Mixed plastic waste and pyrolysis oil

UPDATE: China retaliates with 15% tariff on US LNG SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China has announced a 15% tariff to be imposed on coal and LNG imports from the United States as a retaliation to US trade tariffs, the country’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement. “In accordance with the Tariff Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Customs Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Foreign Trade Law of the People’s Republic of China and other laws and regulations and the basic principles of international law, and with the approval of the State Council, additional tariffs will be imposed on some imported goods originating from the United States starting from 10 February 2025.” A 10% tariff will also be imposed on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and a score of other products. US president Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to talk this week on trade and other issues. The US has imposed 10% tariffs on Chinese goods starting 4 February. “This will drive even more US volumes into Europe, and leave portfolio players with suboptimal logistical flows,” said Saul Kavonic, oil and gas analyst with research firm MST Marquee. “Chinese buyers will pay the tariffs, so will be trying to minimize the US volumes they take contractually, and swap that out for non-US volumes. This benefits other regional producers such as Australia, who will be seen as relatively more reliable after this. “The negative impact on US LNG from these tariffs will only partly offset the strong appetite from other buyers to procure more US LNG under pressure from Trump to rebalance trade deficits. The tariffs will create material market inefficiencies, which will benefit some LNG traders in the regions. It may push prices higher everywhere on the margin, as flows become suboptimal.” CHINA IMPORTS China imported 4.4 million tonnes of LNG from the United States in 2024, ICIS data shows, out of a total of 79.24 million tonnes. If the tariff is enforced and stays beyond the upcoming negotiations expected this week between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, importers could optimize the US-based positions by diverting them elsewhere. However, the imposition of tariffs on energy by the Chinese government fundamentally means higher energy costs for the country, which increases the cost of industrial production and inflationary pressure. The growing tensions in the commercial relationship between the countries could also equate to reluctance by Chinese buyers to commit to new long-term positions with US-based suppliers. Political tensions with the US could turn Chinese buyers to alternative sources of LNG and pipeline gas, including Russia. The move is the latest in a series of tariff exchanges that so far have involved Canada and Mexico in addition to China. The market anticipates that the next wave of tariffs could target members of the European Union. EU states are unlikely to impose retaliatory tariffs on imported energy, as the cost of gas is already growing following the halt of Russian pipeline gas supplies to the region. Roman Kazmin

04-Feb-2025

MUMBAI (ICIS)–India is set to roll out a 20% ethanol-blended (E20) fuel mandate by March – about nine months ahead of schedule – as there will be enough availability of the environment-friendly additive in the domestic market without endangering sugar production. 2.5% price hike for C-heavy molasses to deter feedstock diversion away from sugar Rice feedstock prices reduced to boost production Auto companies to soon launch 100% ethanol vehicles For the year ending October 2025, the Indian government has approved on 29 January a 2.5% hike in the procurement price of ethanol made from C-heavy molasses, which contain the least sugar among three types of available sugarcane feedstock. India’s ethanol supply year (ESY) is from November to October. The price adjustment acts as an incentive for producers to use the C-heavy feedstock to make ethanol, instead of the A and B molasses that typically go into sugar production. Domestic oil manufacturing companies (OMC) such as Indian Oil Corp (IOC), Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd (BPCL) will now have to pay a higher price for ethanol made from C-heavy molasses. The government-determined ethanol price was last revised in November 2022. Meanwhile, to further encourage ethanol production, the government on17 January 2025 reduced the price of rice feedstock by more than 24% to Rs22.50/kilogram (kg) amid a surplus. Rice and maize are alternative feedstocks for ethanol production. This decision has helped to make ethanol produced from rice feedstock more economically viable, Grain Ethanol Manufacturers Association (GEMA) treasurer Abhinav Singal said. The government had banned the use of rice as feedstock for ethanol production from July 2023 to August 2024. Notwithstanding the lifting of the ban, ethanol producers were still finding rice prices too high to make production economically viable. “Stability in feed prices will boost ethanol production from rice. The earlier rate was unviable for the units,” Singal said. Nearly 65% of the ethanol produced in the country is sourced from sugarcane while the remaining 35% comes from grains, including maize and rice. India will achieve 20% blending of ethanol in gasoline in the next two months and will soon be able to blend more than 20% ethanol in gasoline if the need arises, India’s petroleum and natural gas minister Hardeep Singh Puri said at the Auto Expo 2025 on 21 January. In 2023-24, there was a phased roll-out of 20% ethanol in select outlets across the country, with full implementation initially targeted by 2030. The target full implementation was brought forward to 2025-26 as ethanol availability is now assured following a series of measures taken over the past two years, industry sources said. “We have increased ethanol blending in fuel from 1.5% per cent in 2014 to 10% in May 2022, which was well ahead of the November 2022 deadline and now the target of 20% blending has also moved forward significantly,” he added. “Our current distillation capacity, which is at about 16.83 billion litres, is projected to cross 17 billion litres, and will leave us with ample opportunity to blend beyond 20%,” he added. India achieved ethanol blending of 18.2% in gasoline in December 2024, official data show. The government is currently working on a plan to bring down retail prices of ethanol for use as fuel in vehicles with flexible fuel engines, India’s road transport and highways minister Nitin Gadkari said at the Sugar-Ethanol and Bio Energy India Conference on 30 January. Around nine companies in India will soon be launching cars and two-wheelers that run on 100% ethanol, he added. Major automobile manufacturers, including Mahindra & Mahindra, Toyota, Hyundai, and Tata, will introduce 100% ethanol-powered vehicles over the next five months, with two-wheeler makers also adopting the technology, he said. Focus article by Priya Jestin ($1 = Rs87.08)

