also had a dramatic impact on fertilizers markets, with Iran a key global exporter of urea, and some contacts reporting disruption in Israel’s supply of gas to Egypt. SHIPPING Shipping could also face further disruption, with the UK’s Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) monitor publishing an advisory on Wednesday – before the start of the Israel  strikes – that increased Middle East military activity could impact on mariners. “Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution,” the watchdog said. Around 20% of global oil trade passes through along the Strait of Hormuz, and any move by Iran to block the route could have a huge impact on freight traffic that is still disrupted by firms avoiding the Red Sea in the wake of Houthi strikes. Activity in the Red Sea is understood to have subsided in recent weeks after a US-Houthi ceasefire but shipping firms remain leery of the route, and the attacks on Iran could further inflame tensions in the region. Higher risk and insurance price hikes could also drive shipping prices through the region steadily higher. The upward movement for shipping prices had showed signs of plateauing this week, with China-Europe and China-US route charge steady week on week as of 12 June after weeks of surges, according to Drewry Supply Chain Advisors. Some freight indices continued to climb, however, with the Baltic Exchange’s dry bulk sea freight index up 9.6% as of 12 June, the highest level since October 2024. Focus article by Tom Brown Thumbnail image: Iran Tehran Israel Strike – 13 June 2025. Iran's IRIB state TV reported explosions in areas of the capital of Tehran and counties of Natanz, Khondab and Khorramabad. (Xinhua/Shutterstock)

13-Jun-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–After two years of decline, Germany’s GDP could start growing again in 2025, economic research institutes said on Thursday. Although the trade and tariff conflicts are still weighing on export demand, billions of euros of planned government spending on infrastructure and defense would start supporting growth, they said. “Leading indicators support our view that, after two years of contraction, the industrial sector has reached the trough, albeit at a low level,” said Stefan Kooths, head of forecasting at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel). The recovery would be largely driven by domestic factors, with private consumption and corporate investment picking up after a two-year drought, he said. IfW Kiel noted that “significantly greater fiscal room” for the new federal government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz should help drive growth. Germany recently amended its constitution to enable more debt-financed spending. IfW Kiel revised its GDP growth forecast for Europe’s largest economy to 0.3% for 2025, from its previous expectation of zero growth, and for 2026 it expects GDP growth of 1.6%. However, it warned that the “erratic” US tariff policy was fueling uncertainty for Germany’s foreign trade. In addition, German exporters were hampered by “significantly reduced competitiveness”, it said. Another institute, ifo Munich, now forecasts 0.3% GDP growth in 2025, up from its earlier 0.2% projection, and it predicts 1.5% growth for 2026, up from its previous 0.8% assessment. After reaching its low point in the winter, Germany’s economy is now set for a “growth spurt”, partly driven by the government fiscal measures, ifo said. However, like IfW Kiel, ifo warned of the risks posed by US trade policies. The US import tariffs already imposed – and assuming they remain at the current level – would impact Germany’s economic growth by 0.1 percentage points in 2025 and 0.3 percentage points in 2026, ifo said. If a US-EU trade agreement is reached, growth in Germany could be higher, whereas an escalation could lead to a renewed recession, ifo said. A third institute, the Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), said if the US does not escalate its trade conflicts further, Germany’s GDP could grow by 0.4% in 2025, up from IWH’s previous 0.1% growth forecast. IWH also noted that the slow licensing for exports of rare earths from China has led to a shortage that is threatening production in parts of Germany’s manufacturing industry. In Germany’s chemical industry, producers’ trade group VCI currently expects chemical production (excluding pharmaceuticals) to fall by 2.0% this year. Please also visit US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy Thumbnail photo of Chancellor Friedrich Merz (Source: Christian Democratic Union party)

