China’s lending bubble is being deflated

Economic growth

SHARE THIS STORY

The changes underway in China’s lending policies are far more significant that anything being planned by central banks in Tokyo, Frankfurt or Washington as I describe in my latest post for the Financial Times, published on the BeyondBrics blog

China lend Feb16

Investors’ attention remains focused on the minutiae of central bank policies in the developed world. But they might spare a thought for developments in China’s lending policies.

The implications of these dwarf anything being considered in Tokyo, Frankfurt, London or Washington, as the chart below highlights. It shows the changes since 2008 in official and shadow lending, which together constitute China’s total social financing (TSF).

  • Phase 1, 2009. TSF lending doubled to $20tn, after President Hu and Premier Wen pressed the panic button in response to China’s loss of exports following the start of the financial crisis
  • Phase 2, 2010–2013. After stabilising in 2010–2011, lending soared again to peak at $28tn in 2013 as the shadow sector went out of control. By 2013, it was $11tn higher than in 2008 and equal to official lending at $14tn a year.
  • Phase 3, 2013 onwards. President Xi Jinping’s appointment in March 2013 changed everything. Shadow lending has since more than halved to $6tn, while TSF lending is down $4tn – despite an expansion in official lending to maintain banking sector liquidity

According to the Brookings Institution, the period between Q4 2008 and Q1 2014 saw TSF rise from 129 per cent to 207 per cent of GDP. Unsurprisingly, this caused the global commodities market to glow red-hot as China’s property sector became a speculator’s heaven.

The key moment was probably 2011, when the myth began to take hold that China had suddenly become “middle class”. Companies and investors devoured the headlines from the Asian Development Bank’s 2011 Report, which suggested that the majority of Chinese households had “become middle class by 2007”. And they chose to ignore as mere detail, its caveat that this was based on “$2 – $20 purchasing power parity per capita daily income”. Yet even two adults earning $20 a day, every day of the year, would have an annual combined income of just $14,600, well below the poverty line in any western country.

Worryingly, it seems many are still reluctant to remove their rose-tinted glasses. As a result, risks are rising in financial markets, as Xi is most unlikely to suddenly allow lending to ramp up again in support of China’s Old Normal economy. His focus is instead on November 2017, when the National Congress meets to reappoint him for a second five-year term. Any wavering now would undermine his core narrative, which highlights his success in tackling the problems of debt, pollution and corruption that he inherited. And it would distract from the key message of his New Normal policies, which aim to rebalance growth in favour of the long-neglected rural half of the country.

This scenario, of course, implies further pain ahead in the EMs and the west for those who have invested in building new capacity to supply China’s mythical middle classes. This pain will likely be intensified by the decision to focus China’s new Five-Year Plan for 2016–2020 on a supply-side revolution, modelled on those carried out by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. Anyone who lived through that period needs no reminding that restructuring an outdated economy is an extremely painful process, as over-capacity is reduced and inefficient industries downsized.

The key issue is that China’s lending bubble until 2013 was like a balloon. And as we learnt to our cost with the US subprime bubble, it is highly dangerous to keep on pumping until the balloon bursts. Xi’s core problem is that China’s lending bubble has essentially been subprime on steroids: as the FT reported back in 2011, house price to earnings ratios in the Tier 1 cities had already reached 14: 1, compared with an average of 5: 1 in the US. There are simply no precedents for safely deflating a bubble of this size.

Xi’s only option is to try and deflate the bubble by following Deng Xiaoping’s advice “to cross the river by feeling the stones”. Investors therefore need to spend much more time on studying developments in China’s lending policies. Obsessing about central bank policy in developed markets may provide much needed light relief, but means they are in great danger of finding themselves all at sea as Xi continues to reverse the tide of leverage.

PREVIOUS POST

China's polyethylene market creates Winners and Losers

03/02/2016

Tens of billions of dollars have been spent over the past 6 years to produce the...

Learn more
NEXT POST

2015 operating rates confirm chemical industry slowdown

08/02/2016

Financial markets are becoming more and more chaotic, with prices regularly movi...

Learn more
More posts
Global chemical industry – key trends for success in today’s New Normal
02/08/2020

The chemical industry is the best leading indicator for the global economy. On Friday, I had the pri...

Read
Oil prices signal potential end to the V-shaped recovery myth
26/07/2020

Oil prices have moved into another ‘flag shape’ – which previously provided critic...

Read
Bankruptcies now the key risk as hopes for V-shaped recovery disappear
19/07/2020

Governments, financial markets and central banks all originally assumed the Covid-19 pandemic would ...

Read
Merkel warns of need to prepare for No Deal Brexit
05/07/2020

Most people missed the fact that last Tuesday was the last possible date to delay the UK’s exi...

Read
World moves from Denial to Anger, as the Paradigm of Loss moves forward
07/06/2020

I have been warning about the Covid-19 risk since early February, and in April suggested here that: ...

Read
The New Normal for global industry
31/05/2020

The global chemical industry is the third largest sector in the world behind agriculture and energy,...

Read
Debt, deflation, demographics and Brexit set to challenge London house prices
17/05/2020

London property websites haven’t used the word “reduced” for many years. But it...

Read
The bill for two decades of doomed stimulus measures is due
03/05/2020

The Financial Times kindly made my letter on the risks now associated with central bank stimulus the...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more