Mono propylene glycol (MPG)

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US can maintain nearly all the plastic and chemical tariffs it imposed this year after an appeals court granted on Thursday the government's request to stay the judgment of a lower court. The stay will remain in place while the case is under consideration by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Earlier, the US lost a judgment over its tariffs in the US Court of International Trade. That lower court ruled that the president exceeded its authority when it imposed tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). These IEEPA tariffs included nearly all of the duties that the US imposed in 2025 on imports of commodity plastics and chemicals. Had the appeals court rejected the government's request for a stay, then the US would have had 10 calendar days to withdraw the tariffs it imposed under IEEPA. The tariffs covered by the ruling include the following: The 10% baseline tariffs against most of the world that the US issued during its so-called Liberation Day event on 2 April. These include the reciprocal tariffs that were later paused. The US issued the tariffs under Executive Order 14257, which intended to address the nation's trade deficit. The tariffs that the US initially imposed on imports from Canada under Executive Order 14193. These were intended to address drug smuggling. The US later limited the scope of these tariffs to cover imported goods that do not comply with the nations' trade agreement, known as the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The tariffs that the US initially imposed on imports from Mexico under Executive Order 14194. These were intended to address illegal immigration and drug smuggling. Like the Canadian tariffs, these were later limited to cover imported goods that did not comply with the USMCA. The 20% tariffs that the US imposed on imports from China under Executive Order 14195, which was intended to address drug smuggling. Because the appeals court granted the government's request for a stay, the US can maintain the IEEPA tariffs. The ruling did not cover sectoral tariffs imposed on specific products like steel, aluminium and auto parts, and it does not cover the duties that the US imposed on Chinese imports during the first term of US President Donald Trump. IMPLICATIONS OF THE RULINGIf the ruling is upheld by the higher courts, it could bring some imports of plastics and chemicals back to the US while lowering costs of other products. While the US has large surpluses in many plastics and chemicals, it still imports several key commodities. US states that border Canada import large amounts of polyethylene (PE) and other plastics from that country because it is closer than the nation's chemical hubs along the Gulf Coast. Other significant imports include base oils, ammonia, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), methanol and aromatics such as benzene, toluene and mixed xylenes (MX). RULING COULD REDIRECT CHINESE EXPORTS OF PLASTIC PRODUCTSThe IEEPA tariffs of the US caused countries to redirect exports of plastics and chemicals to other markets, particularly to Europe. The result depressed prices for those plastics and chemicals. If the ruling holds, some of those exports could return to the US and reduce the quantity of exports arriving in Europe. The IEEPA tariffs had a similar effect on the plastic products exports by China. Those exports were redirected to other countries, especially southeast Asia. These redirected shipments flooded those countries with plastic goods, displacing local products and lowering domestic demand for the plastics used to make those products. If the ruling is restored by higher courts, then it could direct many of those shipments back to the US, although they would unlikely affect shipments of auto parts. Those shipments are covered by the sectoral tariffs, and the court ruling did not void those tariffs. RULING REMOVES BASIS FOR RETALIATORY TARIFFS AGAINST US PLASTICS, CHEMSChina had already imposed blanket tariffs in retaliation to the IEEPA tariffs the US imposed on its exports. China unofficially granted waivers for US imports of ethane and PE, but those for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) were still covered by the duty. China relies on such imports as feedstock for its large fleet of propane dehydrogenation (PDH) units, which produce on-purpose propylene. If upheld, the ruling could restore many of those exports and improve propylene margins for those PDH units. The EU was preparing to impose retaliatory tariffs on exports of nearly every major commodity plastic from the US. Other proposals would cover EU imports of oleochemicals, tall oil, caustic soda and surfactants from the US. Canada also prepared a list of retaliatory tariffs that covered US imports of PE, polypropylene (PP) and other plastics, chemicals and fertilizers. If the ruling holds, it would remove the basis for the proposed tariffs of Canada and the EU as well as the existing ones already imposed by China. RULING WOULD NOT ELIMINATE THREAT OF FUTURE TARIFFSEven if the higher courts uphold the ruling and bars tariffs under IEEPA, the US has other means to impose duties that are outside of the bounds of the ruling. Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Such tariffs would be limited to 15%, could last for 150 days and address balance of payment deficits. Tariffs imposed under the following statutes would require federal investigations, which could delay them by several months. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The president can impose tariffs of up to 50% against countries that discriminate against US commerce. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which addresses unfair trade practices. This was the basis on the tariffs imposed on many Chinese imports during the peak of the trade war between the two countries. Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which addresses imports with implications for national security. Trump used this provision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum. The US has started Section 232 on the following imports: Pharmaceutical and active pharmaceutical ingredient (APIs) – Section 232 Semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment – Section 232 Medium and heavy-duty trucks, parts – Section 232 Critical minerals – Section 232 Copper – Section 232 Timber and lumber – Section 232 Commercial aircraft and jet engines – Section 232 Ship-to-shore cranes assembled in China or made with parts from China – Section 301 Shipbuilding – Section 301 The case number for the appeal is 2025-1812. The original lawsuit was filed in the US Court of International Trade by the plaintiffs VOS Selections, Genova Pipe, Microkits, FishUSA and Terry Precision Cycling. The case number is 25-cv-00066. Thumbnail Photo: A container ship, which transports goods overseas. (Image by Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock) Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy

29-May-2025

