September 2008: How History Is Repeating Itself

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Europe, India, Indonesia, Japan, Oil & Gas, Olefins, South Korea, US

By John Richardson

Crude-Oil-Prices-3WE know that weak growth in China, Europe and the US will have a major negative impact on the global economy in 2015.

But does this really mean a new global financial crisis? Won’t the world’s economy instead just splutter along as it has done, pretty much, since the last crisis in 2008?

No because of disastrously wrong economic policies pursued in the US, in Japan – and  in China.

The US isn’t anywhere close to recognising what it has done wrong – and will probably continue to regard damage that the Fed’s policies have inflicted on emerging markets as nothing more than “collateral damage”.

But, despite the size of the US economy, America is not an economic, social and political island. A currency war, as the dollar strengthens will, of course, make it much harder for the States to export its way to growth – and, quite obviously, as overseas economies tank, there will be less demand for goods and services in general.

Here is another thing: Each country or region will become much more inward-focused and self-sufficient – including, most importantly, China. Trade barriers will be erected as the global economy becomes much more regionalised.

How will the US then, for example, find a home for all of its polyethylene (PE) exports?

And remember how South Korea had its own name for the 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis? It called it the “IMF Crisis” and thus implicitly blamed the US for what happened to its economy.

Openness to US trade is hardly going to be helped if this resentment is repeated in South Korea and elsewhere.

Japan has joined the party a little later, but its policies are equally misguided and potentially as harmful as it is likely to play a big role in the new global currency war.

South Korea has, even more recently, followed Japan through “Choinomics”. More consumer debt in South Korea is not the answer.

The fantastic, truly fantastic, news for the longer term health of the global economy is that China has a visionary, brave set of new leaders. They fully recognise what’s gone wrong and are determined to put it right.

But, in the process, they will be forced to do what suits China in order to make the transition successful. This will inflict its own kind of damage on the global economy.

What is the exact mechanism of the new global financial crisis, then? We know the players and their roles, but what has started the ball rolling unstoppably downhill?

It is oil prices. The collapse in oil prices is a symptom of weak demand.

In the longer term, yes, cheaper oil prices are exactly what the world needs – and they have already enabled vital economic reforms in India and Indonesia.

But more immediately, oil and commodity prices in general will continue to unwind – along with the collateral trade that underpinned markets. These were trading volumes based on bogus notions of real demand.

This article from Gillian Tett, the award-winning Financial Times, who prepared excellent analysis of the last crisis, is also worth a very close read.

She has been warning for several months of what she calls “crowded exits” for corporate bond holders.

It now takes seven times as long to sell a corporate bond as it did in 2008 because of new regulations restricting the speculative activity of banks, she said.

“While markets might seem placid today, particularly given the easing announced by the Japanese and European central banks, this calm could come to a halt,” she wrote.

“Emerging market corporate bonds are a case in point: The level of corporate borrowing has jumped sharply, particularly in Asia” she added.

“The bonds issued by shale gas developers are another potential flash point; the tumble in oil prices has put this sector under pressure,” said Tett.

Because corporate bonds cannot be sold in a hurry investors might panic and sell other assets, including “blue chip” equities, at very low prices.

As a reminder, this is how events unfolded in September 2008.

• Earnings from new investments proved too low to pay the interest due on debts.

• Investors found themselves unable to sell under-performing assets, and suddenly realised they had over-paid.

• This led to panicked sales and a broad-based collapse in financial and financial commodity markets.

• Bank credit committees were, meanwhile, forced to hold emergency meetings during which they sought to minimise investment losses and reduce further risks.

• This reduction in risk led to a global collapse in the availability of trade finance, including, of course, for chemicals companies.

• As the global economy became “gummed up” in this way, GDP growth rates collapsed.

Go back to your planning departments and prepare for today’s repeat of history.


Another Failed US "Wealth Effect"


By John Richardson HERE are some alarming facts about the US economy: The wealth...

Learn more

Asia's Petchems Decline: Reject Tried And Trusted Analysis


By John Richardson ASIA’S petrochemicals traders and producers have on the who...

Learn more
More posts
China moves closer to Iran as tensions with the US build: Implications for petrochemicals

By John Richardson Opinions and emotions and can shape how we interpret data, but, as we all know, o...

China polyolefins market H1 review: so far so good, but beware of the risks ahead

By John Richardson ALL looks fine in the polyolefins world. The Old Normal appears to have reasserte...

Polyethylene market recovery could be threatened by slower China crude buying, weaker economic growth

By John Richardson EVEN by China’s standards, where just about every number is eye-wateringly larg...

Why the polypropylene industry must switch from volumes to value

By John Richardson EVERYONE knows about the oversupply in the polyethylene (PE) market as it has bee...

China consulate closure underlines long-term split with US, potential big shift in petchems trade flows

The views in this blog post are, as always, my personal views and do not reflect the views of ICIS. ...

China’s real GDP could have been negative in Q2: What this may mean for PP

By John Richardson CHINA’S official GDP growth of 3.2% for Q2, which was announced last week, may ...

Iran and China new deal could hasten Belt & Road Initiative petrochemicals self-sufficiency

By John Richardson ONCE AGAIN, please don’t say I didn’t tell you. A proposed new investment and...

China paraxylene imports head for bigger declines as excess industrial production appears to boost GDP

By John Richardson SOME PEOPLE see the 9.9% year-on-year rise in China’s crude oil imports in Janu...


Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more


Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more