04-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China has imposed a 15% tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the US, and a 10% tariff on US crude oil and heavy machinery, effective 10 February. The retaliatory tariffs were announced by China’s State Council on the day that the US’ additional 10% tariffs on Chinese goods took effect. “The unilateral imposition of tariffs by the US side seriously violates the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and is not only not conducive to solving its own problems, but also undermines the normal economic and trade cooperation between China and the United States,” it said in a statement on Tuesday.

04-Feb-2025

Correction: In the ICIS story headlined “INSIGHT: US tariffs unleash higher costs to nation's chem industry” dated 3 February 2025, the wrong volumes were used for the following imports: Canadian ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms; Canadian polypropylene, in primary forms; Canadian mixed xylene isomers; Mexican polypropylene, in primary forms; and Mexican cyclohexane. The US did not import cyclohexane from Mexico in 2023. A corrected story follows. HOUSTON (ICIS)–The tariffs that the US will impose on all imports from Canada, Mexico and China will unleash higher costs for the nation's chemical industry, create supply-chain snarls and open it to retaliation. For Canada, the US will impose 10% tariffs on imports of energy and 25% tariffs on all other imports. For Mexico, the US imposed 25% tariffs on all imports but the countries' presidents said on Monday the tariffs are being paused for a month. For China, the US will impose 10% tariffs on all imports. US IMPORTS LARGE AMOUNTS OF PE FROM CANADAUS petrochemical production is concentrated along its Gulf Coast, which is far from many of its manufacturing hubs in the northeastern and midwestern parts of the country. As a result, individual states import large amounts of polyethylene (PE) from Canada – even though the nation as a whole has a large surplus of the material. Even Texas imports large amounts of PE from Canada – despite its abundance of plants that produce the polymer. In addition, polyester plants in North and South Carolina import large amounts of the feedstocks monoethylene glycol (MEG) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) from Canada. The US as a whole imports significant amounts of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) from Canada – again, despite its surplus of these plastics. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Canada in 2023. The products are organized by their harmonized tariff schedule (HTS) code. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 kilograms 1,319,817,405 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 1,088,071,523 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 420,561,390 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 407,710,439 2905.31.00 Ethylene Glycol kilograms 329,542,378 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 271,201,880 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 188,800,413 2902.44.00 Mixed xylene isomers liters 746,072 2905.12.00 Propan-1-ol (Propyl alcohol) and Propan-2-ol (isopropyl alcohol) kilograms 87,805,095 3901.30.60 Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers kilograms 71,372,396 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM MEXICOMexico is not as large of a source of US petrochemical imports as Canada, but shipments from the country are still noteworthy. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Mexico in 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 69,230,708 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 34,674,435 2915.24.00 Acetic anhydride kilograms 25,294,318 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 24,005,371 2915.31.00 Ethyl acetate kilograms 18,855,544 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 14,469,582 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 8,849,478 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM CHINAChina remains a significant source for a couple of noteworthy chemicals despite the effects of the tariffs that US President Donald Trump imposed during his first term in office. The following table shows 2023 US imports from China. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 29152100 Acetic acid kilograms 21,095,566 39093100 Poly(methylene phenyl isocyanate) (crude MDI, polymeric MDI) kilograms 206,642,886 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) China's shipments of plastics goods are more significant. OIL TARIFFS WILL HIT US REFINERSCanada and Mexico are the largest sources of imported crude oil in the US, and the heavier grades from these countries complement the lighter grades that the US produces in abundance. Those imports help fill out refining units that process heavier crude fractions, such as hydrocrackers, cokers, base oil units and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units. Refiners cannot swap out heavier Canadian and Mexican grades with lighter US grades. Instead, they will need to pay the tariffs or find another supplier of heavier grades, possibly at a higher cost. The following table shows the largest sources of imported crude in 2023. Figures are listed in thousands of barrels/day. COUNTRY IMPORTS % Canada 3,885 59.9 Mexico 733 11.3 Saudi Arabia 349 5.4 Iraq 213 3.3 Colombia 202 3.1 Total US imports 6,489 Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA) US refiners could take another hit from higher catalyst costs. These are made from rare earth elements, and China remains a key source. TARIFFS TO RAISE COSTS FOR FERTILIZERCanada is the world's largest producer of potash, and it exports massive amounts to the US. It is unclear how the US could find another source. Russia and Belarus are the world's second and third largest potash producers. Together, the three accounted for 65.9% of global potash production in 2023, according to the Canadian government. Canada accounts for significant shares of other US imports of fertilizers. The following table lists some of Canada's fertilizer shipments to the US in 2023 and shows its share of total US imports. Figures are from 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUME % 31042000 Potassium chloride metric tonne 11850925 88.8 31023000 Ammonium nitrate, whether or not in aqueous solution metric tonne 295438 76.6 31024000 Mixtures of ammonium nitrate with calcium carbonate or other inorganic nonfertilizing substances metric tonne 29203 75.7 31055100 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing nitrates and phosphates metric tonne 1580 66.1 31022100 Ammonium sulfate metric tonne 947140 49.6 31052000 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing the three fertilizing elements nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium metric tonne 147850 41.4 Source: US ITC SUPPLY CHAIN SNARLSIf US companies choose to avoid the tariffs and seek other suppliers, they could be exposed to delays and supply chain constraints. Other companies outside of the petrochemical, plastic and fertilizer industries will also be seeking new suppliers. The scale of these disruptions could be significant because Canada, Mexico and China are the largest trading partners in the US. The following table lists the top 10 US trading partners in 2023 based on combined imports and exports. Country Total Exports ($) General Imports ($) TOTAL Mexico 322,742,472,406 475,215,965,697 797,958,438,103 Canada 354,355,997,349 418,618,659,183 772,974,656,532 China 147,777,767,493 426,885,009,750 574,662,777,243 Germany 76,697,761,127 159,272,068,221 235,969,829,348 Japan 75,683,130,214 147,238,042,342 222,921,172,556 South Korea 65,056,093,590 116,154,470,335 181,210,563,925 UK 74,315,228,810 64,217,031,774 138,532,260,584 Taiwan 39,956,725,574 87,767,403,487 127,724,129,061 Vietnam 9,842,922,146 114,426,076,081 124,268,998,227 Source: US ITC RETALIATIONUS petrochemical exports would be tempting targets for retaliation because of their magnitude and the global capacity glut. China, in particular, could impose tariffs on US chemical imports and offset the disruptions by increasing rates at under-utilized plants. So far, none announced plans to target chemicals on Sunday. Canada's plans to impose 25% tariffs on $30 billion in US goods does not include oil, refined products, chemicals or plastics. That batch of tariffs will take place on February 4. Canada will impose 25% tariffs on an additional $125 billion worth of US goods following a 21-day comment period, it said. The government did not highlight plastics or chemicals in this second batch of tariffs. Instead, it said the tariffs will cover passenger vehicles and trucks, including electric vehicles, steel and aluminium products, certain fruits and vegetables, aerospace products, beef, pork, dairy, trucks and buses, recreational vehicles and recreational boats. In a statement issued on Sunday, Mexico's president made no mention of retaliatory tariffs. Instead, she said she will provide more details about Mexico's response on Monday. China said it will start legal proceedings through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and take corresponding countermeasures. RATIONALE BEHIND THE TARIFFSThe US imposed the tariffs under the nation's International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president authority to take actions to address a severe national security threat. In a fact sheet, Trump cited illegal immigration and illicit drugs. Saturday's executive order is the first time that a US president imposed tariffs under IEEPA. Prior IEEPA actions lasted an average of nine years. They can be terminated by a vote in Congress. Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows containers, in which goods are commonly shipped. Image by Shutterstock)

