Titanium dioxide (TiO2)

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from southeast Asia and Vietnam have risen above rates from China to the US as tariffs – and a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs – are already shifting global trade patterns. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said he is now seeing the shifting global trade patterns caused by the tariffs play out in ocean freight rates. “Falling demand out of China has coincided with shippers rushing imports out of Vietnam, which is subject to a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs,” Sand said. “Seeing the relationship between these two trades turn on its head is an early indication of the potential for tariffs to shift global trade on its axis.” Sand, using Xeneta data, said importing into the US West Coast from China was more expensive than importing from Vietnam on 16 March. But by 25 April, Vietnam has become the more expensive of the two trades, as shown in the following chart. In another example, the spread in rates between China and southeast Asia trades into US West Coast has widened from $7/FEU (40-foot equivalent unit) on 31 March to $181/FEU on 25 April (with southeast Asia the more expensive). “As shippers stopped or slowed exports from China due to the tariffs, they have accelerated exports from southeast Asia countries, which has caused the spread in freight rates on these trades to widen,” Sand said. AVERAGE GLOBAL RATES TICK LOWER Average global container rates edged lower by 2% week on week, accord to supply chain advisors Drewry and as shown in the following chart. Drewry expects rates to continue to decline in the coming week due to uncertainty stemming from reciprocal tariffs. Blank sailings have surged again this week as carriers strive to maintain rates or at least stop the slide. Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, said the impact of the trade war has led shippers to pause, or outright cancel, shipments. “This in turn reduces demand for capacity on container vessels, to which carriers respond by cancelling sailings,” Murphy said. Murphy said this level of escalation in blanked capacity illustrates a dramatic change in the market. “Partly from the perspective of the magnitude of the blank sailings, which are more akin to what we tend to see seasonally following Chinese New Year in January/February and Chinese Golden Week in October,” Murphy said. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos also fell over the week, with rates to both US coasts down by 5%. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, said some vessels are leaving China only half full because of canceled orders. Levine said some retailers have inventory from front-loading deliveries over the past few months and are taking a wait-and-see approach. PORT CHARGES TARGETING CHINA-LINKED SHIPS Levine said revised guidelines from the US Trade Representative (USTR) targeting China’s dominance in the maritime industry should not lead to the significant port call omissions and congestion that many feared would result from the original per port call proposal. Market intelligence group Linerlytica said that although port fees on Chinese operated and Chinese-built ships are retained, carriers will be able to circumvent the fees by swapping out all of the affected ships in the next 180 days as the fee will no longer apply on the operators’ fleet composition or prospective orders but only on ships calling at US ports on a per voyage basis. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES HOLD STEADY US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were steady this week with rates remaining unchanged from last week despite rates continuing to be pressured downward for several trade lanes. There is downward pressure on rates along the USG-Asia trade lane as charterers are still in wait-and-see mode, and besides contract of affreightment (COA) cargoes there is very little seen in the market. The tariffs and uncertainty continue to dampen the spot market, weighing on rates. The usual spot cargoes of methanol from Jose to China are the only ones reported, leaving methanol requirements from the region active to Asia. Similarly, rates from the USG to ARA and all other trade lanes also held steady. The spot market to Europe gained momentum with a relatively good number of inquiries following the Easter holidays.  Despite the increased interest rates remain unchanged as the clean petroleum products (CPP) market continues to remain soft, leaving those vessels to participate in the chemical sector. From the USG to Brazil, this trade lane had seen more inquiries, but there is plenty of available space for May lending downward pressure to spot rates and leaving most owners still trying to fill up prompt part space to both South American coasts for 1H May. Rates are soft and have lost some ground. The USG to India route has seen an uptick in inquiries over the last week with no confirmed fixtures. Market talk of a trade deal between the US and India have sparked some interest leaving the rates flat for the time being and expected to remain unchanged in the near term. With additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

25-Apr-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Newly announced port fees by the US Trade Representative (USTR) are less substantial than the proposal from February, but a shipping analyst expects vessel supply to decrease and rates to climb on certain routes. Theodor Gerrard-Anderson, chemical freight analyst at Lighthouse Chartering, said that most bulk liquid shipowners will not be affected by the USTR’s final plan for port fees on China-linked vessels, but major Chinese operators will see impacts from Annex I. And despite exemptions in Annex II, Gerrard-Anderson anticipates tighter vessel supply and higher rates for vessels transiting the US Gulf. Annexes I and II from the USTR’s final plan are the applicable sections for the bulk liquid transportation market. The effects from Annex I, which focuses on service fees on Chinese vessel operators and vessel owners of China, will be impacted as many of these owners have established a meaningful presence in the US market and maintain large contract of affreightment (COA) portfolios for trading specialty chems and bulk liquid cargoes, Gerrard-Anderson said. Annex II, which essentially impacts the rest of the bulk liquid transportation market, includes exemptions for tankers less than 80,000 deadweight tonnage (DWT) even if they are built in China, and for ships on short sea trades of less than 2,000 nautical miles. Special purpose-built vessels for the transport of chemical substances in bulk liquid forms will not be charged. Another exemption, designed to help maintain US exports, is that ships arriving ballast will not be charged to ensure tonnage is available for export. Analysts at shipping broker NETCO said that most vessels in their segment are exempt under Annex II. On the container shipping side, the softening of the fee structure reduces the risk of severe port congestion and could ease overall upward pressure on freight rates, according to an analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta. Emily Stausbøll, Xeneta senior shipping analyst, said it is significant that the final proposal has fees levied on a net tonnage basis per US voyage, rather than cumulative fees for every port the ship calls at. "We must look carefully at the potential impact of the revised port fees, but changes will be welcomed by the ocean container shipping industry given the significant criticism levelled at the initial proposal during the public hearing,” Stausbøll said. “The fact fees will not be imposed on every port call is particularly important because it lowers the risk of congestion had carriers decided to cut the number of calls on each service into the US,” Stausbøll said. “This port congestion had the potential to cause severe disruption and upward pressure on freight rates.” Stausbøll said costs could still be very high for Chinese carriers and carriers operating Chinese-built vessels – particularly for ships with the largest capacity. "The latest announcement should still be viewed in the context of the original proposal, which offered dire consequences,” Stausbøll said. “The situation has changed for the better, but it isn't a great victory for the ocean container shipping industry because these fees still add further pressure at a time when businesses are already trying to navigate the spiraling tariffs announced by the Trump Administration." Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks.