BARCELONA (ICIS)–ExxonMobil is selling its refinery at Gravenchon, France, to Canadian refining group North Atlantic. The two companies have entered exclusive negotiations for North Atlantic to acquire an 82.89% controlling interest in Esso Société Anonyme Française SA and 100%  of ExxonMobil Chemical France. Filing of a tender offer is expected in the first quarter of 2026 for the deal which includes Exxon’s refinery at the Gravenchon site, the second largest refinery in France. The  transaction will be submitted to local trade unions in accordance with French law. In 2024, ExxonMobil sold its Fos-Sur-Mer refinery near Marseille, France, along with fuel terminals in Toulouse and Villette. The company also closed its cracker and downstream production  at Gravenchon in 2024. At the time, the company said the site had lost more than €500 million since 2018 and despite efforts to improve the site’s economics, it remained uncompetitive. According to the ICIS Supply & Demand Database ExxonMobil still has some small chemicals capacities at Gravenchon and nearby Port Gerome including propylene, polyalphaolefins and oligomers. Local trades union, CSEC, said in a press release that ExxonMobil would market chemicals and specialty products on behalf of the new owners. ExxonMobil did not reply to a request for confirmation of this. It also has large base oils capacities in France including 12,000 barrels/day at Port Jerome and 3,200 barrels/day at Gravenchon. In a statement released on 28 May, North Atlantic said it has the ambition to consolidate Gravenchon as a center of French energy and industry for decades and to grow North Atlantic into a transatlantic energy champion. Located on a 1,500-acre site in the Normandy region of France, the combined facility is one of the largest integrated chemical complexes in western Europe. The refinery includes two distillation trains, several conversion units and associated logistics facilities. The site has the capacity to process 230,000 barrels/day of crude oil and other feedstocks, according to North Atlantic. North Atlantic said it aims to develop Gravenchon into a green energy hub to accelerate the deployment of low-carbon fuels and renewable power. The company said it is committed to maintain employment and existing compensation and benefits. Ted Lomond, president and CEO of North Atlantic and president of North Atlantic France said: “This is a pivotal moment for North Atlantic as we enhance our transatlantic presence and commitment to energy security through innovative energy solutions aligned with global energy needs”. Ajay Parmar, ICIS director of energy and refining said: “My view is that Exxon is choosing to sell assets where profitability has been and likely will continue to be dented going forward. Refinery margins in Europe have returned back to around their pre-COVID levels this year, after a few years of bumper profits post-pandemic.” He added: “These refinery assets are less profitable and so the company is probably looking to divest for this reason. Exxon/Esso also sold off the Fos-Sur-Mer refinery last year – I think the strategy is to steadily exit these lower margin businesses.” Photo: Part of an oil refinery complex (Shutterstock) Focus article by Will Beacham

28-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US delay of its proposed 50% tariffs on EU imports will still leave its polymers vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs. The new deadline is 9 July. For US exports, the EU has already drafted a list of targets for retaliatory tariffs, part of its second round of €95 billion in tariffs on US imports. A full list of all the proposed imports can be found here. This is on top of the first round of €21 billion in tariffs on US imports. A full list of all the proposed imports can be found here. In all, the EU could impose tariffs on nearly every major polymer from the US, including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The EU is also considering tariffs on US imports of surfactants, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and tall oil, a feedstock used to make renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable naphtha. The following table lists some of the many plastics and chemicals proposed on the EU's second round of tariffs. CN CODE DESCRIPTION 28151200 sodium hydroxide "caustic soda" in aqueous solution "soda lye or liquid soda" 29053926 butane-1,4-diol or tetramethylene glycol [1,4-butanediol] having a bio-based carbon content of 100% by mass 29091910 tert-butyl ethyl ether (ethyl-tertio-butyl-ether, etbe) 29152100 acetic acid 29153200 vinyl acetate 29291000 isocyanates 32061100 pigments and preparations based on titanium dioxide of a kind used for colouring any material or produce colorant preparations, containing >= 80% by weight of titanium dioxide calculated on the dry matter (excl. preparations of heading 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3212, 3213 and 3215) 32061900 pigments and preparations based on titanium dioxide of a kind used for colouring any material or produce colorant preparations, containing < 80% by weight of titanium dioxide calculated on the dry matter (excl. preparations of heading 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3212, 3213 and 3215) 34023100 linear alkylbenzene sulphonic acids and their salts 34023990 anionic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. linear alkylbenzene sulphonic acids and their salts, and aqueous solution containing by weight 30-50% of disodium alkyl [oxydi(benzenesulphonate)]) 34024100 cationic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale 34024200 non-ionic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. soap) 34024900 organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. soap, anionic, cationic and non-ionic) 34025010 surface-active preparations put up for retail sale (excl. organic surface-active preparations in the form of bars, cakes, moulded pieces or shapes, and organic surface-active products and preparations for washing the skin in the form of liquid or cream) 38030010 crude tall oil 38030090 tall oil, whether or not refined (excl. crude tall oil) 38170050 linear alkylbenzene 38170080 mixed alkylbenzenes and mixed alkylnaphthalenes, produced by the alkylation of benzene and naphthalene (excl. linear alkylbenzene and mixed isomers of cyclic hydrocarbons) 38231100 stearic acid, industrial 38231200 oleic acid, industrial 38231300 tall oil fatty acids, industrial 38231910 fatty acids, distilled 38231930 fatty acid distillate 38231990 fatty acids, industrial, monocarboxylic; acid oils from refining (excl. stearic acid, oleic acid and tall oil fatty acids, distilled fatty acids and fatty acid distillate) 38237000 fatty alcohols, industrial 38260010 fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters, containing by weight => 96,5 % of esters "famae" 38260090 biodiesel and mixtures thereof, not containing or containing < 70 % by weight of petroleum oils or oils obtained from bituminous minerals (excl. fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters containing by weight >= 96,5 % of esters "famae") 39013000 ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, in primary forms 39019080 polymers of ethylene, in primary forms (excl. polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene-alpha-olefins copolymers having a specific gravity of < 0,94, ionomer resin consisting of a salt of a terpolymer of ethylene with isobutyl acrylate and methacrylic