03-Feb-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News from the week ended 31 January. Colombia accepts US terms for migrants’ deportations, fends off 25% tariff threat Colombia became over the weekend the first Latin American country to get a taste of President Donald Trump’s immigration policy mixed with unconventional diplomacy after the country refused landing to two flights with repatriated Colombian migrants. INSIGHT: US tariffs of 25% on Mexico and Canada would cause massive hit to GDP – ICIS analysis Proposed US tariffs of 25% on all imports from Mexico and Canada would have a massive negative impact to the GDP of the exporting countries and slow US GDP growth as well, according to the ICIS economist. Brazil’s chemicals to slow in 2025 amid currency, fiscal deficit woes – Activas CEO Brazil’s chemicals distribution sector posted healthy activity in 2024 as manufacturing finally gained traction, but conditions are set to worsen in 2025 amid high inflation, high borrowing costs, and a government too prone to spend, according to the CEO at Brazilian chemicals distributor Activas. Dow to face margin pressure in Q1 with no help from macros – execs Dow expects to face sales and margin pressures in Q1 2025 with no improvement in the macro outlook following a difficult Q4, senior executives said. LyondellBasell confident on Q1 PE price gains on cracker downtime, lack of new capacity – execs LyondellBasell expects to see price improvement in North America polyethylene (PE) in Q1 on industry cracker outages and lack of new local capacity starting up, along with higher demand through 2025.

03-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Abu Dhabi Chemicals Derivatives Co (TA’ZIZ) said on Monday it has awarded South Korea’s engineering firm Samsung E&A a $1.7 billion contract to build the first methanol plant in the UAE, which is slated to be completed in 2028. The plant, to be built in Al Ruwais Industrial City in western Abu Dhabi, will have a capacity of 1.8 million tonnes/year, TA’ZIZ said in a statement posted on the website of its parent firm Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC). TA’ZIZ is a joint venture (JV) between ADNOC and sovereign wealth fund ADQ. Samsung A&E was formerly known as Samsung Engineering. “The [methanol] plant will enhance the UAE’s position as a leader in sustainable chemicals production and strengthen TA’ZIZ’s role in enabling ADNOC’s global ambition to lead the chemicals sector,” TA’ZIZ CEO Mashal Saoud Al Kindi said. The company said that the plant will be "powered by clean energy from the grid, making it one of the world’s most energy-efficient methanol plants". Set up in 2020 to develop industrial projects and diversify the economy away from oil in the UAE, TA'ZIZ is expected to produce 4.7 million tonnes/year of chemicals by 2028 in its initial phase, including methanol, low-carbon ammonia, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene dichloride (EDC), vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), and caustic soda. Several of these chemicals will be produced for the first time in the UAE. ADNOC is moving in the specialty chemical space as part of its growth. On 1 February, ADNOC announced that it is in talks with Austrian petrochemical firm OMV to acquire Canada's Nova Chemicals from Mubadala, another Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund. If the acquisition goes through, a new global polyolefins group combining Nova Chemicals, Borealis, and Borouge will be formed, it said. Borealis is a 75:25 joint venture between OMV and ADNOC, while Borouge is jointly owned by ADNOC (54%) and Borealis (36%).

