China PE Market Strength Questioned

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Environment, Polyolefins, US

Dear blog reader – a  technical error, beyond our control, means that we are unable to upload the tables and graphs for today’s post. Watch out next week, as, when the problem has been solved, we will add the missing tables and graphs. Apologies….

 

By John Richardson

THE sustainability of the strength in China’s polyethylene (PE) market is being questioned.

Firstly, as my ICIS pricing colleague Chow Bee Lin, wrote in her Asian PE price report last week:  “The recent weeks of PE resin price hikes had left many plastics processors grappling with squeezed margins, which in turn fuelled their resistance against the current spot prices and further price hikes.”

These comments were supported by a polyolefin industry source who told the blog on Monday that the market may have reached a plateau because of downstream margin problems.

“We are also approaching the end-of-year destocking season, when both producers and traders want to keep inventories at a minimum because of financial-reporting reasons,” he said.

And, as we discussed on Monday, the market needs to absorb considerable amounts of new capacity, even before the post-2017 surge in US capacity.

If the outlook on demand was more favourable, then these supplies would not be causing such concerns, we believe.

What is influencing the outlook right now is the November plenum. November 9-12 has now been set for this crucial government meeting, after which pro-reform policies could be introduced.

Paul Satchell, the UK-based chemicals analyst, believes that the outcomes of the plenum could be a further trigger for destocking. We then might find out how much of this year’s 14% apparent PE demand growth in China (local production plus imports) is real demand.

Above and beyond the specifics of the PE market, it might also be the case that a  mini commodities Supercycle (prompted by a government stimulus package that was also described as “mini”) is close to its end.

A late October report, by Westpac Securities’ Phat Dragon service, provides support for this argument.

“The predictable cresting and then decline in the growth rate of railway investment is now conclusively underway, and will be a drag on the (progressively broadening) categories of transport, infrastructure and tertiary industry capex through the end of this year and in the first half of 2014,” wrote Phat Dragon in that same report, which was quoted in this Macro Business article.

“The factors holding up those important categories, in the face of the rail slowdown, have been accelerating outlays on highways and continued high growth in the strategically important (and massive) utility and environmental management complex,” continued Phat Dragon

“Yet even here there are signs that a peak in growth rates has been reached. Phat Dragon observes that the growth in the value of new projects across the urban economy has slowed quite abruptly, to be well below that of ongoing work, implying that the pipeline is being replenished at a rate that is insufficient to maintain current growth rates.

“A rolling over in the growth of centrally-approved and SOE capex is consistent with that inference, as is the observation that the investment upturn has been relatively narrow (i.e. very large project size, but fewer of them), which made it fundamentally vulnerable once the swing sectors saw their momentum crest.”

Steel prices have weakened over the last three months. This might have some wider relevance.

Some PE market players will hope, of course, that whatever the outcomes of the November plenum, China’s leaders will continue to kick the can down the road through further fiscal stimulus – once the impact of this year’s boost peters out by around Q2 2014.

But, interestingly, despite the renewed property bubble so well-described by fellow blogger Paul Hodges on Wednesday, Macrobusiness wrote in this second article:  “One of the mysteries of this year’s Chinese rebound has been why property developers have not yet followed rising prices with rising starts. That may be turning now which will support iron ore demand, provided the coming clamp is not too tight.”

Perhaps the answer is that the government wanted to prevent the failure of property developments already underway while at the same time discouraging new projects that would have added to property oversupply?

Or maybe the screws have already been tightened on the property sector now that bubble has entered another dangerous inflation cycle?

Further lending for property, for the time being at least, seems unlikely to be made available, because domestic Chinese banks had already hit their 2013 loan targets following excessive real estate lending in the last couple of months,  said Jim Reid, strategist with Deutsche Bank.

He added that there were reports that domestic loans to property developers had jumped 50% in September from a year earlier.

But still, might China be tempted, come the second quarter of next year, to once again put its foot on the stimulus peddle?

Debt problems are another reason to think that they will at least hesitate before even repeating the “mini” stimulus of 2013.

PREVIOUS POST

The Rebirth Of Naphtha Cracking

31/10/2013

  By John Richardson Might cracking naphtha in Asia, Europe, and perhaps ev...

Learn more
NEXT POST

US Housing Recovery? What Recovery?

04/11/2013

  By John Richardson A SUSTAINED US housing recovery is vital for the globa...

Learn more
More posts
China’s PP production growth could lead to big declines in 2020 imports
01/06/2020

By John Richardson PLEASE DON’T say I didn’t warn you. China is rapidly moving towards polypropy...

Read
Coronavirus, impact on the developing world and the scale of demand losses
29/05/2020

By John Richardson ALL OF us are struggling to come to terms with a collapse in the global economy t...

Read
Coronavirus, reshoring and the polyester industry: Good luck with that
27/05/2020

By John Richardson POLITICIANS, not just including the Populist variety, are talking a lot about res...

Read
Beware of the fragile nature of the oil and petrochemical price recovery
22/05/2020

By John Richardson RECENT rises in oil and petrochemicals prices should not in my view be taken as a...

Read
China petrochemical inventories build on what could be false hopes of a V-shaped rebound
19/05/2020

By John Richardson AS PETROCHEMICALS storage space in China fills up on the hope that the country ca...

Read
Further polyethylene rate cuts seem inevitable with no certainty on who will blink first
18/05/2020

By John Richardson IT IS NOT just a razor-like focus on petrochemicals demand that will get you thro...

Read
What petrochemical companies must do to adapt to a smaller coronavirus economy
15/05/2020

By John Richardson PETROCHEMICAL companies can adapt to the coronavirus New Normal by running their ...

Read
Coronavirus and the way forward: Forecasting micro surges in petrochemicals demand
11/05/2020

By John Richardson THE MONTH of May is normally a low season for toluene di-isocyanate (TDI) demand ...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more