acid and a-b-a block copolymer of ethylene of polystyrene, ethylene-butylene copolymer and polystyrene, containing by weight <= 35% of styrene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms) 39021000 polypropylene, in primary forms 39023000 propylene copolymers, in primary forms 39029010 a-b-a block copolymer of propylene or of other olefins, of polystyrene, ethylene-butylene copolymer and polystyrene, containing by weight <= 35% of styrene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms 39029020 polybut-1-ene, a copolymer of but-1-ene with ethylene containing by weight <= 10% of ethylene, or a blend of polybut-1-ene with polyethylene and/or polypropylene containing by weight <= 10% of polyethylene and/or <= 25% of polypropylene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms 39031100 expansible polystyrene, in primary forms 39031900 polystyrene, in primary forms (excl. expansible) 39032000 styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers "san", in primary forms 39033000 acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers "abs", in primary forms 39039090 polymers of styrene, in primary forms (excl. polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers "san", acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene "abs", copolymer solely of styrene with allyl alcohol, of an acetyl value of >= 175 and brominated polystyrene, containing by weight >= 58% but <= 71% of bromine, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms) 39041000 poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, not mixed with any other substances 39042100 non-plasticised poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, mixed with other substances 39042200 plasticised poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, mixed with other substances 39051200 poly"vinyl acetate", in aqueous dispersion 39051900 poly"vinyl acetate", in primary forms (excl. in aqueous dispersion) 39052100 vinyl acetate copolymers, in aqueous dispersion 39052900 vinyl acetate copolymers, in primary forms (excl. in aqueous dispersion) 39053000 poly"vinyl alcohol", in primary forms, whether or not containing unhydrolyzed acetate groups 39061000 poly"methyl methacrylate", in primary forms 39071000 polyacetals, in primary forms 39072911 polyethylene glycols, in primary forms 39072920 polyether alcohols, in primary forms (excl. bis(polyoxyethylene) methylphosphonate and polyethylene glycols) 39072999 polyethers in primary forms (excl. polyether alcohols, polyacetals and copolymer of 1- chloro-2,3-epoxypropane with ethylene oxide) 39073000 epoxide resins, in primary forms 39074000 polycarbonates, in primary forms 39075000 alkyd resins, in primary forms 39076100 poly"ethylene terephthalate", in primary forms, having a viscosity number of >= 78 ml/g 39076900 poly"ethylene terephthalate", in primary forms, having a viscosity number of < 78 ml/g 39079110 unsaturated liquid polyesters, in primary forms (excl. polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate" and poly"lactic acid") 39079190 unsaturated polyesters, in primary forms (excl. liquid, and polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate" and poly"lactic acid") 39079980 polyesters, saturated, in primary forms (excl. polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate", poly"lactic acid", poly"ethylene naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate" and thermoplastic liquid crystal aromatic polyester copolymers) 39089000 polyamides, in primary forms (excl. polyamides-6, -11, -12, -6,6, -6,9, -6,10 and -6,12) 39091000 urea resins and thiourea resins, in primary forms 39092000 melamine resins, in primary forms 39093100 poly"methylene phenyl isocyanate" "crude mdi, polymeric mdi", in primary forms 39094000 phenolic resins, in primary forms 39095010 polyurethane of 2,2'-"tert-butylimino"diethanol and 4,4'-methylenedicyclohexyl diisocyanate, in the form of a solution in n,n-dimethylacetamide, containing by weight >= 50% of polymer 39095090 polyurethanes in primary forms (excl. polyurethane of 2,2'-"tert-butylimino"diethanol and 4,4'-methylenedicyclohexyl diisocyanate, in the form of a solution in n,ndimethylacetamide) Source: EU CN CODE DESCRIPTION 39011010 linear polyethylene with a specific gravity of < 0,94, in primary forms 39011090 polyethylene with a specific gravity of < 0,94, in primary forms (excl. linear polyethylene) 39012010 polyethylene in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms, of a specific gravity of >= 0,958 at 23°c, containing <= 50 mg/kg of aluminium, <= 2 mg/kg of calcium, of chromium, of iron, of nickel and of titanium each and <= 8 mg/kg of vanadium, for the manufacture of chlorosulphonated polyethylene 39012090 polyethylene with a specific gravity of >= 0,94, in primary forms (excl. polyethylene in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms, of a specific gravity of >= 0,958 at 23°c, containing <= 50 mg/kg of aluminium, <= 2 mg/kg of calcium, of chromium, of iron, of nickel and of titanium each and <= 8 mg/kg of vanadium, for the manufacture of chlorosulphonated polyethylene) 39014000 ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of < 0,94 , in primary forms 39081000 polyamides-6, -11, -12, -6,6, -6,9, -6,10 or -6,12, in primary forms Source: EU

27-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Asian Chemical Connections by John Richardson. I could present a dozen charts such as the main one in today's post on polypropylene (PP) — for example on polyethylene (PE), ethylene, propylene and styrene—and the patterns would be similar though, of course, the numbers would differ. During the pandemic, while demand dipped in many places, China’s PP consumption rose—from 7% growth in 2019 to 9% in 2020, then stayed strong at 7% in 2021. The same trend played out across other chemicals and polymers. This was the “China in, China out” story: Rising imports of feedstocks to make finished goods that lockdown-affected, cash-rich Westerners were snapping up, backed by stimulus. Margins climbed—not just from demand, but also from refinery feedstock shortages as fuel demand dropped and refinery rates were cut. But 2022 marked a shift. As ICIS Data and Analytics illustrates, multiple headwinds kicked in: The Evergrande Turning Point, China's constantly deteriorating demographics, and a China petrochemicals self-sufficiency drive dating back to 2014. Focusing on China's PP self-sufficiency and exports: China's PP capacity as a percentage of domestic demand is expected to surge from 89% in 2014 to 134% by 2028. In 2020, China’s PP exports were around 500,000 tonnes. In 2023 they reached 1.3m tonnes and climbed to 2.4m tonnes in 2024. ICIS data suggests China’s exports in 2025 could reach 3.1m tonnes. On current trends, China’s exports to ASEAN could exceed 1 million tonnes to ASEAN in 2025 versus less than 900,000 tonnes in 2024. The trade war? Hard to say if it's moved the needle. These structural trends were in motion long before it began—and they’ll likely outlast it too. Sentiment swings (as seen since April’s “Liberation Day”) will keep influencing prices and buying patterns, but the fundamentals remain. The Chemicals Supercycle is over. What comes next? That’s the big question. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS.