03-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Oil prices jumped while shares of petrochemical firms in Asia tumbled on Monday, after US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico. Canada, Mexico vow to retaliate against US tariffs China warns of unspecified countermeasures Trade war jitters send Asian bourses tumbling Trump signed on 1 February executive orders on the tariffs, firing the first shots of a potential new trade war, just days into his presidency. Prices in $/bbl as of 06:12 GMT) Latest Previous Change Brent April 76.41 75.67 0.74 WTI March 73.94 72.53 1.41 US WTI crude rose by more than $1/barrel amid fears of a disruption in crude supply from two of the US' largest suppliers – Canada and Mexico. Effective 4 February, the US will apply a 25% duty on goods from the two countries, while a 10% levy applies on Chinese goods. Following the announcement, Canada and Mexico declared their intentions to retaliate against the tariffs, while China pledged to challenge the US tariffs at the World Trade Organization (WTO). For the Canadian energy sector, the Trump administration decided to impose a tariff of only 10%. Canada is a key supplier of crude oil to the US, with the US importing around 4 million barrels/day from Canada or 61% of total imports. This crude oil is a heavier crude, on which many US refineries are configured to run on, particularly in the midwestern region of the country, according to Dutch banking and financial information services provider ING. “Given the importance of Canadian oil to the US, it is not surprising to see that WTI is trading stronger this morning,” ING said. In a statement on 1 February, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) president and CEO Chet Thompson said: "American refiners depend on Canadian and Mexican crude oil to produce the affordable, reliable fuels consumers need every day." “We are hopeful a resolution can be quickly reached with our North American neighbors so that crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals are removed from the tariff schedule before consumers feel the impact.” ING said: “More broadly, an escalation in trade tensions is not supportive for risk assets with it souring sentiment and raising concerns over the impact it could have on global growth, which means the strength in crude oil prices may be short-lived.” “The strength in the US dollar will also likely provide some headwinds not just for oil but the broader commodities complex.” The dollar index, which measures the strength of the US dollar against six major global currencies, rose to 109.60 in early trading on Monday, up from 108.370 in the previous session. The stronger US dollar saw the Indian rupee (Rs) plunging to a record low of Rs87.1450 on Monday, breaching the Rs87-per US dollar mark for the first time. Since October last year, the rupee has lost nearly 4% of its value. Japan’s yen (Y) was more resilient, losing 0.2% to Y155.53 per US dollar. EYES ON CHINA Apart from filing a complaint with the WTO, China's commerce ministry announced that it would take unspecified countermeasures to US’ fresh tariffs. No immediate tariffs were announced as the world's second-biggest economy is in the middle of its Lunar New Year holiday, with its markets due to re-open on 5 February after an eight-day break. “Seeing that the tariff hike is with an additional 10%, which is relatively small – don’t forget that tariffs against Chinese goods entering the US have been in place for the last 7 years – we expect that the initial retaliation from China's side is likely to be mild,” ING said. “We do feel that if pushed into a corner, China's retaliation could be stronger than what most expect, but at this stage we haven't reached that point yet,” it added. “Overall, the path to avoid a more destructive US-China trade war is a narrow one.” ING expects “a very modest impact on China’s growth” from Trump’s initial move. In 2024, China’s exports to the US grew by 4.9% to $524 billion, bringing its trade surplus with the US to $360 billion, partly due to some front loading of exports toward the end of the year ahead of promised US tariffs, according to ING. “Another 10% tariff will further squeeze low margin exports to the US and likely will price out a portion of exports,” ING said. “The more vulnerable sectors will likely be those with easy replacements, such as textiles and certain electronics and machinery goods.” Separately, the 25% tariff hike on Mexico will disrupt one of China's primary export re-routing channels, according to ING. As a result, China may redirect exports to alternative markets, such as ASEAN and Latin American countries, if the US tariffs on Mexican goods remain or escalate, it said. “China is likely to focus on boosting trade ties with other countries to help offset a more protectionist US,” ING added. Trade war jitters sent bourses in Asia tumbling along with shares of petrochemical firms on Monday. At 06:00 GMT, Japan's Mitsui Chemicals and Asahi Kasei was down 2.96% and 3.17% in Tokyo, respectively, while South Korean producer LG Chem slumped by 6.53% in Seoul. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 index was 2.0% lower at 38,686.96, while South Korea's KOSPI fell by 2.80% at 2,446.46. Taiwan’s Formosa Petrochemical Corp fell by 6.00% in Taipei, while Thailand producer PTT Global Chemical was 2.33% lower in Bangkok. On the first trading day after the Lunar New Year holidays, Taiwan's benchmark TAIEX slumped by 3.56% to 22,689.05, while South Korea's key KOSPI fell nearly 3.00% at 2,443.10. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index fell by 1.07% to 20,008.78, while Japan's bellwether Nikkei 225 was down by 2.75% at 38,485.37. Focus article by Nurluqman Suratman (updates stock and oil prices, adds details throughout) Thumbnail image: At Qingdao Port in Shandong province, China on 29 January 2025. (Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

