Mixed plastic waste and pyrolysis oil

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Asia-US container rates surged this week as trade between the US and China is expected to surge amid the 90-pause on reciprocal tariffs between the two nations. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos showed minimal increases in the low-single digits, but rates from supply chain advisors Drewry showed significant increases of 19% from Shanghai to New York and 16% from Shanghai to Los Angeles, as shown in the following chart. Following the latest US–China trade developments, Drewry expects an increase in Transpacific spot rates in the coming week due to shortage in capacity. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said the 90-day pause is expected to lead to a surge of activity, where spot rates will peak and then flatten as carriers redeploy capacity to match demand over the next two to four weeks. “The US-China announcement on the temporary lowering of tariffs fired the starting gun for shippers to rush as many imports as they can during the 90-day window of opportunity,” Sand said. “There is no time to waste for these shippers and the rush of cargo will put upward pressure on spot rates on Transpacific trades.” But Sand said that a deeper dive into data shows shippers paying prices towards the market mid-high for rates agreed post the US-China announcement, while legacy agreements struck before 12 May will continue to keep a lid on the bubbling market averages for a short time. The following chart shows Xeneta’s rates from North China to the US Gulf. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, also expects to see a surge in imports. “We are likely to see a significant demand rebound in the near term as shippers replenish inventories that may have started to run down in the past month and as many Chinese manufacturers have high levels of finished goods already ready to ship,” Levine said. With an August deadline for the possible return of higher tariff levels, it is also likely that the near-term ocean demand rebound will mark the start of more frontloading, Levine said. “If so, it would also mark the early start of this year’s peak season, which could end earlier than usual as well for the same reasons,” Levine said. TANKER RATES STABLE TO LOWER US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were stable to lower this week with rates for parcels from the US Gulf (USG) to Asia dropping once again. Rates from the USG to Asia ticked lower both for smaller parcels and larger parcels. Overall, market activity is weaker for most destinations to Asian ports, prompting owners to reposition tonnage to bridge the gap between southeast Asia and northern destinations. Overall, along this route there is very little quoted, aside from the usual contract of affreightment (COA) volumes there has not been much activity, besides the usual methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG) cargoes. From the USG to Brazil, the market COA volumes remain steady as there were some inquiries and much less space is available for May for part cargoes, as COA nominations appear completed for the month. According to one ship broker, “owners are reporting very limited parcel space available”. The usual mix of caustic soda and methanol seems to be most visibly seen quoted in the market. For the USG to Rotterdam, there are some bits of cargo space still available for May. Most of the outsider vessels that were on berth have already sailed, and only the regulars remain at this time as they push tonnage availability which is all but full. However, there were steadier quotes styrene, methanol and caustic seen in the market this week for June loadings. Freight rates are now expected to remain steady for the time being. With additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Asia benzene prices saw an uptrend early week. However, by Friday, these gains were erased by a drop in crude prices. Market gets boost from US-China trade breakthrough Early week increases of over $50/tonne eroded by oil drop at week's close Caution over sustainability of uptrend amid incoming European cargoes In this chemical podcast, Asia benzene editor Angeline Soh discusses the situation and some insights from the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) 2025, held in Bangkok, Thailand.

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Asia's petrochemical industry leaders are navigating a complex global landscape marked by unprecedented challenges, with a renewed focus on sustainability, innovation, and regional collaboration, industry leaders said on Friday. Oversupply, sluggish demand, trade conflicts weigh on industry Challenges open doors for transformation through digital innovation, efficiency Protectionist trade policies cast shadow over global economic activity Facing economic volatility, supply chain disruptions, and increasing environmental demands, top executives from across the region attending the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) in Bangkok emphasized that the industry must adapt to ensure continued prosperity. APIC 2025 with the theme “Ensuring a Transformed World Prosperity” runs on 15-16 May. "We are now standing at a defining crossroads," Federation of Thai Industries, Petrochemical Industry Club (FTIPC) chairman Apichai Chareonsuk said, acknowledging formidable pressures on the industry. He cited “economic volatility, supply chain uncertainties, and rising expectations for environmental responsibility" among the list of complex challenges facing the petrochemical industry. However, he viewed these challenges as opportunities for progress. "These challenges are also opening doors to transformation- through digital innovation, resource efficiency, and sustainable development," Chareonsuk said. INDIA AS BEACON OF GROWTH India, a giant emerging market in Asia, nonetheless, is a "beacon of growth” fueled by burgeoning end-use sectors, according to the country’s Chemicals and Petrochemical Manufacturers’ Association (CPMA) secretary general Shekhar Balakrishnan. The south Asian country is emerging as one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, he noted. This growth, he explained, is underpinned by a robust rise in end-use sectors, including automobiles, infrastructure, construction, among others. These sectors, he added, have propelled the petrochemical industry to new heights, adding that "the Indian petrochemical industry has entered a new phase of growth". "As I speak, a new world-scale cracker is in its last stage of commissioning," Balakrishnan said. Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd (HPCL) is slated to begin commercial operations at its refinery and petrochemical complex at Barmer in India's western Rajasthan state this year. The complex can produce 820,000 tonnes/year of ethylene and 400,000 tonnes/year of propylene. Furthermore, he noted that across the country, "new investments covering a broad spectrum of petrochemicals are materializing to augment India’s production capabilities further and make the petrochemical industry in this part of the world even more robust". Balakrishnan also drew attention to the widespread commitment to environmental responsibility in the region. "I will be failing in my duty if I do not highlight the tremendous efforts that organizations in India and the Asian region are making towards sustainability," he remarked. He stressed the balance between the industry's essential role and the need for responsible practices. "Petrochemicals are essential enablers of modern life … However, the collective challenge before us is to adopt smart, sustainable processes and technologies,” the CPMA secretary-general said. "The industry is actively embracing the circular economy, especially in polymers, creating huge opportunities for reuse and recycling while addressing the global crisis of material waste," he added. Balakrishnan highlighted the success of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework in India. "This is already yielding significant societal benefits and setting the stage for sustainable industrial growth." "For instance, India today recycles over 90% of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles into value-added articles." PROTECTIONIST POLICIES PROLIFERATE Japan Petrochemical Industry Association (JPCA) chairman Koshiro Kudo said that "protectionist trade policies around the world" are casting a shadow over global economic activity. He also pointed to the disruptive influence on the industry of "growing geopolitical risks, fluctuations in tariff policies, economic security issues, problems in China’s real estate market, and the increasing frequency of natural disasters caused by climate change". In Japan, the operating rate of ethylene plants “has remained below 90% since May 2022, and has recently dropped to around 80%, continuing in a very challenging situation." Kudo also emphasized the industry's environmental obligations, stating that it "is also expected to play a role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem by recycling CO2 [carbon dioxide], as well as supplying materials”. Achieving sustainability necessitates that "international cooperation and technological innovation in the petrochemical industry are essential, and it is necessary to fully leverage the power of chemistry", he said. JPCA's two-phase approach to structural reform is to focus first on applying available technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and developing innovative technologies for further emission reductions, and then on applying new technologies to achieve sustainable development goals, Kudo said. He emphasized the need to transform petrochemical complexes into "environmentally friendly 'sustainable complexes' through technological innovation" to function as environmental and energy infrastructure hubs. Kudo also drew attention to the demographic challenge of declining birth rates across Asia. He stressed the need to utilize technologies such as digital transformation, "green" transformation, and artificial intelligence to improve plant operation efficiency, facilitate technology transfer, accelerate R&D, and improve safety. Korea Chemical Industry Association (KCIA) chairman Hak-Cheol Shin described the current market as an "unprecedented crisis marked by global oversupply, sluggish demand, and full-scale trade conflicts" which calls for regional unity. "Amidst growing uncertainties in the global trading order, closer solidarity and cooperation among us are more crucial than ever to ensure the sustainable growth of our industry." "The external environment surrounding the petrochemical industry this year is more complex and challenging than ever before," he said. Shin warned that “the implementation of US tariff policies is expected to bring about cataclysmic changes in global trade". Exacerbating business challenges were "persistent oversupply centered around China" and "instability in raw material procurement stemming from the reorganization of global supply chains", he said. If downstream industries weaken due to tariff shocks, the petrochemical industry's growth momentum may also diminish, the KCIA chief said. Shin urged a proactive response to both market dynamics and increasing environmental demands. REGIONAL UNITY IS KEY "At this critical juncture, APIC members must demonstrate stronger solidarity and leadership than ever before," KPIA's Shin said. "While addressing internal and external risks such as trade conflicts and global oversupply, we must also remain fully responsive to the growing societal demands for enhanced environmental regulations, including carbon neutrality and key elements of the UN Plastics Treaty." Shin stressed the need to "enhance operational efficiency, optimize energy utilization, and shift toward high-value-added products through the adoption of cutting-edge technologies" to minimize environmental impacts and reinforce competitiveness. "As we navigate global challenges – from climate change to economic volatility – our industry stands at the forefront of delivering solutions that balance growth, sustainability, and societal progress," Malaysian Petrochemicals Association (MPA) president Bahrin Asmawi  said. Various initiatives are underway in line with Malaysia's National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) and New Industrial Master Plan 2030 (NIMP 2030). These include investments in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCU), green hydrogen, and utilizing bio-based feedstocks, as well as accelerating adoption of renewable energy in production and chemical recycling. Asmawi stressed the indispensable nature of collaboration, saying: "No single entity can drive transformation alone." MPA is committed to fostering partnerships with the government, investors, technology providers, and communities, he said. Asmawi also proposed a united front among APIC members to address trade policy challenges, particularly suggesting that regional cooperation could lead to "better effective negotiating deals" in the context of recent US tariff announcements. Petrochemical Industry Association of Taiwan (PIAT) chairman Mihn Tsao emphasized in his key address at APIC 2025 "both the urgency and the opportunity of our time." The industry is "called upon to deliver not