China Scrap Plastic Restrictions Create 111 Million Tonne Problem, Opportunity

Business, China, Company Strategy, Economics, Environment, Europe, European economy, European petrochemicals, Polyolefins, Styrenics, Sustainability, Technology, US

By John Richardson

FOR so many years, developed countries were able to limit the extent to which they had to incinerate, landfill and properly recycle plastic waste by shipping the waste to developing countries, mainly to China.

A Science Advances study highlights the extent to which the developed world depended on China as an easy “out of sight out mind” dumping ground for plastic rubbish:

Since it began reporting in 1992, China has imported 106 million MT of plastic waste, making up 45.1% of all cumulative imports. Collectively, China and Hong Kong have imported 72.4% of all plastic waste. However, Hong Kong acts as an entry port into China, with most of the plastic waste imported to Hong Kong (63%) going directly to China as an export in 2016.

But that option is no longer available following China’s decision to severely restrict its imports of plastic rubbish from early 2018 onwards. In theory, plastic waste can still be shipped to China. But in practice, meeting contamination limits of only 0.5% per tonne has created an economically insurmountable barrier for exporters.

The end result has been a 99% drop in China’s imports of scrap or waste polyethylene (PE), polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS) and other polymers so far in 2018 compared with last year.

Exports of plastic rubbish to other developing countries have been stepped up to try and compensate for the new China regulations. But other developing countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam don’t have the recycling facilities on anywhere near the scale of China to plug the gap.

It also seems certain that these countries will follow China in restricting imports of contaminated plastic rubbish because of the negative impact on the environment.

The Science Advances study thus estimates that if the new Chinese restrictions remain in place from 2018 until 2020, some 111m tonnes of plastic rubbish that would have been shipped to China will be displaced globally.

Will developed countries end up dumping more plastic in landfills? Certainly not in the EU, which is moving in the opposite direction. The European Circular Economy Package, which was released in June, involves major new restrictions on landfilling. The package states that:

As of 2030, all waste suitable for recycling or other recovery, in particular in municipal waste, must not be accepted in a landfill, except for waste for which landfilling delivers the best environmental outcome.

Obviously, plastic falls under the category of being suitable for recycling, with the Circular Economy Package linked to the EU Plastics Strategy, which was launched in January. The strategy has set to the target that all EU plastics packaging must be recyclable by 2030.

And forget incineration as a means of getting rid of this displaced plastic rubbish in the EU, as regulators remain very much against burning plastic because, according to the European Commission, it generates 400m tonnes of CO2 globally every year.

Recycling and redesigning plastics

What of the US, though, given the Trump administration’s policy of rolling back rather than increasing environmental legislation? Science Advances estimates that the US will account for 37m tonnes of the 111m tonnes of displaced waste plastic exports to China in 2018-2030.

But whatever rollback of regulations that allows more landfilling and incineration at a federal level could be more than compensated for by tougher rules in certain pro-green states such as California. There is also, of course, the possibility that President Trump will be out of office by 2020.

And globally, the Science Advance study further underlines the threats and opportunities faced by polymer producers because of the shift in public opinion and so legislation towards plastics. We have gone beyond a historic tipping point:

  • Virgin polymer consumption in single-use applications will decline. This means that global growth will no longer be above global GDP, as has been the case in recent years. Consumption will instead will fall below the growth in GDP. PE, PET and PS will be especially badly affected because of their heavy use in packaging applications.
  • The opportunity to make money will no longer come from building ever-more capacity virgin polymers capacity, based on access to cheap feedstock. Profitability will instead be driven by increasing mechanical and chemicals recycling capabilities. Companies will need to work with brand owners and retailers to redesign packaging to make virgin plastics more recyclable. And where this is impossible, polymer companies will need to invest in breaking down waste plastic into naphtha and transportation fuels – i.e. chemicals recycling through technologies such as pyrolysis.
PREVIOUS POST

Six More Years Of America First: Implications For Global Petchems

22/07/2018

By John Richardson DESPITE all the criticism surrounding President Trump’s han...

Learn more
NEXT POST

Increasing Risks Of Financial Crisis By End-Year

27/07/2018

A sign that the central bank “put option” has come to an end By John...

Learn more
More posts
European petrochemical markets keeping calm and carrying on in light of Saudi attacks
19/09/2019

Here is a guest post from my very good ICIS colleague, Matt Tudball, our head of European Markets, w...

Read
Global PE market to remain long despite Saudi cutbacks caused by drone attack
17/09/2019

By John Richardson TRADERS lucky enough to be holding long positions in PE ahead of the 14 September...

Read
Risk of stagflation and recession from drone attack on Saudi oil facilities
17/09/2019

By John Richardson ANY major change in US government foreign policy always carries major risks becau...

Read
Drone attack on Saudi oil facilities: Substantial investment required to avoid a repeat
16/09/2019

The views expressed below are personal and do not express the views of ICIS Here is a another blog p...

Read
President Trump can only cause major economic damage by beating China, unless he has a time machine
12/09/2019

The views in this blog, are, as always, my own personal views and don’t reflect the views of I...

Read
Unsustainable boom in China auto market ends as sales of new vehicles move permanently lower
08/09/2019

By John Richardson THERE IS a big temptation when making forecasts of becoming too excited about the...

Read
Global PP demand could be 81.5m tonnes less than forecast in 2019-2028 as China Debt Supercycle ends
05/09/2019

By John Richardson SOME PEOPLE argue that despite the rapid rise in Chinese consumer debt over the l...

Read
China economic stimulus and PP: How global demand could have been 71m tonnes smaller
04/09/2019

By John Richardson CHINA came to the rescue of the global economy in 2009. This wasn’t for altruis...

Read

Market Intelligence

ICIS provides market intelligence that help businesses in the energy, petrochemical and fertilizer industries.

Learn more

Analytics

Across the globe, ICIS consultants provide detailed analysis and forecasting for the petrochemical, energy and fertilizer markets.

Learn more

Specialist Services

Find out more about how our specialist consulting services, events, conferences and training courses can help your teams.

Learn more

ICIS Insight

From our news service to our thought-leadership content, ICIS experts bring you the latest news and insight, when you need it.

Learn more