12-Jun-2025

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (ICIS)–Chemical companies can find more ways to grow profits beyond cost cutting as they enter another year of slow economic growth in the longest downturn in years. Early in 2025, chemical companies lost faith that economic growth will be strong enough to contribute to profit growth, and that drought could extend into 2026. A five-year global chemical buyer value study conducted by the consultancy Accenture shows areas where chemical companies can wring value out of their operations that go beyond cost-cutting. The study was conducted in December 2024-February 2025. Cost cutting is not off the table. The study found that chemical companies have overestimated their customers' preferences for some products and services. MULTI-YEAR DOWNTURNThe downturn in the chemical industry started about three years ago after consumers stopped splurging on big-ticket items following the pandemic. Higher inflation caused interest rates to increased, which raised house prices and depressed demand for plastics and chemicals used in construction. Consumers moved less because they could not afford new or existing houses, so that lowered demand for durable goods like furniture and appliances. The war between Russia and Ukraine caused a surge in energy costs. In Europe energy prices never returned to levels before the conflict. Higher costs lowered demand and contributed to de-industrialization in Europe. This year, tariffs and uncertain trade policy from the US have made companies and consumers more reluctant to purchase goods and make investments. The performance of US-listed shares of chemical companies illustrates how difficult these past few years have been for the industry. The following lists Wednesday’s closing prices for the US listed companies followed by ICIS and their 52-week highs. Figures are in dollars/share. Company Price 52 Week High AdvanSix 24.81 33.00 Avient 36.06 54.68 Axalta 30.29 41.66 Braskem 3.75 7.71 Chemours 11.87 25.80 Celanese 58.19 150.31 DuPont 69.40 90.06 Dow 30.68 57.22 Eastman 80.04 114.50 HB Fuller 56.58 87.67 Huntsman 12.04 25.12 Kronos 6.73 14.37 LyondellBasell 61.12 100.46 Methanex 35.05 54.49 NewMarket 667.15 667.15 Olin 21.80 52.17 PPG 113.01 137.24 RPM 115.11 141.79 Stepan 56.53 94.77 Sherwin-Williams 357.13 400.42 Tronox 6.01 20.29 Trinseo 3.39 7.05 Westlake 80.19 156.64 For now, a recession is not in the outlook, but neither is a strong recovery. ICIS expects that US economic growth will slow to 1.5% in 2025 from 2.8% in 2024. Growth in 2026 could be 1.7%. The country has a 34% chance of slipping into a recession in the next 12 months. HOW TO GROW IN A SLOW GROWTH WORLDChemical companies don't have to wait for the recovery to increase profits, according to the chemical buyer study from Accenture. It found that 36% of chemical customers are willing to pay 5% or more above market price if their needs are fully met, and 43% are willing to buy 10% or more if all of their product and service needs are met, the study said. Chemical companies can increase revenue if they know where to look. The following table shows the top 10 customer needs for 2025, according to the Accenture study. Product Performance Reliable Delivery Quality Technical Support Product Consistency Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Secure & Seamless Transactions Trust Product Innovation Brand Strength Product Offerings Source: Accenture Making high-quality molecules will always be a priority, but chemical companies can do a better job of meeting their customers' needs by targeting services, Accenture said. Many underestimated needs cited by customers centered around services. The following table lists the top 10 services valued by chemical customers. Reliable delivery Quality technical support Data privacy and cybersecurity Secure and seamless transactions 24/7 access Order flexibility Complaint resolution Easy access to product info. & regulatory support E-commerce Comprehensive product support & expert guidance Source: Accenture New technologies are opening more opportunities for chemical companies to stand out by improving their services. Accenture mentioned the following: AI-based transport management solutions E-commerce platforms for seamless transactions Web portals and large language model-supported platforms for 24/7 access. CUSTOMER NEEDS HAVE EVOLVED SINCE 2020Chemical companies can extract more value by updating their priorities to keep up with the changing demands from their customers. The following table lists the top five needs that customers are underestimated by chemical companies. It compares those needs with Accenture's list from 2020. 2025 2020 24/7 access Packaging customization Reliable delivery Reliable delivery Product consistency Water conservation Environmental health & safety compliance Complaint resolution Product innovation Digital interfaces & experiences/chatbots Source: Accenture HOW TO CUT THE RIGHT COSTSCompanies may still have some fat they can cut, based on the Accenture study. It showed a gap between what customers want and what chemical companies think they want. The following lists the top five overestimated needs by chemical companies in 2025 and compares them with those in 2020. 2025 2020 Renewable-based products Value-added services Market intelligence Product consistency Product customization Quality technical support Value-added services Product sampling/trails Local/regional supply source Recyclable products Source: Accenture Renewable-based products, which also covers recycled materials, can demand a premium, but it may fall short of what producers need to generate a profit. While 74% of chemical customers are willing to pay more for sustainable products, only 38% are willing to pay a premium of more than 5%, according to Accenture. Only 13% are willing to pay a premium of at least 15%. That is short of the premium of 20% that is likely to be needed to produce sustainable products. HOW CAN CHEMICAL COMPANIES GET ON THE SAME PAGE AS THEIR CUSTOMERSChemical companies have a tendency to focus on innovation even when it does not align with their customers' needs, because that is the nature of a science-based industry, said Denise Dignam, CEO of Chemours, a US-based producer of pigment and fluoromaterials. She spoke on a panel that discussed the findings of Accenture's study during the annual meeting held by the American Chemistry Council (ACC). “We are scientists. We like innovation," she said. Chemical companies need to be mindful that customers value mundane but critical services like supply chain logistics. One strategy to keep customer needs front and center is to rely on front-line sales people, said Alastair Port, executive president of Indorama Ventures: Indovinya. Port cautioned against relying too heavily on point-of-time surveys. Someone who fills out those surveys is providing feedback that is tied to one moment in time. It does not encompass overall satisfaction with the company's products and services. Ed Sparks, CEO of catalyst producer WR Grace, said technical resources and sales people are the best resources for gauging the actual needs of customers. Their collect data from their interactions with customers, convert it into information that can then become market intelligence. Companies that produce commodity chemicals can find ways to stand out even when their products vary little from their competitors, Port said. Buyers of commodity chemicals vary greatly in size. Smaller ones may not have innovation departments or elaborate purchasing departments. Commodity chemical producers can tailor their services to match the needs of their varied customers. Chemical producers can replicate molecules, but they cannot replicate service, Sparks said. WR Grace's refining catalyst business has a prominent service component, under which the company helps refiners optimize their operations. “That service component is really hard to replicate,” Sparks said. The ACC Annual Meeting ended on 4 June. Insight article by Al Greenwood Thumbnail shows money. Image by ICIS.

