President Trump’s Vietnam warning threatens more polyethylene disruptions

China, Company Strategy, Economics, Olefins, Polyolefins, US

Just to stress  that, as always, what follows are my own personal views and not those of ICIS

By John Richardson

DON’T say I didn’t warn you. Three weeks ago I said that Vietnam could well be dragged into the trade war.

“A lot of companies are moving to Vietnam, but Vietnam takes advantage of us. So there’s a very interesting situation going on there,” said President Trump yesterday, during an interview with Fox Business News.

Asked whether he wanted to tariff Vietnam, Trump did not say no.

“Well, we’re in discussions with Vietnam. Vietnam is almost the single worst – much smaller than China, much, but it’s almost the single worst abuser of everybody,” he added.

The president’s comments are in line with reports that plastic converters are increasingly shifting from China to Vietnam in order to manufacture finished plastic products for export to the US. This avoids the tariffs the US has imposed on Chinese exports of plastic products.

Some of the converters that have reportedly relocated to Vietnam are said to have remained under Chinese ownership.

But if tariffs were placed on Vietnam, low-value manufacturing might merely shift to other developing countries as US labour costs are too high to compete with any developing country.

The difficulty for the US is that it has an ageing native population and so lacks enough young people to work at low-enough wages to compete with the developing world. This could be solved through increased immigration, but that is politically difficult right now.

Would more immigration even work given that the US is so developed? In reality, the kind of low value manufacturing jobs that President Trump wants to bring back to America may have gone for good.

If the US places tariffs on Vietnam, global supply chains would once again re-adjust as manufacturing shifted to the next cheapest and most efficient set of locations.

China would very probably retain ownership of a large slice of this manufacturing, no matter where it moved to in the developing world, for the following reasons:

  • China has vast financial resources, strong upstream integration in many finished-goods supply chains, good access to technologies and close government relationships with the rest of the developing world.
  • These relationships have been forged through Chinese investments in infrastructure via its Belt and Road Initiative. The initiative is not perfect and has many critics. But Western funding for infrastructure falls short of the needs of the developing world. Some funding is better than no funding at all, even if you might not always like the conditions.
  • China has also developed close links through offering preferential access to its vast domestic market to hydrocarbon and other basic raw material producers in Africa, the Middle East and southeast Asia.

Politics, politics and politics

Or if course the hint of tariffs on Vietnam may come to nothing. But at some point the US will still have to decide this:  Is the trade just about restricting the rise of China or is it also about re-shoring large numbers of low-value manufacturing jobs?

If the trade war is about both taking on China and re-shoring jobs, the only logical approach would be to impose tariffs on all developing countries.

Back to polyolefins. The US has very successfully raised exports to developing countries other than China since September of last year. In late August, China imposed 25% additional import duties on US cargoes of high-density PE (HDPE and linear-low density PE (LLDPE) as part of its response to US tariffs on its finished goods.

US HDPE and LLDPE exports to Vietnam exceeded those to China in the eight months from September 2018 until April this year, as the above chart indicates. Just look at the scale of the change in trade flows compared with the eight months from January until August 2019.

If the US did impose tariffs on Vietnam, the Vietnamese economy would surely suffer, reducing what has been stellar demand growth for PE so far in 2019. Lower demand growth would mean less demand for US material, forcing US PE producers to target other developing countries. But what if these other countries were also then hit by US tariffs?

The US is dealing with these sales and marketing difficulties during a period of major capacity expansions.

The old saying about the value of a house is that there are three things you have to worry about – location, location and location. We can adapt this phrase for trade flows. The three things you have to now worry about in assessing trade flows are politics, politics and politics.

 

PREVIOUS POST

US LLDPE imports and the impact on European petrochemicals

26/06/2019

  By John Richardson EUROPEAN linear-low density polyethylene (LLDPE) marke...

Learn more
NEXT POST

China petrochemicals recovery on G20 trade war progress will be shortlived

30/06/2019

By John Richardson China petrochemical and polymer price spreads over naphtha fe...

Learn more
More posts
Global polyethylene in 2020: Margins will reach historic lows as new growth model emerges
08/12/2019

Here is a first of a series of outlook articles for 2020 where I focus on the risks ahead for the gl...

Read
Long term downcycle will transform global petrochemicals, creating new Winners and Losers
06/12/2019

By John Richardson THIS IS not a normal downcycle. Please get over that idea however many people, bo...

Read
Asian PE and PP margins at lowest levels in at least five years and will go lower……
04/12/2019

By John Richardson NOT since at least the beginning of 2014 have Northeast and Southeast Asian polye...

Read
Asian polypropylene market heads for major 2020 downturn
02/12/2019

By John Richardson THE ASIAN polypropylene (PP) market hasn’t been as bad as the region’s polyet...

Read
China new vehicle sales: A long term decline and what this means for petrochemicals
29/11/2019

By John Richardson THE MAINSTREAM view is that there is nothing fundamental about the decline in new...

Read
Asian copolymer polyproplyene used as a sink for growing oversupply of ethylene
27/11/2019

By John Richardson A SURE sign that the Asian ethylene-to-polyethylene (PE) markets are distressed c...

Read
Asian polyethylene shutdowns? Once again, good luck with that idea
25/11/2019

By John Richardson I was new to the game as I had only been analysing the petrochemicals business fo...

Read
Europe to become much more self-sufficient in polyethylene because of sustainability
20/11/2019

Yes, I know I promised to focus on Asia and its cracker-to-PE industry today and how the region will...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more