26-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Asia-US rates for shipping containers rose this week, leading ocean carriers to rush to ramp up capacity to handle an expected surge in bookings. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos rose by 3% to both US coasts, while rates from supply chain advisors Drewry showed a 2% increase on rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles and a 4% rise in rates from Shanghai to New York, as shown in the following chart. Following the latest US-China trade developments, Drewry expects an increase in spot rates in the coming week as carriers are reorganizing their capacity to accommodate a higher volume of cargo bookings from China. Kyle Beaulieu senior director, head of ocean Americas at Flexport, said during a webinar this week that carriers who initiated blank sailings and discontinued services to the US are now resuming services. Beaulieu said there were 10 China-US services that were halted, and as of today, six are planning to resume from Week 22 to Week 24. Beaulieu said ports in the Pacific Northwest have been the biggest beneficiaries so far as that is the shortest route to the US. Alan Murphy, CEO, Sea-Intelligence, said carriers who were reducing transpacific capacity due to the decrease in bookings from China amid 145% tariffs are now working to ramp up capacity prior to the 14 August deadline. This means that typical peak season volumes now must be shipped no later than mid-July. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, said there is still confusion on whether July and August deadlines mean goods need to be loaded at origins by those dates – as was the case with the 9 April tariff deadline – or that goods must arrive in the US by then. “The latter would significantly shorten these lower-tariff windows,” Levine said. “Ocean shipments from Asia would have to move in the next week or two to arrive before 9 July.” Levine noted that carriers have separately come out with mid-month general rate increases (GRIs) from $1,000-3,000/FEU (40-foot equivalent unit) and have similar GRIs planned for 1 June and 15 June with aims to get rates up to $8,000/FEU. “If successful, rate levels would be about on par with the Asia – US West Coast 2024 high reached last July,” Levine said. “Daily transpacific rates as of Monday have already increased about $1,000/FEU to the East Coast and $400/FEU to the West Coast to about $4,400/FEU and $2,800/FEU, respectively.” Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES HOLD STEADY US liquid chemical tanker freight rates as assessed by ICIS held steady this week despite upward pressure for several trade lanes. There is upward pressure on rates along the US Gulf-Asia trade lane as charterers are seeking to send cargos to the region following the pause on tariffs. The announcement caused a significant uptick in spot activity. The increase in interest should be significant but almost certainly short lived as cargoes rush to arrive prior to the 90-day expiration date. Several parcels of monoethylene glycol (MEG) and methanol were seen quoted in the market. Similarly, rates from the USG to Rotterdam were steady this week, even as space among the regular carriers remains limited. Contract tonnage continues to prevail and given the limited available space; spot demand remains relatively good. Several larger sized cargos of styrene, methanol, MTBE and ethanol were seen in the market. Several outsiders have come on berth for both May and June, adding to the available tonnage for completion cargos. Easing demand for clean tankers has attracted those vessels to enter the chemical sector. For the USG to South America trade lane, rates remain steady with a few inquiries for methanol and ethanol widely viewed in the market. Overall, the market was relatively quiet with fewer contract of affreightment (COA) nominations, putting downward pressure on rates as more space has become available. On the bunker side, fuel prices have declined as well, on the back of lower energy prices, as a result week over week were softer. Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

23-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)– ChemOne Group is planning to incorporate bionaphtha as a feedstock for its upcoming $5.3 billion Pengerang Energy Complex (PEC) in Johor, Malaysia, a senior company executive said. The PEC is expected to process 150,000 barrels/day of condensate plus a side feed of naphtha, that will in turn produce 2.5 million tonnes/year of aromatics, 3.8 million tonnes/year of energy products output, and hydrogen output of 26,000 tonnes/year, according to Mobin Rahman, ChemOne Group’s Vice President for Technology. Construction of the PEC project is expected to start by mid-2025 after its operator secured an agreement for $3.5 billion of financing, with the start-up of the complex expected in Q4 2028. The hydrogen produced will be used to support the production of hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO), which in turn can be processed into sustainable bionaphtha, according to Rahman. “The incorporation of bionaphtha as a feedstock in PEC will then advance ChemOne's work in creating a sustainable, circular petrochemical chain,” he said. Bionaphtha, a byproduct of HVO and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, is increasingly used in Asia's petrochemical industry for sustainable plastics, packaging, and fuel blending. “The petrochemical industry globally is heavily reliant on fossil-based naphtha as a feedstock in steam crackers to produce olefins. Bionaphtha thus presents itself as a renewable alternative to fossil-based naphtha,” Rahman said. “This signals the potential for greater integration of bionaphtha into the petrochemical industry as its technology matures and supply increases,” Rahman noted. However, its relatively higher cost as compared to conventional fossil-based naphtha makes its adoption limited. Moreover, converting bionaphtha to paraxylene (PX) through catalytic reforming is challenging primarily due to the feedstock's composition and the inherent limitations of the process. Bionaphtha, derived from bio-crude oils, often contains a high proportion of normal paraffins and other non-aromatic components, which are difficult for catalytic reforming to convert into aromatics. BIONAPHTHA USE IN ASIA INCREASING   Major petrochemical companies in Asia are incorporating bionaphtha in their steam crackers as a drop-in feedstock in place of fossil-based naphtha, or in a mix with fossil-based material to produce partially renewable chemicals. “As a region that consumes the most plastics globally, the demand for plastics remains constantly high,” Rahman said. “When coupled with the increasing eco-conscious preferences among consumers, we see a resulting heightened demand for bioplastics. This has, as such, been a significant driver in the region's demand for bionaphtha as a feedstock for its production.” In line with the global green transition, multiple countries in Asia have also enacted fuel blending mandates. Singapore, for example, has set a 1% SAF blending mandate from 2026 onwards. Given the current mandate by countries to ensure that SAF is blended with jet fuel, the production of SAF, and consequently the use and production of bionaphtha, is set to rise, Rahman said. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates that SAF could contribute to a 65% reduction in emissions, much needed by the aviation industry to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Just like fossil-based naphtha, bionaphtha can also be used as a gasoline blending component – offering a more sustainable fuel blend to help countries and companies achieve their decarbonization goals, according to Rahman. While carbon capture & storage (CCS) and green hydrogen also offer valuable decarbonization strategies, bionaphtha provides a relatively easier and expected to be more readily available pathway. “Looking ahead, the global momentum towards sustainability will likely continue to see an increasing demand for bionaphtha in petrochemical production processes.” BIOPLASTICS USE GROWING One of the most promising downstream applications for bionaphtha lies in bioplastics, Rahman noted, including polyethylene furanoate (PEF), bio-polyethylene (bio-PE) and bio-propylene (bio-PP). PEF is a fully bio-based alternative to PET, while bio-PE and bio-PP are drop-in biopolymers with varying levels of bio-content, with bio-PP currently achieving up to 40% through the bio-mass balance process. In South Korea and Japan, leading beauty brands are already incorporating bio-naphtha into packaging and product development, setting a precedent for other industries to follow, Rahman noted. Companies like Japanese producer Nippon Shokubai and Indonesia’s Chandra Asri are exploring the use of bionaphtha in super absorbent polymer production (SAP), utilizing mass balance processes and independent certification bodies to ensure transparency and sustainability. South Korea’s LG Chem has also been manufacturing eco-friendly plastic products using bio-naphtha since 2020. LG Chem since 2021 has been shipping its bio-balanced SAP products – also certified with ISCC Plus – to overseas markets. ISCC PLUS is an international certification system that verifies the sustainability of bio-based and bio-circular raw materials throughout the supply chain. Separately, Mitsubishi Chemical has partnered with Japanese beverage company Suntory and apparel manufacturer Goldwin to use sustainable plastics for their end-products. The conglomerate also locked in partnerships with providers of the key bioplastics ingredient bionaphtha. It announced a strategic partnership with Finnish company Neste for the bioplastics supply chain. SUSTAINABILITY MANDATES TO PLAY KEY ROLE  Regulatory frameworks and sustainability mandates play a significant role in accelerating the adoption of bionaphtha, Rahman said. “Policies surrounding the reduction of plastic waste – like Japan's Plastic Resource Circulation Act for example – can incentivise manufacturers to adopt more sustainable production materials, while also encouraging retailers and consumers to opt for biobased plastics as an alternative to single-use plastics.” “In addition to that six other Asian governments – Philippines, China, South Korea, India, Bangladesh, and Malaysia – are regulating plastic waste, thereby building a potential market for biobased alternatives.” Other regulatory frameworks surrounding the general reduction of carbon emissions also help drive the adoption of bionaphtha in the petrochemical sector, as companies seek to harness potential financial incentives and avoid regulatory penalties, Rahman noted. “Take for example carbon taxes implemented in countries like Singapore, with carbon tax rates that will increase at least thrice within the decade to reach $80 per tonne of GHG [greenhouse gas] by 2030,” he noted. “Companies looking to comply with such regulatory requirements, or to be eligible for carbon credits and offsets, may turn towards bionaphtha to help reduce lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions along the supply chain.” South Korea's emission trading scheme also specifically rewards companies that integrate renewable feedstocks into their petrochemical production, providing a financial incentive for the adoption of bionaphtha in the industry, Rahman added. BIONAPHTHA MARKET SET FOR RAPID GROWTH  The market size for bionaphtha continues to expand at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 19% and is projected to reach more than 3 million tonnes by 2032, according to Rahman. The expansion is due to increased environmental awareness, policies that encourage the use of sustainable energy, and improvements in production technology, he said. “Currently, about 15% of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production results in bio-naphtha as a byproduct. If demand continues to rise, this ratio can be increased to 40%, but the industry must also grapple with the limited availability of bio-based raw materials such as waste cooking oil.” “To ensure long-term viability, diversification of feedstock sources and the development of alternative production methods are imperative.” COST COMPETITIVENESS REMAINS AN ISSUEThe key challenge for bionaphtha revolves around cost competitiveness, and this is especially pertinent for Asian petrochemical producers who operate on thinner margins compared to their Middle East and US counterparts who benefit from cheaper feedstocks, according to Rahman. “Investing in low-carbon technologies is difficult for Asian producers if it further erodes their profit margins,” he said. “Besides, in terms of feedstock, while bio-based alternatives such as bionaphtha are available, many petrochemical complexes still rely on fossil-based naphtha.” “This is due to the comparatively higher prices of its alternatives, limited supplies depending on international supply chains, as well as potentially incompatible infrastructure where retrofitting is too costly.” Steam cracking operates at temperatures above 800°C and consumes large amounts of energy. This is mostly powered by fossil fuels, as its alternative – the electrification of steam crackers, requires high-capacity renewable energy that is not cost-competitive in Asia at the moment. “Even if high-capacity renewable energy becomes more accessible, the electrification of steam crackers requires a complete redesign or a retrofit that would incur very high costs. As such, decarbonizing these steam crackers poses significant technical and economic hurdles for businesses,” Rahman said. TECHNOLOGY TO THE RESCUETechnological advancements – like the introduction of new hydrotreating catalysts, help to improve conversion efficiency and reduce coke formation, according to Rahman. Other innovations like mild hydrocracking configurations that allow for targeted production of bionaphtha fractions can also enhance the overall efficiency of bionaphtha production, he said. More importantly, however, advancements that allow for better hydrogen recovery are particularly crucial in enhancing both the scalability and efficiency of bionaphtha production. “Especially in complexes like ChemOne Group's PEC, where hydrogen is produced as a by-product and used in the downstream production of hydrogenated vegetable oils, embedding strong hydrogen recovery systems can help improve yield efficiency and reduce costs. This in turn better primes its production for scalability,” he said. “In addition, at ChemOne Group's Pengerang Energy Complex, engineering-driven improvements in its LD-PAREX technology have yielded an almost 10% increase in conversion percentage from its Condensate Feedstocks to its higher value aromatics products,” Rahman said. “This also enhances the efficiency of downstream SAF/bionaphtha production and thereby improves production economics, both of which enhance the supply and cost appeal to facilitate further scaling of bionaphtha production.” Interview article by Nurluqman Suratman