only economic value but also social and environmental responsibility," he said. "Innovation, sustainability, and partnership are no longer optional – they are essential to our continued development." Despite facing significant global headwinds in 2024, including geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, inflation, and climate change, Tsao noted the Taiwanese industry's resilience and "steadfast commitment to transformation". This transformation, he explained, included intensified investments in green innovation, AI-driven process optimization, and sustainable material development. Taiwan has a formal commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 through its "Climate Change Response Act" and the introduction of carbon fee regulations in 2024 as a "critical turning point", he said. Future focus areas must include developing high-value, low-carbon production, driving technological innovation through AI, and deepening international cooperation to secure competitiveness. "Collaboration across borders and industries is essential in addressing the global challenges we face: decarbonization, overcapacity, shifting geopolitical dynamics, and the fragmentation of the multilateral trading system." For Singapore, efforts to transform its industry in line with national sustainability goals, include the Singapore Green Plan 2030 and the national net-zero ambition by 2050, Singapore Chemical Industry Council (SCIC) chairman Henri Nejade said. This transformation includes the development of Jurong Island into a Sustainable Energy & Chemicals Park focusing on sustainable products, sustainable production, and Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). Government initiatives like the establishment of a Future Energy Fund also support low-carbon and next-generation energy solutions. Nejade also emphasized the importance of regional cooperation in navigating regulatory landscapes through initiatives like the ASEAN Regulatory Co-operation Platform (ARCP). The ARCP is an industry-led initiative to drive greater engagements and capacity building involving all the regulators and industry representatives from all the 10 ASEAN member states. Such cooperation helps "address non-tariff barriers, thus helping to create conducive business environments." Insight article by Nurluqman Suratman Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy. Thumbnail image: Leaders of the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) member countries. The event runs on 15-16 May in Bangkok, Thailand. (Nurluqman Suratman)

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–The US tariff policies and other economic headwinds present significant challenges for chemical exporters in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Nevertheless, opportunities and avenues for cooperation exist, especially with Asia, according to the secretary general of the Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA). "Navigating the complexities of global trade is a top priority," Abdulwahab Al Sadoun told ICIS on the sidelines of the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) 2025. The GCC region comprises six Middle Eastern countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The GPCA plays a pivotal role in facilitating partnerships between companies in both the GCC region and China, a strategy that has gained momentum in recent years, Al Sadoun said. "We estimate that GCC chemical producers hold equity in joint ventures processing approximately 2.7 million barrels/day of crude and operating over 23 million tonnes per year of downstream petrochemical capacity across China, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore," said Al Sadoun. While US tariff policies present significant challenges for GCC chemical exporters, Al Sadoun sees opportunities amid the turbulence. “Even a baseline 10% tariff will raise the price of GCC chemical products in the US market,” Al Sadoun said, citing a paper published by GPCA that highlighted the potential effects of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs. Some products that would be particularly affected are high-volume, price-sensitive exports such as urea, paraxylene (PX) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). However, Asia’s dominance as a trading partner offers a silver lining. “Asia accounted for over half of our total exports in 2023," Al Sadoun said, with China, India and Turkey among key markets. "If China reduces imports from the US, the GCC can step in to fill that gap, provided we act swiftly to capture market share and diversify our trade partners,” said Al Sadoun. Asia also accounts for well over half of global plastics consumption, with more than 50% of all GCC chemical exports already flowing to Asia, Al Sadoun added. “Recent joint ventures, such as Aramco’s partnerships at Panjin and Gulei in China, both designed around crude‑to‑chemicals schemes that convert more than 50% of each barrel directly into petrochemical feedstock, demonstrate how upstream strength can be paired with local finishing capacity,” Al Sadoun said. GCC CHEM PRODUCERS HAVE COMPETITIVE EDGEAmid falling oil prices in 2025, Al Sadoun believes chemical producers in the Gulf still hold an advantage over competitors reliant on naphtha. “While crude oil prices may be falling, the Arabian Gulf’s gas-based model still gives chemical producers a clear cost edge over their naphtha-reliant competitors.” At the same time, he emphasized the importance of continuing to optimize energy use and focus on higher-value projects. Companies are channeling investments into specialty elastomers, crude-to-chemicals complexes and downstream sectors such as mobility, packaging and electric vehicle (EV) materials, Al Sadoun said. “With plant utilization in the Arabian Gulf running in the 90% range – far above most global peers – the region is well placed to ride out softer oil, provided it keeps lowering variable costs and broadening its product slate. “GPCA’s role is to benchmark those cost and efficiency gains across its membership and ensure best practice spreads quickly from one site to the entire Gulf cluster.” SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE A KEY FOCUSSupply chain resilience has emerged as a critical focus for Arabian Gulf chemical producers. “Recent shocks, such as geopolitical flare-ups, pandemic-era port closures, even weather-driven canal disruptions, have confirmed that leading companies cannot simply react; they must anticipate, adapt and seize the openings that turbulence creates,” Al Sadoun said. Al Sadoun pointed out four lessons: the first, route flexibility; the second, the need for end-to-end