03-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Oil prices surged, while shares of petrochemical firms in Asia tumbled on Monday after US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico. Trump signed on 1 February executive orders on the tariffs, firing the first shots of a potential new trade war, just days into his presidency. US crude rose by more than $1/barrel amid fears of a disruption in crude supply from two of the US' largest suppliers – Canada and Mexico. Product Latest Previous Change Brent April 76.30 75.67 0.63 WTI March 73.87 72.53 1.34 Canada and Mexico supply around a quarter of the crude oil processed by US refiners, primarily for production of fuels such as gasoline and heating oil, according to the US Department of Energy. Effective 4 February, the US will apply a 25% duty on goods from the two countries, while a 10% levy applies on Chinese goods. Energy products from Canada will be hit with a 10% duty, but Mexican energy imports will be charged the full 25%. Canada and Mexico announced their own plans for retaliatory tariffs on the US. China’s Ministry of Commerce said on 2 February that it will file a complaint against the US at the World Trade Organization (WTO), as well as take necessary countermeasures to safeguard its interest. Markets in China remain closed on 3-4 February for the Lunar New Year holidays and will re-open on 5 February. Trade war jitters sent bourses in Asia tumbling along with shares of petrochemical firms on Monday. At 01:30 GMT, Japan's Mitsui Chemicals and Asahi Kasei was down 2.11% and 2.08% in Tokyo, respectively, while South Korean producer LG Chemfell by 5.05% in Seoul. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 index was 2.24% lower at 38,686.96 while South Korea's KOSPI fell by 2.80% at 2,446.46. Thumbnail image: At Qingdao port in Shandong province, China on 29 January 2025. (Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

03-Feb-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Senior editor for recycling Matt Tudball discusses the latest developments in the European recycled polyethylene terephthalate (R-PET) market, including: Colourless, mixed coloured flake sellers raise offers for February Italian bale prices rise again European Commission members may face grilling on regulation at Petcore Annual Conference in Brussels on 4-5 February