22-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Taiwan's ethylene crackers are expected to run at 60-70% of capacity on average this year amid heightened regional competition and weak downstream demand, according to the Petrochemical Industry Association of Taiwan (PIAT). Economic uncertainty, US tariffs and geopolitical risk are pressure points for the industry, the industry body said in a report released at the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) 2025 on 15-16 May in Bangkok. Taiwan’s ethylene capacity is about 4.0 million tonnes; while its propylene capacity is about 3.4 million tonnes, according to PIAT. Despite a potential short-term rebound in prices for Taiwan’s petrochemical sector in 2025, continued capacity extensions in China will “intensify market price competition”, PIAT said. For 2025, it forecasts a 2.7% growth for both supply and demand of ethylene, with a projected 61% surge in exports. Propylene, on the other hand, is expected to post a 2.2% contraction in both supply and demand, with exports expected to more than double. Ethylene (in tonnes) 2024 2025 (estimated) change Supply Production 2,596,243 2,650,000 2.1% Import 228,176 250,000 9.6% Total 2,824,419 2,900,000 2.7% Demand Domestic 2,818,820 2,891,000 2.6% Export 5,599 9,000 60.8% Total 2,824,419 2,900,000 2.7% Year End Capacity (tonnes/year) 4,005,000 4,005,000  Propylene (in tonnes) 2024 2025 (estimated) change Supply Production 2,315,130 2,363,700 2.1% Import 309,100 202,600 -34.5% Total 2,624,230 2,566,300 -2.2% Demand Domestic 2,566,418 2,400,500 -6.5% Export 57,812 165,800 186.8% Total 2,624,230 2,566,300 -2.2% Year End Capacity (tonnes/year) 3,370,500 3,370,500 Source: PIAT China is expected to increase its 2025 ethylene capacity by approximately 7.8 million tonnes, or by 15%, to 60.99 million tonnes. But ethylene derivative consumption is expected to grow at a slower rate of 12.6%, and ethylene demand is expected to rise by just 6%, PIAT said, posing a challenge for neighboring suppliers that have historically relied on exports to China. Taiwanese producers have either reduced operating rates or remained idle over the past three years, while ethylene exports to China dropped to zero last year. “Given weak downstream demand and regional competition, cracker utilization rates are expected to average 60%-70% in 2025,” PIAT said in the report. Meanwhile, Taiwan’s demand for propylene is expected to weaken further due to weak downstream demand, particularly for polypropylene (PP) and epichlorohydrin (ECH). China's ongoing capacity expansion also continues to pressure Taiwanese producers, said the PIAT. Since 2024, Taiwan’s propylene exports to China have been subject to tariffs, posing a challenge for accessing the Chinese market. According to PIAT data, major petrochemical production dropped 2.39%, exports were down by 4.3% and demand fell by 1.1% in 2024 from the previous year. Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy. Thumbnail image At the port city of Keelung, Taiwan on 20 March 2025. (RITCHIE B TONGO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

19-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Asia-US container rates surged this week as trade between the US and China is expected to surge amid the 90-pause on reciprocal tariffs between the two nations. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos showed minimal increases in the low-single digits, but rates from supply chain advisors Drewry showed significant increases of 19% from Shanghai to New York and 16% from Shanghai to Los Angeles, as shown in the following chart. Following the latest US–China trade developments, Drewry expects an increase in Transpacific spot rates in the coming week due to shortage in capacity. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said the 90-day pause is expected to lead to a surge of activity, where spot rates will peak and then flatten as carriers redeploy capacity to match demand over the next two to four weeks. “The US-China announcement on the temporary lowering of tariffs fired the starting gun for shippers to rush as many imports as they can during the 90-day window of opportunity,” Sand said. “There is no time to waste for these shippers and the rush of cargo will put upward pressure on spot rates on Transpacific trades.” But Sand said that a deeper dive into data shows shippers paying prices towards the market mid-high for rates agreed post the US-China announcement, while legacy agreements struck before 12 May will continue to keep a lid on the bubbling market averages for a short time. The following chart shows Xeneta’s rates from North China to the US Gulf. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, also expects to see a surge in imports. “We are likely to see a significant demand rebound in the near term as shippers replenish inventories that may have started to run down in the past month and as many Chinese manufacturers have high levels of finished goods already ready to ship,” Levine said. With an August deadline for the possible return of higher tariff levels, it is also likely that the near-term ocean demand rebound will mark the start of more frontloading, Levine said. “If so, it would also mark the early start of this year’s peak season, which could end earlier than usual as well for the same reasons,” Levine said. TANKER RATES STABLE TO LOWER US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were stable to lower this week with rates for parcels from the US Gulf (USG) to Asia dropping once again. Rates from the USG to Asia ticked lower both for smaller parcels and larger parcels. Overall, market activity is weaker for most destinations to Asian ports, prompting owners to reposition tonnage to bridge the gap between southeast Asia and northern destinations. Overall, along this route there is very little quoted, aside from the usual contract of affreightment (COA) volumes there has not been much activity, besides the usual methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG) cargoes. From the USG to Brazil, the market COA volumes remain steady as there were some inquiries and much less space is available for May for part cargoes, as COA nominations appear completed for the month. According to one ship broker, “owners are reporting very limited parcel space available”. The usual mix of caustic soda and methanol seems to be most visibly seen quoted in the market. For the USG to Rotterdam, there are some bits of cargo space still available for May. Most of the outsider vessels that were on berth have already sailed, and only the regulars remain at this time as they push tonnage availability which is all but full. However, there were steadier quotes styrene, methanol and caustic seen in the market this week for June loadings. Freight rates are now expected to remain steady for the time being. With additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Asia's petrochemical industry leaders are navigating a