18-Apr-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US is taking steps that could lead to tariffs on imports of up to 50 critical minerals, many of which are used to make catalysts for key processes used by refiners and chemical producers. If the US ends up imposing the tariffs on the critical minerals, then they would take the place of the reciprocal tariffs. REFINING CATALYSTS AND AROMATICS MARKETSFluorspar is used to make hydrofluoric acid, a catalyst used in alkylation units. These units convert isobutane and propylene into alkylate, a high-octane blendstock. Cerium and lanthanum are used to make catalysts for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units. These units convert gas oils into gasoline and refinery grade propylene (RGP). If the US imposes tariffs on these catalysts and if the tariffs cause large enough price increases, then refiners could alter their operations to reduce their costs. If refiners lower alkylation operating rates, they may rely on other high-octane blendstock such as toluene or mixed xylenes (MX). Changes in alkylation and FCC rates would concurrently affect supply and demand for RGP. ANTIMONY AND PETChinese restrictions on antimony already have led producers to propose price increases for polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which relies on the mineral as a catalyst. If the US imposes tariffs on antimony, then it would further increase prices from the other countries that export the mineral to the US. BISMUTH AND POLYURETHANESBismuth is used as a catalyst for making polyurethanes. One such bismuth-based catalyst won an innovation award. OTHER CATALYSTSIridium, neodymium, rhodium, ruthenium, ytterbium and yttrium are all used to make catalysts, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). Palladium and platinum are used in catalytic converters in automobiles. TIO2 AND PAINTS MARKETSThe US also considers titanium and zirconium as critical minerals. It is unclear if the US would impose tariffs on titanium metal or titanium oxide. However, the US list of critical minerals implies that the tariffs could include titanium oxide. Titanium oxide is the feedstock that is used to make titanium dioxide (TiO2), a white pigment that is used to make paints opaque. Producers of paints and coatings are already facing higher costs from US tariffs on steel. In 2023, Sherwin-Williams estimates that plastic and metal containers made up 15% of its product's costs. A tariff on titanium oxide would further increase costs for paints and coatings producers. Zirconium is a byproduct of processing mineral sands that contain titanium. TiO2 producers Tronox and Chemours operate such mines. Tronox's are in Australia and South Africa, and Chemours has mines in the US states of Florida and Georgia. FLUORSPAR AND FLUOROMATERIALSFluorspar is also the upstream feedstock for fluorochemicals and fluoropolymers. Polyurethane foams use fluorochemicals as blowing agents. Fluoropolymers include Teflon. These are becoming increasingly important in 5G equipment, semiconductor fabrication plants and lithium-ion batteries. Fluoropolymers are also used as membranes in hydrogen fuel cells and chlor-alkali plants. BARITE, CESIUM USED IN OIL PRODUCTIONBarite is used to make drilling mud. Cesium is used to make cesium formate drilling fluids, which are used by oil and gas producers. FLAME RETARDANTSAluminum and antimony are used to make flame retardants. INVESTIGATION TO PRECEDE ANY TARIFFSBefore the US imposes any tariffs on critical minerals, it will conduct an investigation under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The US has used that section to impose tariffs on other products such as steel and aluminium. The scope of the investigation will include the 50 minerals deemed critical by the USGS, processed critical minerals and derivative products. Derivative products include semi-finished goods and final products "such as permanent magnets, motors, electric vehicles, batteries, smartphones, microprocessors, radar systems, wind turbines and their components and advanced optical devices", according to the order. The secretary of commerce will have 180 days to submit a final report of the investigation to the president. Recommendations will include tariffs and policies the US could adopt that would promote more production of critical minerals. LIST OF CRITICAL MINERALSThe following table shows the minerals that the US considers critical. Aluminium Magnesium Antimony Manganese Arsenic Neodymium Barite Nickel Beryllium Niobium Bismuth Palladium Cerium Platinum Cesium Praseodymium Chromium Rhodium Cobalt Rubidium Dysprosium Ruthenium Erbium Samarium Europium Scandium Fluorspar Tantalum Gadolinium Tellurium Gallium Terbium Germanium Thulium Graphite Tin Hafnium Titanium Holmium Tungsten Indium Vanadium Iridium Ytterbium Lanthanum Yttrium Lithium Zinc Lutetium Zirconium Source: USGS Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows a fuel pump that dispenses gasoline, which relies on critical minerals for production. Image by Shutterstock.)