31-Jan-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Customers in several US states closer to Canada than its Gulf Coast petrochemical hubs import large amounts of plastics and chemicals from the country, including materials that the US produces in abundance, and these shipments could soon become subject to tariffs totalling hundreds of millions of dollars. US President Donald Trump has said he could announce on February 1 tariffs of up to 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. Even though the US has large surpluses of many plastics and chemicals, domestic companies still import large amounts of these materials from Canada. These customers face the prospects of higher tariffs from Canadian imports or potentially higher shipping costs from suppliers that are farther away. CANADIAN EXPORTS TO NORTHERN STATESUS plastics and chemicals production is concentrated on the Gulf Coast in the south, which is far from the manufacturing and plastic processing hubs in Michigan, Illinois and Ohio in the north. These and other northern US states are much closer to Canada's petrochemical plants in Sarnia, Ontario province, than they are to the Gulf Coast. The following table shows various plastics and chemicals that Canadian exported in 2023 to Michigan, Illinois and Ohio. The bottom row shows how much customers from each state would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these 2023 exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description Michigan (tonnes) Illinois (tonnes) Ohio (tonnes) 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 30,403 41,967 59,908 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 125,693 66,493 85,328 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 163,543 155,042 88,793 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 6,232 122,970 20,694 3901.30.00 Ethyl vinyl acetate copolymer 55 55,012 2,526 2905.31.00 Ethylene glycol 5 152,746 8,634 Total tariff bill $119,027,186 $243,701,358 $103,054,090 Source: Statistics Canada CANADIAN IMPORTS FROM THE CAROLINASNorth and South Carolina are also large destinations for Canadian exports. These states are home to auto plants as well as facilities that make polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which uses monoethylene glycol (MEG) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) as feedstocks. The following table shows 2023 shipments made to these states. The bottom row shows how much customers would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description South Carolina (tonnes) North Carolina (tonnes) 3904.10.00 PVC, not mixed with any other substances 428 134,433 2905.31.00 Ethylene glycol 66,973 2,731 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts 102,162 162,505 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 25,379 13,076 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 79,301 30,278 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 98,070 40,879 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 38,763 1,033 Total tariff bill $168,380,231 $166,512,281 Source: Statistics Canada Even though Texas is home to many plastics and chemical plants, it is still a destination for a large amount of plastic exports from Canada. The following table shows 2023 shipments made to Texas. The bottom row shows how much customers would pay if a 25% tariff was levied on the total value of these exports. Export figures are in tonnes. HTS Code Description Texas (tonnes) 3901.10.00 PE having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 62,300 3901.20.00 PE having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more 189,247 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers 185,610 3902.10.00 Polypropylene 21,315 Total tariff bill $145,297,714 Source: Statistics Canada CONSEQUENCES OF TARIFFSWhether the US proposes the tariffs on February 1 is still up in the air. Trump has used the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tool in the past, as he did against Mexico during his first term and against Colombia earlier this month. In both cases, the US reached agreements with the countries without imposing the tariffs. If the US does impose the tariffs, customers could pay the additional tax, or they could find another supplier. For states closer to Canada, new suppliers could increase shipping times and costs. If the tariffs are broad enough, customers will be competing for cargo space with other companies that are also procuring supplies from new suppliers. The tariffs could make the US plastic and chemical markets more vulnerable to weather disruptions because most of its production is concentrated along the Gulf Coast. This region of the US is vulnerable to hurricanes and, increasingly, to sub-freezing temperatures. Since 2021, the Gulf Coast has had spells of sub-freezing temperature every winter season. The region's plants were not designed to operate in such low temperatures, so they typically suffer from unplanned outages during the winter. Canadian material made US chemical and plastic supply chains more resilient by offering an alternative to Gulf Coast material. HOW CANADIAN TARIFFS COULD UNFOLDIf the US does pursue tariffs against Canada, it will likely do so under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977, said Jacob Jensen, a data analyst for the American Action Forum (AAF), a think tank. The IEEPA allows the president to propose actions to address a severe national security threat. In the case of tariffs, immigration, fentanyl or both would be declared as national emergencies, and that would trigger IEEPA. Once the president notifies Congress through a letter or a speech, the tariffs could be imposed. Imposing tariffs under IEEPA would be a first for the US, Jensen said. It could also be long term. The average duration of an IEEPA order is nine years. They can be terminated by a vote in Congress. The US can impose tariffs under other laws, but the ones that Trump proposed for Canada do not meet the parameters under those regulations. Tariffs under Section 301 address unfair trade practices and require investigations. The US has not started such an investigation on Canadian trade practices. Tariffs under Section 232 cover specific products and are not broad-based like the ones Trump proposed against Canada. Tariffs under Section 201 are intended to provide temporary relief for a group of products or an industry. They are not broad-based. Tariffs under Section 122 have a limit of 15%. Tariffs under Section 338 have no precedence and could face court challenges. OTHER POTENTIAL TARIFFSSince winning the election, Trump also proposed tariffs of 25% on imports from Mexico and 10% on imports from China. During his campaign, Trump proposed the following tariffs: Baseline tariffs of 10-20% on all imports. Tariffs of 60% on imports from China. A reciprocal trade act, under which the US would match tariffs that other countries impose on its exports. Insight by Al Greenwood

30-Jan-2025