By John Richardson

THE WORLD is becoming a much more complex and fragmented place as the consensus about the benefits of open markets and the largely unrestricted movement of labour is challenged.

There also seems to be a split between those individuals and governments that agree with the science supporting human-made climate change versus those who doubt, or even reject, the science.

Those who accept that human activity is behind changing sea levels and weather patterns also seem to be more likely to support new and stringent legislation that attempts to deal with pollution, such as the plastic waste crisis. Let me call this group Camp 1. In Camp 1 also appear to be those less concerned about the negative impact of immigration and in favour very open global markets.

Camp 2 is more sceptical about the scientists that blame people for changes in the climate. And whilst they worry about the environment, their bigger priority can sometimes be protecting and creating new jobs in traditional industries. For this reason they are also more likely to favour new controls over immigration and higher trade barriers.

Why do  I think this division has happened? That’s not the theme here but will be discussed in later posts.

Rest of developing world to follow China’s lead

It will obviously not be as binary as this – a straightforward case of everyone and every country fitting into Camp 1 and Camp 2. There will be many individuals and countries that end up in various positions between these two camps. The world is never as black and white as I’ve just depicted.

This just a personal view of how the world might divide that is aimed at helping chemicals companies plan for the future. This is my objective, but apologies if any of this causes offence.

There are other interpretations possible of the split I’ve just outlined above. But I think we can all agree is that the world is, as I said at the beginning, becoming more complex and fragmented. Planning for this world is essential, regardless of our personal views.

It seems probable to me – at least for now following the results of last month’s European Elections – that most of Western Europe is leaning more towards Camp 1. The success of liberals and environmental parties, such as Germany’s Green Party, suggests this.  Some of Eastern Europe appears to be more inclined towards Camp 2 as of course is the United States.

Where does this leave Asia, Africa, Central and Latin America and the Middle East? China might pursue a very pragmatic course, picking sides selectively based on its economic interests. It has to put its economy first as it attempts to compensate for potentially ruinous demographics.

Unless China can trade openly with much of the rest of the world through exporting its wares, outsourcing its low value manufacturing, obtaining the technologies it needs to escape its middle-income trap and obtaining sufficient imports of oil and gas and safe food, it will be in big trouble.

Pragmatism might have to be its approach if Camp 2 gains enough influence. But what if Camp 1 were to emerge as the dominant force? It would then serve China best to work most closely with this group of countries.

From an environmental perspective, Camp 1 is in China’s best interests as it faces chronic air, water and soil pollution. Pollution is as big a challenge as its ageing population. A more sustainable approach would serve China’s interests extremely well, regardless of whether Camp 1 or 2 wins.

New green industries, such as electric vehicles, will also play a major role in moving China up the manufacturing and services value chains – vital if it is going to escape its middle-income trap.

How the rest of Asia, Africa and Central and Latin America and the Middle East will be divided will again be determined by very complex and highly uncertain trade-offs.

In the under-developed countries there will perhaps be a desire to postpone dealing with environmental stress for the sake of catch-up economic growth. There may also be a greater temptation to protect local markets for the sake of local jobs.

I think not, though. The bans on heavily contaminated plastic waste that was being shipped from the West to developing Asia ex-China are just one example of growing environmental awareness in the developing world in general. These bans follow China’s decision to heavily restrict imports of contaminated plastic waste from January 2018.

Equatorial Asia and Africa are on the front line of climate change because of rising sea levels. So are other regions of Africa that are not wealthy enough to guarantee sufficient water and food. They, too, are on the front line of climate change because of the greater frequency and severity of droughts.

Into the calculations will also have to come what position China takes because of the close economic and geopolitical links between China and the rest of the developing world. The rest of the developing world would probably have to follow China.

I see it more likely that China will align with Camp 1 because of its environmental pressures and because a critical mass of big economies will end up in Camp 1.  The US and China are engaged in trade, technological and Cold wars. As the US seems to be more inclined towards Camp 2 this gives China a third reason to pick Camp 1.

