The BoE’s pre-emptive strike is not without risk

Economic growth

SHARE THIS STORY
The Financial Times has kindly printed my letter below, arguing that it seems the default answer to almost any economic question has now become “more stimulus” from the central bank.

After 15 years of subprime lending and then quantitative easing, last week’s warning from the Bank of England suggests there are fewer and fewer economic questions to which the default answer is not “more stimulus”.

But it is still disappointing to find the Financial Times supporting this reflex reaction when considering the risks associated with Brexit next month (“Bank of England must grapple with the risks of a no-deal Brexit”, February 6). Nobody would dispute that the bank has a critical role in terms of ensuring financial stability through the Brexit transition. As the FT says, the “potential outcomes are discrete and the impacts vary widely”.

But the bank has already fulfilled this role by publishing its November assessment of the no-deal risks for government and parliament to consider. There is therefore no justification for the bank to pre-emptively impose its views by deciding to keeping interest rates artificially low.

The political risks associated with such an intervention would be large, particularly if the bank’s assessment or its proposed solution proves wrong. And there is also the risk of unintended consequences.

The history of stimulus does, after all, suggest that the only certain outcome of lower interest rates would be a further rise in today’s already sky-high level of asset prices.

Paul Hodges
The pH Report

PREVIOUS POST

IKEA heads into the circular world with furniture subscription trial

10/02/2019

“Once upon a time, Granny and Grandad used to go to a large shop on the mo...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Companies and investors have just 30 working days left to prepare for a No Deal Brexit

17/02/2019

Companies across the UK and EU27 are suddenly realising there are now just 30 wo...

Learn more
More posts
Pandemic redraws the map
11/10/2020

  Companies have entered a new landscape where the coronavirus has accelerated major paradigm s...

Read
What will happen if President Trump loses the election?
04/10/2020

I spent from September 2015 onwards, during the last US Presidential election, trying to explain why...

Read
Covid fears risk a Great Depression and major social unrest
27/09/2020

Governments spent most of February/March ignoring my warnings here on the dangers posed by the Covid...

Read
The state of the global economy in 2020
13/09/2020

Last Wednesday, I gave the opening presentation for the ICIS PET Conference and looked at whether th...

Read
Reality dawns for business as No Deal Brexit approaches
06/09/2020

I warned before the June 2016 Brexit referendum that Brexit was all about politics, and Boris Johnso...

Read
Global chemical industry – key trends for success in today’s New Normal
02/08/2020

The chemical industry is the best leading indicator for the global economy. On Friday, I had the pri...

Read
Oil prices signal potential end to the V-shaped recovery myth
26/07/2020

Oil prices have moved into another ‘flag shape’ – which previously provided critic...

Read
Bankruptcies now the key risk as hopes for V-shaped recovery disappear
19/07/2020

Governments, financial markets and central banks all originally assumed the Covid-19 pandemic would ...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more