visibility; third, the need for regional buffer stocks such as joint warehouses in key import markets; and lastly, digital risk forecasting. The use of tools such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) are moving supply chain management from reactive to predictive, while diversified sourcing and strategic inventories reduce single region dependency, Al Sadoun said. FOCUS ON RENEWABLES Even as the GCC region continues to leverage its cost advantage through gas, its member countries are also committed to energy transition. “GCC nations aim to source 25-50% of their energy mix from renewables by 2030,” Al Sadoun said, adding that the region is also investing heavily in carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), currently capturing 4.4 million tonnes of CO2 annually – 10% of the global CCUS capacity. Hydrogen production is another priority, with Oman, the UAE and Saudi Arabia setting ambitious targets. Oman has committed to producing 1 million tonnes of hydrogen by 2030, the UAE to 1.4 million tonnes of hydrogen by 2031 and Saudi Arabia aims for 4 million tonnes of hydrogen by 2030. "These initiatives are part of our strategy to reduce environmental impact while maintaining our competitive edge," Al Sadoun emphasized. APIC 2025 runs in Bangkok, Thailand, from 15-16 May. Interview article by Jonathan Yee (recasts paragraphs 1 and 7 for clarity)

16-May-2025

MUMBAI (ICIS)–India’s merchandise exports in April grew by 9% year on year to $38.5 billion, while the trade deficit for the month widened to $26.4 billion due to high imports of petroleum products, official data showed. The trade deficit in March 2025 was $21.5 billion, according to data from the Ministry of Commerce. “Last year, there were many problems. Trade route was a big problem with ships forced to avoid the Red Sea. There were supply issues. Cost of transport and insurance increased. But Indian exporters have shown that they have achieved resiliency in their business,” Indian commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal said during a press briefing. “India’s trade performance in April underscores the robust fundamentals of Indian exports despite global headwinds, including geopolitical tensions, inflationary trends, and supply chain disruptions,” Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) president S C Ralhan said. India’s merchandise imports in April rose by 19.1% year on year to $64.9 billion, with crude petroleum and products imports up by 25.6% at $20.7 billion, official data showed. Higher imports, particularly of capital goods and energy raw materials, reflects improving domestic demand and capacity expansion, FIEO chief Ralhan said. Meanwhile, trade with the US has increased in April, India’s commerce chief Barthwal said. India expects to conclude the first phase of the trade deal with the US by October this year, with an official Indian team expected to visit the US this month for trade talks. The south Asian nation expects to increase bilateral trade with the US to more than $500 billion by 2030. During his state visit to Qatar on 15 May, US President Donald Trump was quoted in the media as saying that an agreement with India is close. India’s April exports of petroleum products rose by nearly 4.7% year on year to $7.37 billion, while those of organic and inorganic chemicals dropped by around 9.1%, to 2.27 billion. Exports of pharmaceutical products rose by 2.4% to $2.49 billion. April man-made fabrics and yarn exports increased by 4.2% to $383.8 million, while plastics shipments rose by 4.6% to $696.4 million. Meanwhile, April imports of organic and inorganic chemical rose by 10.9% year on year to $2.45 billion, while those of artificial resins and plastic materials rose by 14.2% to $1.95 billion. April fertilizer imports rose by 10% to $653.6 million, while imports of chemical material and products more than doubled to $1.97 billion. Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy.

16-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The tariff deal that the US has reached with China did not eliminate the duties on steel, aluminium and auto parts, all of which could lower automobile production and reduce demand for the plastics and chemicals used to make the vehicles. The US maintained its 25% sectoral tariffs on Chinese imports of steel, aluminium and auto parts. It levies the same tariffs on imports from much of the world. Imports from Canada and Mexico can avoid the tariffs if they comply with the nations' trade agreement, known as the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Oxford Economics expects US auto production will fall by -2.0% to -0.9% year on year in 2025. Fitch Ratings, a credit rating agency, lowered its US auto sales forecast by 6.7% and warned of production cuts. WHY ARE AUTOS IMPORTANT TO CHEMSAutomobiles made in North American contain an average of 198 kg of plastic, according to ICIS, making them an important end market for producers. Polypropylene (PP) is the most commonly used resin in North American automobiles followed by polyurethanes and nylon, as shown in the following charts. In addition, automobiles are large end markets for paints and coatings. In all, the typical automobile has nearly $4,000 worth of chemistry WHAT CHEMS SAY ABOUT AUTOSCelanese, whose Engineered Materials segment is heavily dependent on autos, stressed the uncertainty about the effects that tariffs will have on this key end market during the second half of the year. It will prepare by reducing inventory, controlling costs and lowering operating rates if warranted by demand weakness. Polyurethanes producer Huntsman is seeing automobile build rates drop low-single digit percentages. By the time order patterns trickle through original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and down to chemical companies, Huntsman is seeing double-digit drops in some order patterns. AdvanSix warned that uncertainty surrounding tariffs is affecting the market for nylon and other engineering plastics. Axalta Coating Systems, which makes auto paint, warned of a $50 million gross annualized charge from tariffs. Axalta lowered its 2025 sales guidance to $5,300-5,375 million from $5,350-5,400 million. Earnings guidance remained unchanged. Steps that Axalta could take to offset a portion of that hit include insourcing production capacity to domestic plants; sourcing raw materials locally; reformulating products; managing strategic inventory; and executing pricing actions. TARIFFS RAISE AUTO COSTS, THREATEN OUTPUTTariffs on auto inputs will increase costs for vehicles, and producers will likely pass through a portion of those higher costs to