THE CENTRAL character of The Big Short was the only person who bothered to read the detail of US mortgage debt securities that were at the heart of the Global Financial Crisis.

All of us course now know that these securities were built on sub-prime debt that went wrong and almost caused the collapse of the global financial system.

But when the main character of The Big Short, Michael Burry, was poring over the details of debt securities, he faced a lot of pressure from his hedge fund investors to accept the conventional wisdom that these were, in fact, incredibly sound investments.

He was also thought to be a fool by the banks who devised the products that he used to short US mortgage debt securities.

The last laugh was on him and the investors that stuck with Mr Burry because, as we again all now know, he was right and nearly all the of the rest of the investment world was wrong..

History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes. Nobody would these days attempt to talk up the value of repackaged US sub-prime mortgages. But far too few people worry about the chart on the left at the beginning of this blog post.

Now take a look at the chart on the right – a repeat of the chart I used in Monday’s blog post where I discussed the big declines Chinese stock markets. What has happened in Chinese equities may well be repeated in in the US. As margin debt declines so could the S&P 500, the Dow Jones and the Nasdaq.

It will then become evident that the momentum that has driven US stock markets to record highs has not been based on the fundamentals of sound companies and countries. It has instead been built on the central bank “put option” – the notion that whenever a downturn has occurred over the last ten years, on or more of the central banks has stepped into to re-inflate markets with more stimulus.

Now, though, things are very different:

  • The US Federal Reserve is firmly committed to more increases in interest rates.
  • China’s government, through its central bank, doesn’t have the capacity to repeat the scale of stimulus that we’ve seen since 2008.
  • The European Central Bank is facing major pressure from Germany not to repeat bail outs of deficit-busting fellow EU members.
  • The EU is also preoccupied with the immediate strain of the Italian budget and a very good chance that in March next year, Britain will crash out of the EU with no BREXIT deal. This makes coordinated EU-wide action to stem a fall in financial markets even more unlikely
  • Crucially, also, the animus in international relations makes a repeat of 2008 very unlikely. In that year, the world’s major central banks worked very well together to limit the damage from the Global Financial Crisis. But now the US is engaged in a trade war/Cold War with China, and has at best shaky relationships with the EU and other countries and regions.

10% of US and EU firms: Interest costs exceed EBIT

As the great unwinding of unsustainable US and global debt levels takes place, the focus will not just fall on the role that margin debt has played in US stock markets.

Attention will also be on the 10% of US and EU firms that the Bank of International Settlements says “rely on rolling over loans as their interest bill exceeds their EBIT. They are most likely to fail as liquidity starts to dry up”.  Bianco Research adds that 14% of S&P 1500 companies have earnings unable to cover their interest payments.

The focus will also be on emerging market companies and governments that borrowed heavily in US dollars when the dollar was weak and interest rates were low. As both trends continue to reverse, emerging markets will likely default on their debt obligations.

This will happen against a background of the US/China trade/Cold War because of the long- term nature of the dispute. Quick solutions seem impossible.

Trade war tariffs and high oil prices may also perpetuate today’s inflationary pressures. This would make it difficult for central banks to cut interest rates. Inflation would also be a tax on growth.

Chemicals production already points to downturn

Chemicals companies talk of healthy order books for 2018 with growth in some markets such as China exceeding expectations.

But in his latest PH report, fellow blogger Paul Hodges refers to American Chemistry Council global chemicals production data as a sign that conditions have already turned negative:

Capacity utilisation fell by 0.5% in August to 83.9% versus 85.9% a year ago.  This is a very significant decline, and suggests that those forecasters expecting recession to be delayed until 2020 will be disappointed.  

He added that China’s production began to turn negative in February on a year-on-year basis, with the slowdown deepening in August as production fell by 3.1%.

The chemicals industry is the “industry of industries” because it is upstream from finished goods. It thus serves an excellent early indicator when things are going right or going wrong. This is why everyone in every industry should take note of the global chemicals production slowdown.

The slowdown in China’s chemicals production is by itself also a major source of concern.

China has played a bigger role in driving global petrochemicals since 2008. In both percentage growth and tonnes consumed China has created greater distance between itself and all the other developing countries and regions. Meanwhile, growth in the developed world has been pretty much stagnant.

To give you just one example, China’s share of global PE growth jumped to 43% between 2009 and 2017 versus 36% in in 2000 and 2008.

PREVIOUS POST

China and the end-game of the global credit bubble

22/10/2018

THE CENTRAL character of The Big Short was the only person who bothered to rea...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Global recession approaches as chems data weakens, debt problems build

26/10/2018

THE CENTRAL character of The Big Short was the only person who bothered to rea...

Learn more
More posts
China benzene spreads at ten-year low on misplaced trade deal hopes
19/05/2019

By John Richardson THE ABOVE chart shows that in April the average spread between CFR Japan naphtha ...

Read
Longer trade war: Impact in numbers on China polymers demand
15/05/2019

By John Richardson WE MUST now start to quantify the impact on the petrochemicals industry of no end...

Read
Plastics pollution crisis: Impact on polyethylene margins in 2022-2027
13/05/2019

By John Richardson ALMOST all countries late last week signed a UN deal to monitor the flow of hard-...

Read
China PE demand boom will not stop further margin declines
10/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S polyethylene (PE) market is being temporarily weighed down by overstock...

Read
China holds all the petchems demand aces as it digs in for longer trade war
08/05/2019

By John Richardson THE STRENGTH of China’s position in the intensifying trade war is further under...

Read
President Trump’s Tweets increase risk of no trade deal until 2021
06/05/2019

By John Richardson THE PROSPECTS of a trade deal seem to have have faded into the distance as a resu...

Read
Pressure on US builds as PE exports to China tumble and EU considers tariffs
03/05/2019

By John Richardson DONALD TRUMP insisted in early March that he was willing to walk away from a bad ...

Read
China 2019 PE demand grows in double digits as PP struggles
01/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA’S polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) markets continue to tell us so...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more