complex global landscape marked by unprecedented challenges, with a renewed focus on sustainability, innovation, and regional collaboration, industry leaders said on Friday. Oversupply, sluggish demand, trade conflicts weigh on industry Challenges open doors for transformation through digital innovation, efficiency Protectionist trade policies cast shadow over global economic activity Facing economic volatility, supply chain disruptions, and increasing environmental demands, top executives from across the region attending the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) in Bangkok emphasized that the industry must adapt to ensure continued prosperity. APIC 2025 with the theme “Ensuring a Transformed World Prosperity” runs on 15-16 May. "We are now standing at a defining crossroads," Federation of Thai Industries, Petrochemical Industry Club (FTIPC) chairman Apichai Chareonsuk said, acknowledging formidable pressures on the industry. He cited “economic volatility, supply chain uncertainties, and rising expectations for environmental responsibility" among the list of complex challenges facing the petrochemical industry. However, he viewed these challenges as opportunities for progress. "These challenges are also opening doors to transformation- through digital innovation, resource efficiency, and sustainable development," Chareonsuk said. INDIA AS BEACON OF GROWTH India, a giant emerging market in Asia, nonetheless, is a "beacon of growth” fueled by burgeoning end-use sectors, according to the country’s Chemicals and Petrochemical Manufacturers’ Association (CPMA) secretary general Shekhar Balakrishnan. The south Asian country is emerging as one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, he noted. This growth, he explained, is underpinned by a robust rise in end-use sectors, including automobiles, infrastructure, construction, among others. These sectors, he added, have propelled the petrochemical industry to new heights, adding that "the Indian petrochemical industry has entered a new phase of growth". "As I speak, a new world-scale cracker is in its last stage of commissioning," Balakrishnan said. Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd (HPCL) is slated to begin commercial operations at its refinery and petrochemical complex at Barmer in India's western Rajasthan state this year. The complex can produce 820,000 tonnes/year of ethylene and 400,000 tonnes/year of propylene. Furthermore, he noted that across the country, "new investments covering a broad spectrum of petrochemicals are materializing to augment India’s production capabilities further and make the petrochemical industry in this part of the world even more robust". Balakrishnan also drew attention to the widespread commitment to environmental responsibility in the region. "I will be failing in my duty if I do not highlight the tremendous efforts that organizations in India and the Asian region are making towards sustainability," he remarked. He stressed the balance between the industry's essential role and the need for responsible practices. "Petrochemicals are essential enablers of modern life … However, the collective challenge before us is to adopt smart, sustainable processes and technologies,” the CPMA secretary-general said. "The industry is actively embracing the circular economy, especially in polymers, creating huge opportunities for reuse and recycling while addressing the global crisis of material waste," he added. Balakrishnan highlighted the success of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework in India. "This is already yielding significant societal benefits and setting the stage for sustainable industrial growth." "For instance, India today recycles over 90% of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles into value-added articles." PROTECTIONIST POLICIES PROLIFERATE Japan Petrochemical Industry Association (JPCA) chairman Koshiro Kudo said that "protectionist trade policies around the world" are casting a shadow over global economic activity. He also pointed to the disruptive influence on the industry of "growing geopolitical risks, fluctuations in tariff policies, economic security issues, problems in China’s real estate market, and the increasing frequency of natural disasters caused by climate change". In Japan, the operating rate of ethylene plants “has remained below 90% since May 2022, and has recently dropped to around 80%, continuing in a very challenging situation." Kudo also emphasized the industry's environmental obligations, stating that it "is also expected to play a role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem by recycling CO2 [carbon dioxide], as well as supplying materials”. Achieving sustainability necessitates that "international cooperation and technological innovation in the petrochemical industry are essential, and it is necessary to fully leverage the power of chemistry", he said. JPCA's two-phase approach to structural reform is to focus first on applying available technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and developing innovative technologies for further emission reductions, and then on applying new technologies to achieve sustainable development goals, Kudo said. He emphasized the need to transform petrochemical complexes into "environmentally friendly 'sustainable complexes' through technological innovation" to function as environmental and energy infrastructure hubs. Kudo also drew attention to the demographic challenge of declining birth rates across Asia. He stressed the need to utilize technologies such as digital transformation, "green" transformation, and artificial intelligence to improve plant operation efficiency, facilitate technology transfer, accelerate R&D, and improve safety. Korea Chemical Industry Association (KCIA) chairman Hak-Cheol Shin described the current market as an "unprecedented crisis marked by global oversupply, sluggish demand, and full-scale trade conflicts" which calls for regional unity. "Amidst growing uncertainties in the global trading order, closer solidarity and cooperation among us are more crucial than ever to ensure the sustainable growth of our industry." "The external environment surrounding the petrochemical industry this year is more complex and challenging than ever before," he said. Shin warned that “the implementation of US tariff policies is expected to bring about cataclysmic changes in global trade". Exacerbating business challenges were "persistent oversupply centered around China" and "instability in raw material procurement stemming from the reorganization of global supply chains", he said. If downstream industries weaken due to tariff shocks, the petrochemical industry's growth momentum may also diminish, the KCIA chief said. Shin urged a proactive response to both market dynamics and increasing environmental demands. REGIONAL UNITY IS KEY "At this critical juncture, APIC members must demonstrate stronger solidarity and leadership than ever before," KPIA's Shin said. "While addressing internal and external risks such as trade conflicts and global oversupply, we must also remain fully responsive to the growing societal demands for enhanced environmental regulations, including carbon neutrality and key elements of the UN Plastics Treaty." Shin stressed the need to "enhance operational efficiency, optimize