By John Richardson

Mickey_Mouse_CostumeTHE blog has a terrible confession to make: We sometimes get it very badly wrong. How’s that for modesty?

A couple of months ago we got it very badly wrong when we kept waffling on and on, in post after post, about whether China would hit GDP growth of 3-4%, 5%, 6% or above 7% in 2014.

We forgot what we already knew: That China’s numbers are largely “man-made and therefore unreliable,” according to comments made by Li Keqiang back in 2010.

We, however, can console ourselves in that we are not the only people to get suckered-in to a seemingly endless debate about what China’s growth will be in 2014.

In the latest round of this debate, the Wall Street Journal yesterday wrote:  “Chinese Finance Minister Lou Jiwei said that the government’s [2014] 7.5% economic growth target isn’t a ‘floor,’ suggesting that Beijing may be comfortable with slower growth.”

This ran counter to comments made over the last few weeks by that man again, Li Keqiang, in which he appeared to indicate that China would not be happy with growth of less than 7.5% . Economists have taken these statements as an indication that more economic stimulus is on the way.

Every cough and splutter of this debate does, of course, represent a trading opportunity for those who want to go either short or long in equity and commodity markets.

But beyond that, the discussion is pretty much valueless, as Matthew Crabbe points out  in his new book,  Myth-Busting China’s Numbers: Understanding and Using China’s Statistics.

In a review of the book, the Financial Times points out that the same applies to pretty much all government statistics.

“One of the first and most important points he makes is that in China’s Leninist system all information is political and can be designated a ‘state secret’ at any time if the ruling Communist party decides it does not help to bolster the party’s own legitimacy and power,” writes the FT.

“Crabbe also explains why data and statistics are so often manipulated by party cadres whose career advancement relies very heavily on them meeting various top-down targets issued by Beijing.  This book is timed very well – just as the crowd of self-proclaimed China hands based all around the world has begun to multiply exponentially.

“The extremely important point he makes repeatedly is that it is impossible to understand what is happening in China by just looking at the data published by the government.”

And so what data should we look at? Electricity consumption points out fellow blogger, Paul Hodges, in this post on the same subject.  Consumption is up by 5% so far this year compared with 22% during 2009 – at the height of China’s huge economic stimulus package.

What else matters?: Slowing investment in the property market and the unwinding of collateral trades attached to real estate, as we discussed earlier this week.

Here is something else that matters: The number of times you read negative phrases, such as “persistently weak downstream demand”, in ICIS pricing reports. We have yet to quantify this, but negative statements such as the one above, appear to have greatly increased in frequency in our reports since the start of this year.

That’s  it for this week. There will be no post tomorrow as the blog takes a short break  for a trip to Euro Disney. No  jokes about Mickey Mouse Chinese GDP data, please.


China: Half Of All Loans Collateralised By Land, Real Estate


By John Richardson BEN Bernanke, who as at that time chairman of the Fed, warned...

Learn more

China: How Conventional Wisdom Becomes Conventional Wisdom


By John Richardson HOW does  conventional wisdom – i.e. the opinion of the ma...

Learn more
More posts
China’s policy dilemma: raising local demand while protecting exports

  By John Richardson IN THIS Western-centric world, a huge amount of ink is split over the cons...

China’s polyethylene demand good so far in 2020 but beware of risks ahead

Note that all the comparisons in this post are on a year-on-year basis unless otherwise stated By Jo...

Ah, I see: China’s booming demand mystery a little closer to being solved

  Note that all the data comparisons below are on a year-on-year basis By John Richardson THE P...

The China polyester mystery continues in a world turned upside down

By John Richardson SOMETHING very strange is happening in China’s polyester industry which has eno...

China will struggle to boost local retail sales during rest of 2020 with export outlook uncertain

By John Richardson IF IT were easy, then there would be an oversupply of owners of large yachts in M...

Pandemic and the developing world: No quick and easy solutions

By John Richardson POVERTY alleviation in low-income developing countries could be set back a decade...

The pandemic and petrochemicals demand: a whole new approach is required

By John Richardson MONITORING demand has never been harder because of the pandemic. One of my collea...

China’s limited policy options to help lower-paid workers make 2020 retail sales recovery unlikely

All the data comparisons below are on a year-on-year basis By John Richardson AS I’VE been flaggin...


Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more


Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more