12-Jun-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–UK GDP fell in April following growth the previous month, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) announced on Thursday. Monthly GDP fell by 0.3%, following a 0.2% rise in March, although rose by 0.7% in the three months to April, compared with the three months to January. This followed 0.7% growth in the first quarter. Both the fall in output for April and the wider trend of growth were driven by activity in the services sector, falling 0.4% on the previous month, but rising by 0.6% over the three-month period. Overall production fell by 0.6% in April, driven by a decline in manufacturing, but also rose by 1.1% in the three months to April. This was reflected in output for the chemicals industry, which tracked a 0.13 percentage point (pp) decline for the month, but rose by 0.11pps over the past three months. In contrast, production of rubber and plastics products rose by 0.04pps for both periods. Sentiment has been clouded in the second quarter, due to the possibility of tariffs rolled out from the US. In the wake of US president Donald Trump’s Liberation Day announcement on 2 April, the UK has managed to secure a trade deal with the US, the EU, and other trading partners. The impact of new terms has not yet been felt in the market, and wider global macroeconomic conditions remain unclear.

12-Jun-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Researchers at Colorado State University’s Weather and Climate Research department maintained their prediction of an above-average Atlantic hurricane season, with a probability that 33% of major storms could make landfall in the US Gulf. The CSU team predicts 17 named storms during the Atlantic hurricane season, which began on 1 June and runs through 30 November. Of those 17 storms, researchers forecast nine to become hurricanes and four to reach major hurricane strength of Category 3 or higher. Hurricanes are rated using the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, numbered from 1 to 5, based on a hurricane’s maximum sustained wind speeds, with a Category 5 storm being the strongest. Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale Category Wind speed 1 74-95 miles/hour 2 96-110 miles/hour 3 111-129 miles/hour 4 130-156 miles/hour 5 157+ miles/hour While still very early in the season, researchers said it is showing characteristics as seen in 1996, 1999, 2008, 2011, and 2021. In 1996, there were six major hurricanes, which was the most since 1950, but none entered the US Gulf. In 1999, five storms reached Category 4, with none threatening the US Gulf. Storms in both years made landfall on the US East Coast in North Carolina. Hurricane Ike, one of five major hurricanes in 2008, made landfall in Galveston near the entrance to the Houston Ship Channel, causing chemical plants and refineries in the region to struggle to restart. Hurricane Irene was the only hurricane to make landfall in 2011, striking near Cape Lookout, North Carolina. It was one of seven hurricanes that season, of which four became major hurricanes. In 2021, there were 21 named storms with seven becoming hurricanes, four of which were major storms and several entered the US Gulf. Hurricane Ida was the most destructive, making landfall in Louisiana and leading to many plant shutdowns. The report also includes the following probability of major hurricanes making landfall in 2025: 51% for the entire US coastline (average from 1880–2020 is 43%) 26% for the US East Coast, including the Florida peninsula (average from 1880–2020 is 21%) 33% for the US Gulf Coast from the Florida panhandle westward to Brownsville, Texas (average from 1880–2020 is 27%) 56% for the Caribbean (average from 1880–2020 is 47% Hurricanes directly affect the chemical industry because plants and refineries shut down in preparation for the storms, and they sometimes remain down because of damage. Power outages can last for days or weeks. Hurricanes shut down ports, railroads and highways, which can prevent operating plants from receiving feedstock or shipping out products. Most US petrochemical plants and refineries are on the Gulf Coast states of Texas and Louisiana, making them prone to hurricanes. Other plants and refineries are scattered farther east in the states of Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida – a peninsula that is also a hub for phosphate production and fertilizer logistics. Additional reporting by Al Greenwood

11-Jun-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–ADNOC Logistics & Services (ADNOC L&S) on Wednesday said that it has entered into a $531-million strategic partnership with polyolefins major Borouge to boost UAE’s production and export of petrochemicals. As part of the partnership, Borouge has awarded ADNOC L&S a 15-year contract to manage logistics on up to 70% of its annual production, "which will increase significantly following the completion of the Borouge 4 plant expansion", ADNOC L&S said in a filing on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). ADNOC L&S is a unit of Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC), which holds a 54% stake in Borouge. Borouge operates an integrated polyolefin complex at Al Ruwais Industrial City in Abu Dhabi. "As Borouge plans to ramp up production capacity by 1.4 million tonnes/year by the end of 2026 through its Borouge 4 mega project, Borouge will become the world’s largest single-site polyolefin complex," it said. The agreement covers port management, container handling, and feeder container ship services for the Borouge container terminal in Al Ruwais Industrial City. ADNOC L&S will deploy a minimum of two dedicated container feeder ships to transport Borouge’s products from Al Ruwais to the deepwater ports of Jebel Ali in Dubai and Khalifa Port in Abu Dhabi. "The mutually beneficial service agreement will deliver a minimum guaranteed value of $531m, supporting the next phase of Borouge’s accelerated growth plans, driving operational cost savings over the full contract term," it said. The deal could lead to more than $50 million in cost savings and efficiencies for Borouge in the first five years alone enhancing the company’s supply chain network, the company added. ADNOC L&S’ integrated logistics capabilities include managing container terminal operations, feeder services, and logistics solutions to meet increasing global demand. Borouge is involved in an upcoming merger with Austria's Borealis and Canadian producer Nova Chemicals which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2026.

11-Jun-2025