17-Apr-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Container throughput from China’s main ports fell by 6.1% over the past week and cargo bookings over the next three weeks are projected to be down by 30-60% in China and by 10-20% in the rest of Asia as the trade war intensifies. Market intelligence group Linerlytica said the Labor Day holiday in China will further dampen cargo demand in May which could force carriers to cancel additional sailings over the coming weeks to slow the decline in cargo rates. US President Donald Trump initiated the trade war by imposing tariffs with the goal of strengthening supply chains and bringing back domestic manufacturing that has increasingly moved overseas. Lars Jensen, president of consulting firm Vespucci Maritime, noted a survey from television news channel CNBC that showed the effort may be futile. According to the survey, most respondents said bringing back supply chains could double the costs, leading most to instead search for new sources of material from low-tariff countries. More than half of respondents said the main impediment to reshoring is high costs, while 21% said finding skilled labor was the top reason. Instead of moving supply chains back to the United States, 61% of respondents said it would be more cost-effective to relocate supply chains to lower-tariffed countries. ASIA-US CONTAINER RATES Average rates rose last week, reversing the trend that saw prices for shipping containers fall steadily from July 2024. Linerlytica said that three transpacific services have been withdrawn this year, with the MSC Mustang and Premier Alliance PN4 both withdrawn even before they were launched while TS Line’s AWC2 deployed small 1,700 TEU (20-foot equivalent unit) ships on irregular schedules. “These tentative capacity cuts have done little to restore market balance with further turbulence ahead,” Linerlytica said. Linerlytica said that recent tariff concessions are likely insufficient to restore transpacific volumes with about 30-40% of transpacific container imports still effectively halted by the tariffs that remain in place. The trade war is principally affecting carriers with the largest exposure to Chinese transpacific exports to the US, with Hede (100%), Matson (90%), SeaLead (82%), TS Lines (80%) and COSCO (71%) being most at risk from the immediate fallout. The following chart shows transpacific liftings by carrier for this year. Meanwhile, US container imports surged over the first three months of the year as retailers pulled forward volumes to get ahead of the tariffs. But the Global Port Tracker from the NRF and Hackett Associates is predicting import cargo at the nation’s major container ports to drop dramatically beginning next month, as shown in the following chart. “Imports during the second half of 2025 are now expected to be down at least 20% year over year,” Hackett Associates Founder Ben Hackett said. “Even balanced against elevated levels earlier this year, that could bring total 2025 cargo volume to a net decline of 15% or more unless the situation changes.” Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks.

15-Apr-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–New energy storage plays a crucial role in ensuring power balance in China, especially in effectively addressing the intermittent issues of new energy generation. It helps alleviate the dual pressures of power supply security and consumption. China new energy storage capacity more than double by 2030 China new energy storage capacity at 73.76 million kW/168 million kWh by the end of 2024 Policy support accelerates rapid development of new energy storage By fully considering market and price factors, it can achieve a win-win situation of ensuring power balance and profitability. The new energy storage market in China has great development potential in the future. The cumulative installed capacity of new energy storage in China is expected to exceed 100 gigawatts (GW) by 2025, according to the Energy Storage Industry Research White Paper 2025 released by the Institute of Engineering Thermophysics on 10 April. The capacity is likely to surpass 200GW by 2030, more than double the 2024 level of 73.76GW. NEW ENERGY GENERATION CAPACITY EXCEEDS COAL POWER FOR FIRST TIME China's "dual carbon" goals, announced in September 2020, aim to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. As the "dual carbon" goals approach, China's power structure is continuously evolving towards cleaner energy, with the proportion of non-fossil energy, especially new energy, steadily increasing. The total wind and solar power generation in 2024 increased by 20% to 1,288.4 billion kilowatt hours (kWh), according to data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). As of February 2025, the installed capacity of wind and solar power totalled 1.45 billion kW, surpassing coal power for the first time to become the largest power source in China. This achievement came nearly six years ahead of the 2030 target of 1.2 billion kW for wind and power generation installed capacity. The national new energy utilization rate was 96.3% as of December 2024, according to data from the State Grid Energy Research Institute released at the 3rd China Energy Storage Conference and Exhibition in end-March. NEW ENERGY GENERATION AND STORAGE AS KEY SUPPORT FOR POWER SUPPLY Due to the randomness and volatility of new energy generation output, coupled with the integration of a large number of power electronic devices into the grid, the operation of power system faces challenges such as supply stability and consumption. New energy generation combined with new energy storage will provide key support for power supply. In terms of ensuring supply, new energy generation has insufficient output capacity during peak power load periods. The balancing capacity of wind power is 5-15%, while the balancing capacity of solar power during the evening peak is almost 0, data from the State Grid Energy Research Institute showed. During consecutive days of no sunlight and no winds, the prolonged low output of new energy may lead to temporary power shortages. On the consumption side, the growth of new energy installed capacity will continue to maintain a rapid growth momentum, surpassing the growth rate of system regulation capacity. Hence the utilization rate of new energy is expected to be on a downward trend in the future. The total installed capacity of power generation nationwide will exceed 3.6 billion kW in 2025, with an additional new energy generation installed capacity of over 200 million kW, according to the National Energy Administration's Energy Work Guidelines for 2025, released in February. Additionally, changes due to technical characteristics present new challenges to the operational risks of the power system. New energy storage features fast regulation speed and the ability to charge and discharge, providing regulation capabilities in both time and space scales. Through the innovative application of grid-forming energy storage, it is an important solution to the many challenges of large-scale integration