Time To Scrap Old Thinking On Oil Markets

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Environment, Oil & Gas, Sustainability, US

By John Richardson

FifteendollarsoilA SEASONAL fall-off in demand for oil, rising concerns over the Chinese economy and worsening global oversupply of crude could push oil down into the $30 dollars a barrel range, a majority of analysts surveyed by the Wall Street Journal now believe.

And money manager David Kotok has told CNNMoney that oil might even fall to as low as $15 a barrel.

This is good news, as the consensus opinion is now catching up with what I have been warning about for many months now – that the recovery in oil prices from early February to the end of July was built on very shaky ground. I have long felt that we were heading back towards the historic average prices of $30 a barrel. In the process, you also cannot discount the possibility of prices substantially undershooting this level.

But what worries me is that some people in the chemicals industry might have seen this coming. Are they therefore facing inventory losses on raw materials and finished products, and do they have realistic expectations of future prices and margins?

As recently as May, at the Asian Petrochemicals Industry Conference in Seoul, South Korea, most people I spoke to talked of a New Normal of oil prices remaining stable in the $60-80 a barrel range.

What encouraged this kind of thinking? Here is what I believe:

  1. A lot of people in the chemicals industry have seen almost nothing but crude in the region of $100 a barrel for their entire professional careers.
  2. Many people in the industry can obviously remember back to 1999, when oil was last at $15 unadjusted for inflation. But most analysts had been saying for a long time that we had entered a new paradigm of supply being insufficient to meet demand.  Old thinking dies hard when you’ve heard the same thing over and over again. Some chemicals executives who could remember back to 1999 were thus reluctant to change their views.
  3. And central to the problem is the failure to grasp that it is financial markets that have long driven the price of oil. Now that stimulus is being withdrawn by the Fed and China, financial markets are losing their muscle in the crude market. So real supply and demand fundamentals are reasserting themselves, and real supply is far in excess of real demand.

You should also separate the short term from the long term here. The short term factors, you might want to argue, will soon go away. These include, as I have already mentioned, a seasonal slowdown in demand because of maintenance work at US refineries. Storage at the key Cushing terminal in the US could also overflow in two months, with a force majuere at BP’s Whiting refinery further lengthening. Then we have Iraq production at record levels as Iran prepares to return to the market.

So, if you read further into the Wall Street Journal I linked to above, you will see this: Most analysts still expect prices to bottom out soon and trudge toward $70 a barrel by the end of next year.

I think this is dangerous thinking as it doesn’t take into account the secular, long term decline in demand for oil, which I discussed on Tuesday.

So we are heading to $30 crude, or lower, both over the short and long term.

PREVIOUS POST

China’s Environment: Business As Usual Not An Option

19/08/2015

By John Richardson SONG Wei, an environmentalist from Hunan province, told the B...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Surviving The Crisis Depends On How You React

20/08/2015

By John Richardson PEOPLE make up chemicals companies – not just ever-more ing...

Learn more
More posts
Why a hard look at the data show China has not seen a V-shaped recovery
06/08/2020

          Note: All the data comparisons below are year-on-year By John Ric...

Read
China moves closer to Iran as tensions with the US build: Implications for petrochemicals
02/08/2020

By John Richardson Opinions and emotions and can shape how we interpret data, but, as we all know, o...

Read
China polyolefins market H1 review: so far so good, but beware of the risks ahead
30/07/2020

By John Richardson ALL looks fine in the polyolefins world. The Old Normal appears to have reasserte...

Read
Polyethylene market recovery could be threatened by slower China crude buying, weaker economic growth
28/07/2020

By John Richardson EVEN by China’s standards, where just about every number is eye-wateringly larg...

Read
Why the polypropylene industry must switch from volumes to value
26/07/2020

By John Richardson EVERYONE knows about the oversupply in the polyethylene (PE) market as it has bee...

Read
China consulate closure underlines long-term split with US, potential big shift in petchems trade flows
23/07/2020

The views in this blog post are, as always, my personal views and do not reflect the views of ICIS. ...

Read
China’s real GDP could have been negative in Q2: What this may mean for PP
22/07/2020

By John Richardson CHINA’S official GDP growth of 3.2% for Q2, which was announced last week, may ...

Read
Iran and China new deal could hasten Belt & Road Initiative petrochemicals self-sufficiency
19/07/2020

By John Richardson ONCE AGAIN, please don’t say I didn’t tell you. A proposed new investment and...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more