By John Richardson

YOU CAN bet on a rally in equity markets and in oil prices if some kind of deal is announced by the US and China over their trade dispute by the 1 March deadline.

But we could be back to Square One if a deal is then picked apart by President Trump’s core supporters, and even by the Democrats who to a large extent support him on trade.

Events may end up mirroring what’s happened with the president and the Mexico border wall. A few weeks ago, it seemed as if a compromise deal would be accepted by the Democrats and Republicans on border security, but then right wing commentators such as Ann Coulter spoke out against the compromise.

She warned that the White House risked becoming ‘a joke presidency that scammed the American people” unless the president got his wall built. The president seems to have dug his heels in over the border wall since this type of criticism – hence, the partial government shutdown.

So here’s the thing:

  • A deal that fully addressed all the US concerns over China would require China to scrap its economic growth model and, as a result, accept a much higher risk of economic stagnation because of failure to escape its middle-income trap.
  • Any such deal would also have to involve China abandoning its global military ambitions in general, whilst specifically reducing its military presence in the South China Sea. China would have to give up hope of greater geopolitical influence, along with jeopardising its energy security through a withdrawal from the South China Sea.

The chances of China conceding to all of the US demands therefore seems to me to be close to zero. A halfway deal feels like the most likely outcome. This would involve China giving some ground as the US conceded that 100% achievement of its objectives was impossible.

Time running out for the March deadline

But, as I said, what if any such deal was picked apart and the president felt that his re-election chances were in jeopardy? He might feel the need to double down on the trade war/Cold War with China, especially if he failed to get his Mexico border wall – or was just perceived as having failed to get his wall in today’s world of constantly shifting semantics.

None of this is again meant as a criticism of Mr Trump. This is instead meant to give you some clarity about the risks ahead.

Perhaps no deal of any kind can be reached by the 1 March deadline, given that Washington is only just back from the Christmas holidays, the Chinese Lunar New Year is just around the corner – and again, as I said, the gulf between the two sides is so big.

This raises the second most likely scenario: The deadline for concluding the trade talks could be pushed back a few more months with existing tariffs remaining in place. But this would at least involve a continued pause on the implementation of new tariffs.

A third scenario is a complete collapse of talks and a major escalation of the trade war.

And of course there is a fourth scenario where a deal is done that’s acceptable to both sides, resulting in a permanent end to the trade war/Cold War.

Filling the policy vacuum

The above table provides my percentage ratings for these four different scenarios. These are bound to shift around over the next few days, weeks and months.

You might want to argue over my percentages and may want to add scenarios of your own. This would be all good as this is a critical debate.

Why the debate is important is that everyone needs to accept that we are living in exceptionally uncertain times because of the rise of populist politics. The latest issue of The Economist uses the phrase “destructive ambiguity” when referring to the president. I see this as a useful phrase for politics in the West in general.

Just a few years ago, chemicals companies didn’t need to game plan different political outcomes because mainstream politicians were firmly in charge of all the Western governments. This guaranteed predictable policy approaches to trade and economics etc.

This is no longer the case. Populist politicians have filled the policy vacuum created by the failure of mainstream politicians to address lost economic opportunities resulting from ageing populations and the rise of automation.

A vital part of business planning has become detailed political risk analysis. This is essential for making decisions on everything from short-term sales targets to investments in multi-billion dollar chemicals projects.

PREVIOUS POST

China slowdown: After Apple, next wake-up call will be from auto markets

04/01/2019

By John Richardson THE NEXT big wake-up fall for global financial markets and th...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Flood of US LLDPE begins to disrupt markets with worse to follow

09/01/2019

By John Richardson THE ABOVE table illustrates the 2018 impact on smaller LLDPE ...

Learn more
More posts
Global polyethylene in 2020: Margins will reach historic lows as new growth model emerges
08/12/2019

Here is a first of a series of outlook articles for 2020 where I focus on the risks ahead for the gl...

Read
Long term downcycle will transform global petrochemicals, creating new Winners and Losers
06/12/2019

By John Richardson THIS IS not a normal downcycle. Please get over that idea however many people, bo...

Read
Asian PE and PP margins at lowest levels in at least five years and will go lower……
04/12/2019

By John Richardson NOT since at least the beginning of 2014 have Northeast and Southeast Asian polye...

Read
Asian polypropylene market heads for major 2020 downturn
02/12/2019

By John Richardson THE ASIAN polypropylene (PP) market hasn’t been as bad as the region’s polyet...

Read
China new vehicle sales: A long term decline and what this means for petrochemicals
29/11/2019

By John Richardson THE MAINSTREAM view is that there is nothing fundamental about the decline in new...

Read
Asian copolymer polyproplyene used as a sink for growing oversupply of ethylene
27/11/2019

By John Richardson A SURE sign that the Asian ethylene-to-polyethylene (PE) markets are distressed c...

Read
Asian polyethylene shutdowns? Once again, good luck with that idea
25/11/2019

By John Richardson I was new to the game as I had only been analysing the petrochemicals business fo...

Read
Europe to become much more self-sufficient in polyethylene because of sustainability
20/11/2019

Yes, I know I promised to focus on Asia and its cracker-to-PE industry today and how the region will...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more