Home Blogs Asian Chemical Connections China’s big declines in 2020 PX and PP imports: the impact on its major trading partners

China’s big declines in 2020 PX and PP imports: the impact on its major trading partners

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Environment, Europe, European economy, Fibre Intermediates, India, Indonesia, Japan, Middle East, Naphtha & other feedstocks, Oil & Gas, Olefins, Polyolefins, Singapore, South Korea, Sustainability, Thailand, US
By John Richardson on 18-Jun-2020

By John Richardson

CHINA’S refineries and petrochemicals plants came roaring back to almost full production in April as the country’s coronavirus lockdown came to an end, even though downstream manufacturing was a long way from full recovery.

As of last week, I was told by my contacts in China that petrochemicals and polymers buyers were still only running at 70-80% of pre-virus production rates.

The persistent weakness in consumer demand was confirmed by the 2.8% year-on-year fall in retail prices in May. Meanwhile, China’s producer prices in May fell at their fastest rate in four years.

Now, however, we have seen renewed China lockdowns centred on Beijing because of a secondary outbreak of the virus. This threatens to further dampen consumer demand and add to oversupply in manufacturing.

I do not expect cutbacks in manufacturing output that reflect even weaker local demand. China may instead seize the opportunity to gain bigger shares in export markets as the rest of the world falteringly and slowly emerges from lockdowns.

Support for the export drive will be provided by cheap raw materials that were stockpiled earlier this year when prices were very low.

During the first five months of 2020, China’s iron ore imports rose by 5.1% on a year-on-year basis. The country’s steel production in April was at 62% of the global total compared with 54% before the pandemic began. Oil inventories in January-April rose by 670,000 bbl/day, easily exceeding the previous record increase, which was set by the US in 2014 at around 100,000 bbl/day.

China has lots of new refinery capacity. I believe the capacity will be run hard to take advantage of the cheap crude and to increase export revenues in compensation for weak domestic demand. Expect a big surge in Chinese gasoline and diesel exports  nobody wants much jet fuel) over the next few months.

As reformers at new refineries run at high rates to make mixed xylenes (MX) and toluene blend stock for gasoline, a lot of the MX will be channelled into paraxylene (PX) production. Some of the toluene will be converted to more PX to make further tonnes of PX as China runs its new PX capacity very hard.

The new PX plants will be run hard to again take advantage of cheap oil as well as excellent economies of scale. As with its new refineries, China’s new PX plants are very far to the left of the global cost curve. This explains why I think China’s PX imports in 2020 will be much lower than in 2019, as I discussed on Monday.

A further factor behind high local PX and other petrochemicals and polymers production will be the need to protect local downstream jobs at a time of high unemployment, in my opinion.

Cheap raw material supply to garment mills, washing machine and TV factories will help keep the factories open during a period of weak and uncertain local demand. As with transportation fuels, cheap raw materials will also enable China’s finished goods manufacturers to gain bigger shares of export markets.

China will further raise its effective PX self-sufficiency through the Brunei Hengyi Petrochemical 1.5m tonnes/year PX plant, located in Brunei, which is 70% owned by Hengyi – a Chinese purified terephthalic acid (PTA) producer. I am assuming that most of the PX from the Brunei facility will be exported to China – for argument’s sake, 80% of its production in 2020.

The end result is the above chart on the left. It shows two scenarios for 2020 PX imports versus actual imports in 2019 from China’s biggest trading partners. I am assuming they will gain the same percentage shares of the total China market in 2020 and they did last year.

Both scenarios keep to our base case for 2020 demand growth at minus 1% over last year.

Scenario 1 assumes our base case average local PX operating rate of 64% and excludes the addition to Chinese self-sufficiency from Brunei. Scenario 2 adds in Brunei and assumes capacity utilisation of 78%, in line with the production growth we saw in January-April this year.

As you can see, the drop in imports from China’s main PX trading partners would be huge under either outcome:

  • Imports from South Korea fall to 4.6m tonnes from last year’s 6m tonnes even under our base case outcome. The downside sees imports at just 3.2m tonnes – a decline of 46% when you look at the exact numbers.
  • Japan’s exports under Scenario 1 fall to 1.6m tonnes from 2019’s 2.1m tonnes. Scenario 2 sees a decline to 1.1m tonnes
  • Scenario 1 sees PX imports from India declining by 23% over last year to less than a million tonnes. My second scenario sees a 46% decline to just 687,091 tonnes.

As I shall discuss next Monday, when I look at scenarios for China’s PX imports in 2020-2030, I expect this trend will continue.

How will  less efficient overseas refinery-to-PX complexes respond to this trend? Consolidation seems possible, especially in markets where demand for transportation fuels will fall because of the rise of electric vehicles.

Polypropylene (PP) serves as another good example of rising self-sufficiency. 2020 net imports, even under our base for an average operating rate of 88%, would fall to 3.8m tonnes in 2020 from last year’s 5.4m tonnes.

The worst-case outcome would see this year’s net imports fall to just 2.8m tonnes. This again assumes that January-April production continues at the same level for the rest of 2020, leading to an operating rate of 93%.

And was with PX, both PP import scenarios stick to our base case of 3% demand growth in 2020 over last year.

Break this down to China’s imports from its top PP trading partners and we see that:

  • Even under our base case (Scenario 1 in the above chart on the right), imports from South Korea slip to 788,680 tonnes in 2020 from 2019’s 1.1m tonnes. Scenario 2 involves a decline to just 584,028 tonnes.
  • Imports from Singapore slip to 595,612 tonnes in Scenario 1 from last year’s 809,1000 tonnes. The worst outcome of Scenario 2 sees a fall to 441,059 tonnes.
  • Shipments from Saudi Arabia will fall to either 408,915 tonnes in the most optimistic of the two outcomes or a worst case of 302,807 tonnes. This compares with last year’s imports of 554,884 tonnes.

China looks set to push towards  to much greater self-sufficiency in PP for the same reasons driving high rates of PX production, including cheap oil. Cheap oil could translate into very competitive naphtha for steam cracker-based propylene feedstock.

If fluid catalytic crackers run hard in order to produce gasoline for export, this could mean plentiful supplies of propylene to make more PP. There are also reports of China stockpiling propane for start-ups of PDH-based PP plants in H2.

A theme of later posts will be on the challenges facing the Middle East as China moves to greater petrochemicals self-sufficiency, and as the EU increases its independence from imports through a big government-funded increase in polymers recycling. The region needs a new business model.

So does the rest of the global petrochemicals industry as China continues to push hard towards self-sufficiency (in later posts I shall also provide long-term scenarios for Chinese PP, polyethylene (PE) and styrene self-sufficiency).

Other challenges include what I believe will be a permanent loss of demand caused by the pandemic and environmental pressures that will make it much harder to produce virgin polymers and transport them around the world.

The new business model, which I shall again look in later posts, needs to centre on the societal value of petrochemicals.