of new energy. POLICY SUPPORT ACCELERATES RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ENERGY STORAGE Governments at national and local levels have introduced policies in areas such as ancillary services, demand response, and direct subsidies to encourage the strategic development of new energy storage. The Energy Law of the People's Republic of China, promulgated in November 2024, proposed the rational layout and active, orderly development and construction of pumped storage power stations. It also promotes the high-quality development of new energy storage and emphasizes the regulatory role of various types of energy storage in the power system. The National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration (NEA) jointly issued the Notice on Deepening Market-oriented Reform of New Energy Grid-connected Electricity Prices and Promoting High-quality Development of New Energy on 27 January 2025, marking the formal establishment of a dual-driven mechanism of policy and market for the energy storage industry. The configuration of energy storage should not be used as a prerequisite for the approval, grid connection, and grid access of new energy projects, which will fully leverage the decisive role of the market in resource allocation and facilitate the formation of a more mature and comprehensive business model for energy storage, the notice stated. At the local level, governments of 18 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions released 32 batches of energy storage demonstration project lists from 2021 to 2024.  Over 40 cities in eight provinces have introduced subsidies for user-side energy storage. For example, the subsidy amount for initial investment in energy storage projects ranges from yuan (CNY)100 to CNY200 per kWh in Shenzhen and Dongguan of Guangdong province, and in Shanghai. Subsidies for the charge and discharge volumes of energy storage projects range from CNY0.15 to CNY0.30 per kWh, with a subsidy period of two to three years in cities such as Wuhu in Anhui, Ningbo, and Wenzhou in Zhejiang. The nationwide operational new energy storage capacity reached 73.76 million kW/168 million kWh by the end of 2024, about 20 times the level in 2020, at the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan period  and more than double compared with end-2023 levels, according to NEA data. Data from the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) showed that the installed capacity of new energy storage in its operating area reached 58.61 million kW/137.86 million kWh by the end of 2024, more than double their 2025 levels. During the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-2030), an additional 180 million kW of new energy storage is expected to be added, with an effective capacity of 160 million kW, covering 27.4% of the incremental demand for power generation. ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDS OUT Currently, there are dozens of new energy storage technology routes in China, including advanced compressed air energy storage, flywheel energy storage, lithium iron phosphate batteries, vanadium redox flow batteries, and sodium-ion batteries, each suitable for different scenarios based on their characteristics. Among them, electrochemical energy storage (such as lithium-ion batteries, lead-acid batteries, flow batteries, and sodium-sulfur batteries) has become the mainstream form of new energy storage due to its high efficiency, high power density, and high energy density. The dominant role of lithium-ion battery storage has been further strengthened, with over 97% of the newly added new energy storage in 2024 coming from this type of storage. There was a total of 1,473 operational electrochemical energy storage stations by the end of 2024, with a total installed capacity of 62.13GW/141.37GWh, according to data from the National Electrochemical Energy Storage Power Station Safety Monitoring Information Platform. Among these, lithium-ion battery storage installed capacity was 135.76GWh, representing 96.03% of the total (with 99.91% of lithium-ion projects being lithium iron phosphate). However, lithium-ion batteries have relatively poor thermal stability and are prone to thermal runaway issues. As the number of energy storage projects increases, higher requirements are placed on safety technology and management capabilities. The platform data also showed that in 2024, China saw significant improvement in the operational performance of electrochemical energy storage compared to the previous year. The average annual operation time was 1,649 hours, an increase of around 510 hours compared to 2023. The average annual utilization time was 911 hours, an increase of about 300 hours year on year. The total charging electricity was 8,991GWh, and the discharging electricity was 7,980GWh, with an average conversion efficiency of 88.75%. Energy storage is mainly used in three major application scenarios: the power generation side, the grid side, and the user side. Currently, energy storage stations on the user side are relatively profitable, while the profit margins for the power generation side and the grid side are limited. Based on a typical 20-year lifespan and 350 charge-discharge cycles per year for batteries, the energy storage market needs to achieve a revenue of CNY0.42 per kWh, Zheng Yaodong, an expert from China Southern Power Grid said at the 3rd China Energy Storage Conference and Exhibition. However, this is difficult to achieve under the current domestic market mechanism. In the future, the development of new energy storage business models should follow a comprehensive market system approach, including the capacity market, energy market, and ancillary services market, to gradually improve and perfect the business models. Insight article by Anita Yang ($1 = CNY7.30)

14-Apr-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from east Asia and China to the US reversed direction and edged slightly higher this week as US tariffs went into effect and as capacity tightened. The increases are in line with global average rates, which ticked higher by 3% this week, according to supply chain advisors Drewry and as shown in the following chart. Rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles rose by 3% and rates from Shanghai to New York rose by 2%, as shown in the following chart. Drewry expects rates to increase in the coming weeks due to tariffs and reduced capacity. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos also rose over the week, with Asia-USWC rates up by 3% and Asia-USEC rates up by 5%. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, said many shippers rushed to get cargo loaded in the small window before tariffs went into effect, but noted that there are concerns that the sudden policy changes could also mean delays at US customs for arriving shipments. Levine said he expects to see a drop in demand for containers into the US as shippers wait for the situation to stabilize. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said global maritime supply chains have become more complex amid the trade war between the US and China. “Shippers will be monitoring freight costs across the major and secondary trades,” Sand said. “Japan, for example, is one the key trade partners with the US, so a rush to frontload goods could put upward pressure on spot rates on this trade.” Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES HOLD STEADY US liquid chemical tanker freight rates as assessed by ICIS held steady this week despite downward pressure for several trade lanes. There is downward pressure on rates along the USG-Asia trade lane as charterers are seeking to divert cargoes to other regions. Overall, most market participants continue to struggle with tariff uncertainties and other alternatives. As a result of the limited cargo activity, spot rates appear to be softening. However, methanol requirements from the region remain active to Asia. Similarly, rates from the USG to Rotterdam were steady this week, even as space among the regular carriers remains limited. However, several larger size cargos of caustic soda, methanol, MTBE, ethanol and styrene were seen in the market. Several outsiders have come on berth for both April and May, adding to the available tonnage for completion cargos. Easing demand for clean tankers has attracted those vessels to enter the chemical sector. Contract tonnage continues to prevail, with interest in styrene, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), methanol and ethanol. For the USG to South America trade lane, rates remain steady with a few inquiries for methanol and ethanol widely viewed in the market. Overall, the market was relatively quiet with fewer COA nominations, putting downward pressure on rates as more space has become available. On the bunker side, fuel prices have declined as well, on the back of plummeting energy prices, as a result week over week were softer. Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Thumbnail image shows a stack of shipping containers. Image by Shutterstock

11-Apr-2025

NEW YORK (ICIS)–It is now a full-blown trade war between the US and China with the launch of massive salvos of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, far exceeding levels during the first US-China trade war which started in 2018. Trade flows are set to be disrupted in a big way, resulting in a seismic shift in the global chemical industry. The US implemented additional 84% tariffs on imports from China on 9 April – a 34% reciprocal tariff announced on 2 April, and another 50% in response to China’s initial planned retaliation of 34% tariffs on imports from the US. With the earlier 20% tariffs on China implemented in February (+10%) and March (+10%), the additional US tariffs on imports from China jump to 104%. The US escalation against China brings the US effective tariff rate to 29.4%, the highest level since 1890 during the McKinley administration, pointed out Kevin Swift, ICIS senior economist. Since 2 April, dubbed ‘Liberation Day’ by US President Trump, the US claims over 50 countries have reached out for negotiations. “It’s been a week, and this is causing real damage to the economy. Credit markets starting to show signs of stress,” said Swift. “We are increasingly concerned as this continues to play out with no sign of resolution.” The ICIS economist sees a 34% probability of a recession in the US economy in the next 12 months but adds that “the risk of recession is rising every day this goes on”. US PE, EG EXPORTS TO CHINAChina plans to retaliate against the retaliation, upping the tariff ante by another 50% and bringing tariffs on US imports to 84% if implemented on 10 April. US exports of polyethylene (PE) and ethylene glycol (EG) to China can fully be expected to grind to a halt. Since 2018, the start of the first US-China trade war, US ethylene, PE and EG exports to China have exploded more than four times to over 3.5 million tonnes in 2024, with PE at around 2.4 million tonnes – more than three times the volumes in 2018, according to the ICIS Supply and Demand Database. US PE exports to China accounted for between 15-20% of total US PE exports, depending on grade. US EG exports accounted for over 30% of total US EG exports. "There is no other market that can absorb as much EG as China. There could be some reshuffling, but not complete substitution," said Antulio Borneo,  vice president and Americas olefins lead analyst at ICIS. Even with China’s initial planned retaliatory tariffs of 34%, “US PE margins go negative at current production costs,” said Harrison Jacoby, director of PE at ICIS, who noted that US PE exports overall have been down 8.1% year to date. While US PE exports could shift to Europe, the EU is planning retaliatory tariffs against the US, with PE initially among the targets. In retaliation for US 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that took effect on 12 March, the EU approved a new round of tariffs on imports from the US on 9 April. The initial list of proposed tariffs released in March included high density PE (HDPE), linear low density PE (LLDPE) and low density PE (LDPE), along with a range of plastics and rubber products. The EU tariff levels percentage levels reportedly range from 10-25%, with one set of tariffs to go into effect on 15 April and another on 15 May, according to media reports. On 9 April the US implemented 20% tariffs on imports from the EU as part of its broad reciprocal tariffs. The US is also a major exporter of PE to Europe. In 2024, the US exported nearly 1.5 million tonnes of LLDPE, over 500,000 tonnes of HDPE, and around 150,000 tonnes of LDPE to the EU; representing around 19% of total LLDPE exports, 11% of total HDPE exports and 8% of total LDPE exports, according to the ICIS Supply and Demand Database. US PE exports to the EU in 2024 were almost 1.5 times higher than in 2018. Total US PE exports to China and Europe comprised 32% of total US PE exports in 2024. The US is a major importer of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) with China and the EU as major suppliers. With 104% tariffs on China, the US will not see anything close to the 229,000 tonnes of MDI imported from China in 2024, which accounted for 57% of total US MDI imports, according to the ICIS Supply and Demand Database. CHINA EXPOSUREUBS analyst Joshua Spector on 9 April highlighted publicly traded US chemical companies’ exposure to China. Those with a meaningful percentage of sales from China include Methanex (22%), Celanese (19%), DuPont (19%), Huntsman (18%), Eastman, Axalta Coating Systems, PPG (all at 11%), and Celanese and Dow (both 10%). “Chemical demand in China is typically about equal to US and Europe combined. China is overall a net importer of petrochemicals but an exporter of several coal and mineral-based chemicals (including caustic soda and titanium dioxide), and often several niche chems (rare earth chemicals, pesticide ingredients, etc) that are small but critical to many chemicals,” said Spector. Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Infographics by Yashas Mudumbai Insight article by Joseph Chang

09-Apr-2025