customers. The size of those cost pass throughs will play a large role in the tariffs' effects on chemical demand. Higher prices for automobiles will discourage sales. Lower sales will reduce auto production and cut demand for plastics and chemicals used to make those vehicles. THE EFFECT SO FAR ON AUTO BUILDSPrior to the announcement of the US and China trade deal, Ford estimated that the gross cost impact from the tariffs is $2.5 billion. Among that, half will come from imported and exported parts as well as the effect that steel and aluminium tariffs will have on domestic prices. The rest is from imported vehicles. Already, Stellantis halted production for two weeks at a plant in Windsor, Ontario Province, Canada, because of tariffs. AUTO'S EXPOSURE TO TARIFFSThe US auto industry's exposure to tariffs is not trivial because the country imports enormous amounts of auto parts, steel and aluminium. Many of these products are subject to 25% sectoral tariffs or 10% baseline tariffs. More than 50% of the content of cars assembled in the US is imported, according to a 3 May CNN article, citing US government statistics. AUTO PART TARIFFSThe following chart breaks down 2024 general imports by country for auto parts under the 8708 code of the harmonized tariff schedule (HTS). Figures are in billions of dollars. Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) Not all auto parts will be hit by the 25% tariffs. Some parts are excluded. Those from Mexico and Canada will escape the levy if they comply with the USMCA. STEEL AND ALUMINIUM TARIFFSThe following chart shows 2024 general imports of iron and steel under the HTS codes 7206-7224. These codes cover iron and nonalloy steel; stainless steel; and other alloy steel. The chart breaks down the imports by country and lists the value in trillions of dollars. Source: ITC Metal imports from the UK will be exempt under a recent trade deal, as indicated by a press conference in that country. Imports from Canada and Mexico would be exempt from these tariffs if they comply with the USMCA. Not all of these steel imports would be used in automobiles But the chart does illustrate that the US imports iron and steel from many countries that will be covered by the 25% tariffs. The following chart provides a similar breakdown for 2024 general imports of articles of iron and steel under Chapter 72. Figures are in trillions of dollars. Source: ITC The following chart provides the country breakdown for 2024 general imports of aluminium and articles thereof under Chapter 76. Figures are in trillions of dollars. Source: ITC OTHER THREATS TO DOMESTIC AUTO PRODUCTIONTariffs are taxes, and taxes reduce economic growth. Slower GDP growth translates to lower sales and production. ICIS expects that US economic growth will slow to 1.5% in 2025 from 2.8% in 2024. Growth in 2026 could be 1.7%. The country has a 34% chance of slipping into a recession in the next 12 months. Many US consumers bought automobiles to avoid paying tariffs. Those purchases made ahead of the tariffs will come at the expense of future sales. US SELF-SUFFICIENT FOR MANY PLASTICS, CHEMS USED IN AUTOSMany of the plastics and chemicals used by the US auto industry are produced in abundance in the country, and that will limit customers' exposure to the nation's tariffs for those products used in automobiles. The US is self-sufficient in polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PE), a plastic used in packaging and fuel tanks. Nylon is excluded from the tariffs. Polyurethanes, the second most common polymer used in automobiles, are made with methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), and a substantial amount of US MDI imports comes from China. The US also relies on imports of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), much of which comes from Mexico, South Korea and Taiwan. Additional reporting by Stefan Baumgarten, Joseph Chang and Jonathan Lopez Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows automobile. Image by Shutterstock)

15-May-2025

By Jennifer Sanin and Tatjana Jovanovic This article reflects the personal views of the authors and is not necessarily an expression of ICIS’s position. LONDON (ICIS)–The EU’s choice to oust dissenters from the decision-making process on a Russian gas ban is an act of political desperation. Recently, the European Commission presented its plan to end Russian fossil fuel imports by 2027 but failed to offer much detail until the release of legislative proposals in June. While decisions on sanctions require a unanimous vote to pass, legislation can pass via “qualified majority”. Restricting trade with a country seems like the definition of a sanction, but the EU’s choice to make it a legislative issue conveniently sidelines the inevitable dissent from less compliant member states. Both Slovakia and Hungary , whose main gas supplier is Russia, have vehemently rejected the proposal and are seeking joint action to counter it. More and more eastern European populations further impoverished by high energy costs are turning against the EU’s stance on Russian energy. The common scare tactic of Russian gas supply weaponization can not be wielded against these states, as they are clearly more concerned about the EU cutting off their access to affordable energy than Russian President Vladimir Putin himself. Intelligence agencies and media outlets can blame the trend on “Russian interference” all they like, but reliance on costly and volatile global LNG is hardly conducive to a stable energy price for consumers. “Not being supplied by Russian gas means getting dependent on the US, which is not really reliable at the moment,” one trader said. “Hard to get the gas over unless you reverse flow from west EU,” another trader added. “And relying on LNG as well… so I get [their concerns].” Indeed, the cost of firm annual transit from Netherlands to Slovakia totals €3.27/MWh compared with just €1.36/MWh to pull on Hungary’s Turkstream volumes, which themselves are contracted at a discount to the TTF. A moral argument? Diversity of supply ought to mean just that: a mix of all possible sources, including the huge fuel-rich land just over the border. Business itself does not necessarily bend to geopolitical shifts. For a long time after Russia’s invasion, Ukraine continued making money off transiting its aggressor’s gas to Europe. Plenty of US and European trading partners either violate human rights outright or hold deeply opposing cultural values – China’s oppression of Uyghurs, Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen, Sharia law in Qatar to give a few examples. Following the logic of doing business exclusively with “morally