China MEG spreads turn negative on 171% rise in US retail prices for Chinese clothing

Aromatics, Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Europe, European economy, European petrochemicals, Fibre Intermediates, Middle East, US

By John Richardson

THERE are a lot of theories out there about why the spreads between Chinese mono-ethylene glycols (MEG) prices and naphtha feedstock costs have fallen in April and May of this year (see the above chart).

But as I shall explain in detail later on, the only explanations that entirely stand up are the blow to confidence caused by the extension of the trade war and a 171% increase in the cost of Chinese clothing in the US. This extraordinary increase in the cost of garments sold in Walmart etc. is the result of the long-running rise in China labour costs and  the recent US trade-war tariffs.

Let’s first of all deal with the other theories. Theory One is that the contraction in spreads is purely down to a seasonal lull in demand. In June and July, demand for textiles and garments in China tends to dip.

No. In the run-up to the last down season – April and May 2018 – spreads averaged $333/tonne. In April-May 2017 they were at $256/tonne. But in April-May this year, they have been at minus $1/tonne. Also note that so far May 2019, spreads have been negative for the first time since May 2014. Something else must be going on.

Theory Two is that because the US cannot export MEG cost effectively to China as a result of the 25% tariffs China imposed from August last year as part of the trade war, it has been forced to “flood Europe”. This has forced Middle East producers to divert cargoes to China that they cannot sell in Europe, also flooding the China market and causing excess inventories.

There was a modest increase in US exports to Europe in Q1 as US MEG production ramps up. We expect the US to be in a 416,000 tonnes net export position in 2019 from a small net import position in 2018.

Iranian exports to China were at 65,505 tonnes in Q1 of this year compared with 37,011 tonnes in the first quarter of last year. But Kuwait’s exports were modestly lower. And most importantly, as Saudi Arabia is the biggest player in the China market, its exports only edged up to 1.1m tonnes in Q1 this year over 1m tonnes in Q1 2018.

Total Chinese imports were also only slightly higher in Q1 this year at 2.6m tonnes compared with 2.5m tonnes in the first quarter of 2018.

Let’s therefore give Theory Two a firm “No” as well. China has not been flooded with Middle East MEG. Nor has it been flooded with MEG from anywhere else.

Let’s then deal with Theory Three. This relates to possible major technical leaps forward at Chinese coal-to-MEG plants. What could be an outdated view is that these plants are still running at low operating rates because the glycols they produce are low quality.

Back in 2012, coal-based MEG accounted for just 9% of China’s total capacity. In 2019, we expect this to rise to 38%. But we expect the plants to this year run at an average operating rate of just 39% compared with 63% in 2018.

If we are wrong and these plants are running considerably higher, domestic supply may have surged, contributing to the fall in MEG spreads. I think, having talked to half a dozen inventory players, that Theory Three has some validity. I shall further explore this subject of a later post when I will examine the potential for shrinking China MEG imports in 2019-2025.

Theory Four is again wrong. The surge on oil prices and so naphtha costs in 2019 is said to be behind the weakness in MEG spreads.  But between January 2009 and August 2014, MEG spreads averaged $120/tonne when naphtha was at $838/tonne CFR Japan. In January-May this year, spreads have been at $61/tonne and naphtha at only $543/tonne CFR Japan.

US retail prices for Chinese clothing jump 171%

Rising labour costs and US tariffs on Chinese exports resulted in the average US retail cost of a Chinese garment reaching $69.50 in Q2 this year, up from $25.70 in Q2 last year – a 171% increase, according to Sheng Lu, an associate professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware.

“By the end of the first quarter of 2019, the number of apparel items made in China that were held in US clothing retailers’ inventories were down more than two thirds to 8,352 stock-keeping-units, an industry identifier that tracks the attributes of each particular garment,” writes the South China Morning Post.

This is despite April-May being peak seasonal months for US demand for Chinese garments.

If the US follows through on its threat to impose 25% tariffs on its remaining $300bn of imports from China, all of its apparel and non-apparel imports from China will be affected by the trade war. The additional tariffs could be in place from as early as July this year.

As with benzene, everyone was confident that a trade deal would be done and that the deal would boost China’s MEG market. Now, though, following the 5 May change in events, it is reasonable to assume no trade deal for the rest of this year – and possibly throughout 2020 as well.

Confidence has collapsed across many chemicals and polymers markets, with MEG especially vulnerable because China is a major exporter of textiles to the US.

If the global economy slows down because of a prolonged trade war this could have hurt China’s overall textiles exports – the biggest in the world. World Trade Organisation data show China’s textiles exports totalled $110bn in 2017. In distant second place was the European Union at $69bn.

And if the Chinese economy slows as a result of a prolonged trade war, local spending on non-essential clothing will drop. You don’t buy a designer dress, or even a cheap shirt you don’t really need, if you we are worried about the future.

Combine this with lack of real new economic stimulus in Q1 – and China’s limited capacity to further stimulate the economy during the remainder of 2019 – and growth up and down the Chinese polyester value chain will likely fall short of expectations.

We see MEG demand rising to 17m tonnes in 2019 from 16m tonnes in 2018. The longer the trade war carries on, the more likely it is that we will have to downgrade this forecast. The same applies to our prediction that China’s polyester fibre demand will increase to 43.7m tonnes in 2019 from 41.4m tonnes in 2018.

As market conditions become clearer, I’ll provide revised estimates of Chinese demand growth for MEG, paraxylene, purified terephthalic acid and polyester fibre.

PREVIOUS POST

China's paraxylene imports in 2019-2025 face major downside risks

21/05/2019

By John Richardson NEVER underestimate China’s ability to execute vast and hig...

Learn more
NEXT POST

China could easily become styrene net exporter as trade war drives self-sufficiency

27/05/2019

By John Richardson CHINA MIGHT remain a major net importer of styrene by 2025, m...

Learn more
More posts
President Trump can only cause major economic damage by beating China, unless he has a time machine
12/09/2019

The views in this blog, are, as always, my own personal views and don’t reflect the views of I...

Read
Unsustainable boom in China auto market ends as sales of new vehicles move permanently lower
08/09/2019

By John Richardson THERE IS a big temptation when making forecasts of becoming too excited about the...

Read
Global PP demand could be 81.5m tonnes less than forecast in 2019-2028 as China Debt Supercycle ends
05/09/2019

By John Richardson SOME PEOPLE argue that despite the rapid rise in Chinese consumer debt over the l...

Read
China economic stimulus and PP: How global demand could have been 71m tonnes smaller
04/09/2019

By John Richardson CHINA came to the rescue of the global economy in 2009. This wasn’t for altruis...

Read
Hong Kong an example of rising political risk and the end of easy growth
02/09/2019

This blog expresses my opinions and not those of ICIS By John Ricuardson THE UNREST in Hong Kong wor...

Read
China imposes trade-war tariffs in US LDPE and raises tariffs on HDPE and LLDPE
27/08/2019

By John Richardson DON’T SAY I didn’t tell you. As I predicted, China has levied trade-war tarif...

Read
President Trump’s “better off without China” tweet not supported by the data
24/08/2019

The opinions in this blog post are, as always, my own and do not reflect the views of ICIS   By...

Read
How sustainability will upend the petrochemicals cost curve, creating new winners and losers
23/08/2019

By John Richardson THE FUTURE I described on Wednesday, of declining petrochemicals and polymers dem...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more