THE CENTRAL character of The Big Short was the only person who bothered to read the detail of US mortgage debt securities that were at the heart of the Global Financial Crisis.

All of us course now know that these securities were built on sub-prime debt that went wrong and almost caused the collapse of the global financial system.

But when the main character of The Big Short, Michael Burry, was poring over the details of debt securities, he faced a lot of pressure from his hedge fund investors to accept the conventional wisdom that these were, in fact, incredibly sound investments.

He was also thought to be a fool by the banks who devised the products that he used to short US mortgage debt securities.

The last laugh was on him and the investors that stuck with Mr Burry because, as we again all now know, he was right and nearly all the of the rest of the investment world was wrong..

History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes. Nobody would these days attempt to talk up the value of repackaged US sub-prime mortgages. But far too few people worry about the chart on the left at the beginning of this blog post.

Now take a look at the chart on the right – a repeat of the chart I used in Monday’s blog post where I discussed the big declines Chinese stock markets. What has happened in Chinese equities may well be repeated in in the US. As margin debt declines so could the S&P 500, the Dow Jones and the Nasdaq.

It will then become evident that the momentum that has driven US stock markets to record highs has not been based on the fundamentals of sound companies and countries. It has instead been built on the central bank “put option” – the notion that whenever a downturn has occurred over the last ten years, on or more of the central banks has stepped into to re-inflate markets with more stimulus.

Now, though, things are very different:

  • The US Federal Reserve is firmly committed to more increases in interest rates.
  • China’s government, through its central bank, doesn’t have the capacity to repeat the scale of stimulus that we’ve seen since 2008.
  • The European Central Bank is facing major pressure from Germany not to repeat bail outs of deficit-busting fellow EU members.
  • The EU is also preoccupied with the immediate strain of the Italian budget and a very good chance that in March next year, Britain will crash out of the EU with no BREXIT deal. This makes coordinated EU-wide action to stem a fall in financial markets even more unlikely
  • Crucially, also, the animus in international relations makes a repeat of 2008 very unlikely. In that year, the world’s major central banks worked very well together to limit the damage from the Global Financial Crisis. But now the US is engaged in a trade war/Cold War with China, and has at best shaky relationships with the EU and other countries and regions.

10% of US and EU firms: Interest costs exceed EBIT

As the great unwinding of unsustainable US and global debt levels takes place, the focus will not just fall on the role that margin debt has played in US stock markets.

Attention will also be on the 10% of US and EU firms that the Bank of International Settlements says “rely on rolling over loans as their interest bill exceeds their EBIT. They are most likely to fail as liquidity starts to dry up”.  Bianco Research adds that 14% of S&P 1500 companies have earnings unable to cover their interest payments.

The focus will also be on emerging market companies and governments that borrowed heavily in US dollars when the dollar was weak and interest rates were low. As both trends continue to reverse, emerging markets will likely default on their debt obligations.

This will happen against a background of the US/China trade/Cold War because of the long- term nature of the dispute. Quick solutions seem impossible.

Trade war tariffs and high oil prices may also perpetuate today’s inflationary pressures. This would make it difficult for central banks to cut interest rates. Inflation would also be a tax on growth.

Chemicals production already points to downturn

Chemicals companies talk of healthy order books for 2018 with growth in some markets such as China exceeding expectations.

But in his latest PH report, fellow blogger Paul Hodges refers to American Chemistry Council global chemicals production data as a sign that conditions have already turned negative:

Capacity utilisation fell by 0.5% in August to 83.9% versus 85.9% a year ago.  This is a very significant decline, and suggests that those forecasters expecting recession to be delayed until 2020 will be disappointed.  

He added that China’s production began to turn negative in February on a year-on-year basis, with the slowdown deepening in August as production fell by 3.1%.

The chemicals industry is the “industry of industries” because it is upstream from finished goods. It thus serves an excellent early indicator when things are going right or going wrong. This is why everyone in every industry should take note of the global chemicals production slowdown.

The slowdown in China’s chemicals production is by itself also a major source of concern.

China has played a bigger role in driving global petrochemicals since 2008. In both percentage growth and tonnes consumed China has created greater distance between itself and all the other developing countries and regions. Meanwhile, growth in the developed world has been pretty much stagnant.

To give you just one example, China’s share of global PE growth jumped to 43% between 2009 and 2017 versus 36% in in 2000 and 2008.

PREVIOUS POST

China and the end-game of the global credit bubble

22/10/2018

WHEN stock markets are rising it makes sense to fund your investments through ma...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Global recession approaches as chems data weakens, debt problems build

26/10/2018

THE CHEMICALS industry is the “industry of industries” – upstream of all t...

Learn more
More posts
BASF’s shocking Q2 results should have been no shock at all
09/07/2019

y John Richardson NOBODY should be surprised by the BASF results for Q1 2019 where, on a year-on-yea...

Read
Multiple trade disputes and the risks for the US PE industry
03/07/2019

By John Richardson FALLING out with a trading partner as big as China is problematic enough. But the...

Read
China PE overstocking at nearly a million tonnes as demand weakens, competition intensifies
02/07/2019

By John Richardson MEASURING petrochemicals and polymer inventory levels in China with any reasonabl...

Read
China petrochemicals recovery on G20 trade war progress will be shortlived
30/06/2019

By John Richardson China petrochemical and polymer price spreads over naphtha feedstock costs will r...

Read
President Trump’s Vietnam warning threatens more polyethylene disruptions
27/06/2019

Just to stress  that, as always, what follows are my own personal views and not those of ICIS By Jo...

Read
US LLDPE imports and the impact on European petrochemicals
26/06/2019

  By John Richardson EUROPEAN linear-low density polyethylene (LLDPE) markets have yet to feel ...

Read
Southeast Asia PE spreads further underline weak demand, but trade talks promise rebound
25/06/2019

By John Richardson THE GOOD news today is that the US and China have agreed to resume trade talks. P...

Read
Global polyethylene: Supply is not the problem, it is demand
24/06/2019

By John Richardson WHEN people talk about supply it is very often because it is much easier to quant...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more