energy utilization, and shift toward high-value-added products through the adoption of cutting-edge technologies" to minimize environmental impacts and reinforce competitiveness. "As we navigate global challenges – from climate change to economic volatility – our industry stands at the forefront of delivering solutions that balance growth, sustainability, and societal progress," Malaysian Petrochemicals Association (MPA) president Bahrin Asmawi  said. Various initiatives are underway in line with Malaysia's National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) and New Industrial Master Plan 2030 (NIMP 2030). These include investments in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCU), green hydrogen, and utilizing bio-based feedstocks, as well as accelerating adoption of renewable energy in production and chemical recycling. Asmawi stressed the indispensable nature of collaboration, saying: "No single entity can drive transformation alone." MPA is committed to fostering partnerships with the government, investors, technology providers, and communities, he said. Asmawi also proposed a united front among APIC members to address trade policy challenges, particularly suggesting that regional cooperation could lead to "better effective negotiating deals" in the context of recent US tariff announcements. Petrochemical Industry Association of Taiwan (PIAT) chairman Mihn Tsao emphasized in his key address at APIC 2025 "both the urgency and the opportunity of our time." The industry is "called upon to deliver not only economic value but also social and environmental responsibility," he said. "Innovation, sustainability, and partnership are no longer optional – they are essential to our continued development." Despite facing significant global headwinds in 2024, including geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, inflation, and climate change, Tsao noted the Taiwanese industry's resilience and "steadfast commitment to transformation". This transformation, he explained, included intensified investments in green innovation, AI-driven process optimization, and sustainable material development. Taiwan has a formal commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 through its "Climate Change Response Act" and the introduction of carbon fee regulations in 2024 as a "critical turning point", he said. Future focus areas must include developing high-value, low-carbon production, driving technological innovation through AI, and deepening international cooperation to secure competitiveness. "Collaboration across borders and industries is essential in addressing the global challenges we face: decarbonization, overcapacity, shifting geopolitical dynamics, and the fragmentation of the multilateral trading system." For Singapore, efforts to transform its industry in line with national sustainability goals, include the Singapore Green Plan 2030 and the national net-zero ambition by 2050, Singapore Chemical Industry Council (SCIC) chairman Henri Nejade said. This transformation includes the development of Jurong Island into a Sustainable Energy & Chemicals Park focusing on sustainable products, sustainable production, and Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). Government initiatives like the establishment of a Future Energy Fund also support low-carbon and next-generation energy solutions. Nejade also emphasized the importance of regional cooperation in navigating regulatory landscapes through initiatives like the ASEAN Regulatory Co-operation Platform (ARCP). The ARCP is an industry-led initiative to drive greater engagements and capacity building involving all the regulators and industry representatives from all the 10 ASEAN member states. Such cooperation helps "address non-tariff barriers, thus helping to create conducive business environments." Insight article by Nurluqman Suratman Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy. Thumbnail image: Leaders of the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) member countries. The event runs on 15-16 May in Bangkok, Thailand. (Nurluqman Suratman)

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Sluggish domestic demand weighed on Japan’s petrochemical industry, resulting in reduced production volumes in 2024 compared with previous years, according to the Japan Petrochemical Industry Association (JPCA). 2024 ethylene output falls 6.3% Production of five major plastics shrink by 5% Japan economy forecast to grow by 1.2% in 2025 “Although some crackers in Southeast Asia and East Asia are reducing production, there are plans for capacity increases in crackers that significantly exceed demand in China,” JPCA said in a report prepared for the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) 2025. The conference is being held in Bangkok, Thailand from 15-16 May. Operating rates of crackers in Japan are expected to remain lowered, as with previous years, JPCA said. Japan's ethylene production in 2024 fell 6.3% year on year to 4.99 million tonnes, as domestic crackers have operated at below 90% of capacity since August 2022, with the monthly average run rate falling below 80% five times in 2024. Japan’s real GDP growth rate in 2024 was 0.1% amid weak exports, neutral growth in private consumption, and a slight increase in government consumption. For the whole of 2024, the country’s total production of five major plastics – namely, linear density polyethylene (PE), high density PE (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) – declined to 5.7 million tonnes, lower by 5.2% from 2023. Production (in thousand tonnes) Product 2024 2023 % change Ethylene 4,989 5,324 -6.3 LDPE 1,160 1,219 -4.8 HDPE 656 665 -1.4 PP 1,935 2,075 -6.8 PS 549 564 -2.7 PVC 1,406 1,496 -6.0 Styrene monomer (SM) 1,297 1,428 -9.2 Ethylene glycol (EG) 276 264 4.6 Acrylonitrile (ACN) 303 341 -11.2 Sources: METI, Japan Styrene Industry Association (PS, SM) and Vinyl Environmental Council (PVC) Domestic demand as ethylene equivalent in 2024  inched up by 1.4% to 3.92 million tonnes, according to JPCA data. While the global economy is expected to grow steadily in 2025, there is a risk of deterioration in the global economy and a corresponding decline in demand due to geopolitical issues, JPCA said, citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, as well as the tariff policy of the US Trump administration. The latter has caused costs of raw material prices to soar, JPCA said. Meanwhile, Japan's real GDP growth rate for 2025 is projected to accelerate to 1.2%, supported by increased exports, sustained growth in personal consumption, and increases in capital investment, said JPCA. Higher wage hikes in 2025 should help boost domestic consumption, it said. In the report, JPCA called on the petrochemical industry to adopt new roles and responsibilities in achieving carbon neutrality and advancing a recycling-oriented society. The report outlined a two-stage timeline: first, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing facilities by immediately deploying currently available technologies; and second, to establish sustainable development goals by gradually introducing new technologies into society. “Not only corporate efforts but … collaboration and system design throughout the supply chain are required,” JPCA said. Focus article by Jonathan Yee

15-May-2025