righteous” partners, Europe would have to limit its trade to only include secular Western states. The outcome of the war can not rationally be linked to eastern Europe’s consumption of Russian gas, and the ban is blatantly an ideological one. Cheap Russian gas? One riposte to the concept of “cheap” Russian gas is to say that Gazprom supplied European companies under legacy oil-linked contracts, which eventually turned out more expensive than hub pricing amid gas market liberalisation. Already in 2015, many of these legacy contracts were re-written to incorporate TTF linkage . Then in 2018, the Russian energy giant adapted by selling excess volumes on an electronic sales platform at TTF-linked prices, which ICIS covered extensively at the time. Anyway, specific contract terms are a distraction from the crucial point that Russian pipeline gas is a flexible and abundant source of supply that would ease volatility across Europe, not just regional hubs. Slovak energy company SPP recently argued that lack of infrastructure capacity makes eastern Europe more vulnerable to supply crunches. This could be addressed with infrastructure expansion but uncertainty around Europe’s fossil fuel phase-out and a possible Russia-Ukraine peace deal makes such projects hard to plan. Speculators’ paradise One could also ask who stands to gain from such a volatile energy price environment while European consumers and industry suffer. The total removal of Europe’s most flexible supply source would almost inevitably expose the markets to price swings, and a volatile environment is most attractive for wealthy speculative traders. TTF front-month at-the-money implied volatility – the option market’s measure of a contract’s future price swings – skyrocketed after the invasion and has hovered over 50% ever since. That is much higher than the benchmark contract for most liquid commodity, Brent crude M+2, and therefore more lucrative for high-risk speculative traders. At-the-money July ’25 Brent implied volatility stood at around 30% on 14 May. The market impact of heightened speculative activity is a hotly debated topic , specifically its impact on inflating prices (in the case of net longs)– but most sources polled by ICIS agree it can exacerbate volatility. This begs the question… who are the winners of the EU’s political grandstanding? While it is no secret that eastern Europe is often used as a playground for West versus East, this latest proposal may have gone a step too far.

15-May-2025

This article reflects the personal views of the author and is not necessarily an expression of ICIS's position. Romanian pro-EU candidate favours free trade but is less outspoken on clean energy Polish and Romanian presidential candidates' position on Russia could sway EU policies Rise of populist parties across CEE could lead to fragmentation of markets LONDON (ICIS)– Romanians and Poles will be heading to the polls on Sunday and their vote could hardly be more consequential for the direction of energy markets in central Europe and arguably the EU as a whole. Apart from holding presidential elections on the same day, there are many other notable similarities. As mayors of Bucharest and Warsaw, educated at elite EU universities, Romania’s presidential candidate Nicusor Dan and his Polish counterpart Rafal Trzaskowski have strong pro-EU agendas. At the opposite end, Romania’s populist far-right candidate George Simion and Poland’s Karol Nawrocki prefer to champion the cause of the EU-disillusioned grassroots. But there are also differences. While Dan and Trzaskowski promote the EU’s market-based economic model, the Romanian candidate is less outspoken in favour of clean forms of generation than his Polish counterpart. Simion, on the other hand, embraces economic nationalism, with a strong emphasis on state control over natural resources. He bemoans the abnormal weight of spot trading in the Romanian gas market, caused primarily by heavy market regulation and taxation, but proposes the continuation of state intervention. Like Nawrocki, he advocates preserving coal-fired generation but acknowledges the role of renewables in the installed capacity mix. Perhaps the most critical point in the candidates’ electoral campaigns remains their position on Russia. Unlike Simion, leader of the far right AUR party, who has been more amenable to a rapprochement with Moscow, Nawrocki continues his Law and Justice Party’s anti-Russia narrative. Nevertheless, Simion’s recent fleeting trip to Poland to endorse the conservative candidate elicited sarcastic remarks from the Polish prime minister Donald Tusk who said the encounter ‘had made Russia happy.’ If elected, their position on Russia will matter to the wider EU market on several accounts. In Romania’s case, a Simion win would swell the chorus of populist eastern European leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orban or Slovakia’s Robert Fico opposing Russian sanctions and favouring the resumption of Russian oil and gas supplies to Europe. With a standing ban on entering Ukraine and Moldova, Simion has already expressed opposition to supporting Ukraine’s war efforts and insisted on protecting Romania’s interests rather than supporting neighbouring countries. This raises questions about his commitment to facilitating the expansion of cross-border electricity and gas interconnections with Ukraine and Moldova and ultimately threatens to undermine Kyiv and Chisinau’s EU membership bids. Although Nawrocki’s political stance on Russian fossil imports is unclear it is equally uncertain whether as an EU sceptic he would lend support to EU Russian sanctions. In hindsight, Romania and Poland have benefited from substantial EU funds, collectively raking in over €300 billion since their accession in 2007 and 2004. Even so, large swathes of the population remain disillusioned as distortive national economic policies have been preventing an equitable distribution of funds. This is symptomatic of all central and eastern European countries, where the population felt left behind, even though their countries had been net beneficiaries of EU support since accession. The emergence of populist movements with strong nationalist, interventionist and anti-EU agendas across central and eastern Europe may not lead to a full breakup of the bloc but threatens to fragment energy markets and inject further political instability in an already volatile environment. As central and eastern Europe’s largest countries, the outcome of Sunday’s elections in Romania and Poland will provide a tantalizing insight into the direction that the EU will take and policies that it intends to pursue in the long term.