SAN ANTONIO (ICIS)–Here is a summary of chemical market stories, heading into this year’s International Petrochemical Conference (IPC). Hosted by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the IPC takes place on 23-25 March in San Antonio, Texas. AFPM ‘25: US tariffs, retaliation risk heightens uncertainty for chemicals, economies The threat of additional US tariffs, retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, and their potential impact is fostering a heightened level of uncertainty, dampening consumer, business and investor sentiment, along with clouding the 2025 outlook for chemicals and economies. AFPM '25: New US president brings chems regulatory relief, tariffs The new administration of US President Donald Trump is giving chemical companies a break on regulations and proposing tariffs on the nation's biggest trade partners and on the world. AFPM ’25: Shippers weigh tariffs, port charges on global supply chains Whether it is dealing with on-again, off-again tariffs, new charges at US ports for carriers with China-flagged vessels in their fleets, or booking passage through the Panama Canal, participants at this year's IPC have plenty to talk about. AFPM ’25: LatAm chemicals face uncertain outlook amid oversupply, trade policy woes Latin American petrochemicals face ongoing challenges from oversupplied markets and poor demand, with survival increasingly dependent on government protectionist measures. AFPM ’25: US propane supply long; ethane prices rising The US petrochemical industry is seeing a glut of upstream propane supply and rising prices for key feedstock ethane. AFPM ’25: Weak demand takes toll on US ethylene as supply concerns ease Persistently poor demand, underpinned by worries over global tariff policies and a sluggish US economy are putting downward pressure on US ethylene prices. AFPM ’25: US propylene demand weak despite recent supply disruptions Weak demand in the US propylene market has counterbalanced recent supply disruptions, pushing spot prices and sentiment lower. AFPM ’25: US BD supply lengthening; rubber demand optimistic US butadiene (BD) has been rather balanced in Q1 despite a couple of planned turnarounds and cracker outages limiting crude C4 deliveries, but supply is expected to lengthen, and demand is cautiously optimistic. AFPM ’25: US aromatics supply ample amid low demand Domestic supply of aromatics is ample and demand is relatively poor. AFPM ’25: US methanol exports, bunker fuel demand to grow, but domestic demand sentiment low US methanol participants’ outlook on the key downstream construction and automotive sectors has dimmed, but optimism continues for export growth and bunker fuel demand. AFPM ’25: Tariffs, weak demand weigh on US base oils Uncertain US trade policy paired with already weak finished lubricant demand weighs on base oil market sentiment. AFPM ’25: Trade policies dampening outlook for Americas PE The US polyethylene (PE) industry started 2025 with some early successes amid the backdrop of lower year-on-year GDP growth. Now, with the impact of volatile tariff policy on top of the aforementioned lower GDP forecast, the outlook for PE has fallen. AFPM '25: Tariffs to shape the trajectory of caustic soda in US and beyond The North American caustic soda market is facing continued headwinds coming via potential tariffs, a challenged PVC market and planned and unplanned outages. US President Donald Trump has threatened to implement tariffs on Mexico, Canada and the EU as well as on products that are directly tied to caustic soda but has delayed enactment on multiple occasions. These delays have bred uncertainty in the near-term outlook, impacting markets in the US and beyond. AFPM '25: US PVC to face headwinds from tariffs, economy The US polyvinyl chloride (PVC) market is facing continued headwinds as tariff-related uncertainties persist. The domestic PVC market is expected to grow between 1-3% in 2025 but continues to face challenges in housing and construction. Meanwhile, export markets continue to wrestle with the threat of protectionist policies and tariffs at home and abroad. AFPM ’25: US spot EG supply balanced-to-tight on heavy turnaround season; EO balanced Supply in the US ethylene glycols (EG) market is balanced-to-tight as the market is undergoing a heavy turnaround season. The US ethylene oxide (EO) market is balanced as demand from derivatives including surfactants is flat. AFPM ’25: US PET prices facing upward price pressure on tariffs, China’s antimony exports ban, peak seasonUS polyethylene terephthalate (PET) prices continue to face volatility as the market assesses the impacts of potential tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. AFPM ’25: US PP volatility persists amid weak demand The US polypropylene (PP) market is facing weak demand, raw material volatility and tariff uncertainty. AFPM ’25: US ACN rationalization inevitable amid declining demand Production of acrylonitrile (ACN) in the US is being reduced or shuttered as already weak demand continues to fall and as downstream plants are shutting down. Changes to the supply/demand balance, trade flows and tariff uncertainties are weighing on market participants. AFPM ’25: US nylon trade flows shifting amid global capacity changes, tariff uncertainties US nylon imports and exports are changing as capacity becomes regionalized and geographically realigned. The subsequent changes to trade flows, price increase initiatives and tariff uncertainties are weighing on market participants. AFPM ’25: US ABS, PC face headwinds from closure and oversupply The US acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC) markets are lackluster and oversupplied. Demand remains soft kicking off the year, and the closure of INEOS’s Addyston, Ohio, ABS facility and tariff uncertainties continue to pressure ABS and PC markets. AFPM ’25: US styrene market facing oversupply amid weak demand, trade uncertainty The US styrene market is transitioning from a period of supply tightness to one of potential oversupply, driven by weak derivative demand and the recent restart of Styrolution’s Bayport, Texas, unit. This return to full operation, coupled with subdued demand, suggests ample supply in the short term. AFPM ’25: US PS faces slow start to 2025 amid weak demand Domestic polystyrene (PS) demand started the year off weaker than expected, with limited restocking and slower markets. AFPM ’25: US phenol/acetone face challenging outlook heading into Q2 US phenol and acetone are grappling with a lot of moving pieces. AFPM ’25: US MMA facing new supply amid volatile demand heading into Q2 US methyl methacrylate (MMA) is facing evolving supply-and-demand dynamics. Roehm's new plant in Bay City, Texas, is in the final stage of start-up, but is not in operation yet. There is anticipation of sample product being available in Q2 for qualification purposes. AFPM ’25: US epoxy resins in flux amid duties, tariffs heading into Q2 US epoxy resins is grappling with changes in duties and trade policies. AFPM ’25: Acetic acid, VAM eyes impact of tariffs on demand, outages on supply The US acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) markets are waiting to see what impact shifting trade and tariff policy will have on domestic and export demand, while disruptions are beginning to tighten VAM supply. AFPM '25: US etac, butac, glycol ethers markets focus on upcoming paints, coatings demand US ethyl acetate (etac), butyl acetate (butac) and glycol ethers market participants are waiting to see if the upcoming paints and coatings season will reinvigorate demand that has been in a long-term slump. AFPM ’25: Low demand for US oxos, acrylates, plasticizers countering feedstock cost spikes US propylene derivatives oxo alcohols, acrylic acid, acrylate esters and plasticizers have been partly insulated from upstream costs spikes by low demand, focusing outlooks on volatile supply and uncertain demand. AFPM ’25: N Am expectations for H2 TiO2 demand rebound paused amid tariff implementations After initial expectations of stronger demand for titanium dioxide (TiO2) in the latter half of 2025, the North American market is now in flux following escalating tariff talks. AFPM ’25: US IPA, MEK markets look to supplies, upstream costs US isopropanol (IPA) market has an eye on costs as upstream propylene supplies are volatile, while the US methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) market is evaluating the impact of global capacity reductions. AFPM ’25: US melamine prices continue to face upward pressure on duties, tight supply US melamine is experiencing upward pricing pressure, thanks in large part to antidumping and countervailing duty sanctions and tight domestic supply. AFPM '25: US polyurethane industry braces for cascade effect of tariffs US polyurethane prices for toluene diisocyanate (TDI), methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and a variety of polyether and polyester polyols continue to see increase pressure as the market assesses the impacts of potential tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. AFPM ’25: US BDO market eyes costs, demand outlook uncertain US 1,4 butanediol (BDO) production costs have been mounting, and margins have been crunched. Supply is ample and demand has been lackluster. AFPM ’25: US propylene glycol demand begins softening after prior feedstock-driven uptick After a cold winter with strong demand for seasonal propylene glycol (PG) end-uses in antifreeze and de-icers in many parts of the US, demand is starting to cool. AFPM ’25: US MA sentiment cautious ahead of potentially volatile Q2 US maleic anhydride (MA) is facing a volatile economic backdrop. Spot feedstock normal butane has fallen below $1/gal in March due to the end of peak blending season and strong production. AFPM ’25: US PA, OX face trade uncertainty, production constraints US phthalic anhydride (PA) and orthoxylene (OX) demand remains relatively weak. Prices have been remaining flat and are expected to settle lower this month after losing mixed xylene (MX) price support and underlying crude oil price declines. AFPM '25: Tight feedstock availability to keep US fatty acids, alcohols firm despite demand woes Tight supplies and high prices for oleochemical feedstocks are expected to keep US oleochemicals prices relatively firm, as continued macroeconomic headwinds, including escalating trade tensions between the US and other countries, only further weigh on consumer sentiment and discourage players from taking long-term positions. AFPM '25: Historic drop in biodiesel production to keep US glycerine relatively firm A drop in US biodiesel production to levels not seen since Q1 2017 is likely to keep the floor on US glycerine prices relatively firm through at least H1 as imports of both crude and refined material fail to fully offset the short-term shortfalls in domestic supply. PRC ’25: US R-PET demand to fall short of 2025 expectations, but still see slow growth As the landmark year, 2025, swiftly passes, many within the US recycled polyethylene terephthalate (R-PET) industry doubt the demand and market growth promised by voluntary brand goals and regulatory post-consumer recycled (PCR) content minimums will come to fruition. PRC ’25: US pyrolysis recycling players churning through regulatory, economic uncertainty As both regulatory and economic landscapes continue to change, production and commercialization progress among pyrolysis based plastic recyclers continues to be mixed. Pyrolysis, a thermal depolymerization/conversion technology which targets polyolefin-heavy mixed plastic waste, or tires, is expected to become the dominant form of chemical recycling over the next decade. Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Macroeconomics: Impact on chemicals topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Recycled Plastics topic page

22-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Commercial vessels are likely to continue diverting away from the Red Sea in the peak season of summer as the US has stepped up attacks on Houthi rebels in Yemen, a shipping analyst said. Lars Jensen, president of consultant Vespucci Maritime, said shipping capacity is likely to maintain its strong supply/demand balance if demand growth holds up. “Additionally, [US President Donald] Trump has warned that counterattacks from the Houthis will de facto be seen as attacks performed by Iran and that Iran will be held responsible,” Jensen said. “For shipping this means an increased risk of escalation, which could include the Strait of Hormuz.” Trump said on 15 March that “no terrorist force will stop American commercial and naval vessels from freely sailing the waterways of the world”. In a social media post on 16 March, the president said the US military was carrying out aerial attacks on the terrorists’ bases, leaders, and missile defenses to protect American shipping, air, and naval assets, and to restore navigational freedom. Jensen said the Houthis remain defiant and claimed to have attacked a US aircraft carrier with missiles and drone. The Red Sea is also one of several global shipping choke points to be targeted by the US Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) for possible impacts to shipping that could include refusing entry to US ports by vessels registered in countries responsible for creating unfavorable conditions. BACKGROUND Global shipping capacity tightened dramatically in December 2023 when attacks by Houthis on commercial vessels in the Red Sea led to diversions around the Cape of Good Hope, leading to higher costs for carriers using more fuel and more ships for the longer journeys around the south of Africa, and higher container rates for shippers. Houthi rebels began attacks as retaliation for Israel’s attacks on Hamas in the West Bank. There was hope that after a ceasefire was declared between Israel and Hamas in January shippers could return to using the Suez Canal, but most of the major carriers continued to avoid the route. The diversions have the largest impact on the Asia-Europe trade lane. About 30% of all global container trade passes through the Suez, but only 12% of US-bound cargo. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks.