Environmental credits and a new polymer trading system

I see a big coalition of major economies in Camp 1 and a big, if not equal, weight of economies joining Camp 2. We can debate endlessly about which country will end up where but that’s leave this for now and assume a more or less even split.

Let’s next think about what this would mean for polymers trade:

  • Polymer cargoes moving within Camp 1, or from Camp 2 to Camp 1, would have to carry environmental certificates.
  • These certificates would detail to what extent the polymer pellets had been made from mechanically or chemically recycled polymers, and the degree to which CO2 emissions had been controlled during production and shipping.
  • The certificates would also need to detail the provisions producers had made for sustainable final disposal – efforts made to ensure that plastic bags and films etc. made from the polymers were not dumped into rivers or oceans.
  • The greater the strength of certification the lower the environmental levied taxes levied or environmental credits earned. And of course vice versa.

I think an environmental credit system for trading polymers would be good if it can be made to work. Laggard producers would be incentivised to up their game with the leaders able to sell credits in secondary markets. These secondary markets would be a great new source of wealth and jobs.

Whatever gets the job done, though, whatever system works. I believe we simply have to deal with the global plastics rubbish crisis before it creates runaway environmental damage we cannot control. A UN committee recently concluded that 44% of seabirds face extinction because of plastics rubbish.

The chart at the beginning of this blog post, using high-density polyethylene as an example, illustrates what this could mean for how the polymer is produced. Out base case assumes just 7% of global production will come from recycled materials by 2030.

But let’s assume, for argument’s sake, production based on recyclate at 33.5% – admittedly, total guesswork on my part, but closer to the global rates at which aluminium, glass and steel are recycled. This could be outcome of the new trading system I’ve just outlined. Just look at the two orange shaded areas and consider the implications for your business.

Back to my main theme of these two emerging camps. It’s disturbing, it’s worrying, but I see this as the world in which we will soon be living. Painful as it is, I believe we have to face up to these realities and build new business strategies for the chemicals industry.

PREVIOUS POST

Trade War: 88m tonnes of lost polymers demand despite the boom in Asia ex-China

12/06/2019

By John Richardson SURE, there are tremendous opportunities for petrochemicals a...

Learn more
NEXT POST

China real estate a growing stress point for global chemicals demand

17/06/2019

By John Richardson WE ALL know, or at least we all should know, just how importa...

Learn more
More posts
BASF’s shocking Q2 results should have been no shock at all
09/07/2019

y John Richardson NOBODY should be surprised by the BASF results for Q1 2019 where, on a year-on-yea...

Read
Multiple trade disputes and the risks for the US PE industry
03/07/2019

By John Richardson FALLING out with a trading partner as big as China is problematic enough. But the...

Read
China PE overstocking at nearly a million tonnes as demand weakens, competition intensifies
02/07/2019

By John Richardson MEASURING petrochemicals and polymer inventory levels in China with any reasonabl...

Read
China petrochemicals recovery on G20 trade war progress will be shortlived
30/06/2019

By John Richardson China petrochemical and polymer price spreads over naphtha feedstock costs will r...

Read
President Trump’s Vietnam warning threatens more polyethylene disruptions
27/06/2019

Just to stress  that, as always, what follows are my own personal views and not those of ICIS By Jo...

Read
US LLDPE imports and the impact on European petrochemicals
26/06/2019

  By John Richardson EUROPEAN linear-low density polyethylene (LLDPE) markets have yet to feel ...

Read
Southeast Asia PE spreads further underline weak demand, but trade talks promise rebound
25/06/2019

By John Richardson THE GOOD news today is that the US and China have agreed to resume trade talks. P...

Read
Global polyethylene: Supply is not the problem, it is demand
24/06/2019

By John Richardson WHEN people talk about supply it is very often because it is much easier to quant...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more