15-May-2025

SAO PAULO (ICIS)–Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had already got several investment deals in the bag midway through his five-day state visit to China – among others, Envision Group has committed $1.0 billion in Latin America’s largest economy to produce sugarcane-based sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Green hydrogen, ammonia also within Envision plans for its ‘Net-Zero Industrial Park Energy production, energy storage on focus in Brazil, China firms talks, deals China’s insatiable hunger for grain sees Brazil as the counterweight to US supply SAF: LARGE SCALEWhile Envision Group’s announcement did not disclose any financial details about its Brazilian SAF plans, Brazil’s Planalto Presidential Palace press services said in a separate statement the firm’s investment would stand at around $1.0 billion. The announcement came soon after Lula met Envision’s management in Beijing. “Envision will develop Latin America's first Net-Zero Industrial Park in Brazil. Anchored by the production of SAF, the park will establish a complete green fuel value chain while advancing the development of green hydrogen and green ammonia,” said the company. “We will build Latin America’s first Net Zero Industrial Park in Brazil, creating a green ecosystem centered on SAF, green hydrogen, green ammonia, and renewable energy systems,” said Envision on a post on social media network LinkedIn. “By leveraging Brazil’s abundant renewable resources to drive sustainable growth and continuously innovating to lower the cost of green fuels, this collaboration [is to] contribute positively to Brazil's green transition and reindustrialization.” IT’S ALL (MOSTLY) ABOUT ENERGY The Brazilian president is due to meet “several companies” this week while in his visit to China, eyeing not only investments in Brazil but also partnerships with Brazilian institutions and the creation of research centers. The main objective for the latter would be to generate “technological development” in the energy sector, said the cabinet’s chief of staff, Rui Costa, who is travelling with the President. According to the Brazilian government, agreements with Chinese companies will involve projects in renewable energy – wind and solar energy but also some hybrid projects which will focus primarily on energy storage in Brazilian territory. “Brazil is one of the countries that has invested the most in wind and solar energy, but today it lacks the ability to store this energy,” said Costa. Apart from Envision, CGN Power also said it would invest Brazilian reais (R) 3.0 billion ($535 million) in a wind, solar, and energy storage hub. Lula also met the chairmen of automotive group GAC and the chairman of Windey Energy Technology Group. Within automotive, electric vehicles (EVs) major Great Motor Wall (GMW) said it would invest R6.0 billion in car manufacturing facilities in Brazil. Finally, another deal to highlight would be China’s semiconductor company Longsys commitment to invest R650 million to expand capacity at its Brazilian subsidiary Zilia, potentially helping avoid US tariffs on China-made chips. Meanwhile, Lula also found time in his first two days of state visit to meet with the CEO of Norinco, a conglomerate in the defense sector but whose reach expands also to infrastructure projects such highways, railways, hydroelectric plants, and water treatment plants. On May 13, Lula and China’s President Xi Jinping also had a one-on-one, although the pair had already met a few days earlier in Moscow. RELENTLESS GROWTH IN BILATERAL TRADE According to figures by the Brazilian cabinet, China has since 2009 been Brazil’s largest trading partner. Bilateral trade stood in 2023 at $157.5 billion, with Brazil exporting to China goods worth $104.3 billion and importing goods worth $53.1 billion from China. The growth in bilateral trade continued up to the first quarter of this year. According to the same information by Brazil’s cabinet, between January and March trade between Brazil and China stood at $38.8 billion – Brazil exported $19.8 billion and imported $19 billion. Among the main products exported by Brazil are crude petroleum oils, soybeans, and iron ore and concentrates. Brazil, in turn, mainly imports from China vessels, telecommunications equipment, electrical machinery and appliances, valves and thermionic tubes (valves). MOSCOW STOPOVER CRITICISMBefore landing in China over the weekend, Lula had visited Russia and took part on 10 May in Moscow’s Red Square military parade in which the country remembers the victory of the Soviet Union against Germany. Lula defended his presence in Red Square and argued that did not disqualify him as a potential peace mediator between Russia and Ukraine, the latter suffering a full-scale invasion by the former since 2022. Lula has always sought to develop Brazil’s soft power influence and as a global mediator. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, however, he has at times stated that Moscow and Kyiv bear equal responsibility for the war, calling them both to settle their differences through dialogue. Front page picture: Lula (left) meeting with Chinese officials in Beijing  Picture source: Brazil's Planalto presidential palace press services Insight by Jonathan Lopez ($1=R5.61)