19-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The new administration of US President Donald Trump is giving chemical companies a break on regulations and proposing tariffs on the nation's biggest trade partners and on the world. RELIEF FROM RED TAPEThe new administration marks a sharp break from the previous one of the former president,Joe Biden. He proposed a wave of regulations towards the end of his administration that increased costs while providing little benefit to the chemical industry. Several proposed rules under that previous administration will likely fall by the wayside, said Eric Byer, president and CEO of the Alliance for Chemical Distribution (ACD), a trade group that represents chemical distributors. So far under Trump, the regulatory climate has been mostly positive, Byer said. Trump pledged to reduce regulations, and late in his campaign, said he would purge 10 regulations for every one introduced by his administration. The government is conducting earnest analyses of the economic effects of rules, something that the previous administration had glossed over, Byer said. LESS RIGID ENVIRONMENTAL RULESThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reviewing how it evaluates existing chemicals for safety under its main program, known as TSCA. Among items it could review is the whole chemical approach that the agency adopted under the previous administration. That approach made it likely that the EPA would determine that a chemical posed an unreasonable risk. Such a finding would expose the chemical to more restrictions. For environmental regulations in general, the EPA announced numerous reviews of existing regulations that could have far-reaching effects on costs. The following lists some of the regulations under review: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). The standards for chemical manufacturing will be among those that the EPA will initially review. The greenhouse gas reporting program. The Risk Management Program (RMP). One RMP rule compromised plant safety by requiring companies to share information that had been off limits since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, according to trade groups. The Technology Transitions Program. Currently, the program restricts the use hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are used to make refrigerants and blowing agents for polyurethanes. Terminating the environmental justice and diversity, environment and inclusion (DEI) arms of the EPA. Environmental justice has made it harder to build chemical plants. Particulate matter national ambient air quality standards (PM 2.5 NAAQS). The review could lead to guidance from the EPA that increases both the flexibility and clarity of permitting obligations for chemical plants, according to the ACC. A rule by the previous administration that intended to account for what it described as the social cost of carbon. The Waters of the US Rule. The EPA wants to review the rule to reduce permitting and compliance costs. ENDING FAVORABLE EV RULESThe EPA is reviewing the tailpipe rule that was adopted by the previous administration. The tailpipe rule gradually reduced the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of automobiles. Critics have said that this and other regulations from the previous administration were so strict, they acted as bans on vehicles powered by internal combustion engines (ICE). The EPA will also review the standards for model years 2027 and later light-duty and medium-duty vehicles. The Department of Transportation (DOT) wants to reset the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which critics say unduly favor electric vehicles (EVs) by being too strict. SUPERFUND TAX MAY BE RESCINDEDThe Republican controlled government could repeal the Superfund tax, which was imposed in 2022 on several building-block petrochemicals and their derivatives. Confusion arose over how to calculate the taxes for the derivatives. The government also seems to lack the resources to administer the program. So far, legislators have introduced bills in both legislative chambers that would repeal the tax, including Senate Bill 1195 and House of Representatives Bill 640. These would likely need to be part of a larger tax bill. Byer of the ACD said the repeal will not be easy. However, it does have a chance to succeed, and the effort is getting traction among legislators. The ACD, the ACC and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) were among the trade groups that signed a letter urging Congress to repeal the tax. TARIFFS POSE RISK TO CHEMSThe tariffs adopted and being proposed by the US could increase costs of imports of steel and aluminium needed to build new plants and repair existing ones. They also increase the costs of minerals used to make catalysts as well as regional imports of plastics and chemicals. US tariffs also expose its chemical industry to retaliatory tariffs. US tariffs could cause short term logistical disruptions because companies will be re-arranging supply chains to avoid the taxes and to secure materials from new suppliers that could be farther away. "I think we will see some near-term reconfiguration of moving products because of the tariffed countries, predominantly China, Mexico and Canada," Byer said. "Either way, people will reconfigure. My hope is that the reconfiguration part will only last a few weeks to a few months at most so we can get back to just doing straight on trade deals and supply chain movements without to deal with tariff stuff." Hosted by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the IPC takes place on 23-25 March in San Antonio, Texas. Insight article by Al Greenwood Thumbnail Photo: US Capitol. (By Lucky-photographer)

13-Mar-2025