14-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Tough times lie ahead for the Asia’s petrochemical industry amid continued oversupply and a global economic downturn because of US tariffs, but a pivot to sustainable products can help. US-China trade war threatens industries Oversupply, weak demand signal prolonged downturn; plant closures loom Energy transition offers feedstock opportunities Global megatrends, including geopolitics, energy transition, and sustainability are fundamentally reshaping petrochemical demand patterns and the entire industry. The US-China trade war de-escalated this week as both sides agreed to bring down tariffs on each other significantly by 14 May. An all-out trade war between the US and China, the world’s two-biggest economies, could trigger a global recession. There is also a possibility that amid high trade tensions with the US, China could flood the global market with excess products, which may prompt building of trade barriers by other countries After striking an initial agreement to bring down tariffs from more than 100%, the US and China are expected to continue with trade negotiations. In the meantime, uncertainty is dominating markets, leading to soft demand. DIFFICULTIES The petrochemical industry is facing significant challenges, including oversupply, cost volatility, and regulatory shifts, ICIS Chemical Analytics vice president Alexander Lidback said. Amid persistently low demand, firms are shutting plants around the world, notably in Europe, and without significant shutdowns, polyolefin oversupply could persist into the mid-2030s, forcing companies into survival mode. The industry will need to "go through worse to get better", with 2027/2028 being a potential turning point for survival, Lidback said. China's increased capacity, which was "underestimated", is also a contributing factor to oversupply, and global polyolefins capacity significantly exceeds demand currently, ICIS senior consultant John Richardson said. Adaptation through plastics circularity and innovation could be a way for companies to survive, although this also presents its own difficulties, said Bala Ramani, director of sustainability consulting and Asia strategy advisor at ICIS. All three will be speaking at the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) in Bangkok, Thailand on 15-16 May, discussing market challenges and opportunities in the sector. The theme for APIC 2025 is "Ensuring a Transformed World Prosperity”, with a particular focus on “Action for Planet with Innovation and Collaboration”. CIRCULARITY There is a need amid the current demand downturn to adapt to the changing landscape -one of which is by exploring plastics circularity and alternative feedstocks. Sustainable polyolefins present as “interesting opportunity”, especially for integrated polyolefins producers to leverage existing assets for driving incremental value, Ramani said. “By embracing a multi-faceted production model, the polyolefins industry can reduce its environmental footprint, meet evolving regulatory demands, and unlock new value streams in a resource-constrained world,” said Ramani. The path towards circularity sustainability for polyolefins involves several approaches: mechanical recycling, circular polyolefins derived from pyrolysis oil, and bio-circular polyolefins derived from bio-naphtha or other hydrogenated bio-derived oil. Pyrolysis is expected to become a complementary solution alongside mechanical recycling in tackling plastic pollution. In turn, polyolefins producers can maximize the value of pyrolysis oil integration by strategically aligning feedstock procurement, technology, and processing configurations, Ramani said. Europe leads with robust regulations and collaboration, eyeing over 13 million tonnes of sustainable polyolefins by 2040. Asia, however, lags, stymied by fragmented policies despite interest for sustainable polyolefins from markets such as India, Japan and South Korea. “In Asia, early adoption by a few markets and global brands, combined with evolving yet fragmented policies, is building momentum and opportunities, with future growth hinging on regulatory alignment and infrastructure development,” Ramani said. Regulatory fragmentation among Asian countries compared with EU regulatory mandates makes sustainable polyolefins market tricky to scale. South Korea and Japan are paving the way for sustainable polyolefins demand, although Asian investments are likely to target developed markets such as the EU, before pivoting to local and regional markets in the long term. Were EU recycled content targets to be adopted in Asia, the region could unlock over 18 million tonnes of sustainable polyolefins demand by 2040. But while alternative feedstocks and sustainable polyolefins offer opportunities for producers, their widespread adoption faces other hurdles including regulatory uncertainty, high costs, technology scalability and insufficient waste infrastructure. “Amid ongoing industry challenges, sustainable polyolefins are set to drive resilience through resource efficiency, regulatory compliance, and new value creation enabled by circular production models,” Ramani said. Insight article by Jonathan Yee Click here to view the ICIS Recycled Plastics Focus topic page.  Visit the ICIS Topic Page: US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy. Thumbnail image: Panorama from Golden Mount, skyline of Bangkok, Thailand, (By Walter G Allgöwer/imageBROKER/Shutterstock)

14-May-2025